EPTBIG TIME SUPERSTAR
NBA Regular Season 2011-2012 - Page 175
| Forum Index > General Games |
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
BIG TIME SUPERSTAR | ||
|
roadrunner_sc
United States1220 Posts
On February 24 2012 11:28 parazice wrote: today Chalmers Bosh outplayed Lin Stat hard As everyone would have expected from the veterans. Heat's game pretty clear from the beginning - shut down Lin completely. With Charmers sticking close by, Lebron/Bosh coming in for the occasional double team there's no way you can get a decent looks. Pick and roll with Chandler was non-existent, and Lin's shooting has been the worst since he began as a start. This is how things are suppose to be. You can't expect a fresh guard to have too much presence against the likes of Lebron/Wade. JLin is a new pg, learning the ropes, Heat has the talents and the experience to win a championship, much less dominate a recently put-together offense from Knicks. And Lin is allowed to make mistakes at this point, it's his first game against a team of this caliber. | ||
|
RowdierBob
Australia13536 Posts
On February 24 2012 11:33 Jibba wrote: Amare scored 2 points in the second half. BIG TIME SUPERSTAR Amare's never been a superstar calibre player anyway. He's an all-star type guy, but he's one of those players who was made to look a lot better than he was by playing with an all-time-great ball distributor in Nash. Kind of like how Martin Gortat looks a lot better than he is because of Nash, or Pekovic because of Rubio on the T Wolves. | ||
|
klaxen
United States361 Posts
20 pts, 9 reb, 8 ass, 5 stl, 2 blocks | ||
|
seiferoth10
3362 Posts
Edit: Though, Novak sure can sink those threes. | ||
|
Holcan
Canada2593 Posts
| ||
|
igotmyown
United States4291 Posts
And I'm expecting the Thunder to paste the Lakers. The Thunder have been almost unbeatable at home, and they've been among Heat and the Bulls as elite teams. | ||
|
iNdEMAND
130 Posts
| ||
|
Glaceau
Wales333 Posts
| ||
|
Engore
United States1916 Posts
On February 24 2012 11:58 klaxen wrote: Lebron's stat lines are always so crazy >.> I don't even follow the heat that much but hes just a beast. 20 pts, 9 reb, 8 ass, 5 stl, 2 blocks I want a quadruple double so bad. Fuckkk cmon LBJ do it. | ||
|
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
On February 24 2012 13:57 Engore wrote: I want a quadruple double so bad. Fuckkk cmon LBJ do it. Hakeem has two. O.O | ||
|
krndandaman
Mozambique16569 Posts
| ||
|
holy_war
United States3590 Posts
| ||
|
BlueRoyaL
United States2493 Posts
On February 24 2012 11:58 klaxen wrote: Lebron's stat lines are always so crazy >.> I don't even follow the heat that much but hes just a beast. 20 pts, 9 reb, 8 ass, 5 stl, 2 blocks yeah he's such a beast in all areas of the game it's not even funny. Sure it's definitely arguable that there are some other players that play certain areas of the game better, but no one dominates all ends of the game as well as him. too fast, strong, court vision is phenomenal, passes are amazing, and his shooting and post techniques seem to get better every season | ||
|
city42
1656 Posts
Sadly the NBA robbed him of the first one. I can't remember exactly, but I think but they incorrectly credited him with 9 assists and some stupid rule wouldn't let them correct it. It took him less than a month to get another one, which is scary. edit: Even scarier: this might be a better game than either of those quadruple doubles! | ||
|
Vindicare605
United States16127 Posts
On February 24 2012 15:11 city42 wrote: Sadly the NBA robbed him of the first one. I can't remember exactly, but I think but they incorrectly credited him with 9 assists and some stupid rule wouldn't let them correct it. It took him less than a month to get another one, which is scary. edit: Even scarier: this might be a better game than either of those quadruple doubles! One of the most dominant big men ever. | ||
|
krndandaman
Mozambique16569 Posts
| ||
|
dave333
United States915 Posts
| ||
|
igotmyown
United States4291 Posts
The Spurs were at one point a championship contender, seeing as how they won the 2007 title. But at some point, probably the 2009 playoffs, they seem to have lost it. My immediate tendency is to seek out the obvious qualitative answers, a narrative why they lost and why it's impossible for them to win again, at least in the same era. That's an easy one to explain. Tim Duncan, their superstar player, aged past his superstar years. Manu too is only getting worse with age. But the Spurs kept winning, at least in the regular season. So wait, they're playing better even as they're becoming worse? The playoffs seem to prove that their success is an aberration. But first of all, I'd like to ask how is it even possible? The only thing countering the aging trend is Tony Parker peaking, and a lot of role players developing and becoming more effective. This slams against the reasoning of the superstar theory. Sure your role players and even your All-Star Tony Parker can get better, but they have a ceiling, especially with Tiago not busting into the NBA with an all star level performance. The addition of a lot of small numbers will match the subtraction of a big number (Duncan). Or can it (Detroit 04)? Championship teams all have stories about role players, from the Brian Cardinal/Kidd/Marion to the PJ Browns stepping up, which is why sports writers spout some stuff about needing a deep bench regardless of how the salary cap changes. Can a really good but not elite player and a bunch of good role players win it all? How can the Spurs keep winning but not have a chance? Does that even make sense? Weren't the Mavericks fundamentally flawed as well? | ||
|
x2fst
1272 Posts
| ||
| ||
