• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 02:27
CET 07:27
KST 15:27
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!12[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
Weekly Cups (October 19-25): Clem triples first in 5.0.173Evil Geniuses - shutting down19ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier5Weekly Cups (October 12-18): 5.0.17 era begins1[$1250] International ShieldBattery League91
StarCraft 2
General
Evil Geniuses - shutting down Weekly Cups (October 19-25): Clem triples first in 5.0.17 REPORT: StarCraft 2: Remastered In Development No more SC2 streamers on team liquid? How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR?
Tourneys
2026 KungFu Cup Announcement RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 ScienceCraft (October 24-25) - Live Event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
Simple Questions/Answers [G] How to playtest arcade maps [A] Nemrods 1/4 players
External Content
Mutation # 549 Endless Sparkles The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 548 Shining Bright Mutation # 547 Temple Of Terror
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Do we even care about balance? Starcraft player cRuZa Passed away. SCHNAIL now supports Remastered
Tourneys
[$1250] International ShieldBattery League [Megathread] Daily Proleagues KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4 [BSL23] RO24 Group D - Sunday 21:00 CET
Strategy
50,000-Word Terran Builds Memo 2026-10-22 Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Mobile Legends: Bang Bang Armies of Exigo - YesYes? General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Chess Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
Reynor Fan Club The Flash Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Innovate or Game Over?
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 8532 users

Star Wars Episode VII: The Force Awakens - Page 54

Forum Index > Media & Entertainment
Post a Reply
Prev 1 52 53 54 55 56 196 Next
We made a thread specifically for Episode 8 now, let us head over to that one
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/entertainment/521373-star-wars-episode-viii-the-last-jedi
OkStyX
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
Canada1199 Posts
April 27 2013 17:31 GMT
#1061
On April 26 2013 02:57 HeatEXTEND wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 25 2013 16:40 TOCHMY wrote:
Episode I, II and III were good. Why? Because they had Lightsabers and Blasters.

End of discussion.


I'm guessing this is exactly what Lucas was thinking while making them lol.


Rofl! I was pretty young still when the prequel movies came out i didn't dislike them but even then i did notice that they traded acting for special effects.
Team Overklocked Gaming! That man is the noblest creature may be inferred from the fact that no other creature has contested this claim. - G.C. Lichtenberg
RomanTechnology
Profile Joined April 2013
6 Posts
April 28 2013 07:35 GMT
#1062
On April 26 2013 05:12 zmsFlood wrote:
Disney-made Star Wars -movies? IT'S A TRAP!


I think Disney would do a fantastic job. They are good storytellers. Plus they have the budget to afford whats needed. A lot of Hollywood movies suffer because budget of constraints. Disney is a billion dollar company. I don't think they would have to settle for sub-par writers, actors, directors etc because they can afford the best of the best.
NicolBolas
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States1388 Posts
April 28 2013 11:42 GMT
#1063
On April 28 2013 16:35 RomanTechnology wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 26 2013 05:12 zmsFlood wrote:
Disney-made Star Wars -movies? IT'S A TRAP!


I think Disney would do a fantastic job. They are good storytellers. Plus they have the budget to afford whats needed. A lot of Hollywood movies suffer because budget of constraints. Disney is a billion dollar company. I don't think they would have to settle for sub-par writers, actors, directors etc because they can afford the best of the best.


I have rarely seen movies that suck primarily because of budget issues. I mean, I suppose you could say that if they'd hired a higher-paid script-writer, director, actors, crews, etc, then the films might have been better. But generally speaking, most movies suck because of who made them, not budget. Lower-cost workers can still produce solid entertainment, and higher-cost workers can still fail epically (see Bayformers and many other big budget crapfests).

Is it possible for Disney to make a great movie here? Yes. Is it likely? Not given the people they've hired thus far.
So you know, cats are interesting. They are kind of like girls. If they come up and talk to you, it's great. But if you try to talk to them, it doesn't always go so well. - Shigeru Miyamoto
HeatEXTEND
Profile Joined October 2012
Netherlands836 Posts
April 28 2013 14:51 GMT
#1064
That Star Trek prequel movie was pretty good though, way above expectations. It's the same guy directing 7 right ?
knuckle
StarStruck
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
25339 Posts
April 28 2013 14:58 GMT
#1065
On April 28 2013 23:51 HeatEXTEND wrote:
That Star Trek prequel movie was pretty good though, way above expectations. It's the same guy directing 7 right ?


Yes.
-Archangel-
Profile Joined May 2010
Croatia7457 Posts
April 28 2013 18:15 GMT
#1066
On April 28 2013 23:51 HeatEXTEND wrote:
That Star Trek prequel movie was pretty good though, way above expectations. It's the same guy directing 7 right ?

Well if you consider a movie that is Star Trek in name only good then I guess he did...
Now he is probably going to apply same treatment to Star Wars.
7mk
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Germany10157 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-05-04 01:13:35
May 04 2013 01:12 GMT
#1067
On April 28 2013 16:35 RomanTechnology wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 26 2013 05:12 zmsFlood wrote:
Disney-made Star Wars -movies? IT'S A TRAP!


I think Disney would do a fantastic job. They are good storytellers. Plus they have the budget to afford whats needed. A lot of Hollywood movies suffer because budget of constraints. Disney is a billion dollar company. I don't think they would have to settle for sub-par writers, actors, directors etc because they can afford the best of the best.


Well compare the budgets of Episodes 4-6 and Episodes 1-3.
I dont even know the numbers but I know that episode 4 only cost a few million and despite the prequels surely costing way more, they sucked a lot more.

edit: Ok I looked it up. Episode 4 cost 11 million dollars, episode 1 cost 115 million dollars... yeah I dont think the lack of money was the problem
beep boop
Dagobert
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Netherlands1858 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-05-04 02:13:22
May 04 2013 02:12 GMT
#1068
On May 04 2013 10:12 7mk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 28 2013 16:35 RomanTechnology wrote:
On April 26 2013 05:12 zmsFlood wrote:
Disney-made Star Wars -movies? IT'S A TRAP!


I think Disney would do a fantastic job. They are good storytellers. Plus they have the budget to afford whats needed. A lot of Hollywood movies suffer because budget of constraints. Disney is a billion dollar company. I don't think they would have to settle for sub-par writers, actors, directors etc because they can afford the best of the best.


Well compare the budgets of Episodes 4-6 and Episodes 1-3.
I dont even know the numbers but I know that episode 4 only cost a few million and despite the prequels surely costing way more, they sucked a lot more.

edit: Ok I looked it up. Episode 4 cost 11 million dollars, episode 1 cost 115 million dollars... yeah I dont think the lack of money was the problem


FYI, $11,000,000.00 in 1977 had the same buying power as $43,395,378.01 in 2013 ($30,977,663.23 in 1999.).
7mk
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Germany10157 Posts
May 04 2013 12:41 GMT
#1069
So in those terms Episode 1 had almost 4 times the budget of Episode 4 for a movie not even half as good
beep boop
sCCrooked
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Korea (South)1306 Posts
May 04 2013 12:56 GMT
#1070
On May 04 2013 21:41 7mk wrote:
So in those terms Episode 1 had almost 4 times the budget of Episode 4 for a movie not even half as good


That pretty much sums up popularized music/news/TV/movies as of late.
Enlightened in an age of anti-intellectualism and quotidian repetitiveness of asinine assumptive thinking. Best lycan guide evar --> "Fixing solo queue all pick one game at a time." ~KwarK-
sc2superfan101
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
3583 Posts
May 04 2013 16:11 GMT
#1071
On April 24 2013 09:30 OKMarius wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 19 2013 06:47 sc2superfan101 wrote:Natalie Portman is just a horrible actress in general and was even worse in those movies.


What? Have you seen Black Swan? V For Vendetta? Closer? I'm not a fan, but calling her a horrible actress is just dumb.

I haven't seen Black Swan, I thought V for Vendetta was stupid and her acting was entirely forgettable. Haven't seen Closer. I saw Garden State and again found her performance to be wanting. Basically, she is entirely forgettable to me when she isn't horrid.
My fake plants died because I did not pretend to water them.
Jan1997
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
Norway671 Posts
May 04 2013 16:34 GMT
#1072
I'm suprised to see that they are going to be making a seventh episode. In my opinion it's not that great. I do not think that star wars should have been brought back. They should have just left it like it was.
Do something today that your future self will be thankful for.
Craze
Profile Joined July 2010
United States561 Posts
May 04 2013 16:45 GMT
#1073
On May 05 2013 01:34 Jan1997 wrote:
I'm suprised to see that they are going to be making a seventh episode. In my opinion it's not that great. I do not think that star wars should have been brought back. They should have just left it like it was.


The universe is so fantastic and well flushed out though, it's both a gold mine for revenue and entertainment. They could make a movie per year for the next 40 years and not run out of good stories to tell given how many good books, comics and games there are.
sc2superfan101
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
3583 Posts
May 04 2013 17:02 GMT
#1074
On April 24 2013 12:59 M.R. McThundercrotch wrote:
Yeah, it is not like there are numerous examples of this all throughout human history or anything, from monks to masons to literally every other profession, except for exactly the thing that I just said.

Yeah, and all that shit happened centuries ago. In the modern world we kind of look down on people who let children (infants) join their military cult (Kony anyone?). Star Wars is like... 10,000 years more advanced than us, at least. The fact that the leading moral "yard-stick" of a hyper-modern civilization is still stuck in a 13th century mentality concerning the rights of children should be a tip-off that maybe that plot-line is stupid.

Uh, the fact that he is hundreds of years old is the exact reason you would have be a huge influential player and the fact that he was so hunted is the reason that he lived a hermits life in a swamp on an uninhabited planet.

A wise old being who is hundreds of years old, to me, has to be some kind of warped to still be some major player in world galactic politics. I mean, how long has this douche been on the damn Council, sitting up their in his Ivory Tower? And how does that mesh with the eccentric little hermit-Kermit we all know and love?

And no one knows who Yoda is! There is literally no indication that either the Emperor or Darth Vader have even the slightest clue as to who Yoda is. According to prequel logic, they should know that he is alive and still opposing them. But whenever they see Luke they say: "Obi-wan has trained you well". That heavily implies that they don't know of Yoda's existence or they would assume that since Luke has powered up considerably over the years since Obi-Wan's death that he is receiving extra training from the only other Jedi still alive. I would think that one of the first questions they would ask him would be: "Where the f*ck is that asshole Yoda at?"

There is some indication in the original three (V and VI, to be exact) that Yoda might have been vaguely involved with the Fall of the Republic, but only as a minor player who flew beneath the notice of either Anakin or the Emperor.

It also doesn't make sense having Yoda be a huge player in the movies (I, II, III) on a thematic level. His character in the originals is eccentric, jaded, exceedingly wise, and utterly unconcerned with the mundane. Bringing him out of the swamp and slapping him down as the leader of the Jedi Council jars with that impression horribly. Suddenly Yoda can't be too eccentric or jaded or why would anyone put him as a leader? Him being jaded with Luke suddenly isn't the result of his seven hundred years, the "I've seen this all a hundred times before" syndrome, but as a result of Anakin's betrayal. You would think someone who is over seven hundred years old would have seen worse than that in his time, and plenty of it. He is suddenly forced to be concerned with the mundane, even if only in implication because he is the leader of the galaxy's most powerful military force/police force. Instead of having an eccentric old warrior who is mysterious, we're left with a goddamn career politician. It completely destroys the mystery and romance of his character.

That's also why having him show up as a major player is a bad idea: Yoda and the Emperor share something in common in V and VI: they both show a kind of disdain for the light-saber, subtly revealing a part of their philosophy. Those who are high-level Force users tend to be less than concerned with mundane aspects of life. The reason we don't see shelves of paperwork on the Emperor's desk is because the Emperor isn't the type of man to be concerned with the something so crude as that. The reason we don't see Yoda doing some light-saber sparring with Luke is because Yoda isn't the type of person to consider the light-saber to be all that useful. When Luke goes into the cave to face his dark-side, Yoda straight up tells him that his light-saber and blaster won't help him. In Episode VI, Luke only achieves victory when he throws down his light-saber in front of the Emperor and refuses to fight.

But if Yoda is in the prequels as a major player, we the audience demand to know: why didn't he stop the Emperor? So either they have to fight using Dragonball Z powers ("I can see your shwarzt is as big as mine!") or they have to have a lightsaber battle. Either of them gives off the same thematic impressions: these men (Yoda, Palpatine) are not the ethereal, intelligent, unconcerned men that we know and love and hate. It's like when they give every dark user of the Force "Force lightning" abilities. It destroys the intensity of the later climax. Throughout the entire trilogy (IV, V, VI) we see the Force as an invisible power. When suddenly the Emperor busts out with lightning, you get a real sense that it's because he's so powerful that when he uses the Force it causes the air itself to burn. It is a rude awakening to how out-classed Luke is. It is tense because we, the audience, can't see any way for Luke to escape something so powerful and terrifying. When every low level dark-force wielding bastard is throwing around lightning like it's nothing, and when the Light-side guys block it with their lightsaber it destroys the mystery, and thus the weight, of the later scene. It's the same reason you don't have the Emperor let out an old-man fart: we're supposed to think of people like the Emperor and Yoda as a kind of ascended beings. Seeing them fight on any visual level (something necessitated by putting Yoda in as a major players) ruins their mystery. It ruins the idea of the Force not being a quantifiable, material concept. It ruins the idea that the power to destroy planets is insignificant in comparison. It turns them into entirely mundane beings who still haven't moved beyond settling their dispute with a dick-showing contest.

And the prequels are full of that crap. Everything mystical about the Force is quantified and explained until it becomes nothing more than telekinesis. Everything mystical about the Jedi is lost until they become nothing more than sword-wielding SWAT teams combined with the Navy Seals combined. All for the cheap effect of "That was in the originals so it has to be EVEN BIGGER in the prequels!"

And, at the end of the day, that is why these sequels will fail: they will take what little mystery is left to the series and quantify it even more. They will almost certainly cast the original actors, so now we get to see Han Solo and Luke and Leia Skywalker as old farts. Great...
My fake plants died because I did not pretend to water them.
StarStruck
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
25339 Posts
May 04 2013 17:16 GMT
#1075
On May 04 2013 10:12 7mk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 28 2013 16:35 RomanTechnology wrote:
On April 26 2013 05:12 zmsFlood wrote:
Disney-made Star Wars -movies? IT'S A TRAP!


I think Disney would do a fantastic job. They are good storytellers. Plus they have the budget to afford whats needed. A lot of Hollywood movies suffer because budget of constraints. Disney is a billion dollar company. I don't think they would have to settle for sub-par writers, actors, directors etc because they can afford the best of the best.


Well compare the budgets of Episodes 4-6 and Episodes 1-3.
I dont even know the numbers but I know that episode 4 only cost a few million and despite the prequels surely costing way more, they sucked a lot more.

edit: Ok I looked it up. Episode 4 cost 11 million dollars, episode 1 cost 115 million dollars... yeah I dont think the lack of money was the problem


Is that other guy trying to say they didn't have a big enough budget to get who they want? My lord. P.S. in our community Lucas is known to be high on detail (similar to Michael Bay) and is a good storyteller himself. The biggest beef other film makers have with him is he isn't very good with giving actor's direction. It's typical in his films.
marvellosity
Profile Joined January 2011
United Kingdom36161 Posts
May 04 2013 17:24 GMT
#1076
+ Show Spoiler +
On May 05 2013 02:02 sc2superfan101 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 24 2013 12:59 M.R. McThundercrotch wrote:
Yeah, it is not like there are numerous examples of this all throughout human history or anything, from monks to masons to literally every other profession, except for exactly the thing that I just said.

Yeah, and all that shit happened centuries ago. In the modern world we kind of look down on people who let children (infants) join their military cult (Kony anyone?). Star Wars is like... 10,000 years more advanced than us, at least. The fact that the leading moral "yard-stick" of a hyper-modern civilization is still stuck in a 13th century mentality concerning the rights of children should be a tip-off that maybe that plot-line is stupid.

Show nested quote +
Uh, the fact that he is hundreds of years old is the exact reason you would have be a huge influential player and the fact that he was so hunted is the reason that he lived a hermits life in a swamp on an uninhabited planet.

A wise old being who is hundreds of years old, to me, has to be some kind of warped to still be some major player in world galactic politics. I mean, how long has this douche been on the damn Council, sitting up their in his Ivory Tower? And how does that mesh with the eccentric little hermit-Kermit we all know and love?

And no one knows who Yoda is! There is literally no indication that either the Emperor or Darth Vader have even the slightest clue as to who Yoda is. According to prequel logic, they should know that he is alive and still opposing them. But whenever they see Luke they say: "Obi-wan has trained you well". That heavily implies that they don't know of Yoda's existence or they would assume that since Luke has powered up considerably over the years since Obi-Wan's death that he is receiving extra training from the only other Jedi still alive. I would think that one of the first questions they would ask him would be: "Where the f*ck is that asshole Yoda at?"

There is some indication in the original three (V and VI, to be exact) that Yoda might have been vaguely involved with the Fall of the Republic, but only as a minor player who flew beneath the notice of either Anakin or the Emperor.

It also doesn't make sense having Yoda be a huge player in the movies (I, II, III) on a thematic level. His character in the originals is eccentric, jaded, exceedingly wise, and utterly unconcerned with the mundane. Bringing him out of the swamp and slapping him down as the leader of the Jedi Council jars with that impression horribly. Suddenly Yoda can't be too eccentric or jaded or why would anyone put him as a leader? Him being jaded with Luke suddenly isn't the result of his seven hundred years, the "I've seen this all a hundred times before" syndrome, but as a result of Anakin's betrayal. You would think someone who is over seven hundred years old would have seen worse than that in his time, and plenty of it. He is suddenly forced to be concerned with the mundane, even if only in implication because he is the leader of the galaxy's most powerful military force/police force. Instead of having an eccentric old warrior who is mysterious, we're left with a goddamn career politician. It completely destroys the mystery and romance of his character.

That's also why having him show up as a major player is a bad idea: Yoda and the Emperor share something in common in V and VI: they both show a kind of disdain for the light-saber, subtly revealing a part of their philosophy. Those who are high-level Force users tend to be less than concerned with mundane aspects of life. The reason we don't see shelves of paperwork on the Emperor's desk is because the Emperor isn't the type of man to be concerned with the something so crude as that. The reason we don't see Yoda doing some light-saber sparring with Luke is because Yoda isn't the type of person to consider the light-saber to be all that useful. When Luke goes into the cave to face his dark-side, Yoda straight up tells him that his light-saber and blaster won't help him. In Episode VI, Luke only achieves victory when he throws down his light-saber in front of the Emperor and refuses to fight.

But if Yoda is in the prequels as a major player, we the audience demand to know: why didn't he stop the Emperor? So either they have to fight using Dragonball Z powers ("I can see your shwarzt is as big as mine!") or they have to have a lightsaber battle. Either of them gives off the same thematic impressions: these men (Yoda, Palpatine) are not the ethereal, intelligent, unconcerned men that we know and love and hate. It's like when they give every dark user of the Force "Force lightning" abilities. It destroys the intensity of the later climax. Throughout the entire trilogy (IV, V, VI) we see the Force as an invisible power. When suddenly the Emperor busts out with lightning, you get a real sense that it's because he's so powerful that when he uses the Force it causes the air itself to burn. It is a rude awakening to how out-classed Luke is. It is tense because we, the audience, can't see any way for Luke to escape something so powerful and terrifying. When every low level dark-force wielding bastard is throwing around lightning like it's nothing, and when the Light-side guys block it with their lightsaber it destroys the mystery, and thus the weight, of the later scene. It's the same reason you don't have the Emperor let out an old-man fart: we're supposed to think of people like the Emperor and Yoda as a kind of ascended beings. Seeing them fight on any visual level (something necessitated by putting Yoda in as a major players) ruins their mystery. It ruins the idea of the Force not being a quantifiable, material concept. It ruins the idea that the power to destroy planets is insignificant in comparison. It turns them into entirely mundane beings who still haven't moved beyond settling their dispute with a dick-showing contest.

And the prequels are full of that crap. Everything mystical about the Force is quantified and explained until it becomes nothing more than telekinesis. Everything mystical about the Jedi is lost until they become nothing more than sword-wielding SWAT teams combined with the Navy Seals combined. All for the cheap effect of "That was in the originals so it has to be EVEN BIGGER in the prequels!"

And, at the end of the day, that is why these sequels will fail: they will take what little mystery is left to the series and quantify it even more. They will almost certainly cast the original actors, so now we get to see Han Solo and Luke and Leia Skywalker as old farts. Great...


I don't actually have anything to say, but I enjoyed reading this tremendously.
[15:15] <Palmar> and yes marv, you're a total hottie
HeatEXTEND
Profile Joined October 2012
Netherlands836 Posts
May 04 2013 18:44 GMT
#1077
On April 29 2013 03:15 -Archangel- wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 28 2013 23:51 HeatEXTEND wrote:
That Star Trek prequel movie was pretty good though, way above expectations. It's the same guy directing 7 right ?

Well if you consider a movie that is Star Trek in name only good then I guess he did...
Now he is probably going to apply same treatment to Star Wars.


Don't want to derail so I'll just say this:

If the new SW movies even come close to the "Expectation/Actuality" ratio of the latest ST movie, I'll be beyond satisfied.
And for the record, that ST movie could have been A L O T worse, and the "shoved-in" "old" Spock was actually not bad. Again, it could have been utterly horrible, but instead it was a fun ride. That's a lot more then you can say of the SW prequels.
knuckle
eviltomahawk
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States11135 Posts
April 29 2014 17:14 GMT
#1078
New cast announced

The Star Wars team is thrilled to announce the cast of Star Wars: Episode VII.

Actors John Boyega, Daisy Ridley, Adam Driver, Oscar Isaac, Andy Serkis, Domhnall Gleeson, and Max von Sydow will join the original stars of the saga, Harrison Ford, Carrie Fisher, Mark Hamill, Anthony Daniels, Peter Mayhew, and Kenny Baker in the new film.

Director J.J. Abrams says, "We are so excited to finally share the cast of Star Wars: Episode VII. It is both thrilling and surreal to watch the beloved original cast and these brilliant new performers come together to bring this world to life, once again. We start shooting in a couple of weeks, and everyone is doing their best to make the fans proud."

Star Wars: Episode VII is being directed by J.J. Abrams from a screenplay by Lawrence Kasdan and Abrams. Kathleen Kennedy, J.J. Abrams, and Bryan Burk are producing, and John Williams returns as the composer. The movie opens worldwide on December 18, 2015.


[image loading]

http://starwars.com/news/star-wars-episode-7-cast-announced.html

Site is slow atm
ㅇㅅㅌㅅ
GettingIt
Profile Joined August 2011
1656 Posts
April 29 2014 17:33 GMT
#1079
Why do they keep trying to bring back Harrison Ford. That dude is old and demented.
seanisgrand
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States1039 Posts
April 29 2014 17:40 GMT
#1080
On April 30 2014 02:33 GettingIt wrote:
Why do they keep trying to bring back Harrison Ford. That dude is old and demented.


Why wouldn't they bring him back for a sequel?
This is well below quality expected of a post in any forum. -Empyrean
Prev 1 52 53 54 55 56 196 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
08:00
OSC Elite Rising Star #21
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 2398
Pusan 162
ProTech149
910 53
Aegong 29
yabsab 20
Icarus 7
Force[name] 4
Dota 2
monkeys_forever766
NeuroSwarm233
League of Legends
Doublelift4094
JimRising 578
Other Games
summit1g8675
C9.Mang0230
Happy137
Livibee128
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick602
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• practicex 35
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Rush901
• Lourlo666
• Stunt228
Upcoming Events
KCM Race Survival
3h 33m
IntoTheTV X SOOP
4h 33m
SHIN vs GuMiho
Clem vs Classic
OSC
15h 33m
WardiTV Invitational
1d 5h
GSL
1d 5h
Epic.LAN
1d 6h
Replay Cast
1d 16h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
Epic.LAN
2 days
AI Arena Tournament
2 days
[ Show More ]
Yamato Cup
3 days
Map Test Tournament
3 days
WardiTV Weekly
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Rogue vs Classic
Patches Events
5 days
PiGosaur Cup
5 days
Kung Fu Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-10-27
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
International ShieldBattery League
BSL Season 23
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026

Upcoming

IPSL Winter 2026-27
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.