EPTI like the point Grack made that he came into the thread to crap all over me and didn't use it to scumread me.
Do you think that is not valid?
[T][M] Resistance VI - Page 15
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Vivax
21736 Posts
I like the point Grack made that he came into the thread to crap all over me and didn't use it to scumread me. Do you think that is not valid? | ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
Votes for: sharkie, Silverika. Votes against: Grackaroni, RtaniSoul, sicklucker, Superbia, Tumblewood, Vivax. Calix did not vote (counted as reject). Calix has been warned for not voting. Team Leader Tumblewood will now make Attempt #2 to nominate a team for Mission #1. The nomination will be locked Sunday, Jan 29 10:00pm GMT (GMT+00:00), in . | ||
|
sharkie
Austria18281 Posts
So why did so many people vote against the team? Especially artanis as he was the one who chose the team in the first place? o.o | ||
|
RtaniSoul
552 Posts
On January 29 2017 07:13 sharkie wrote: Ah so I see who voted what after all only the voting itself is hidden since we cannot simulate simultaneous voting ok! So why did so many people vote against the team? Especially artanis as he was the one who chose the team in the first place? o.o 24 hours between nominating a team and voting  We changed our minds. Not too certain on Superbia, and we're feeling pretty good on Tumble coming up next. We also thought the team wouldn't go through unless mafia would vote in favour of it. The votes actually make me feel better on Superbia and we may yay vote it next time. Tina's less certain on Superbia. | ||
|
RtaniSoul
552 Posts
| ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9832 Posts
| ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9832 Posts
| ||
|
sharkie
Austria18281 Posts
On January 29 2017 07:17 RtaniSoul wrote: Also, just curious, why did you refer to me as Artanis? someone called you that before so I thought that is your name? On January 29 2017 07:21 Grackaroni wrote: Sharkie are you going to vote up the next mission? Or did you just like the Artisoul/Ikawolf/Superbia team? what do you mean with vote up? I liked the team so thats why I approved it, I am not the next person to nominate a team! | ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9832 Posts
On January 29 2017 07:25 sharkie wrote: someone called you that before so I thought that is your name? what do you mean with vote up? I liked the team so thats why I approved it, I am not the next person to nominate a team! You were saying that you liked the team because it's pretty unlikely for the first team proposed to have a spy in it. Do you believe that those three people aren't spys from their posts? Or are you just taking your chances with any team based on probability? I'm trying to understand your thought process. | ||
|
sharkie
Austria18281 Posts
 Pretty please! | ||
|
RtaniSoul
552 Posts
On January 29 2017 07:31 sharkie wrote: Ah well kinda a mix of both. First team is full chance anyway and I feel pretty good with 6 good guys and only 3 spies. I am actually quite sad that this was not approved. Any chance TW is going to vote the same team again? Pretty please!Are you up for adoption? | ||
|
RtaniSoul
552 Posts
| ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9832 Posts
(5/8 * 4/7 * 3/6) or (5 choose 3 / 8 choose 3). | ||
|
RtaniSoul
552 Posts
| ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9832 Posts
| ||
|
RtaniSoul
552 Posts
i kinda like my demotivated spy team theory ^^ | ||
|
RtaniSoul
552 Posts
yup. last post of the sl, well before the nomination phase ended. though he must have at least been here sometime in the last 24 hours to reject the team...granted, our nomination was the post after this, but still | ||
|
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
On January 29 2017 07:46 RtaniSoul wrote: would be pretty sick if sick, super and calix were the spies Where is this even coming from btw? I don't follow your logic on me at all. | ||
|
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
On January 29 2017 06:24 Vivax wrote: I like the point Grack made that he came into the thread to crap all over me and didn't use it to scumread me. Do you think that is not valid? The post he made was so incredibly anti-town because of its inherent reactivity. Essentially, he is putting shade on me while essentially having no read on me and is in seemingly no progress of doing so. | ||
|
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
| ||
| ||
