Totalbiscuit on IdrA's casting - Page 3
Forum Index > SC2 General |
Uquu
Finland474 Posts
| ||
pachi
Melbourne5338 Posts
| ||
1800STFU
158 Posts
| ||
Weirdkid
Singapore2431 Posts
| ||
NoScary
United States151 Posts
| ||
nihlon
Sweden5581 Posts
| ||
Demand2k
Norway875 Posts
In this case it's sort of like a movie critic seeing a movie that is bad by professional standards, but everyone else loves. Who is right? I'd lean towards the people since that's whom the content is made for in the first place. | ||
Marl
United States692 Posts
| ||
Swineflew
United States61 Posts
On May 13 2011 16:15 Atlare wrote: Thank god somebody else in this thread who can read and not automatically assume TB is being an ass. I guess I should have picked out the 1..... "compliment" in the article and ignored the other 5 paragraphs as to why he is a bad caster, which I don't agree with, hence the post. If Husky is a good caster compared to IdrA, than I guess my view of a good caster is skewed and I'm in the minority. | ||
Iubaris
United States14 Posts
TB's main point is that when casters over-analyze at the expense of making the game seem exciting, you risk alienating that second audience. And while the people who frequent TL tend to be in the more analytical side of the audience, it doesn't mean that both aren't important. "Real" sports are enjoyed by people who both know the ins and outs and strategy of the sport and by those who just like to watch and cheer on their team. In the interests of growing SC2 as an e-sport, we should encourage both audiences, not sacrifice one in the interests of the other. Of course, if you don't care about SC2 as an e-sport, then you can ignore TB's post altogether. | ||
pbjsandwich
United States443 Posts
Idra is a player first and was asked to do these things. TB shouldn't be posting stuff like this when he's far from the best caster in the world you can't be a critic and a professional at the same time bud. and if you are you better be at the top | ||
FabledIntegral
United States9232 Posts
On May 13 2011 16:13 _Darwin_ wrote: IdrA isn't a caster. And I PREFER the "yeah it's gg" as opposed to "NOW I WONDER IF THE 7 SCV TERRAN CAN REPRODUCE FAST ENOUGH TO TAKE ON THE 200/200 TOSS." Agreed. I hate situations where say Terran is marching in with a button of marines/tanks, and the casters say something like "oh, well he just got off an AMAZING baneling bomb, wow this is exactly what he needed right now!" when he's on 1 base vs 4 base or some shit like that and it's obvious if the Terran army got wiped out completely with zero casualties from the Zerg, he'd still win. It just irks me the wrong way. | ||
Anzekay
Australia63 Posts
I'm very disapointed that someone felt the need to make such a misleading post when they clearly read between the lines and didn't properly understand what TB was saying, and even more disapointed that so many people jumped on the bandwagon to criticize TB over something he didn't even say. Regardless, I think he makes excellent points, and I will continue to enjoy Idra's commentating for precisely what it is. | ||
IronMonocle
Canada142 Posts
| ||
dizzy101
Netherlands2066 Posts
| ||
emythrel
United Kingdom2599 Posts
Idra is not a caster however, you wouldn't put him on a cast on his own..... you simply wouldn't. you can see how well Idra works as a colour guy when he was with iNc. iNc called the games while idra added knowledge and depth, not that iNc doesn't do that himself, but iNc is a very good play by play caster considering he is relatively new to the job. | ||
Deleted User 123474
292 Posts
It is best for me, as a master's player, to have a commentator who understands the game, tells me what's happening, is on occasion funny, and --most importantly-- doesn't get on my nerves (read: who isn't Husky). I can't fault IdrA for not being as entertaining as iNcontroL or Artosis. A commentator who plays at a high level is an essential piece to good casting. In something like the NASL, I prefer as few Husky (for lack of different examples) types and as many iNcontroL or even Gretorp types as possible. From your post I gather that TB is an entertainment caster who values superficial, "whoa!" entertainment above all else, which I disagree with. For SC2 to be consistently enjoyable to watch it has to have that intellectual component emphasized. TL;DR: Tell me "ten minutes before the game ends" how it will end, please. If your analysis is good, I will be excessively entertained and impressed. | ||
ed21x
United States103 Posts
| ||
Nayl
Canada413 Posts
The korean casters for OSL/MSL/GSL all reflect what TB is saying. They usually don't (with exception of landslide losses) outright declare that this game is over, in a middle of a game. Their casters keep the tension up, while their commentators explain why player A has a huge lead over player B. | ||
diddLY
United States215 Posts
You are right for the wrong reasons TB. | ||
| ||