• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 03:10
CEST 09:10
KST 16:10
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall12HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed9Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll2Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension2Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
Who will win EWC 2025? RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) WardiTV Mondays Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL Starcraft in widescreen BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone
Tourneys
Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches [Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 484 users

European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread - Page 1361

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 1359 1360 1361 1362 1363 1413 Next
Although this thread does not function under the same strict guidelines as the USPMT, it is still a general practice on TL to provide a source with an explanation on why it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion. Failure to do so will result in a mod action.
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12161 Posts
April 10 2022 21:52 GMT
#27201
On April 11 2022 06:47 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 11 2022 05:18 Nebuchad wrote:
Populism is obviously very good. Elites are engaged in a fight against us, it is good and logical that we fight back. The issue with the far right is of course that they don't hold any populist beliefs. They don't object to the elites because of any kind of class war, they object to the elites because those elites implement a liberal society, and they would rather have elites that implement a "conservative" (fascistic) society.

For the average voter who gets convinced by this, I assume some of them don't understand that they are being lied to about the populism. But mostly conservatives aren't humanists, they just care about themselves, and they correctly deduce that in a society where other people are put down because of identity, they are better off. And they just want to be better off, so they want that.

On April 11 2022 04:45 Sent. wrote:
Moderate government trying to raise the retirement age to 67 aand maybe people being bored of having the same government for 8 years.


Why didn't the far right win at that point?

Real populists don't exist in modern European politics. You'd need to look to South America to see populists (Lula is a very obvious populist). In Europe we basically mean demagogue when we say populist, and those "populist" parties on the far right are rife with demagoguery. That said, Melenchon isn't a populist either. He is a socialist.

I don't see populism as obviously very good. Mob rule is "populism", and it's definitely not good. Moreover, populist platforms tend to be an incoherent mess, because there's no clear ideology. That makes them completely unpredictable when a new situation arises while in power.


Would you say that someone can be a socialist without being a populist? I don't really see how that would work.

But yes I agree with the rest of the facts you presented. We're not doing too well in Europe or in the US and that's a shame, and populism and demagoguery are used interchangeably, which they shouldn't be.
No will to live, no wish to die
plasmidghost
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
Belgium16168 Posts
April 10 2022 21:58 GMT
#27202
On April 11 2022 06:33 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 11 2022 05:15 plasmidghost wrote:
Do y'all have any resources to share for the state of Belgian and EU politics? Moving there in August to the Flanders region and wanted to be aware of everything going on politically. Currently a bit nervous that the far-right party VB has decent support there

The Vlaams Belang is fairly standard populist right for Europe; similar to Wilders in NL or Le Pen in France, but with the added twist of being anti-Walloon. That's their main thing and the main reason they get votes. That said, NVA is the main Flemish party, and have all of the anti-Walloon nonsense too. Due to the Belgian governmental system, VB is all but guaranteed to never ever govern at a national level (it's also the reason Belgian governments crash and burn so often, and take forever to find coalitions): constitutionally Wallonië and Vlaanderen have to share power. I don't understand all the details and it's a running joke in Belgium that absolutely nobody understands their system.

I lived in Leuven for a few months and found life very similar to NL, but with a lower cost of living and better food (and beer). I cycled everywhere, as did everyone else, and public transport worked well too. Not sure how their healthcare system works, but I know for a while people on the border in NL used to visit Belgian hospitals because they had shorter waiting lists for a lot of care. That was a decade or two ago, though.

Anyway, I would worry about VB a lot less than the far right in Belgium's neighbors. The NVA is boneheaded enough tho.

That's good to know, thank you!
Yugoslavia will always live on in my heart
Biff The Understudy
Profile Blog Joined February 2008
France7884 Posts
April 10 2022 22:01 GMT
#27203
On April 11 2022 06:52 Nebuchad wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 11 2022 06:47 Acrofales wrote:
On April 11 2022 05:18 Nebuchad wrote:
Populism is obviously very good. Elites are engaged in a fight against us, it is good and logical that we fight back. The issue with the far right is of course that they don't hold any populist beliefs. They don't object to the elites because of any kind of class war, they object to the elites because those elites implement a liberal society, and they would rather have elites that implement a "conservative" (fascistic) society.

For the average voter who gets convinced by this, I assume some of them don't understand that they are being lied to about the populism. But mostly conservatives aren't humanists, they just care about themselves, and they correctly deduce that in a society where other people are put down because of identity, they are better off. And they just want to be better off, so they want that.

On April 11 2022 04:45 Sent. wrote:
Moderate government trying to raise the retirement age to 67 aand maybe people being bored of having the same government for 8 years.


Why didn't the far right win at that point?

Real populists don't exist in modern European politics. You'd need to look to South America to see populists (Lula is a very obvious populist). In Europe we basically mean demagogue when we say populist, and those "populist" parties on the far right are rife with demagoguery. That said, Melenchon isn't a populist either. He is a socialist.

I don't see populism as obviously very good. Mob rule is "populism", and it's definitely not good. Moreover, populist platforms tend to be an incoherent mess, because there's no clear ideology. That makes them completely unpredictable when a new situation arises while in power.


Would you say that someone can be a socialist without being a populist? I don't really see how that would work.

But yes I agree with the rest of the facts you presented. We're not doing too well in Europe or in the US and that's a shame, and populism and demagoguery are used interchangeably, which they shouldn't be.

Populism - the notion that one represents « the people » against « the elites » is a close cousin of demagoguery since the roman republic, because the opposition elites / people is demagogue in itself.

You can totally be socialist without running that old song though that depends a bit what you mean by socialist (i use the term more as strong social democrat than full marxism let’s nationalize everything).
The fellow who is out to burn things up is the counterpart of the fool who thinks he can save the world. The world needs neither to be burned up nor to be saved. The world is, we are. Transients, if we buck it; here to stay if we accept it. ~H.Miller
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12161 Posts
April 10 2022 22:03 GMT
#27204
I agree that you can be a social democrat without being a populist. I don't really see how you can be a socialist without it. Class war is pretty central to socialism. But it's likely that this is the distinction that was being made since a lot of languages, french included, use "socialism" to mean "social democracy" a lot of the time. English doesn't really do that.
No will to live, no wish to die
Biff The Understudy
Profile Blog Joined February 2008
France7884 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-04-10 23:09:31
April 10 2022 23:08 GMT
#27205
On April 11 2022 07:03 Nebuchad wrote:
I agree that you can be a social democrat without being a populist. I don't really see how you can be a socialist without it. Class war is pretty central to socialism. But it's likely that this is the distinction that was being made since a lot of languages, french included, use "socialism" to mean "social democracy" a lot of the time. English doesn't really do that.

I don’t know; I think you can consider that a class of people is overpriviledged or too influent without getting into full class warfare or populism. The thing with populism is that it postulates the existence of « the people » and those who are not part of it, whether it’s the bourgeoisie or the arabs or the jews or all of them depending of your brand of populism.

I think there is a use for a concept of socialism that is left of your typical social democracy and doesn’t buy into that.
The fellow who is out to burn things up is the counterpart of the fool who thinks he can save the world. The world needs neither to be burned up nor to be saved. The world is, we are. Transients, if we buck it; here to stay if we accept it. ~H.Miller
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23199 Posts
April 10 2022 23:33 GMT
#27206
On April 11 2022 08:08 Biff The Understudy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 11 2022 07:03 Nebuchad wrote:
I agree that you can be a social democrat without being a populist. I don't really see how you can be a socialist without it. Class war is pretty central to socialism. But it's likely that this is the distinction that was being made since a lot of languages, french included, use "socialism" to mean "social democracy" a lot of the time. English doesn't really do that.

I don’t know; I think you can consider that a class of people is overpriviledged or too influent without getting into full class warfare or populism. The thing with populism is that it postulates the existence of « the people » and those who are not part of it, whether it’s the bourgeoisie or the arabs or the jews or all of them depending of your brand of populism.

I think there is a use for a concept of socialism that is left of your typical social democracy and doesn’t buy into that.

Democratic socialism is left of social democracy, but class consciousness is inextricable from any socialist perspective. You're essentially seeing use for a socialism without socialism, which fits rather neatly into Neb's assessments.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Biff The Understudy
Profile Blog Joined February 2008
France7884 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-04-11 00:24:19
April 11 2022 00:23 GMT
#27207
On April 11 2022 08:33 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 11 2022 08:08 Biff The Understudy wrote:
On April 11 2022 07:03 Nebuchad wrote:
I agree that you can be a social democrat without being a populist. I don't really see how you can be a socialist without it. Class war is pretty central to socialism. But it's likely that this is the distinction that was being made since a lot of languages, french included, use "socialism" to mean "social democracy" a lot of the time. English doesn't really do that.

I don’t know; I think you can consider that a class of people is overpriviledged or too influent without getting into full class warfare or populism. The thing with populism is that it postulates the existence of « the people » and those who are not part of it, whether it’s the bourgeoisie or the arabs or the jews or all of them depending of your brand of populism.

I think there is a use for a concept of socialism that is left of your typical social democracy and doesn’t buy into that.

Democratic socialism is left of social democracy, but class consciousness is inextricable from any socialist perspective. You're essentially seeing use for a socialism without socialism, which fits rather neatly into Neb's assessments.

I see the use of a socialism without your version of socialism.

It’s as matter of semantics, and in Europe, the word socialism has been used that way for over a century. It just takes more from Jaurès than Marx. For the far left populist, we use the term « communists ». It’s also a debatable use of the term i guess, but it’s rather unavoidable.

Now if you think it’s a wrong use of the term and socialism necessarly seeing society as the struggle of an idealised people against the tyranny of the not-real-people class, I’m fine with it.
The fellow who is out to burn things up is the counterpart of the fool who thinks he can save the world. The world needs neither to be burned up nor to be saved. The world is, we are. Transients, if we buck it; here to stay if we accept it. ~H.Miller
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23199 Posts
April 11 2022 03:44 GMT
#27208
On April 11 2022 09:23 Biff The Understudy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 11 2022 08:33 GreenHorizons wrote:
On April 11 2022 08:08 Biff The Understudy wrote:
On April 11 2022 07:03 Nebuchad wrote:
I agree that you can be a social democrat without being a populist. I don't really see how you can be a socialist without it. Class war is pretty central to socialism. But it's likely that this is the distinction that was being made since a lot of languages, french included, use "socialism" to mean "social democracy" a lot of the time. English doesn't really do that.

I don’t know; I think you can consider that a class of people is overpriviledged or too influent without getting into full class warfare or populism. The thing with populism is that it postulates the existence of « the people » and those who are not part of it, whether it’s the bourgeoisie or the arabs or the jews or all of them depending of your brand of populism.

I think there is a use for a concept of socialism that is left of your typical social democracy and doesn’t buy into that.

Democratic socialism is left of social democracy, but class consciousness is inextricable from any socialist perspective. You're essentially seeing use for a socialism without socialism, which fits rather neatly into Neb's assessments.

I see the use of a socialism without your version of socialism.

It’s as matter of semantics, and in Europe, the word socialism has been used that way for over a century. It just takes more from Jaurès than Marx. For the far left populist, we use the term « communists ». It’s also a debatable use of the term i guess, but it’s rather unavoidable.

Now if you think it’s a wrong use of the term and socialism necessarly seeing society as the struggle of an idealised people against the tyranny of the not-real-people class, I’m fine with it.


Socialism has at its core the relationship between workers and the means of production, which in itself requires at least a rudimentary class consciousness. While I obviously disagree with your caricature of revolutionary socialism/class analysis, you can't have socialism without class consciousness.

Jaurès even in his reformist perspective recognized this, from Jean Jaurès' 1905 The Socialist Aim:
Socialists believe that society is divided into two great classes by the present form of property-holding, and that one of these classes, the wage-earning, the proletariat, is obliged to pay to the other, the capitalist, a sort of tax in order to be able to live at all and exercise its faculties to any degree.

...

The thing to do, therefore, is to break down this supremacy of one class. The oppressed class must be enfranchised, and with it the whole of society. All differences of class must be abolished by transferring the ownership of the means of production and of life, which is to-day a power of exploitation and oppression in the hands of a single class, from that class to the whole body of citizens, the organised community. For the disorderly and abusive rule of the minority must be substituted the universal co-operation of citizens associated in the joint ownership of the means of labour and liberty. And that is why the essential aim of Socialism, whether collectivist or communist, is to transform capitalist property into social property.
www.marxists.org

Without confronting the contradictions of capitalist alienation (which requires class consciousness) you don't have socialism, you have social liberalism.

If we were to try to reductively pinpoint a difference in the class consciousness between revolutionary and reformist analysis I believe it is in the lengths either sees the capitalist class willing to go to oppose both reform and revolution. Put simply, revolutionary minded folks think a historical materialist analysis points to a documented history of imperialists/capitalists resorting to unimaginable brutality to kill reforms and frequently the reformists themselves. Which, as I understand, Jaurès learned the hard way.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
April 11 2022 05:02 GMT
#27209
On April 11 2022 12:44 GreenHorizons wrote:
Without confronting the contradictions of capitalist alienation (which requires class consciousness) you don't have socialism, you have social liberalism.

That very much seems like the point here: to have liberalism under the guise of being socialism to maintain the facade of being a leftist. Good way to crowd out more genuine leftist positions, which to their credit the liberal groups have been very successful in doing.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Laurens
Profile Joined September 2010
Belgium4541 Posts
April 11 2022 06:42 GMT
#27210
On April 11 2022 05:15 plasmidghost wrote:
Do y'all have any resources to share for the state of Belgian and EU politics? Moving there in August to the Flanders region and wanted to be aware of everything going on politically. Currently a bit nervous that the far-right party VB has decent support there


Some notes about the Flemish political parties in spoilers below, to not derail the thread too much.

+ Show Spoiler +
There are 7 political parties in Flanders. Most of these have a sister party in the French region of the country, Wallonia, so roughly 14 parties in total.

There's the 3 traditional parties: Open VLD, Vooruit and CD&V.
Open VLD are the liberal democrats, they're the 'rich people party'.
Vooruit is the socialist party, so kind of the opposite. And yet the two have had to govern together several times in what we call a 'purple' government. Results were disastrous but out of scope for this post, feel free to google about what Guy Verhofstadt did as PM of Belgium.
CD&V are the christian democrats, they are a rather boring centre party, they have a bit of a reputation of doing whatever they can to get more votes. One of their biggest voting blocks are the farmers in Belgium.

These 3 traditional parties have been bleeding votes in recent years, kinda similar to how it went in France since Macron turned up with EM. In the latest poll the 3 of them together barely got 33% of votes.

The other parties are the Green party, the extreme left (PVDA), extreme right (VB) and NVA.
NVA emerged in like the early 2000s, they want to split the country because they feel there is a 'big corridor of money' going from Flanders to Wallonia. A lot of Flemish ppl support this view. Otherwise they're pretty similar to Open VLD and they have been stealing their votes.

VB is mostly about immigration. I disagree with Acrofales' earlier post that they mainly want to split the country. That's NVA. However, NVA has been the biggest party in Flanders for a while and kinda failed to get anything done with regards to splitting the country so VB is now using this to steal some voters. "Stop voting for NVA, they're lying to you, we'll get it done instead", etc.
But the main point of VB will always be immigration. Belgium has big Moroccon/Turkish communities because we invited them over to help in the mines way back when. And now we have a bunch of 3rd/4th/5th generation "immigrants" who are misunderstood and often clash with "Belgian" youth. Using quotation marks because obviously they're both Belgian at this point, and yet the VB promises to 'send them all back to their country'
The refugee crisis and the terrorist attacks in 2016 boosted the popularity of VB.

When it comes to gay rights etc., VB has been quite tame compared to other extreme right parties. Their vice president, Chris Janssens, came out as gay last year and got full support of the party.

The extreme left gets barely any votes in Flanders. Hugely popular in the French part of the country though.

The fact that the French and Dutch regions vote very differently is the main reason why forming a government is such a difficult task in Belgium. Also why nothing gets done and the country just slowly self-destructs.

But welcome to Belgium, enjoy your stay

Velr
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
Switzerland10694 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-04-11 07:59:26
April 11 2022 07:59 GMT
#27211
On April 11 2022 14:02 LegalLord wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 11 2022 12:44 GreenHorizons wrote:
Without confronting the contradictions of capitalist alienation (which requires class consciousness) you don't have socialism, you have social liberalism.

That very much seems like the point here: to have liberalism under the guise of being socialism to maintain the facade of being a leftist. Good way to crowd out more genuine leftist positions, which to their credit the liberal groups have been very successful in doing.


Imho social democracy (or «liberalism» in the bastardized US understanding of words) is actually feasible to implement/strenghten whiteout overthrowing the system.

People that support this are not grifters or are somehow trying to hide their evil capitalistic plans. They just don’t believe in socialism/communism as feasible systems. They believe in regulated capitalism, more heavily regulated than it is today with more redistribution via taxes and other means.
That doesn’t make them «not leftists», it just makes them responsible people not willing to burn everything down because they drank too much of their pure-ideology-juice.

Sure there are people that are only in it for the political gain and couldn't give a shit for the actual cause, but thats the same for absolutely every political ideology from far-left to far-right.


If your system needs to abolish an existing democracy (no matter for how long) to implement itself or needs totally rational or selfless human actors striving for the «greater good», it’s a horrible system that would crash and burn when it hits the first bump in the road.
Imho it’s not even worth to discuss these as a whole aside from taking some ideas/inspirations.
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12161 Posts
April 11 2022 10:54 GMT
#27212
Tbh I don't really view the discussion of class consciousness as being that interesting, because I don't really view this as an opinion that one can have or not have. It is really just a fact about reality that class war exists, and you can either accept it or not.

Velr, the issue that I have with social democracy is that it's extremely vulnerable to neoliberalism. France had a pretty strong social democracy for a decent while, and it looks like Macron will succeed in implementing neoliberalism in just ten years. While the average person that doesn't follow politics barely realizes that the system has changed. Scares the fuck out of me. And people like Sanders or Corbyn show us that the opposite isn't true, in the countries that have had neoliberalism for a while it's very hard to come back to social democracy.

As you may remember (or not), I don't particularly favor abolishing the existing democracy. There's no particular reason why, once a social democracy has managed to be implemented in a country that has a decent amount of power over the world, that country can't continue to go further left, as long as its citizens are on board. You can continue to push the system left while in a social democracy, you don't have to limit your own ambitions if you don't want to because someone convinced you that better things aren't possible.
No will to live, no wish to die
JimmiC
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada22817 Posts
April 11 2022 13:19 GMT
#27213
--- Nuked ---
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain17976 Posts
April 11 2022 14:01 GMT
#27214
On April 11 2022 06:52 Nebuchad wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 11 2022 06:47 Acrofales wrote:
On April 11 2022 05:18 Nebuchad wrote:
Populism is obviously very good. Elites are engaged in a fight against us, it is good and logical that we fight back. The issue with the far right is of course that they don't hold any populist beliefs. They don't object to the elites because of any kind of class war, they object to the elites because those elites implement a liberal society, and they would rather have elites that implement a "conservative" (fascistic) society.

For the average voter who gets convinced by this, I assume some of them don't understand that they are being lied to about the populism. But mostly conservatives aren't humanists, they just care about themselves, and they correctly deduce that in a society where other people are put down because of identity, they are better off. And they just want to be better off, so they want that.

On April 11 2022 04:45 Sent. wrote:
Moderate government trying to raise the retirement age to 67 aand maybe people being bored of having the same government for 8 years.


Why didn't the far right win at that point?

Real populists don't exist in modern European politics. You'd need to look to South America to see populists (Lula is a very obvious populist). In Europe we basically mean demagogue when we say populist, and those "populist" parties on the far right are rife with demagoguery. That said, Melenchon isn't a populist either. He is a socialist.

I don't see populism as obviously very good. Mob rule is "populism", and it's definitely not good. Moreover, populist platforms tend to be an incoherent mess, because there's no clear ideology. That makes them completely unpredictable when a new situation arises while in power.


Would you say that someone can be a socialist without being a populist? I don't really see how that would work.

But yes I agree with the rest of the facts you presented. We're not doing too well in Europe or in the US and that's a shame, and populism and demagoguery are used interchangeably, which they shouldn't be.

I don't really see the dichotomy, because I don't think socialists have to necessarily overthrow the "elite" in a glorious revolution. I guess if your idea of socialism is that only anarcho-communism really ticks all the boxes, then yes, it is necessarily populist. I don't think Melenchon thinks that, and I don't think Melenchon is a populist. I do think Melenchon is a socialist (on the scale from 0 to anarcho-communism, he's a democratic socialist). The difference is that he favors progressive taxes, blocking the transfer of generational wealth, inhibiting the political power of corporations and other such measures that do not explicitly target one class or another.

Lula, as an opposite, is a populist in that his political stance is very much one of "us" vs "them". The main difference being that inequality is absurdly out of control in South America (and I guess the Americas in general, with the exception of Canada), so making it about economic class warfare is more of a winning strategy than in most of Europe, where decades of social democracy have somewhat limited the increase in inequality. The other difference is that for some reason the disgruntled middle class like to kick down instead of up, blaming poor immigrants for the problems rather than those in power. Which means that the mantle of the disenfranchised populares has been picked up by the far right rather than the (far) left.
Zambrah
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United States7290 Posts
April 11 2022 15:08 GMT
#27215
On April 11 2022 23:01 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 11 2022 06:52 Nebuchad wrote:
On April 11 2022 06:47 Acrofales wrote:
On April 11 2022 05:18 Nebuchad wrote:
Populism is obviously very good. Elites are engaged in a fight against us, it is good and logical that we fight back. The issue with the far right is of course that they don't hold any populist beliefs. They don't object to the elites because of any kind of class war, they object to the elites because those elites implement a liberal society, and they would rather have elites that implement a "conservative" (fascistic) society.

For the average voter who gets convinced by this, I assume some of them don't understand that they are being lied to about the populism. But mostly conservatives aren't humanists, they just care about themselves, and they correctly deduce that in a society where other people are put down because of identity, they are better off. And they just want to be better off, so they want that.

On April 11 2022 04:45 Sent. wrote:
Moderate government trying to raise the retirement age to 67 aand maybe people being bored of having the same government for 8 years.


Why didn't the far right win at that point?

Real populists don't exist in modern European politics. You'd need to look to South America to see populists (Lula is a very obvious populist). In Europe we basically mean demagogue when we say populist, and those "populist" parties on the far right are rife with demagoguery. That said, Melenchon isn't a populist either. He is a socialist.

I don't see populism as obviously very good. Mob rule is "populism", and it's definitely not good. Moreover, populist platforms tend to be an incoherent mess, because there's no clear ideology. That makes them completely unpredictable when a new situation arises while in power.


Would you say that someone can be a socialist without being a populist? I don't really see how that would work.

But yes I agree with the rest of the facts you presented. We're not doing too well in Europe or in the US and that's a shame, and populism and demagoguery are used interchangeably, which they shouldn't be.

I don't really see the dichotomy, because I don't think socialists have to necessarily overthrow the "elite" in a glorious revolution. I guess if your idea of socialism is that only anarcho-communism really ticks all the boxes, then yes, it is necessarily populist. I don't think Melenchon thinks that, and I don't think Melenchon is a populist. I do think Melenchon is a socialist (on the scale from 0 to anarcho-communism, he's a democratic socialist). The difference is that he favors progressive taxes, blocking the transfer of generational wealth, inhibiting the political power of corporations and other such measures that do not explicitly target one class or another.

Lula, as an opposite, is a populist in that his political stance is very much one of "us" vs "them". The main difference being that inequality is absurdly out of control in South America (and I guess the Americas in general, with the exception of Canada), so making it about economic class warfare is more of a winning strategy than in most of Europe, where decades of social democracy have somewhat limited the increase in inequality. The other difference is that for some reason the disgruntled middle class like to kick down instead of up, blaming poor immigrants for the problems rather than those in power. Which means that the mantle of the disenfranchised populares has been picked up by the far right rather than the (far) left.


These things kind of do and are meant to target particular classes though, like noone who lives around the poverty line is going to have the stuff they leave their kids taxed. Thats an example of something exclusively aimed at the upper classes. Corporate power too, the people with corporate power are not the middle or lower classes, they're basically exclusively the upper class.

Incremental change is the Democrat version of Trickle Down economics.
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain17976 Posts
April 11 2022 17:23 GMT
#27216
On April 12 2022 00:08 Zambrah wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 11 2022 23:01 Acrofales wrote:
On April 11 2022 06:52 Nebuchad wrote:
On April 11 2022 06:47 Acrofales wrote:
On April 11 2022 05:18 Nebuchad wrote:
Populism is obviously very good. Elites are engaged in a fight against us, it is good and logical that we fight back. The issue with the far right is of course that they don't hold any populist beliefs. They don't object to the elites because of any kind of class war, they object to the elites because those elites implement a liberal society, and they would rather have elites that implement a "conservative" (fascistic) society.

For the average voter who gets convinced by this, I assume some of them don't understand that they are being lied to about the populism. But mostly conservatives aren't humanists, they just care about themselves, and they correctly deduce that in a society where other people are put down because of identity, they are better off. And they just want to be better off, so they want that.

On April 11 2022 04:45 Sent. wrote:
Moderate government trying to raise the retirement age to 67 aand maybe people being bored of having the same government for 8 years.


Why didn't the far right win at that point?

Real populists don't exist in modern European politics. You'd need to look to South America to see populists (Lula is a very obvious populist). In Europe we basically mean demagogue when we say populist, and those "populist" parties on the far right are rife with demagoguery. That said, Melenchon isn't a populist either. He is a socialist.

I don't see populism as obviously very good. Mob rule is "populism", and it's definitely not good. Moreover, populist platforms tend to be an incoherent mess, because there's no clear ideology. That makes them completely unpredictable when a new situation arises while in power.


Would you say that someone can be a socialist without being a populist? I don't really see how that would work.

But yes I agree with the rest of the facts you presented. We're not doing too well in Europe or in the US and that's a shame, and populism and demagoguery are used interchangeably, which they shouldn't be.

I don't really see the dichotomy, because I don't think socialists have to necessarily overthrow the "elite" in a glorious revolution. I guess if your idea of socialism is that only anarcho-communism really ticks all the boxes, then yes, it is necessarily populist. I don't think Melenchon thinks that, and I don't think Melenchon is a populist. I do think Melenchon is a socialist (on the scale from 0 to anarcho-communism, he's a democratic socialist). The difference is that he favors progressive taxes, blocking the transfer of generational wealth, inhibiting the political power of corporations and other such measures that do not explicitly target one class or another.

Lula, as an opposite, is a populist in that his political stance is very much one of "us" vs "them". The main difference being that inequality is absurdly out of control in South America (and I guess the Americas in general, with the exception of Canada), so making it about economic class warfare is more of a winning strategy than in most of Europe, where decades of social democracy have somewhat limited the increase in inequality. The other difference is that for some reason the disgruntled middle class like to kick down instead of up, blaming poor immigrants for the problems rather than those in power. Which means that the mantle of the disenfranchised populares has been picked up by the far right rather than the (far) left.


These things kind of do and are meant to target particular classes though, like noone who lives around the poverty line is going to have the stuff they leave their kids taxed. Thats an example of something exclusively aimed at the upper classes. Corporate power too, the people with corporate power are not the middle or lower classes, they're basically exclusively the upper class.


There's still a categorical difference between advocating a policy for everyone that affects some people more than others (which is pretty much always the case for any policy) vs advocating nationalising the means of production (a fairly recent example would be Evo Morales (re)nationalization of quite a lot of industries, most famously the hydrocarbon industry: https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/opendemocracyuk/lessons-from-bolivia-renationalising-hydrocarbon-indust/)

Insofar as I know Iberdrola, Petrobras and other foreign companies are still fighting in court, but got nothing in return for the nationalization. This is probably only fair, as Bolivia got next to nothing for the denationalization (some select Bolivians got very very rich tho), but it's a very different type of policy.
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12161 Posts
April 11 2022 17:54 GMT
#27217
I think your definition of fighting the elites is a bit narrow, you can be doing things that hurt them before you're in full blown revolutionary mode. Efforts to unionize are already populist; they knew they were engaging in a fight against us when they broke those unions, those who claim them back ought to recognize the same reality.
No will to live, no wish to die
JimmiC
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada22817 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-04-11 18:04:03
April 11 2022 17:59 GMT
#27218
--- Nuked ---
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12161 Posts
April 11 2022 18:39 GMT
#27219
Maybe you should create a China thread for those kinds of posts Jimmi.
No will to live, no wish to die
Dangermousecatdog
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom7084 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-04-11 18:50:47
April 11 2022 18:48 GMT
#27220
So again I will ask, can you vote in the French election Nebuchad?
Are you, or are you not, voting for Le Pen? If not, who and why?

Also...imagine describing France as a neoliberal system. At that point the word has no meaning, much like how some people throw "you all on the left" around. It's no longer a descriptor of a set of policies, but a tribal rallying call and identity against an "other". How would you define neoliberalism?
Prev 1 1359 1360 1361 1362 1363 1413 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 50m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 243
mcanning 93
StarCraft: Brood War
Zeus 1208
Noble 22
yabsab 10
PianO 0
Dota 2
ODPixel433
NeuroSwarm77
canceldota64
League of Legends
JimRising 721
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1127
shoxiejesuss123
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King124
Other Games
summit1g12620
WinterStarcraft333
SortOf52
Trikslyr35
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick3204
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH393
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota283
League of Legends
• Rush2292
• Lourlo1397
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
2h 50m
WardiTV European League
8h 50m
ShoWTimE vs sebesdes
Percival vs NightPhoenix
Shameless vs Nicoract
Krystianer vs Scarlett
ByuN vs uThermal
Harstem vs HeRoMaRinE
PiGosaur Monday
16h 50m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 8h
Replay Cast
1d 16h
The PondCast
2 days
WardiTV European League
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
Epic.LAN
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
[ Show More ]
Epic.LAN
4 days
CSO Contender
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Online Event
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Liquipedia Results

Completed

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Championship of Russia 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters

Upcoming

CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
K-Championship
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.