Also, I feel the team was town due to the very high number of rejections. Scum will reject the team if it's all town and they will all vote for it if there is even one scum on it. The fact only two said yes tells me that was an all town team.

~SilverWolf77

Superbia

Netherlands8889 Posts

January 28 2017 23:46 GMT

#324

It sucks that we have to wait like 4 days and townies could get impatient but meh.

sharkie

Austria18636 Posts

January 28 2017 23:47 GMT

#325

How can anyone take cred for a successful team? That sounds so illogical for me...

Silverika

United States231 Posts

January 28 2017 23:47 GMT

#326

So I strongly advocate TW puts that whole first team on with him and if he doesn't he gives a DAMN GOOD reason not to.

~SilverWolf77

Superbia

Netherlands8889 Posts

January 28 2017 23:48 GMT

#327

On January 29 2017 08:46 Silverika wrote:
Also, I feel the team was town due to the very high number of rejections. Scum will reject the team if it's all town and they will all vote for it if there is even one scum on it. The fact only two said yes tells me that was an all town team.

~SilverWolf77

Votes at this point are stilll a bit too much WIFOM imo. It leans to the fact that it is the right team.

I just feel pretty good about who the scum are. You had a very similar list (I think pretty much the same).

Silverika

United States231 Posts

January 28 2017 23:48 GMT

#328

On January 29 2017 08:47 sharkie wrote:
How can anyone take cred for a successful team? That sounds so illogical for me...

No, you came into the thread agreeing without saying much else. It seems if you are gonna so strongly advocate for the team, you'd at least give reasons or at least do something to ascertain if you are right.

~SilverWolf77

Silverika

United States231 Posts

January 28 2017 23:49 GMT

#329

On January 29 2017 08:48 Superbia wrote:

Show nested quote +

TW, Calix, sharkie at this point. I'm willing to reconsider based on new evidence but that's where we are at as of right now.

~SilverWolf77

sharkie

Austria18636 Posts

January 28 2017 23:51 GMT

#330

On January 29 2017 08:47 Silverika wrote:
So I strongly advocate TW puts that whole first team on with him and if he doesn't he gives a DAMN GOOD reason not to.

~SilverWolf77

TW cant nominate 4 people

Superbia

Netherlands8889 Posts

January 28 2017 23:51 GMT

#331

On January 29 2017 08:47 sharkie wrote:
How can anyone take cred for a successful team? That sounds so illogical for me...

Can you go over why you have a town read on each of us? The ones you are fine with being on a team.

sharkie

Austria18636 Posts

January 28 2017 23:53 GMT

#332

If you tell me what town read is, maybe? I dont know what you mean with all the reading all the time

Superbia

Netherlands8889 Posts

January 28 2017 23:54 GMT

#333

On January 29 2017 08:53 sharkie wrote:
If you tell me what town read is, maybe? I dont know what you mean with all the reading all the time

Like why do you think this team is going to pass the mission succesfully?

Superbia

Netherlands8889 Posts

January 28 2017 23:54 GMT

#334

Successfully* so many mistakes this evening. z_z

Tumblewood

United States3709 Posts

January 29 2017 00:00 GMT

#335

currently I'm thinking vivax is town for being a shitter but if he drops off today he's probably scum b/c he always does that
I'm warming up to super for bein the in-charge, macho man guy so he is the third-man candidate. other than that I am considering everyone not named calix or sharkie
also super why did you vote no even though you said all three were town?

Superbia

Netherlands8889 Posts

January 29 2017 00:03 GMT

#336

On January 29 2017 09:00 Tumblewood wrote:
currently I'm thinking vivax is town for being a shitter but if he drops off today he's probably scum b/c he always does that
I'm warming up to super for bein the in-charge, macho man guy so he is the third-man candidate. other than that I am considering everyone not named calix or sharkie
also super why did you vote no even though you said all three were town?

I said so afterwards lolol. I was a little undecided on rtanisoul.

Grackaroni

United States9856 Posts

January 29 2017 00:06 GMT

#337

Why is everyone so anti-Calix?

I don't think her inactivity is alignment indicative. She didn't even make the vote.

Tumblewood

United States3709 Posts

January 29 2017 00:10 GMT

#338

hm actually now that I think about it super/calix/sharkie would be a likely team. with two scrub teammates maybe super thought the only way to win was to assert town leadership? I could be wrong on at least calix of those two, but it wouldn't make sense to have two teammates shit the bed and then go and do what, say, grack is doing. if we can say calix and sharkie are scum, grack is actually really town because his actions don't make any sense as scum

Tumblewood

United States3709 Posts

January 29 2017 00:11 GMT

#339

On January 29 2017 09:06 Grackaroni wrote:
Why is everyone so anti-Calix?

I don't think her inactivity is alignment indicative. She didn't even make the vote.

definitely anti-calix in the sense that I'm not putting someone who is null at best in a team that's supposed to be all town

Superbia

Netherlands8889 Posts

January 29 2017 00:12 GMT

#340

On January 29 2017 09:10 Tumblewood wrote:
hm actually now that I think about it super/calix/sharkie would be a likely team. with two scrub teammates maybe super thought the only way to win was to assert town leadership? I could be wrong on at least calix of those two, but it wouldn't make sense to have two teammates shit the bed and then go and do what, say, grack is doing. if we can say calix and sharkie are scum, grack is actually really town because his actions don't make any sense as scum

This feels pretty forced dude (also it makes 0% sense as both calix and sharkie replaced experienced players).