|
You wrote that before that you don't want to engage with me, yet here you are again replying to me, insulting me again.
I don't want to engage with you either, Kwark. You take any opportunity to be as rude as possible towards me. As seen in your reply where you doing your best to insult, safe knowing you are a mod and cannot be actioned upon, whereas I will be if I responded in kind. I wish for you to not in such a manner, but you continue to insist you are right in your manner, and will continue to do so. Now that is truly unpleasant.
If you truly do not want to reply to me, then stop replying to me. I too will not reply to you either. It would be to my disadvantage, but shall we agree on that?
|
Hyrule19012 Posts
On July 22 2022 06:07 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
A smiley is not friendly at the end of a post, it is the opposite, you should know that. It's annoying. I talk to GH, then Kwark comes in then Neb comes in with that comment. Who wants to constantly have to discuss with people acting in such a manner towards me? Does this need happen everytime?
A topic can have multiple people discussing multiple things at one time. You are assuming that every single post is part of the one conversation you are having at the particular moment. If you want to talk to GH, send a PM.
On July 22 2022 06:55 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
You wrote that before that you don't want to engage with me, yet here you are again replying to me, insulting me again.
I don't want to engage with you either, Kwark. You take any opportunity to be as rude as possible towards me. As seen in your reply where you doing your best to insult, safe knowing you are a mod and cannot be actioned upon, whereas I will be if I responded in kind. I wish for you to not in such a manner, but you continue to insist you are right in your manner, and will continue to do so. Now that is truly unpleasant.
If you truly do not want to reply to me, then stop replying to me. I too will not reply to you either. It would be to my disadvantage, but shall we agree on that?
If you don't want to engage, then don't. You are actively whining about how mean Kwark is to you and demanding he respond to you. YOU are the one engaging. Your actions do not reflect your words.
|
On July 22 2022 06:02 Dangermousecatdog wrote:Lets actually go through post by post shall we?
I ain't gonna read all that, you could be 100% correct and justified in all of those answers, it won't change the fact that you said I was hectoring you and being a dick and when we look at the threads you're the one who keeps trying to engage me.
|
|
|
Norway28597 Posts
Nobody else actually moderates it. I've had a I'm not gonna moderate the thread position for years, but lately, I feel forced to because some posters can't avoid going at each other's throats.
I warned BJ for his post in the covid thread before I saw that you had reported it, because it turned the discussion away from the topic and directed towards your posting habit. This is exactly what I want the thread to be free of, and if the posts that do this get no reaction, what inevitably happens is that the thread turns to shit because posters start arguing with each other. Your post, as I see it, is guilty of the same.
But you can rest assured that I do my very best to avoid letting personal bias influence how I moderate, and it definitely did not in this instance. You can also know that I hate doing it and I want to let the discussion flow as freely as possible, but unless people post better, I unfortunately feel like my hands are tied. 
|
|
|
Norway28597 Posts
What? I didn't write a warning to him privately, I pressed the warn button underneath his post, then I wrote a text message explaining why this post was getting warned, exactly the same I did with your post.
And if you want to engage in posting that you yourself consider shitty posting just because you want to prove a point, then I think you'll end up proving a different point than the one you wanted to prove.
|
I don't post in there really any more but I do keep up and blackjack doesn't just post low effort sarcastic posts.
In fact, I would say the amount of effort he puts in to arguing with multiple people every day is probably quite exhausting.
Sometimes he goes too far, yeah, but then every time this thread comes up i notice its jimmi having a problem with someone, so clearly he's not alone in that.
|
|
|
On June 20 2023 21:25 Jockmcplop wrote:
I don't post in there really any more but I do keep up and blackjack doesn't just post low effort sarcastic posts.
In fact, I would say the amount of effort he puts in to arguing with multiple people every day is probably quite exhausting.
Sometimes he goes too far, yeah, but then every time this thread comes up i notice its jimmi having a problem with someone, so clearly he's not alone in that.
I'm just happy I'm not getting blamed for his repeatedly self-acknowledged jerky posting anymore.
|
|
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?36957 Posts
On June 21 2023 01:01 JimmiC wrote:
If you just read the Covid thread you will see more than 10 people have a problem with BJs posting, in fact pages and pages about it. It is a repeated topic that comes up in both threads often. Drone just decided to warn me about it and suggested I post it here so as a rule follower I did that.
Tell all those people to report him then. If BJ is really being that problematic, then I'll take care of it.
|
Norway28597 Posts
Bj has been reported on multiple occasions and many different moderators have rejected the reports.
|
On June 20 2023 09:03 BlackJack wrote:Show nested quote +On June 20 2023 05:13 EnDeR_ wrote:
As someone who had zero sex education, I'd just like to say that it would've been nice to not get all my sex knowledge from porn videos -- my expectations and reality were wildly out of sync. I can't remember exactly, but I must have been around 10-12 when I watched my first porn video and definitely not older than 13. If you're teaching about vaginal sex, I don't see why you shouldn't teach about other types of sex including oral. Call me old-fashioned but I don’t think anyone should be taught how to give a blowjob until they learn how to give a proper rimjob
While we're opening this thread again can I get an explanation on this one? It's his joke about teaching children sex acts. Is that one of the reports that's been rejected? If it has why is that okay with someone?
|
Norway28597 Posts
I just flat out don't see that one as actionable. It's clearly an attempt at a joke. It'd fine if you don't think it's funny but I don't see how it's offensive or insulting. (That said, I wasn't the moderator who rejected this report.)
|
So his 'joke' that added nothing to the discussion is fine because it's a joke, people pointing out that joke added nothing to the discussion get warned, and BJs snarky response to the warned people are once again fine?
And this isn't a one time thing either, this is how it routinely goes whenever anybody gets warned.
And you can't see how that seems incredibly biased to most people?
|
|
|
Norway28597 Posts
I don't give him special treatment. That is nonsense, as is your entire post. If someone chooses to dislike me because I am nice towards a person they don't like that is their prerogative but I really don't care.
|
|
|
On June 22 2023 22:55 Liquid`Drone wrote:
I don't give him special treatment. That is nonsense, as is your entire post. If someone chooses to dislike me because I am nice towards a person they don't like that is their prerogative but I really don't care.
Not only have you literally said you give him special treatment, just scrolling to the last few pages of the US politics thread shows you do very clearly as well. Look at how many times BlackJack has derailed the conversation, and look how many times it's the people pointing that out that have been given warnings (and contrast that with the 0 warnings BlackJack has gotten).
Reddit moderators are less biased than you are when it involves BlackJack.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
