|
On February 10 2017 02:29 Tumblewood wrote: lookin at this there are only 5 players in this game trying to convince anyone of anything. ec particularly pisses me off though for how much analysis he has despite that If you could turn 5 into 6, I would be most grateful.
|
On February 09 2017 23:50 Silverika wrote:Show nested quote +On February 09 2017 23:38 Grackaroni wrote: You shifted your read on sharkie while saying you can't understand how I could have done that. We explained all our reads and how we got there in detail in all our posts.If you need clarification, let us know. I'm talking about all your reads and the unclear progression that is bugging us about you. Not just sharkie. I know I've explained it to death it seems. Any questions, ask. I don't want to keep repeating myself if people don't first read our posts. Also, for the second time, did you read our scum games? ~SW I looked through your filter. You aren't doing your own thing. When everyone disliked sharkie you shat on sharkie using Vivax's reasoning. When everyone dislikes me you shit on me using Artanis'.
You can't even seem to connect why it might be strange for you to flip your read on sharkie based on his recent play while calling me scum for having town read him
I won't be approving a mission with you on it.
|
And no I didn't read your scum games.
|
grack is scum, 100%
He's not checking the scum games even though he was the one who asked for them, he's doing nothing to try to sort us, he's doing nothing to really solve the game at this point. I'm willing to bet money he didn't read any of our latest posting because if he did, he would of know that the sharkie read isn't the only issue we had and we explained in detail all the issues we had which he has decided to ignore. His only response is to selectively quote and mudsling. So yeah, this is a caught spy response. I will never approve a mission he's on.
Despite the dust up sharkie still town-I think he just really wanted us to understand him which if he's townreading us is understandable, Vivax still town, Artani Soul still town.
I need to find 2 scum between EC, SL, TW, and Superbia. I'll filter dive them later. None of these will be easy to sort due to activity levels and low key posting but I'll give it a try later.
I need sleep first.
~SW
|
I think you also said something about me being scum for being open about how I was going to vote, which was actually another argument lifted from Artanis like one page back, which is pretty funny because it reinforces my point.
|
Like not reading the scum games was one thing ika and I were looking for because you asked for them. It was pointless busy work to make yourself look town.Then to say we aren't doing our own thing despite the massive amount of analysis we've put forth, then that means you just want us to be your scumread you have to have because we are pushing you the hardest and you have to have one on this mission. You flip your reads like the wind because they are fake.
~SW
|
silver, because you think grack is confscum does that make sharkie conftown for you?
|
On February 10 2017 03:41 Silverika wrote: Like not reading the scum games was one thing ika and I were looking for because you asked for them. It was pointless busy work to make yourself look town.Then to say we aren't doing our own thing despite the massive amount of analysis we've put forth, then that means you just want us to be your scumread you have to have because we are pushing you the hardest and you have to have one on this mission. You flip your reads like the wind because they are fake.
~SW What are you trying to say here?
|
Grack what are your spy team iterations atm?
Me/Swika/RtaniSoul?
|
On February 10 2017 03:46 Vivax wrote: Grack what are your spy team iterations atm?
Me/Swika/RtaniSoul? No.
|
On February 10 2017 03:37 Grackaroni wrote: I think you also said something about me being scum for being open about how I was going to vote, which was actually another argument lifted from Artanis like one page back, which is pretty funny because it reinforces my point.
More mudslinging from someone who isn't reading our posts and there was actually more to it than that but since you aren't reading us and don't care, I'm not gonna repeat myself.
~SW
|
On February 10 2017 03:46 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On February 10 2017 03:41 Silverika wrote: Like not reading the scum games was one thing ika and I were looking for because you asked for them. It was pointless busy work to make yourself look town.Then to say we aren't doing our own thing despite the massive amount of analysis we've put forth, then that means you just want us to be your scumread you have to have because we are pushing you the hardest and you have to have one on this mission. You flip your reads like the wind because they are fake.
~SW What are you trying to say here?
Reading is hard isn't it?
|
On February 10 2017 03:49 Silverika wrote:Show nested quote +On February 10 2017 03:37 Grackaroni wrote: I think you also said something about me being scum for being open about how I was going to vote, which was actually another argument lifted from Artanis like one page back, which is pretty funny because it reinforces my point. More mudslinging from someone who isn't reading our posts and there was actually more to it than that but since you aren't reading us and don't care, I'm not gonna repeat myself. ~SW I love how anything said against you is mudslinging, and everyone that ever scum reads you is scum in a plot to waver on your alignment because you've been selected for a mission.
I would really like to be you for a day.
|
All this bickering leads to nowhere need clear opinions, teams you would approve and who you think are spies.
Sharkie said he won't approve teams without grack himself and super, who coincidentially are also one of my possible spy teams.
What does Grack say? Will he also only approve teams with himself, sharkie and superbia?
|
Also, I know you aren't scum just from how angry you get at me calling you mafia.
It's just not a very fun way to play the game.
|
On February 10 2017 03:55 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On February 10 2017 03:49 Silverika wrote:On February 10 2017 03:37 Grackaroni wrote: I think you also said something about me being scum for being open about how I was going to vote, which was actually another argument lifted from Artanis like one page back, which is pretty funny because it reinforces my point. More mudslinging from someone who isn't reading our posts and there was actually more to it than that but since you aren't reading us and don't care, I'm not gonna repeat myself. ~SW I love how anything said against you is mudslinging, and everyone that ever scum reads you is scum in a plot to waver on your alignment because you've been selected for a mission. I would really like to be you for a day.
DONE
BYE
|
On February 10 2017 04:01 Vivax wrote: All this bickering leads to nowhere need clear opinions, teams you would approve and who you think are spies.
Sharkie said he won't approve teams without grack himself and super, who coincidentially are also one of my possible spy teams.
What does Grack say? Will he also only approve teams with himself, sharkie and superbia?
Sharkie/grack/super would mean none of ec/sl/tw is a spy... You'd practically have the worst resistance players ever, vivax.. Surely you cannot imagine that happening? I am not the only person, nor the first person who has found tons of bad play from them.
|
I should write a case study on "getting mad about miscommunications in mafia games". It would be amazing. A-mazing.
|
On February 10 2017 04:12 sharkie wrote:Show nested quote +On February 10 2017 04:01 Vivax wrote: All this bickering leads to nowhere need clear opinions, teams you would approve and who you think are spies.
Sharkie said he won't approve teams without grack himself and super, who coincidentially are also one of my possible spy teams.
What does Grack say? Will he also only approve teams with himself, sharkie and superbia? Sharkie/grack/super would mean none of ec/sl/tw is a spy... You'd practically have the worst resistance players ever, vivax.. Surely you cannot imagine that happening? I am not the only person, nor the first person who has found tons of bad play from them.
I don't think in good/bad, I think in resistance/not resistance, and know one of you or grack is scum for sure, maybe both. You should also think one of me/grack is spy for sure if you were resistance so why doesn't it feel like that in this post?
|
On February 10 2017 04:21 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On February 10 2017 04:12 sharkie wrote:On February 10 2017 04:01 Vivax wrote: All this bickering leads to nowhere need clear opinions, teams you would approve and who you think are spies.
Sharkie said he won't approve teams without grack himself and super, who coincidentially are also one of my possible spy teams.
What does Grack say? Will he also only approve teams with himself, sharkie and superbia? Sharkie/grack/super would mean none of ec/sl/tw is a spy... You'd practically have the worst resistance players ever, vivax.. Surely you cannot imagine that happening? I am not the only person, nor the first person who has found tons of bad play from them. I don't think in good/bad, I think in resistance/not resistance, and know one of you or grack is scum for sure, maybe both. You should also think one of me/grack is spy for sure if you were resistance so why doesn't it feel like that in this post?
What do you mean it doesn't feel like that in this post? I barely posted two sentences o.O
|
|
|
|