EPTNaNiwa not invited to Code S - Page 191
| Forum Index > Closed |
While I understand that there's a need to discuss this matter, this thread has way too many trash posts in it. Please think carefully about what you want to say. Ad hominem attacks on Swedish people in general, calling you fellow Starcraft fans idiots etc etc will be dealt with with harsher punishment from here on out. Keep it civil people. Page 230: Here's some more stuff that'll get you banned! - Conspiracy theory mongering about MLG and GOM - Comparing people to Hitler - Posting useless one liners of arguments that have already been repeated ad nauseum. | ||
|
XRaDiiX
Canada1730 Posts
| ||
|
droxe
Germany95 Posts
On December 15 2011 00:29 Usagi wrote: Mlg also earned him a Code S seed because leenock was already code S Nope, he didn't, and Slasher even posted it on his Twitter. | ||
|
Elizar
Germany431 Posts
On December 15 2011 00:15 iglocska wrote: How was Coca cheating? He threw a game that he had nothing to gain from. You know, kinda like Nani. Coca he threw the game to give his friend sth huge to gain: a possible coda-A spot. nani got nothing, and guess what, nesta didn´t get anything as well to compare that and give coca the better position is plain wrong! | ||
|
hagrin
United States278 Posts
Good times, good times. | ||
|
Zzoram
Canada7115 Posts
On December 15 2011 00:30 DrGreen wrote: Hero played like crap after losing first games. He was tilted and so was Naniwa. Being tilted is not the same as trying to lose. | ||
|
Echo_
48 Posts
On December 15 2011 00:29 Pholon wrote: People need to stop saying this. Requiring a certain strategy of a player is the complete opposite of what SC is all about..  In no way was I saying that he should do THIS EXACT SITUATION. He just needed to not do what he did. Literally. He could have proxy 2 gated, cannoned, mass void ray, Mothership rush, anything. He could have played it like a ladder game. | ||
|
iky43210
United States2099 Posts
On December 15 2011 00:31 Mecker wrote: Racism, blatantly. Boycotting GSL until we get an official apology from them. its racism now? I've heard everything fyi, his "examples" doesn't even fit | ||
Vardant
Czech Republic620 Posts
On December 15 2011 00:29 JiPrime wrote: It's a 1-month ban from competition. If anything, it's a slap on the wrist. Anyone who is against this decision needs to think again carefully, because they're looking like fools right now. Isn't it more like 2 months now with the new format? That is a lot. | ||
|
Zorgaz
Sweden2951 Posts
On December 15 2011 00:29 Pholon wrote: People need to stop saying this. Requiring a certain strategy of a player is the complete opposite of what SC is all about.. I agree, but i still think Naniwa could have Cannon rushed, proxy gates, fast DT, or something. What he did had 0 % of winning, and even worse he didn't even micro the probes. | ||
|
poorcloud
Singapore2748 Posts
He got banned cause he threw the game. It was apparent and can be deduced by anyone with a semblance of human intelligence. So stop using probe rushing and trying to compare it to other strategies because you have missed the whole fucking point and your not helping anything by arguing on this. Naniwa got punished for giving up a game that he was obliged to play. That is unprofessional. I'm not gonna talk about the severity of the punishment, but anyone who thinks that Naniwa did the right thing is wrong. If he tried any other strat that might have worked, that would have at least hidden his intention to throw away the game completely. Its not about the action itself, its about what his actions conveyed. So stop missing the point and stop trying to argue about something that dosen't fucking matter at all. It breaks my brain to see some of the posts here trying to compare strategies now. | ||
|
Legace
Sweden342 Posts
On December 15 2011 00:19 Slanina wrote: He offended us, the fans, and he offended the GSL and its tradition. Naniwa simply doesnt have the mindset and the spirit of a champion yet. When he stops behaving like a child, he will stop being treated like one. Simple and easy. Thank you for speaking on my behalf, although I am a fan, I was not offended about what Naniwa did. Disappointed? Sure, but more so because of his behavior then anything else. | ||
|
dude_2
Germany22 Posts
anyone who has ever competed in sports knows that you don't play to your potential in a meaningless match and often don't make a real effort. naniwa made it pretty obvious given that, but i as the audience can't blame him for that. | ||
|
Angry.Zerg
Mexico305 Posts
| ||
|
milky_muh
Sweden38 Posts
GL in future Naniwa!! Hopefully Naniwa has now reached the turn point were he understands that he has to be the change! | ||
|
JinDesu
United States3990 Posts
On December 15 2011 00:29 Pholon wrote: People need to stop saying this. Requiring a certain strategy of a player is the complete opposite of what SC is all about.. Is isn't, but at least there should be a strategy.. to do something... sitting there propped up on one arm and right clicking your probes to the enemy base really isn't much of a strategy.. | ||
|
Femari
United States2900 Posts
On December 15 2011 00:32 Elizar wrote: Coca he threw the game to give his friend sth huge to gain: a possible coda-A spot. nani got nothing, and guess what, nesta didn´t get anything as well to compare that and give coca the better position is plain wrong! There was no Code A spot to gain as has been stated millions of times before. And even so CoCa got the worst punishment of the two so shouldn't even be complaining. | ||
|
tlin
25 Posts
On December 15 2011 00:28 Sc2Null wrote: 1. what choya did was on ladder but he still got punished for this. It wasn't even in an official tournament like byun/coca 2. Not playing seriously and throwing a game are two different things. 3. Hero just got owned tbh lol..I'm pretty sure no one wants to go 0-4. 1. Ladder stats was a requirement for Code S at the time. 2. Really? So GSL would have been cool with a 12 probe rush then? After all it has about the same chance of winning yet could be construed as "not playing seriously" by anyone with half a brain. 3. He went with a cannon strategy that completely relies on killing off the Zerg's Overlords with an air opener. Only he didn't go air. | ||
|
sekritzzz
1515 Posts
On December 15 2011 00:29 Pholon wrote: People need to stop saying this. Requiring a certain strategy of a player is the complete opposite of what SC is all about.. Which is the sad thing in the whole situation. Nobody would of complained if it was a stupid 4 gate or... useless cannons at a watch tower but they whine and punish when a player comes out and openly gives up a game rather than deceiving them because it is a useless game. You change the rules, not punish the player on made up rules. That's what ESWC(i think) did when Stephano+bratok both forfeited their games. A player plays to WIN. Despite people's popular belief that a player owes the fans something, he doesn't. He plays a game he loves and plays it to win. period. | ||
|
Horseballs
United States721 Posts
| ||
|
ReaperX
Hong Kong1758 Posts
| ||
| ||
