|
Hey, if i am not as active as usual. I was finishing up my documentary last night and by the time i finished i had to go to school for my appointment to use the lab where I can print the crap to tape.
I just woke up about 20mins ago. My cousin just said they are coming over and right now i am really dazed and have a headache.
So if you are wondering why i'm a bit less active that is why. Cause of some (fuck ups), i probably will even be a little less active but I'll try my best to stay active as much as i can. who knows i might get lucky.
|
Can anyone tell me a reason why we shouldn't just lynch QuickStriker?
|
On May 02 2009 09:10 Scamp wrote: Can anyone tell me a reason why we shouldn't just lynch QuickStriker?
At this point. I think maybe he might be mafia. Some deaths from some of the clues, were quick, the victims died before being able to react. Thus the name "Quickstriker"
Quickly thereafter truthbringer head rolled across the sidewalk. This might be connected to Quickstriker as well.
Note, Laxercannon died by having an arrow pierce his neck.
Blue arrow?
|
Judging from the previous clue of me, I suspect that clues are based on one thing and one thing only. They also are descriptive of that trait, which maybe part or all of one thing in the profile.
|
Yeah, but in Quickstriker's case he only has that CodeGease guy.
So either Bc would have to use something about CodeGeasse (sorry if i misspelled it)
or use Quickstriker's name. (if quickstriker is mafia)
|
I like to add, some of the clues seem to have facial expressions. Like on day 2 someone stopped and snickered.
Day 3. One of the killers had a wicked smile on their face.
|
I'd like to mention that the format of the Day post has changed. The previous two Day posts both had only two paragraphs in which multiple people were killed. Someone suggested that this might mean the first paragraph refers to one Mafia family and the second to the other. I thought this was a pretty good idea at the time, especially since it suggested both detectives died to the same information leak the first day.
In this Day post, though, the first and last paragraphs in Day Three show two people dying, while the others just mention one person dying. If we assume the posting format hasn't changed, then the only difference is that tonight, vigilantes and contract killers got to hit as well. So, the paragraphs in the middle, with only one person dying, could be referring to vigilante and CK hits. If that's true and BC is really writing his posts that way, then that lends further credence to Caller's claim that he did a vigi hit on Ace. Ace's death is in one of the isolated paragraphs. So, if we believe this hypothesis, that suggests he was killed by a vigilante or CK, at least.
Does this seem like it makes sense to anyone else? It was just something I noticed and thought of while trying to do clue analysis. There are so many people dying and so many clues, but all pretty vague. But I thought this was worth bringing up, if only so to hear what you guys think.
|
On May 02 2009 11:44 dreamflower wrote: I'd like to mention that the format of the Day post has changed. The previous two Day posts both had only two paragraphs in which multiple people were killed. Someone suggested that this might mean the first paragraph refers to one Mafia family and the second to the other. I thought this was a pretty good idea at the time, especially since it suggested both detectives died to the same information leak the first day.
In this Day post, though, the first and last paragraphs in Day Three show two people dying, while the others just mention one person dying. If we assume the posting format hasn't changed, then the only difference is that tonight, vigilantes and contract killers got to hit as well. So, the paragraphs in the middle, with only one person dying, could be referring to vigilante and CK hits. If that's true and BC is really writing his posts that way, then that lends further credence to Caller's claim that he did a vigi hit on Ace. Ace's death is in one of the isolated paragraphs. So, if we believe this hypothesis, that suggests he was killed by a vigilante or CK, at least.
Does this seem like it makes sense to anyone else? It was just something I noticed and thought of while trying to do clue analysis. There are so many people dying and so many clues, but all pretty vague. But I thought this was worth bringing up, if only so to hear what you guys think.
Come to think about it, I also thought it was sort of strange that there was 2 paragraphs of killing rather than one whole big paragraph. But then after I read your post and after I went back to check, your theory could make sense seeing how there were more than 2 paragraphs this time. I wouldn't be 100% yet on this idea but I do support that BC may have wrote the killings in this format and possibly you have unlock one of his ways...
I somehow finally realized this mafia game isn't based on who exactly killed this and that person but basically a game where the townies have to try to figure out the codes and hints laid out from the OP/host of the game and unlock them to know the true meanings and words behind what's written to go further to capture the enemies...
|
Also before people does start questioning me where the heck I was for the past week.... it's been a chaotic crazy week where apparently my oldest sister (who's married) just had her second baby on April 27, 2009 thus marking it the second nephew I have ever.... however..... to go into more details in regards of my laughable crazy family situation, I will put spoilers for those who don't really want to go ahead and read what I want to say briefly to explain further why I was delayed and didn't really became active in this game until just now...
+ Show Spoiler +Basically it's like this, last year at september, my sister and my brother-in-law (with their first nephew) were living seperately at their own place until they hit rock bottom and everything just went out wrong for them thus making them in a horrible bad finanical situation. As a result they have decided to move into my parents house (in which I live at my parents house seeing how I haven't graduated yet from college and I'm a poor college student... ) on last september after practically begging my parents that they'll stay for 3 years and then move out. [note: at this time, I was at Korea doing this teaching program for 6 months in which I got stuck in an isolated random countryside place where my kids I taught had cows, pigs and horses at home...] Then came february 2009, when i finally returned from Korea and my little adventures (in which included my awesome thread and visit to an actual SC proleague match where I met sAviOr face to face), I would be back home getting ready to transfer out of my university to a college here at home so I can commute only to see my sis and bro-in-law at home as well living a room next to mine.... Ok, maybe it won't be that bad.... only little I did find out the hard way, I realized that my freedom and all possible privacy would not happen like I did in Korea where I lived alone in my apartment. So exactly how did it ruin me to the point I can't log in to TL and my computer and do w/e I do anytime I want? Basically it's like this, imagine yourself being at your own room at 3 AM in the morning watching some shows on your computer only to have the other room being heard by bro-in-law and sister and then being reported to my parents saying I stayed up late to get in trouble. WTF? So yea, some privacy that is... If that isn't bad enough, I have this crazy 2 years old nephew who finally figured out how to open doors so that whenever I close my door, it's automatically opens.... so I evenutally broke down and went to Home Depot to buy myself a lock for my room (since it didn't had one before) and installed it myself only to have the spare key taken by my sister for security reasons... WTF? Then comes the TV... oh yes, I want to watch something like Colbert Report, CNN, news, comedy shows or anything and you have that same 2 years old nephew ruining my TV experience by not allowing me to watch TV and forcing me to watch their kiddy shows of Dora the Explorer and Sesame Street. Wow, so basically I can't even use the TV anymore in which is why I watch shows on my laptop in the AMs??? And when I tried to watch what I want, the nephew either hits me, cries and eventually leads to the part I get forced by my sister or him to watch what he wants... WTF? So finally comes the big day, my sister is having her second baby on the day I happened to be at home and imagine what happens when she's gone to the hospital... I'm stuck home all alone with this nephew of mine in which I had to take care of him the entire 2-3 days feeding him, changing diapers, make sure he doesn't fall off the stairs and etc.... wtf... Now that the new baby finally came to this household, I hear double the crying, double the annoyance, double the panic and etc.... god dammit.. I miss Korea now..
So if you actually did read my testimonty, I really hope you have at least some bit of you to understand what the heck I have to go through. I don't know what exactly I have to deserve this but basically this did sort of prevent me to do what exactly I want especially since I can't even stay up 4 AM like I used to anymore....
and also the fact that I am lazy at times and would rather play SC over Mafia or golf over Mafia...
|
You know what is fun?
VOTING. Do your civic obligation, VOTE
The ballots can be entered
here
|
nigga we have no damn clue who da fuk we gonna kill so shuv it u bl00dy mess
|
Why the fuck do we have a blog entry in the middle of our game of mafia?
Why the fuck is that blog entry the majority of the activity in the past ... like 3 hours?
Goddamit.
|
On May 02 2009 14:32 L wrote: Why the fuck do we have a blog entry in the middle of our game of mafia?
Why the fuck is that blog entry the majority of the activity in the past ... like 3 hours?
Goddamit.
i feel bad for insulting you before, so here's my apology:
Sint en Piet zaten te bedenken Wat ze Lucas "L" nu eens zouden schenken Sinterklaas is weer in 't land En dat verstevigt de vriendschapsband
Dit is 't cadeau dat precies bij je past Sint hoopt dat hij je daar blij mee verrast Sint staat bekend om z'n goede smaak En geschenken uitzoeken is z'n belangrijkste taak
Bij dit geschenk wil Sint nog even kwijt Dat je voortaan heel voorzichtig rijdt Ook al is de Sint heel erg oud Dit is een Mafia List voor een iemand met een hart van goud
Dit gedicht is bijna uit Als dichter verschoot ik bijna al m'n kruit Dit is het cadeau waar je op zat te wachten Pak 't maar uit dan hoef je niet langer te smachten
|
Showtime! and laxercannon headed for the gunshots, hoping to be able to save whomever they could. As they ran, they saw a man hiccupping and swaying moving towards them. Showtime moved to see if he was ok, and moved his hands to steady him, the next thing Showtime! knew, he had a knife stuck in his chest. Laxercannon turned, and drawing a knife of his own he moved to attack the man, only to stop dead, as an arrow pierced his neck. As laxercannon fell, he saw a man stepping out of a nearby alley. The man is DRUNK. I ask the real townies to vote lynch lordweird. Note that his profile can be linked to other clues like day 2 the guy that does something in the eyes of his victim and others. I ask to skip lynching qatol for now. The reason is quite simple: he is quite likely to be mafia but IF there are two mafias in the game his 3 votes can be useful for the town. If we lynch Qatol at this stage we lose that, also note how easily Qatol got his first votes to get lynched, and the profile from those players.
|
Meh, I've been so lazy about this game.
when I get the chance, I'm going to do some clue analysis and try to build on what we have. It's just so hard to get myself to do this knowing that last game, we didn't get a single mafia through clue analysis.
On May 01 2009 14:52 Incognito wrote: Goodies from a DT.
"only too see an uncomprehensable phrase before the tv exploded" IS a clue.
The "clumsiness" clue does not point to Qatol.
Enjoy. Did everyone miss this? The strongest link to Qatol isn't a clue towards him. Is the lynch based off vengence or just not caring? Is there actually anything to go on for this lynch?
|
4492 Posts
On May 02 2009 18:49 Vivi57 wrote:Meh, I've been so lazy about this game. when I get the chance, I'm going to do some clue analysis and try to build on what we have. It's just so hard to get myself to do this knowing that last game, we didn't get a single mafia through clue analysis. Show nested quote +On May 01 2009 14:52 Incognito wrote: Goodies from a DT.
"only too see an uncomprehensable phrase before the tv exploded" IS a clue.
The "clumsiness" clue does not point to Qatol.
Enjoy. Did everyone miss this? The strongest link to Qatol isn't a clue towards him. Is the lynch based off vengence or just not caring? Is there actually anything to go on for this lynch?
Shhh! You're next in line, wait your turn.
|
Thats a pretty sweet incomprehensible phrase you got there next to your name, Mynock...
|
not really incomprehensible; look at image properties, see it's called takkun, google takkun, problem solved.
but yes i see what you mean ^^
|
On May 02 2009 18:49 Vivi57 wrote:Meh, I've been so lazy about this game. when I get the chance, I'm going to do some clue analysis and try to build on what we have. It's just so hard to get myself to do this knowing that last game, we didn't get a single mafia through clue analysis. Show nested quote +On May 01 2009 14:52 Incognito wrote: Goodies from a DT.
"only too see an uncomprehensable phrase before the tv exploded" IS a clue.
The "clumsiness" clue does not point to Qatol.
Enjoy. Did everyone miss this? The strongest link to Qatol isn't a clue towards him. Is the lynch based off vengence or just not caring? Is there actually anything to go on for this lynch?
As far as I can tell, the lynch on me is based off of my contributions towards killing: 1. A townie who was hiding 2. A veteran who seemed to have a good read on one of the strongest players in the game 3. A player who was screaming to have me lynched and ignoring all explanations for why he might be wrong.
The other thing that people didn't like was me calling out JeeJee for acting out of character. He latched onto the clue you mentioned and has been accusing me with it. Do you even have a case against me without that clue JeeJee?
Personally, I think we should be lynching QuickStriker.
On May 02 2009 12:20 QuickStriker wrote: I somehow finally realized this mafia game isn't based on who exactly killed this and that person but basically a game where the townies have to try to figure out the codes and hints laid out from the OP/host of the game and unlock them to know the true meanings and words behind what's written to go further to capture the enemies... As far as I can tell, he's saying that BC is organizing his day posts and we should look at clue analysis. Then he goes off talking about his nephew. In other words, its a lot of words which barely contribute to the thread at all. Isn't that generally a mafia tactic? Appearing active by posting but not really contributing? I just don't understand why people aren't making a bigger deal of this...........
Since people will inevitably question why I have been gone since before the day post, I got laid off yesterday and mafia was not a priority.
|
Malongo, what do you think makes LordWeird a stronger candidate than QuickStriker? We have clue and behavioral connections to both. Could you please explain to me why you prefer LordWeird? I'm perfectly willing to swap if someone gives me a reason to. I just don't see why LordWeird is the preferred lynch.
|
|
|
|