EPTBurden United Discussion - Page 14
| Forum Index > Dota 2 Player & Team Discussion |
|
Hoenicker
243 Posts
| ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
While I'm saying that it's no shame losing to vega, they DO need to improve to make it through TI qualifiers  | ||
|
Hoenicker
243 Posts
On May 05 2015 01:49 Sn0_Man wrote: To be fair, since Vega have picked up mag and solo they've crushed a fair few decent teams. Expect them to do damage in the EU qualifiers imo. Yes, but it felt like burden weren't trying to win the game, like stupid buybacks, continiously being caught out of position, actual 322'ing. The only player who tried to win was paris. I think its quite obvious there is something wrong within the team. | ||
|
Hoenicker
243 Posts
| ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
| ||
Tephus
Cascadia1753 Posts
On April 21 2015 11:56 FHDH wrote: Yeah I have. There's nothing but recent games from them. Among those are convincing wins over and close series with good teams. As for your final assertion? I can't even. Bringing this over here as it was from the Navi discussion.. but I'm feeling pretty vindicated. Since this disagreement, Burden have lost all 4 of their matches, all to teams that exist in a lower tier than suggested. 1-2 4anchors 0-2 GoL 0-2 4anchors 0-2 Vega Just one of those times that you can point out the fanboy's bias. | ||
|
cuckoo
595 Posts
they used to be great at decision making, and now its just stupidity after stupidity | ||
|
Furikawari
France2522 Posts
On May 05 2015 02:26 cuckoo wrote: it does feel they stop trying they used to be great at decision making, and now its just stupidity after stupidity This. In second game they win the lanes quite hard, even snowballing PA (2 early kills)... Then nothing. | ||
|
Matthias_
Netherlands89 Posts
On May 05 2015 01:59 Tephus wrote: Bringing this over here as it was from the Navi discussion.. but I'm feeling pretty vindicated. Since this disagreement, Burden have lost all 4 of their matches, all to teams that exist in a lower tier than suggested. 1-2 4anchors 0-2 GoL 0-2 4anchors 0-2 Vega Just one of those times that you can point out the fanboy's bias. Yeah I agree with your assessment that based on their latest games they're by no means in that tier. Although it kinda raises the question what 'that' tier is atm. I mean I don't think any of those teams have left a particularly strong impression as of late, kinda defeating the point about competing globally and being dominant in their region. I mean are Alliance and Na'vi being dominant in the EU region and are they competing globally as of late? Granted Alliance' form does seem to be improving. I think Burden does belong on that list if they can get back to the form they had when playing D2CL groupstage. But who knows they could just be having a slight down and it's just before their up again, I mean 4asc and vega certainly look to be having an 'up' atm. You win some you lose some. By no means do I think BU is supposed to be disqualified from any sort of contender list for qualifiers of any sort because they've lost a few games, it happens. | ||
|
Hoenicker
243 Posts
| ||
FHDH
United States7023 Posts
On May 05 2015 01:59 Tephus wrote: Bringing this over here as it was from the Navi discussion.. but I'm feeling pretty vindicated. Since this disagreement, Burden have lost all 4 of their matches, all to teams that exist in a lower tier than suggested. 1-2 4anchors 0-2 GoL 0-2 4anchors 0-2 Vega Just one of those times that you can point out the fanboy's bias. I knew someone was going to go there. Burden has pretty clearly stopped trying. How did they prepare for this? Well Sing did how many hours of streaming goofy party queue games in recent days? Not even playing some tryhard FPL. Burden deciding they don't give a fuck anymore doesn't make me wrong, but go on with your bad self. No one follows me around the forums telling me everything I've been right about in an argument, but I know. I can handle it. | ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
Anwyay, Burden do seem to not care very much about their matches. Which doesn't spell good things for their TI future, although it's hard to argue that they were ever really likely to even come runner up in the qualifiers for that TI wildcard possibility. | ||
|
FHDH
United States7023 Posts
On May 05 2015 04:52 Sn0_Man wrote: I like how you get presented with hard facts that prove you wrong and you instantly decide that it's a personal feud instead of you know hard facts proving you wrong. I said they were a team capable of X. They gave all indications they stopped trying to be that. But yeah, hard facts that prove me wrong, they definitely weren't capable of X because they didn't do it. | ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
you asserted that they have close series with and sometimes win convincingly over good teams whereas they actually lose badly to shit teams on top of u putting them in a tier list beside an invite, 3/4 front runners for the EU qualifiers and the front runner for the NA qualifier. | ||
|
FHDH
United States7023 Posts
On May 05 2015 05:01 Sn0_Man wrote: ? you asserted that they have close series with and sometimes win convincingly over good teams whereas they actually lose badly to shit teams LOL OK dude. I guess you are bored today so you're going to troll. Or maybe you literally paid zero attention to BU prior to their rapid descent. Either way have fun with it. | ||
|
Tephus
Cascadia1753 Posts
| ||
|
FHDH
United States7023 Posts
On May 06 2015 03:51 Tephus wrote: Or maybe we paid attention, which allowed us to actually evaluate where they were as a team, and laugh at your team comparisons, and now we've been proven right. Or maybe IIIII paid attention, and maybe YOU, and your MOTHER, and NUH UH User was warned for this post | ||
|
booyalka
United States194 Posts
| ||
|
Saki [NETOGE]
United States235 Posts
| ||
|
Nagamundo
131 Posts
On May 06 2015 03:54 FHDH wrote: Or maybe IIIII paid attention, and maybe YOU, and your MOTHER, and NUH UH You seem like a very angry and antagonistic person. | ||
| ||
