EPTUS Politics Mega-thread - Page 4496
| Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
|
Slaughter
United States20254 Posts
| ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
On July 27 2016 08:36 Doodsmack wrote: It's just a single word being used with multiple meanings. Black people don't use it to insult. So you're saying black people are capable of using the word in a non-insulting manner and that white people are incapable of doing this, based purely on the fact that they are white and not black? | ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
| ||
|
Gorsameth
Netherlands22081 Posts
Take it to PM's and stop shitting up the thread. | ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
This is awkward She kind of laughed about how she knew her client was guilty of raping a child and still managed to pass the polygraph test and blamed the child for having adult fantasies and laughed about the destruction of evidence | ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
On July 27 2016 08:41 GGTeMpLaR wrote: They're saying she fought for children as a lawyer.. This is awkward https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2f13f2awK4 she tried to get out of having to represent the guy b/c she didnt want to represent a shitbag but she couldn't, so god forbid that as a lawyer she does her job we've discussed this before | ||
|
Erik.TheRed
United States1655 Posts
On July 27 2016 08:31 LegalLord wrote: Jimmy Carter... not exactly a great person to show off given how justifiably unpopular he was. But I guess at the least they're showing old presidents. My impression is that Carter is well-liked and highly respected among democrats (and probably independents) for his global human rights activism post-presidency. | ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
| ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
On July 27 2016 08:42 Erik.TheRed wrote: My impression is that Carter is well-liked and highly respected among democrats (and probably independents) for his global human rights activism post-presidency. Definitely not my perception of him. Terrible president, kind of weak as a post-president. I'd prefer to hear less of him. | ||
|
Lord Tolkien
United States12083 Posts
As I said before, the only breach in etiquette was her giving her personal opinion on her client's guilt/innocence. | ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
On July 27 2016 08:45 LegalLord wrote: Definitely not my perception of him. Terrible president, kind of weak as a post-president. I'd prefer to hear less of him. Sounds like you don't really know much of him. He's done a massive amount of human rights work. Even still teaches Sunday school in his hometown. He's not in the news much because he focuses on his work over fame. Wikipedia is a solid place to start. | ||
|
biology]major
United States2253 Posts
Edit: uh I was supposed to quote someone but messed up on my phone. | ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
On July 27 2016 08:46 ticklishmusic wrote: Sounds like you don't really know much of him. He's done a massive amount of human rights work. Even still teaches Sunday school in his hometown. Picking up the oneofthem torch for random low-content snarkers I see. | ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
On July 27 2016 08:48 LegalLord wrote: Picking up the oneofthem torch for random low-content snarkers I see. I like to call bullshit out. Besides I'm not wrong. | ||
|
zlefin
United States7689 Posts
On July 27 2016 08:16 Mohdoo wrote: What argument is there against DC being a state? do you still need the answer to this? it looked to me like the other guy answered already, but I haven't seen you say anything else, so i'm not sure. | ||
|
pmh
1400 Posts
Profile Blog PM Joined November 2010 On July 27 2016 08:07 GreenHorizons wrote: There was a huge walkout at the convention, corporate media will tell you soon, maybe. Just read this : http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/07/26/a-call-to-action-walk-out-from-the-democratic-national-convention/ Lots of guts, and I believe this to be a good long run move if you want to create a real movement, but at the same time it is a very risky move in the short term considering it might help Trump, who is not really an ally of their "political revolution". ----- Did people walk out in the end? "Over the past decades, effectively unchallenged by the left, the Democratic establishment has joined the Republicans in carrying out the neoliberal project, differing more in degree than direction." Yup very true what he says. Still I doubt it is the right move at this moment. To now continue this background fight while the race is entering its final phase,it risks pushing neutral people away forever and marginalizing the whole movement. Its close but its still not the right time,bernie did not get the majority of votes. Give it 4 more years of Clinton supporting corporate America (or not who knows) and then you can win the nomination with a clean majority. Maybe even a 3rd party bid would have a chance if they get a good and credible candidate. Curious where Bernie will be in 4 years. Will he run again or is this it. The whole movement very much depends on Bernie. | ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
| ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
| ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
| ||
|
farvacola
United States18846 Posts
 | ||
| ||
