EPTOn August 29 2010 21:33 Macabre wrote:
The main selling point is actually the action based combat.
The main selling point is actually the action based combat.
You mean, like in Age of Conan?
Tera MMORPG - Page 2
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
Manit0u
Poland17845 Posts
You mean, like in Age of Conan? | ||
|
bmml
United Kingdom962 Posts
 . | ||
|
minus_human
4784 Posts
| ||
|
Macabre
United States1262 Posts
On August 29 2010 21:44 minus_human wrote: I see absolutely nothing that is new or impressive. I haven't seen a MMORPG with gameplay like this at a low level. | ||
|
Adeny
Norway1233 Posts
On August 29 2010 21:47 Macabre wrote: I haven't seen a MMORPG with gameplay like this at a low level. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTzPf0BaSWs What do you mean gameplay at this level, he's just casting spells like any other priest. On the other hand it looks fucking amazing. I think you need a definition check, because gameplay refers to the actual interaction between human and game. Pressing a button to cast a spell is nothing new. | ||
|
Macabre
United States1262 Posts
| ||
|
willkillson
United States123 Posts
hell gate london anyone? I got the CE of it and its a very pretty box... Game went offline within the first year. Aiming isn't very innovative honestly though. | ||
|
drlame
Sweden574 Posts
| ||
|
H
New Zealand6138 Posts
| ||
TymerA
Netherlands759 Posts
| ||
|
drlame
Sweden574 Posts
On August 29 2010 22:32 TymerA wrote: Team Liquid clan/guild anyone? :p Sorry not for this game, maybe for ff14  | ||
|
jcarlsoniv
United States27922 Posts
| ||
|
plated.rawr
Norway1676 Posts
The boss fight though, did look somewhat more interesting than the average low-level MMORPG fight. Of course, the question lies in how many fights will use the same script, and how much variation in boss fights will there be? Considering the ammount of effort needed to script a complicated boss fight, I predict very little variation. Sure, this LOOKS good, but it doesn't change any of the gaping flaws of the MMORPG genre. Count me out. | ||
|
HyunA
Romania362 Posts
| ||
|
OhDeezy
United Kingdom54 Posts
| ||
|
keeblur
United States826 Posts
| ||
|
Macabre
United States1262 Posts
 Yes, GW2 looks good. As good as tera? No.. the gameplay isn't as fluid IMO. TERA will have the better PVP | ||
|
OhDeezy
United Kingdom54 Posts
On August 30 2010 00:19 Macabre wrote: Pssh don't hijack my thread with GW2 Yes, GW2 looks good. As good as tera? No.. the gameplay isn't as fluid IMO. TERA will have the better PVP Sorry, you're right. I'll edit my post and make a new topic. | ||
|
NrG.NeverExpo
Canada2114 Posts
| ||
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
On August 29 2010 23:53 plated.rawr wrote: A beautiful world without any sense of immersion. What's the point of breathtaking scenery if it gets ruined by hundred identical mobs patrolling back and forth on a very small patrol route with health bars and interface bits floating about? And revolutionary action-based combat? Looks like Age of Conan to me, but with oversized asian game-culture swords and Lineage graphics. The boss fight though, did look somewhat more interesting than the average low-level MMORPG fight. Of course, the question lies in how many fights will use the same script, and how much variation in boss fights will there be? Considering the ammount of effort needed to script a complicated boss fight, I predict very little variation. Sure, this LOOKS good, but it doesn't change any of the gaping flaws of the MMORPG genre. Count me out. I actually felt far more immersion in L2 than I have in any other MMORPG. Even with dumb mobs, that's not what does it for me. | ||
| ||
