EPT
But let's see what he brings to the table.
[T][M] Resistance VI - Page 16
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
But let's see what he brings to the table. | ||
|
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
| ||
|
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
| ||
|
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
| ||
|
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
| ||
|
sharkie
Austria18332 Posts
On January 29 2017 08:16 Superbia wrote: I also heavily recommend voting against whatever TW comes up with. But let's see what he brings to the table. Maybe TW will vote the same team again | ||
|
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
On January 29 2017 06:24 Vivax wrote: I like the point Grack made that he came into the thread to crap all over me and didn't use it to scumread me. Do you think that is not valid? Also to answer your question: no. | ||
|
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
Sure. I'm all for that. If he comes up with a good reason to. | ||
|
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
To elaborate a little more, I really like my scumread on TW atm and also I think that specifically is NAI. | ||
|
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
Vote no. | ||
|
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
| ||
|
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
| ||
|
sharkie
Austria18332 Posts
| ||
|
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
| ||
|
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
On January 29 2017 08:30 sharkie wrote: Same team as before Can you elaborate on this a little? Who do you think are the 3 spies? | ||
|
Silverika
United States231 Posts
I will be rejecting Tumblewood on the team. I think they are scum casting shade on everyone with the stupid excuse of "well, I don't townread them" That is such a scummy load of BS. If Tumblewood puts the same team with himself, I might consider it because it will confirm him scum unless he passes to try to fool us but I feel like it will be sabotaged and with the first mission rejected, on top of a sabotage, I will be super annoyed. This isn't how my last game went but maybe you guys have a better way since scum won the one I played. I don't know but can someone explain how rejecting missions gets us anywhere? We can't lynch. We can keep people off missions. But we still need to have 3 successful ones. How is that gonna happen exactly? ~SilverWolf77 | ||
|
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
On January 29 2017 08:39 Silverika wrote: First of all, I'm pretty disappointed almost everyone rejected the mission if you guys thought it was all town. If you advocating rejecting the next one as well, we might as well hand it over to scum because after so many rejections, they win and we will just be sitting here chasing our tails with nothing to go on. Then I will feel like I completely wasted my damn time signing up for this. I mean WTF? Even two of the people on it and the team leader said no? Completely ridiculous. I will be rejecting Tumblewood on the team. I think they are scum casting shade on everyone with the stupid excuse of "well, I don't townread them" That is such a scummy load of BS. If Tumblewood puts the same team with himself, I might consider it because it will confirm him scum unless he passes to try to fool us but I feel like it will be sabotaged and with the first mission rejected, on top of a sabotage, I will be super annoyed. This isn't how my last game went but maybe you guys have a better way since scum won the one I played. I don't know but can someone explain how rejecting missions gets us anywhere? We can't lynch. We can keep people off missions. But we still need to have 3 successful ones. How is that gonna happen exactly? ~SilverWolf77 Let's play it safe and patiently. I want to know what people vote and think. I also just want to win with the third mission by getting a strong team of 4 town. The votes for this team look pretty okay in my book. Thing is, you are the 5th leader in the cycle. So if we think you're town, you can have the ultimate decision for the first mission. | ||
|
Silverika
United States231 Posts
On January 29 2017 08:17 Superbia wrote: Yeah I'm like 95% that team was all town. Yet you voted against it. Explain that logic to me. ~SilverWolf77 | ||
|
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
On January 29 2017 08:43 Silverika wrote: Yet you voted against it. Explain that logic to me. ~SilverWolf77 After the votes son. | ||
|
Silverika
United States231 Posts
On January 29 2017 08:19 Superbia wrote: Sharkie just seems like mafia agreeing with the team because its likely right and attempting to get get credits for that. Something like that. Could be completely wrong, but hey. :D I felt that the quick agreement on the team with no discussion was scum knowing it was town and wanting the cred from it. ~SilverWolf77 | ||
| ||
