EPTNHL 2011-2012 Season - Page 50
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
ii.blitzkrieg
Canada1122 Posts
| ||
|
EPO
Canada341 Posts
On March 19 2012 04:27 sharkeyanti wrote: go Flyers!!! that game was sick. When Crosby gets full health Pittsburgh is gonna be retarded good Shiet Pens are already that good when Malkin is going, guy is a beast. The bein said the flyers/pens game was pretty sick... felt like playoffs. Also Voracek played out of his skull, easily coulda had 3-4 pts instead of just the 1 assist if he got a couple bounces. | ||
|
Sub40APM
6336 Posts
| ||
|
sharkeyanti
United States1273 Posts
| ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32063 Posts
| ||
|
GolemMadness
Canada11044 Posts
| ||
|
EPO
Canada341 Posts
On March 21 2012 00:22 sharkeyanti wrote: he won a cup. doing so by making some bold trades and holding on to assets properly. He's definitely improved the Leafs... but it's not like they could have gotten much worse I guess. could argue that he hasn't really improved my leafs by that much given their position in the standings.... and he repeatedly says that he "believes in this group" ... makes you wonder, no? | ||
|
sharkeyanti
United States1273 Posts
| ||
|
StarStruck
25339 Posts
Burke made a few good trades and he's been bery bold. That's about it. Right now the team has zero confidence and they're trying to reinvent their playstyle, which isn't working. There will be a ton of work to do in the offseason again. | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
Discuss. | ||
|
Taku
Canada2036 Posts
On March 21 2012 13:43 xDaunt wrote: Question: Has any team shit the bed harder this year than the Sharks? Discuss. Minnesota? | ||
|
Sub40APM
6336 Posts
Other than that though, meh. Winning the Cup in Anaheim with a mostly pre-built team vs building a team after 3-4 years of Leaf mismanagement are two different skill sets and so far all the Leafs have managed to do was give away 1st round picks or play just bad enough that they missed out on real draft choices. And yah, I'd say Sharks definitely screwed up the most this year. From WCF to not being in the playoffs. But I would also add LA Kings to that. You look at all these big bold moves they've made pre-season and at the deadline and the team basically lives and dies on whether Quick lets in 2 goals or more than 2. Personally I am disappointed with the Red Wings. Ken Holland and Mike Babcock clearly did not have a post-Lidstrom plan. Unless that plan is to offer a boatload of money for the Nashville D corps and hope that some team will take Franzen off their hands for the cap space. Which is too bad because considering the way their last year ended, especially after the Canucks exposed the Sharks so thoroughly, you'd think they would have wanted a serious run at the Cup this year. Oh well. At least the legend of Ken Holland as great hockey mastermind will take a serious beating unless there is some miracle Cup run [there will not be one.] | ||
|
Sub40APM
6336 Posts
On March 21 2012 04:04 GolemMadness wrote: In 9 games before trading Hodgson, Vancouver was 7-0-2. Since then, they've gone 3-5-1. Yowza! Well, unless Luongo and Hodgson had some sort of special, talismanic relationship turning into a 4.00 GAA goalie in March does that to a team. What do you say Canuck faithful, hope that Gillis has the balls to trade Luongo to Tampa for a boatload of picks or keep hoping he gets his shit together while Corey walks away because he wont be the number 1 goalie here with Lou around? | ||
|
StarStruck
25339 Posts
| ||
|
RezChi
Canada2368 Posts
On March 21 2012 13:57 Sub40APM wrote: Well, unless Luongo and Hodgson had some sort of special, talismanic relationship turning into a 4.00 GAA goalie in March does that to a team. What do you say Canuck faithful, hope that Gillis has the balls to trade Luongo to Tampa for a boatload of picks or keep hoping he gets his shit together while Corey walks away because he wont be the number 1 goalie here with Lou around? Gillis doesn't have the balls probably. He didn't have the balls to continue with a skill oriented team to work in the playoffs, so he probably wont trade Luo, on the other hand you can say he had the balls to trade the fan-favourite Hodgson. Who knows. They should play Luongo more and see if he sucks more balls then decide to trade him. | ||
|
RezChi
Canada2368 Posts
On March 21 2012 04:04 GolemMadness wrote: In 9 games before trading Hodgson, Vancouver was 7-0-2. Since then, they've gone 3-5-1. Yowza! Luongo playing shit, and no secondary scoring/play-making. | ||
|
Taku
Canada2036 Posts
On March 21 2012 14:05 RezChi wrote: Luongo playing shit, and no secondary scoring/play-making. You mean no primary scoring, the Sedins slowing down a month early this year. Hopefully it means they pick up in the weeks ahead ._. | ||
|
Orcasgt24
Canada3238 Posts
On March 21 2012 13:43 xDaunt wrote: Question: Has any team shit the bed harder this year than the Sharks? Discuss. The Sharks top 4 has a combined 235 points this year. The rest of the teams forwards have a combined 105 points. They have no secondary scoring from there forward lines. What do you expect from them? San Jose has always been a simple team to play against. If you shut down Thorntons line you win the game. | ||
|
Sub40APM
6336 Posts
On March 21 2012 15:02 Orcasgt24 wrote: The Sharks top 4 has a combined 235 points this year. The rest of the teams forwards have a combined 105 points. They have no secondary scoring from there forward lines. What do you expect from them? San Jose has always been a simple team to play against. If you shut down Thorntons line you win the game. The same team last year did a lot better. So I cant believe that this year all the GMs finally got the tape on the Sharks... | ||
|
EPO
Canada341 Posts
On March 21 2012 16:24 Sub40APM wrote: The same team last year did a lot better. So I cant believe that this year all the GMs finally got the tape on the Sharks... Sharks are still a good team and dangerous, I think they'll make the playoffs yet. Any team with Thornton on it has potential to do some real damage. | ||
| ||
