| Forum Index > Diablo 3 |
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On August 15 2013 04:25 Manit0u wrote: I agree, Diablo is fun, Diablo II and Diablo III not so much... Ah, I see what you did there. He didn’t say Diablo 3 was fun. Very…..well its not really witty or anything since people have their own opinions. But...nice try? | ||
|
wongfeihung
United States763 Posts
On August 15 2013 04:14 dAPhREAk wrote: they could have the exact same game in every way, and just offer two additional character classes and i would happily pay $60. diablo is fun. some people just take it way too seriously. You wanna turn it into Call of Duty?  | ||
|
gosublade
632 Posts
On August 15 2013 04:28 Plansix wrote: Ah, I see what you did there. He didn’t say Diablo 3 was fun. Very…..well its not really witty or anything since people have their own opinions. But...nice try? Diablo 3 is a lackluster game in every other aspect but marketing. This is not a matter of opinion, just simple observation like we do on WW2 villans. | ||
|
hifriend
China7935 Posts
On August 15 2013 02:19 FeyFey wrote: The D2 AH called Ebay even made it into the news in Germany. Only difference is you couldn't hate the developer for it really. Which would happen in todays world anyway. Why don't you have an AH to make it easier for us and why do you allow ebaying ! Will be interesting what they will do in the expansion, they have free hand to throw in new stats and equipment that is focused on team pvp. They could even steal from other games and create gear that works just on PvP maps, to not screw with PvM. I am still undecided when to buy it. Get it first second farm the crap out of it to finance the game. Or wait till some reviews are out. I mean there were enough spoilers in the original to know what will happen in the expansions story. So true. D2 had a ton of itemshops and d2jsp which was HUGE and a lot of people spent money there for trading. So basically, the d2 fanbase showed blizzard that they wished to spend money on items. Blizzard just obeyed. | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
On August 15 2013 04:25 Manit0u wrote: I agree, Diablo is fun, Diablo II and Diablo III not so much... okay. never played, so dont get the reference. On August 15 2013 04:36 gosublade wrote: Diablo 3 is a lackluster game in every other aspect but marketing. This is not a matter of opinion, just simple observation like we do on WW2 villans. thats actually a matter of opinion... | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On August 15 2013 04:36 gosublade wrote: Diablo 3 is a lackluster game in every other aspect but marketing. This is not a matter of opinion, just simple observation like we do on WW2 villans. Your hilarious, trying to pass your opinion off as fact. There are a ton of written reviews for the game on Metacritic that disagree, saying the game was great. There are also a ton of opions of people who didn’t like that game and decided to review bomb it. Just because a lot of people on the internet agree with you on TL does not mean that the whole world did. Its just the people here. | ||
|
TheFish7
United States2824 Posts
On August 15 2013 04:00 Plansix wrote: Blizzard has said they want to update the loot system and provide for more unique items and the ability to get interesting items early on in the game. That is really all I need • Updated loot system with better loot that is more fun • Optional “Classic mode” that removes the AH option that character I would also need • Skill tree system w/ spell damage that is independant from weapon dps • Ability to spend attribute points • Randomly generated environments that are actually random • Ability to bind more than 4 hotkeys • Ability to have more than 4 players in a game • Completely revamped itemization • The Men in Black to come to my house and wipe my memory about how bad D3 was at release | ||
|
Serpico
4285 Posts
On August 15 2013 04:40 Plansix wrote: Your hilarious, trying to pass your opinion off as fact. There are a ton of written reviews for the game on Metacritic that disagree, saying the game was great. There are also a ton of opions of people who didn’t like that game and decided to review bomb it. Just because a lot of people on the internet agree with you on TL does not mean that the whole world did. Its just the people here. Yikes, judging by the state of the enthusiast press, I don't really know why that's good for you. Diablo 3 had to take its own lead dev off the game, that doesn't happen because things went well. It deconstructed the most important parts of Diablo 2 and failed to compensate even a little bit. It was a game that was good for newcomers perhaps and horrible for most veterans, It was the classic example of games that sell well not necessarily being good. | ||
|
Emnjay808
United States10665 Posts
 | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On August 15 2013 04:42 Serpico wrote: Yikes, judging by the state of the enthusiast press, I don't really know why that's good for you. Diablo 3 had to take its own lead dev off the game, that doesn't happen because things went well. It deconstructed the most important parts of Diablo 2 and failed to compensate even a little bit. It was a game that was good for newcomers perhaps and horrible for most veterans, It was the classic example of games that sell well not necessarily being good. WTF is the “enthusiast press”? Is that some term used by people who want to discount reviews as things written by “fanboys” who want to become friends with the developer and get a job later on? I read a number of reviews for Diablo 3 from a large number of websites, including the gold standard for reviewing Giant Bomb, who gives not shits. They all liked the game. I know its hard for people to believe, but there are people out there that liked Diablo 3 and did not buy into the internet hate train on the game. I know everyone here agrees with you, but that does not mean that the rest of the world does. I could find a website where everyone agrees the world if flat too. | ||
|
Grovbolle
Denmark3813 Posts
On August 15 2013 04:49 Plansix wrote: WTF is the “enthusiast press”? Is that some term used by people who want to discount reviews as things written by “fanboys” who want to become friends with the developer and get a job later on? I read a number of reviews for Diablo 3 from a large number of websites, including the gold standard for reviewing Giant Bomb, who gives not shits. They all liked the game. I know its hard for people to believe, but there are people out there that liked Diablo 3 and did not buy into the internet hate train on the game. I know everyone here agrees with you, but that does not mean that the rest of the world does. I could find a website where everyone agrees the world if flat too. I liked the game, got repetitive at some point, but so did Diablo 1 which I still loved and have fond childhood memories of. Having recently returned to D3 and spinning with my WW barb is really fun | ||
|
Noonius
Estonia17413 Posts
| ||
|
tpmraven
United States833 Posts
On August 15 2013 04:49 Plansix wrote: WTF is the “enthusiast press”? Is that some term used by people who want to discount reviews as things written by “fanboys” who want to become friends with the developer and get a job later on? I read a number of reviews for Diablo 3 from a large number of websites, including the gold standard for reviewing Giant Bomb, who gives not shits. They all liked the game. I know its hard for people to believe, but there are people out there that liked Diablo 3 and did not buy into the internet hate train on the game. I know everyone here agrees with you, but that does not mean that the rest of the world does. I could find a website where everyone agrees the world if flat too. Pretending that diablo 3 wasn't a let down is an odd thing to hear. I am not saying diablo 3 was horrible, it just wasn't as good as nearly everyone hoped it would be. | ||
|
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
edit: that whole thing, it's really been beaten to death though. maybe they can salvage something with the expansion, but i suspect it won't change any of the deeper issues that plague d3. | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
On August 15 2013 04:59 tpmraven wrote: Pretending that diablo 3 wasn't a let down is an odd thing to hear. I am not saying diablo 3 was horrible, it just wasn't as good as nearly everyone hoped it would be. nothing is. nobody is saying diablo 3 doesnt have problems, but for me personally, the game was amazing. i spent over 600 hours playing it, and have not once regretted the money i spent on it. indeed, other than starcraft, there has been no better investment of money for time spent on game. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On August 15 2013 04:59 tpmraven wrote: Pretending that diablo 3 wasn't a let down is an odd thing to hear. I am not saying diablo 3 was horrible, it just wasn't as good as nearly everyone hoped it would be. Some peoples standards were a little unreasonable and expected 7000 hours of gameplay for $60. I got about 70 and I'm pretty happy. | ||
|
birdaholic
United States67 Posts
Her response was: "49 is not a 50.. even 49.9999 has never been a 50, thus it's fail". Anyhow my point is.... It is what it is. Bad game is a Bad game. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On August 15 2013 05:08 birdaholic wrote: I remember when I was in high school where I got a very minor quiz score of a 49/100 which is a failure because 50 was the passing score. I asked her nicely to give me a break and be generous once in a while. Her response was: "49 is not a 50.. even 49.9999 has never been a 50, thus it's fail". Anyhow my point is.... It is what it is. Bad game is a Bad game. Your analogy comparing math to people opinions of preference kinda sucks. Math has a correct answer. Personal opinion does not. Claiming that because you did not like a game makes the game bad for everyone else is stupid. | ||
|
Random()
Kyrgyz Republic1462 Posts
| ||
|
birdaholic
United States67 Posts
On August 15 2013 05:10 Plansix wrote: Your analogy comparing math to people opinions of preference kinda sucks. Math has a correct answer. Personal opinion does not. Claiming that because you did not like a game makes the game bad for everyone else is stupid. lol.. you said it yourself.. "a personal opinion".. at the end of the day its an opinion.. calling someone's opinion stupid just make you more stupid... this is why opinion exists.. would it be much of a difference if i give a "positive" opinion for everyone? .. I would be lying to myself if did give an opinion just to please everybody.. it's an opinion... so... to your words.. "Claiming that because you did not like a game makes the game bad for everyone else is stupid"... what kind of hypocrite world do you live in if everything you see are positive.. stop trying to be smart-ass and undermine someones else perspective.. at some point "negative" or "positive" comments are bound to surface no matter you like it or not.. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Britney Dota 2  33756Stork 1636EffOrt  1617Shuttle 942Mini 832firebathero  484ggaemo 270hero 190PianO 123Zeus 110[ Show more ] Counter-Strike Heroes of the Storm Other Games singsing1718 Grubby1635 FrodaN1364 B2W.Neo779 Beastyqt548 RotterdaM169 crisheroes167 XaKoH  96QueenE63 Trikslyr42 |
|
BSL
n0maD vs perroflaco
TerrOr vs ZZZero
MadiNho vs WolFix
DragOn vs LancerX
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV Team League
OSC
BSL
Sterling vs Azhi_Dahaki
Napoleon vs Mazur
Jimin vs Nesh
spx vs Strudel
IPSL
Artosis vs TBD
Napoleon vs TBD
Replay Cast
Wardi Open
Afreeca Starleague
Soma vs YSC
Sharp vs sSak
Monday Night Weeklies
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
