|
no matter if it's more unfair to the Palestinian or not, i agree that there are only really 2 feasible solutions to this issue considering the factors presently known.
one, forced 2 state agreement, which probably has a much lower chance of happening than the other, the slow and complete eradication of the Palestinian state, or to similar effect.
too bad the Palestinian people didn't reach an agreement back when it was still possible and elected Hamas in. In a way, they failed to predict what was to come and overestimated their own capabilities. Sun Tzu would not like that. at least the Vietcong had a plan.
|
On November 15 2012 10:36 Cush wrote: Israel's always getting shit for defending themselves. I don't get it.
This isn't Israel defending itself.
|
On November 15 2012 13:44 Praetorial wrote:Show nested quote +On November 15 2012 13:33 Noam wrote: It was quite obvious that NOW someone would make a thread about this.
However, SEVERAL DAYS AGO, after months of 0 hostile actions from either side, when the Palestinians: 1) Shot an Israeli army jeep with an anti-tank rocket (and did it very purposefully, with 3 separate camera crews lined up) 2) Shot dozens of rockets into Israel (and these rockets are only ever shot at civilian population centers, I assume you all know this by now, but just in case...)
No one was talking about it anywhere, because it is not news until the anti-Israeli PR system goes into full blast mode. You newsmongers sometimes.. just need to get your act straight. Stop accusing me of anti-Israel bias, you hack. I created this thread in response to a news event, and wrote a fairly unbiased OP, and you accuse ME of being biased purely because I didn't give this thread more pro-Israel evidence? Good lord, I hate General sometimes. Edit: Read the OP.
I think you read a bit too much into his post, he wasn't accusing you of anything (at most just telling you to display more information in the OP) and it seems to be addressed at the majority of people posting here.
|
"The truth is that if Israel were to put down its arms there would be no more Israel. If the Arabs were to put down their arms there would be no more war."
This discussion is ridiculous as usual.
|
On November 15 2012 13:51 ggbro wrote:Show nested quote +On November 15 2012 13:44 Praetorial wrote:On November 15 2012 13:33 Noam wrote: It was quite obvious that NOW someone would make a thread about this.
However, SEVERAL DAYS AGO, after months of 0 hostile actions from either side, when the Palestinians: 1) Shot an Israeli army jeep with an anti-tank rocket (and did it very purposefully, with 3 separate camera crews lined up) 2) Shot dozens of rockets into Israel (and these rockets are only ever shot at civilian population centers, I assume you all know this by now, but just in case...)
No one was talking about it anywhere, because it is not news until the anti-Israeli PR system goes into full blast mode. You newsmongers sometimes.. just need to get your act straight. Stop accusing me of anti-Israel bias, you hack. I created this thread in response to a news event, and wrote a fairly unbiased OP, and you accuse ME of being biased purely because I didn't give this thread more pro-Israel evidence? Good lord, I hate General sometimes. Edit: Read the OP. I think you read a bit too much into his post, he wasn't accusing you of anything (at most just telling you to display more information in the OP) and it seems to be addressed at the majority of people posting here. There is no mention of land grabs happening in Gaza. Just conveniently pointing at resulting violence and placing blame on both sides for it.
So lets see. OP says issue as being the fault of both sides. Okay, both sides look bad. Israel gets more land. Palestinians get nothing.
Still unbiased?
|
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
On November 15 2012 13:54 Lemonerer wrote: "The truth is that if Israel were to put down its arms there would be no more Israel. If the Arabs were to put down their arms there would be no more war."
This discussion is ridiculous as usual.
It's looking like no one even has to put down their arms - there's gonna be no more Palestine.
|
Egypt is Israel's ally? Since when?
The majority of the Egyptian public views Israel as an enemy nation. The two countries have fought a virtually incessant string of armed conflicts against each other from 1948 to the early 1990s. Alientating the Egyptians does not create new enemies for Israel.
|
On November 15 2012 11:40 docvoc wrote:Show nested quote +On November 15 2012 11:06 Caihead wrote:On November 15 2012 10:59 Feartheguru wrote:On November 15 2012 10:52 sorrowptoss wrote:On November 15 2012 10:36 Cush wrote: Israel's always getting shit for defending themselves. I don't get it. You don't defend yourself by assassination. You can't justify the planned murder of a person for the sake of peace. It's just as criminal as whatever the said person once did. I think that retaliation is the worst way to "defend" yourself, if it's considered "defending" yourself in the first place; peace is instead a better solution, it's just that in a place like the Gaza Strip, with all its instabilities and Hamas vs Fatah shenanigans, peace is only a dream in a time like now (and Isreal isn't helping by assassinating people). Yes, it is wrong to fire rockets into Isreal from Gaza, but if you're implying that you're seeking justice through the right to defend yourself, than it's wrong to kill in return because that's counter-productive. So... your idea is to let them kill as many Israelis as they want until they decide they want peace. Do some actual research into the history of Hamas / Hezbollah and why they were formed, they were democratically elected into office following a previous government's inability to retaliate or protect its own civilians to Israeli aggression. The rocket attacks from Gaza into Israel ceased when Israel ceased firing during a temporary cease fire, and Israel is the party that instigated it, not the other way around. The only reason why these democratically elected parties are labeled terrorists is because they are on the wrong side, if you took away the names and locations and simply judged the actions on their own "X party launched rockets into Y's territory today, breaking the cease fire and Y retaliated", "X party bombed Y's territory killing its elected leader", etc; you might figure out that both sides have at least equal blame and both parties deserve to be labeled terrorists. What is also obvious is the party that's subjugating the other party, encroaching on its land, forcibly bull dozing down people's houses and building new settlements every month, violating the internationally agreed lines, building prison walls and watch towers and preventing passage between the subjugated party's own territory, etc etc etc. Figure shit out yourself before posting ignorant crap. I really hate these threads. I don't hate them because they don't discuss relevant events, I hate them because the truth doesnt ever really show it's just peoples opinions, not even facts in history. The fact is that about 80 missiles hit Israel from Gaza last weekend. This was a retaliation for that attack, the IDF and various other pro-israel status updaters posted that there were 80 missiles that hit israel over the weekend, on various applications. The mainstream media (yahoo) had that as a link at the very bottom of the page on the second part of international news. This was retaliation for that attack after the Palestinian attempted attacks, especially after Palestine was relatively quiet and peaceful for a bit because of their attempt to get into the U.N. Also no, they are not democratically elected according to modern terms, women and non-islamic people are not allowed to vote. Also I think you could do some actual research, past what mainstream media says, since on this subject they are overwhelmingly wrong. Do some simple research into how Israel came to be, how these movements and where the word Palestinian came from, etc. You will find that the issues are much less black and white than you make them. One party is infact not subjugating the other. Furthermore your reductionist statements are bothering since you state them so matter of factly. You overlook the bombs sent into israel each weekend, you overlook the normal "acts of war" and "acts of aggression" that would normally constitute retributiong that Israel is for some reason not allowed. You treat this man like a saint, he killed three israelis, two of which were childrenhe bombed a school bus with israeli children on it. If he were American or Canadian that would be an enormity of jail time, he got 13 years because of international pressure. Furthermore, he helped orchestrate the shooting of 100 rockets into israel this weekend, last I checked thats an act of war from an independent country. If you want, here is a quick synopsis about the man you are defending. EDIT: Replaced the killed three people part, he actually did worse, so I'm just going to change it so as to explain the depth of his actions.
Out of these 100 rockets, how many civilians were killed? Zero.
IIRC the number of deaths/rockets fired is something like 1/250 ... theyre basically firing small rpgs at open fields and never hit anything.
Want some FACTS? Why do you never mention the FACT that for every Israeli citizen that dies, 7 palestinians die. Where's that FACT, Mr Truth? How convenient that you pro-Israeli bots always oversee that one, cause you know, one would figure it's a pretty important stat.
|
On November 15 2012 13:36 bkrow wrote:Show nested quote +On November 15 2012 13:32 Phyrigian wrote:On November 15 2012 13:20 micronesia wrote:On November 15 2012 13:19 Souma wrote: Palestinians don't want "peace." They want their home back. How lovely would it be if the U.S. took over half of Mexico then said, "Hey, guys, we want peace!" Both sides want this also. Neither side is wrong for wanting to live in the area... otherwise this would be a simple issue. ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/IFobL.jpg) I think it's just a little unfair how palestine gets 90% of their land took away and gets painted as the bad guys when theyre outraged over the conflict. Why is this the second time this image is posted in this thread? Is there an email going around that i missed? Pictures are entertaining and all, but they ignore so much context that it is ridiculous. Do you know the events that lead up to that point? Do you know what happened and why? Do the dates 1936, 1947 and 1948 mean anything to you? Or how about 1999/2000? Both sides have a right to be pissed off. Both sides have done wrong and been wronged. Don't play the underdog card because that doesn't give you a right to attack another sovereign nation.
Are you really going to raise the "sovereignty" card bull shit, I'm sorry I wasn't aware that getting vetoed by the US at the UN while unanimously endorsed by the rest of the world meant that Palestinians had no sovereignty or even right to self determination where as Israel is free to overstep international boundaries that they themselves agreed to in the camp David arrangements and UN resolutions. No shit they are pissed off, the western world is legitimizing and legalizing their quarantine and separation behind literally 20 feet high prison walls and no one can do jack shit about it because any attempt to help or supply them, even ones from the red cross carrying only medical supplies to Gaza are blocked by Israeli warships. I'm getting fucking flash backs to 1930s Poland looking at how these people are living. Both countries are pariah states, but absolutely Palestine is the oppressed party, there simply isn't any way around that fact.
|
What I don't understand is that this is just the beginning of more to come, i an article I read a few hours ago it said that Israel was threatening to advance on ground into Palestine, but nowhere it said for WHAT. They killed some high official of the Hamas, great for them. and now? Annexion before Palestine gets to set any toe into the UN?
It's kinda like the news that *Turkey is bombing targets in Syria* but I didn't find anywhere what kind of targets. So all in all this news is quite misleading, could be they bombed some villages for retaliation, who knows?
The sad part is that there will be no punishment for Israel from the West in any way. Makes me sad to live here...
|
On November 15 2012 14:15 pb.fcnz wrote:Show nested quote +On November 15 2012 11:40 docvoc wrote:On November 15 2012 11:06 Caihead wrote:On November 15 2012 10:59 Feartheguru wrote:On November 15 2012 10:52 sorrowptoss wrote:On November 15 2012 10:36 Cush wrote: Israel's always getting shit for defending themselves. I don't get it. You don't defend yourself by assassination. You can't justify the planned murder of a person for the sake of peace. It's just as criminal as whatever the said person once did. I think that retaliation is the worst way to "defend" yourself, if it's considered "defending" yourself in the first place; peace is instead a better solution, it's just that in a place like the Gaza Strip, with all its instabilities and Hamas vs Fatah shenanigans, peace is only a dream in a time like now (and Isreal isn't helping by assassinating people). Yes, it is wrong to fire rockets into Isreal from Gaza, but if you're implying that you're seeking justice through the right to defend yourself, than it's wrong to kill in return because that's counter-productive. So... your idea is to let them kill as many Israelis as they want until they decide they want peace. Do some actual research into the history of Hamas / Hezbollah and why they were formed, they were democratically elected into office following a previous government's inability to retaliate or protect its own civilians to Israeli aggression. The rocket attacks from Gaza into Israel ceased when Israel ceased firing during a temporary cease fire, and Israel is the party that instigated it, not the other way around. The only reason why these democratically elected parties are labeled terrorists is because they are on the wrong side, if you took away the names and locations and simply judged the actions on their own "X party launched rockets into Y's territory today, breaking the cease fire and Y retaliated", "X party bombed Y's territory killing its elected leader", etc; you might figure out that both sides have at least equal blame and both parties deserve to be labeled terrorists. What is also obvious is the party that's subjugating the other party, encroaching on its land, forcibly bull dozing down people's houses and building new settlements every month, violating the internationally agreed lines, building prison walls and watch towers and preventing passage between the subjugated party's own territory, etc etc etc. Figure shit out yourself before posting ignorant crap. I really hate these threads. I don't hate them because they don't discuss relevant events, I hate them because the truth doesnt ever really show it's just peoples opinions, not even facts in history. The fact is that about 80 missiles hit Israel from Gaza last weekend. This was a retaliation for that attack, the IDF and various other pro-israel status updaters posted that there were 80 missiles that hit israel over the weekend, on various applications. The mainstream media (yahoo) had that as a link at the very bottom of the page on the second part of international news. This was retaliation for that attack after the Palestinian attempted attacks, especially after Palestine was relatively quiet and peaceful for a bit because of their attempt to get into the U.N. Also no, they are not democratically elected according to modern terms, women and non-islamic people are not allowed to vote. Also I think you could do some actual research, past what mainstream media says, since on this subject they are overwhelmingly wrong. Do some simple research into how Israel came to be, how these movements and where the word Palestinian came from, etc. You will find that the issues are much less black and white than you make them. One party is infact not subjugating the other. Furthermore your reductionist statements are bothering since you state them so matter of factly. You overlook the bombs sent into israel each weekend, you overlook the normal "acts of war" and "acts of aggression" that would normally constitute retributiong that Israel is for some reason not allowed. You treat this man like a saint, he killed three israelis, two of which were childrenhe bombed a school bus with israeli children on it. If he were American or Canadian that would be an enormity of jail time, he got 13 years because of international pressure. Furthermore, he helped orchestrate the shooting of 100 rockets into israel this weekend, last I checked thats an act of war from an independent country. If you want, here is a quick synopsis about the man you are defending. EDIT: Replaced the killed three people part, he actually did worse, so I'm just going to change it so as to explain the depth of his actions. Out of these 100 rockets, how many civilians were killed? Zero. IIRC the number of deaths/rockets fired is something like 1/250 ... theyre basically firing small rpgs at open fields and never hit anything. Want some FACTS? Why do you never mention the FACT that for every Israeli citizen that dies, 7 palestinians die. Where's that FACT, Mr Truth? How convenient that you pro-Israeli bots always oversee that one, cause you know, one would figure it's a pretty important stat.
No they don't fire rpg's, they fire Kassam rockets with the goal of hitting border towns. You can google it. Death tolls say nothing about root and cause of conflicts. In WWII Germany lost much more civilians than GB, does this make GB the aggressor? Using words like israelibot and capitalization makes you look like an angry teen who is not yet capable of understanding the complex nature of international conflicts.
|
On November 15 2012 13:49 -Cyrus- wrote:Show nested quote +On November 15 2012 10:36 Cush wrote: Israel's always getting shit for defending themselves. I don't get it. This isn't Israel defending itself.
Unfortunately, the real world isn't Starcraft 2. Israel can't cast Guardian Shield or set up PDDs.
When you get hit by 80 rockets, you probably go for the enemy leader who's trying to get his boys to shoot rockets at you. In the real world, people are going to die because the best way to defend yourself without negotiation with another power (which Hamas refuses to acknowledge as legitimate) is to go kill them.
Terrorism is never clear cut. No human in the history of the universe has thought up of a way to effectively deal with terrorists. Many ancient examples (the zealots) were solved through genocide. Only in the recent era has mitigation through education even been explored.
Terrorism is a really fucking stupid political tool. Terrorists have no legitimacy. Even if Hamas and Israel were to magically sign a treaty, a couple rockets from some dumbass would destroy the peace, because hey, who doesn't believe it's the terrorists shooting the rockets at you?
Education- our only real solution/mitigatory tool against terrorism is ineffective in this sad scenario. Israel and Hamas are just constantly provoking each other and completely ruining the Palestinian populace. There's no opportunity to become educated and learn about democracy and non-violent protest in that kind of environment.
In short, it is Israel defending itself. It's Israel defending itself ineffectively. It's too bad no one found effective methods for defending themselves against terrorists.
|
On November 15 2012 10:56 heliusx wrote:Show nested quote +On November 15 2012 10:54 LgNKami wrote:On November 15 2012 10:38 TOloseGT wrote: And the losers of this whole conflict is...you guessed it, the civilians on both sides. Sound about right. Pretty soon, im sure we'll be involved too. Im starting to think that 12/21/12 thing wasnt much of a lie now. Involved? how? Israel could wipe out 10 palestines alone.
Considering the massive support the U.S. lends to Israel, we're already deeply involved in every way imaginable bar physical troops fighting for them.
|
On November 15 2012 14:21 schaf wrote: What I don't understand is that this is just the beginning of more to come, i an article I read a few hours ago it said that Israel was threatening to advance on ground into Palestine, but nowhere it said for WHAT. They killed some high official of the Hamas, great for them. and now? Annexion before Palestine gets to set any toe into the UN?
It's kinda like the news that *Turkey is bombing targets in Syria* but I didn't find anywhere what kind of targets. So all in all this news is quite misleading, could be they bombed some villages for retaliation, who knows?
The sad part is that there will be no punishment for Israel from the West in any way. Makes me sad to live here...
Israel is forced to retaliate. The killing of the Hamas official was a retaliation for 80 rockets which were fired into Israeli territory last weekend by Hamas troops.
What happens if Israel stops retaliating? First Hamas continues their armed struggle. Cleansing the middle East from jews is a declared goal of this organisation and Israeli appeasement won't stop them from trying to reach that goal. Second israeli innerpolitical pressure for retaliation rises. If they don't retaliate, the point will come that the electorate just votes somebody in who is promising to roll the palestinians over. Nobody endures to get shot at over time without trying to get rid of the threat.
|
Biased OP is biased.
In my opinion its impressive how effective and precise Israel is able to go against the leadership of those who commit terrorist attacks against it.
|
On November 15 2012 14:29 AngryMag wrote:Show nested quote +On November 15 2012 14:21 schaf wrote: What I don't understand is that this is just the beginning of more to come, i an article I read a few hours ago it said that Israel was threatening to advance on ground into Palestine, but nowhere it said for WHAT. They killed some high official of the Hamas, great for them. and now? Annexion before Palestine gets to set any toe into the UN?
It's kinda like the news that *Turkey is bombing targets in Syria* but I didn't find anywhere what kind of targets. So all in all this news is quite misleading, could be they bombed some villages for retaliation, who knows?
The sad part is that there will be no punishment for Israel from the West in any way. Makes me sad to live here... Israel is forced to retaliate. The killing of the Hamas official was a retaliation for 80 rockets which were fired into Israeli territory last weekend by Hamas troops. What happens if Israel stops retaliating? First Hamas continues their armed struggle. Cleansing the middle East from jews is a declared goal of this organisation and Israeli appeasement won't stop them from trying to reach that goal. Second israeli innerpolitical pressure for retaliation rises. If they don't retaliate, the point will come that the electorate just votes somebody in who is promising to roll the palestinians over. Nobody endures to get shot at over time without trying to get rid of the threat.
It's the general concensus of Arabs, AND Jews in the region including many Israeli scholars that Israel will disappear over the course of history because it is not a functional self sustainable state system unless a two state solution or a state dissolution happens. Israel is not self sustainable, the vast majority of its GDP and economic growth is held up exclusively by funding from military and infrastructural projects from the West. It has no access to clean water and is subsisting on stealing the water from Palestinian water sources which in the middle east is an extremely big deal because no country can function with out access to water. It has next to no political integrity in the eyes of the majority of the world's populace as well as political bodies. Though the people of the world may express sympathy and strive for human rights for the Jewish people, particularly those living in Israel, very few actually defend the legitimacy of the Israeli State, and they are expressing equal sympathy for the residents of Palestine.
|
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
On November 15 2012 14:26 boxturtle wrote:Show nested quote +On November 15 2012 13:49 -Cyrus- wrote:On November 15 2012 10:36 Cush wrote: Israel's always getting shit for defending themselves. I don't get it. This isn't Israel defending itself. Unfortunately, the real world isn't Starcraft 2. Israel can't cast Guardian Shield or set up PDDs. When you get hit by 80 rockets, you probably go for the enemy leader who's trying to get his boys to shoot rockets at you. In the real world, people are going to die because the best way to defend yourself without negotiation with another power (which Hamas refuses to acknowledge as legitimate) is to go kill them. Terrorism is never clear cut. No human in the history of the universe has thought up of a way to effectively deal with terrorists. Many ancient examples (the zealots) were solved through genocide. Only in the recent era has mitigation through education even been explored. Terrorism is a really fucking stupid political tool. Terrorists have no legitimacy. Even if Hamas and Israel were to magically sign a treaty, a couple rockets from some dumbass would destroy the peace, because hey, who doesn't believe it's the terrorists shooting the rockets at you? Education- our only real solution/mitigatory tool against terrorism is ineffective in this sad scenario. Israel and Hamas are just constantly provoking each other and completely ruining the Palestinian populace. There's no opportunity to become educated and learn about democracy and non-violent protest in that kind of environment. In short, it is Israel defending itself. It's Israel defending itself ineffectively. It's too bad no one found effective methods for defending themselves against terrorists.
So... just out of curiosity, since it was Jewish terrorism that caused Britain to let their mandate expire and led to this disastrous outcome in the first place, can we just say that both sides are just fighting fire with fire?
|
On November 15 2012 14:34 Redox wrote: Biased OP is biased.
In my opinion its impressive how effective and precise Israel is able to go against the leadership of those who commit terrorist attacks against it.
Your post is biased ._. "Effective and precise" when the article already cites civilian collateral damage? The OP is fine.
|
I will refrain from this discussion on the grounds of horrible but justified bias against israel.
|
On November 15 2012 14:36 Caihead wrote:Show nested quote +On November 15 2012 14:29 AngryMag wrote:On November 15 2012 14:21 schaf wrote: What I don't understand is that this is just the beginning of more to come, i an article I read a few hours ago it said that Israel was threatening to advance on ground into Palestine, but nowhere it said for WHAT. They killed some high official of the Hamas, great for them. and now? Annexion before Palestine gets to set any toe into the UN?
It's kinda like the news that *Turkey is bombing targets in Syria* but I didn't find anywhere what kind of targets. So all in all this news is quite misleading, could be they bombed some villages for retaliation, who knows?
The sad part is that there will be no punishment for Israel from the West in any way. Makes me sad to live here... Israel is forced to retaliate. The killing of the Hamas official was a retaliation for 80 rockets which were fired into Israeli territory last weekend by Hamas troops. What happens if Israel stops retaliating? First Hamas continues their armed struggle. Cleansing the middle East from jews is a declared goal of this organisation and Israeli appeasement won't stop them from trying to reach that goal. Second israeli innerpolitical pressure for retaliation rises. If they don't retaliate, the point will come that the electorate just votes somebody in who is promising to roll the palestinians over. Nobody endures to get shot at over time without trying to get rid of the threat. It's the general concensus of Arabs, AND Jews in the region including many Israeli scholars that Israel will disappear over the course of history because it is not a functional self sustainable state system unless a two state solution or a state dissolution happens. Israel is not self sustainable, the vast majority of its GDP and economic growth is held up exclusively by funding from military and infrastructural projects from the West. It has no access to clean water and is subsisting on stealing the water from Palestinian water sources which in the middle east is an extremely big deal because no country can function with out access to water. It has next to no political integrity in the eyes of the majority of the world's populace as well as political bodies. Though the people of the world may express sympathy and strive for human rights for the Jewish people, particularly those living in Israel, very few actually defend the legitimacy of the Israeli State, and they are expressing equal sympathy for the residents of Palestine. So whats your point? The Israelis should just roll over and die already?
Btw, that would suck for the Israeli Arabs as well. Ask them if they raher want to live in Israel or in one of their Arab "brother" states, and compare how they are treated in both.
|
|
|
|