|
On April 30 2022 05:22 Doc.Rivers wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2022 04:41 NewSunshine wrote:
I mean, in general, I appreciate wanting to err on the side of caution when moderating a conversation. On the other hand, repeatedly bringing up Hunter Biden, despite all the claims being made about it, has nothing to do with politics. Is he a shitty dude? It's looking like it. Is it related to anything political? Doubt it. Combining that with thread policies about argument in absentia, and subjective moderation as a response to past users who would frequently engage in bad faith on incendiary topics, and I think a warning is appropriate here.
A warning technically gets logged on your site record, sure, but that's it. It doesn't matter. You dust yourself off, hopefully take a step back and think about what happened, and everyone moves on. I don't think anything was out of line about it. You and many others really, really don't want Joe & Hunter's interlinked finances to be talked about. As more and more documents come out (as is happening on an almost daily basis, and as was shown by the more recent hunter biden discussion in the thread), it will become very clear why dems didn't want the issue to be talked about. The evidence of public corruption is already sitting right out in the open.
And if so, we've already had 4 years of nobody giving a shit about it. Why start now?
I'm really not hashing this out with you again. It's still a stupid topic until something real comes out, and I'm tired of you posting that something's seriously gonna happen, real soon, seriously. If it happens and it's bad, it doesn't need you hyping it up. Until then, I'm going to continue not giving a shit. Now go away.
|
On April 30 2022 07:25 NewSunshine wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2022 05:22 Doc.Rivers wrote:On April 30 2022 04:41 NewSunshine wrote:
I mean, in general, I appreciate wanting to err on the side of caution when moderating a conversation. On the other hand, repeatedly bringing up Hunter Biden, despite all the claims being made about it, has nothing to do with politics. Is he a shitty dude? It's looking like it. Is it related to anything political? Doubt it. Combining that with thread policies about argument in absentia, and subjective moderation as a response to past users who would frequently engage in bad faith on incendiary topics, and I think a warning is appropriate here.
A warning technically gets logged on your site record, sure, but that's it. It doesn't matter. You dust yourself off, hopefully take a step back and think about what happened, and everyone moves on. I don't think anything was out of line about it. You and many others really, really don't want Joe & Hunter's interlinked finances to be talked about. As more and more documents come out (as is happening on an almost daily basis, and as was shown by the more recent hunter biden discussion in the thread), it will become very clear why dems didn't want the issue to be talked about. The evidence of public corruption is already sitting right out in the open. And if so, we've already had 4 years of nobody giving a shit about it. Why start now? I'm really not hashing this out with you again. It's still a stupid topic until something real comes out, and I'm tired of you posting that something's seriously gonna happen, real soon, seriously. If it happens and it's bad, it doesn't need you hyping it up. Until then, I'm going to continue not giving a shit. Now go away.
The reality is that real evidence is already out and you are willfully ignoring it because of your party allegiance.
|
On April 30 2022 08:53 Doc.Rivers wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2022 07:25 NewSunshine wrote:On April 30 2022 05:22 Doc.Rivers wrote:On April 30 2022 04:41 NewSunshine wrote:
I mean, in general, I appreciate wanting to err on the side of caution when moderating a conversation. On the other hand, repeatedly bringing up Hunter Biden, despite all the claims being made about it, has nothing to do with politics. Is he a shitty dude? It's looking like it. Is it related to anything political? Doubt it. Combining that with thread policies about argument in absentia, and subjective moderation as a response to past users who would frequently engage in bad faith on incendiary topics, and I think a warning is appropriate here.
A warning technically gets logged on your site record, sure, but that's it. It doesn't matter. You dust yourself off, hopefully take a step back and think about what happened, and everyone moves on. I don't think anything was out of line about it. You and many others really, really don't want Joe & Hunter's interlinked finances to be talked about. As more and more documents come out (as is happening on an almost daily basis, and as was shown by the more recent hunter biden discussion in the thread), it will become very clear why dems didn't want the issue to be talked about. The evidence of public corruption is already sitting right out in the open. And if so, we've already had 4 years of nobody giving a shit about it. Why start now? I'm really not hashing this out with you again. It's still a stupid topic until something real comes out, and I'm tired of you posting that something's seriously gonna happen, real soon, seriously. If it happens and it's bad, it doesn't need you hyping it up. Until then, I'm going to continue not giving a shit. Now go away. The reality is that real evidence is already out and you are willfully ignoring it because of your party allegiance.
Then please share it or shhh.
|
Hyrule18315 Posts
This is not a thread for you to argue with each other, this is a thread to provide feedback to staff.
|
On that note, I ask again is TL.net now deciding to regulating truth, and logic in arguments?
And what do you think about my suggestion about warnings for posting videos and descriptions? No fan of Doc.Rivers but a public warning seems overly harsh for soemthign that is only a problem if repeatedly done.
|
I am not sure how to address this properly, but i think the Russo-Ukrainian War Thread needs a bit more modding. We already had russians, russian soldiers and russian supporters dehumanized. We then saw russian TL contributors, not caring about the obvious trolls, be bullied as proxies for Russia and having to explain everything they say. It's telling, that the most civil person in the thread towards the russian poster is the guy that had to flee from Kharkiv. There seems to be alot of hate in that thread right now and it will find individual targets if it is not reigned in.
|
Would there be anyway to have a post count minimum for the Pol threads/war/covid threads? If it was like 200 or something it would stop people from making alts and trolling over and over again, or at the very least make them put in some effort to do so.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
