[T][M] Resistance VI - Page 18

On January 29 2017 09:11 Tumblewood wrote:

definitely anti-calix in the sense that I'm not putting someone who is null at best in a team that's supposed to be all town

On January 29 2017 09:12 Superbia wrote:


This feels pretty forced dude (also it makes 0% sense as both calix and sharkie replaced experienced players).

On January 29 2017 09:22 Grackaroni wrote:

Sorry dude. You've been busted by your own signature.

+ Show Spoiler +

On January 29 2017 09:06 Grackaroni wrote:
Why is everyone so anti-Calix?

I don't think her inactivity is alignment indicative. She didn't even make the vote.

On January 29 2017 07:31 sharkie wrote:
Ah well kinda a mix of both. First team is full chance anyway and I feel pretty good with 6 good guys and only 3 spies. I am actually quite sad that this was not approved. Any chance TW is going to vote the same team again? Pretty please!

On January 29 2017 07:46 RtaniSoul wrote:
would be pretty sick if sick, super and calix were the spies

On January 29 2017 08:01 RtaniSoul wrote:


yup. last post of the sl, well before the nomination phase ended. though he must have at least been here sometime in the last 24 hours to reject the team...granted, our nomination was the post after this, but still

On January 29 2017 08:17 Superbia wrote:
Yeah I'm like 95% that team was all town.

On January 29 2017 08:19 Superbia wrote:
Sharkie just seems like mafia agreeing with the team because its likely right and attempting to get get credits for that. Something like that. Could be completely wrong, but hey. :D

On January 29 2017 08:39 Silverika wrote:
First of all, I'm pretty disappointed almost everyone rejected the mission if you guys thought it was all town. If you advocating rejecting the next one as well, we might as well hand it over to scum because after so many rejections, they win and we will just be sitting here chasing our tails with nothing to go on. Then I will feel like I completely wasted my damn time signing up for this. I mean WTF? Even two of the people on it and the team leader said no? Completely ridiculous.

I will be rejecting Tumblewood on the team. I think they are scum casting shade on everyone with the stupid excuse of "well, I don't townread them" That is such a scummy load of BS. If Tumblewood puts the same team with himself, I might consider it because it will confirm him scum unless he passes to try to fool us but I feel like it will be sabotaged and with the first mission rejected, on top of a sabotage, I will be super annoyed.

This isn't how my last game went but maybe you guys have a better way since scum won the one I played. I don't know but can someone explain how rejecting missions gets us anywhere? We can't lynch. We can keep people off missions. But we still need to have 3 successful ones. How is that gonna happen exactly?

~SilverWolf77

On January 27 2017 07:19 Silverika wrote:
Hi all!! Who has played before? I have one time online and the first mission passed. I'd like to go on the mission since we are members of the Resistance so I'm volunteering. Also, I'll sign my posts, ika42 likely will not. Any high level missions-ones with higher numbers of people that we aren't on will be rejected by us because if one Town voice isn't there, the chances of it being all Town is not high enough to take the risk.

~SilverWolf77

On January 29 2017 08:46 Silverika wrote:
Also, I feel the team was town due to the very high number of rejections. Scum will reject the team if it's all town and they will all vote for it if there is even one scum on it. The fact only two said yes tells me that was an all town team.

~SilverWolf77

On January 29 2017 13:27 sicklucker wrote:
Wait Silverika voted yes. the same person who reminded me its the optimal strategy to never vote yes on the first two votes. nice

On January 29 2017 13:32 sicklucker wrote:


ya sharkie could be mafia. is there a mafia qt in this game?

On January 29 2017 13:35 sicklucker wrote:


unless they know no ones going to vote. no one ever votes for the first mission its like free information to vote no on it

On January 29 2017 09:12 Superbia wrote:


This feels pretty forced dude (also it makes 0% sense as both calix and sharkie replaced experienced players).