|
On June 08 2016 00:43 emperorchampion wrote: Tumble went from "6/10 would lynch" to saying, actually maybe I won't, I think that's what I found most suspicious I see. Well questioning's over.
For now I'd like other players' thoughts about this and I encourage people to read emperorchampion's filter again. o/
|
|
Thanks for helping me fill out my filter as well! I feel like I've learned a lot from you and super
|
On June 07 2016 19:23 Superbia wrote: Who do you think is scum jelly? Seems like I need to see another day's votes and results to solidify my scum reads, but I feel like my town reads are becoming more solid because of a new approach I am using. However, given my superfail read Day 1, I would like to withhold reading anyone until Day 2 ends.
|
On June 07 2016 23:51 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On June 07 2016 23:32 Superbia wrote: I'll read skynx' post later. Moosy pls explain why jealous is so town for you beyond any doubt that you're so willing to hard defend him like this. He's not town beyond doubt. The biggest problem here is that you never showed you had a scum read on Jealous in the first place. Why the sudden flip? In my opinion he was trying to see my reaction, applying soft pressure that might make me seem scummy by being overly defensive or something along those lines? I was also a little confused when he said that.
|
Last few pages have been interesting, I'm liking the new Moosy a lot more, at least in terms of post quality and style.
|
Does everyone believe the mafia are just afk?
|
|
On June 08 2016 01:17 Jealous wrote:Seems like I need to see another day's votes and results to solidify my scum reads, but I feel like my town reads are becoming more solid because of a new approach I am using. However, given my superfail read Day 1, I would like to withhold reading anyone until Day 2 ends.
Why do you reach this conclusion now?
|
TT/FF, where you guys at.
|
And bddt/blkcoffee. I know one of you is getting replaced. What about the other?
|
On June 07 2016 23:20 Skynx wrote:Hmmmmmm I'm getting bandwagonned then ok lemme handle this. I'm gona start since QT lynch since I was away for the night. So up to 47, only clear push on me was from TT. Two other were like mayyyybe on lynching me: Moosy (cuz of qt case), FF (for same reason). Then just before lynch Tumble decides I'm the clear lynch target and tries to get others switch to me for shennanie, doesn't happen tho. Following that Super, btdt reads me mafia out of nowhere. Moosy somewhat mafia reads me but I can't make sense of that post anyway. Tumble gets nk. Moosy 100% sr's me but then is unsure again in same post. Then kush votes for me. You guys know what this looks like? + Show Spoiler +In order of appearance: On May 27 2016 05:25 Koshi wrote: No I am serious. Marv is mafia. Just read his filter. Look how much defense there is in it. Against Rels. Against sicklucker. He is always around for that. People notice it. But he just defends against it but there is never anything more.
JAT open eyes. marv is mafia.
Also being second on scumlynches as scum is his forte. On May 27 2016 07:03 raynpelikoneet wrote: Day 2
Koshi the VT is dead.
It is now Day 2. Day ends Saturday, May 28 10:00pm GMT (GMT+00:00). You have to place your votes.
On May 27 2016 07:03 marvellosity wrote: Great shot mafia, thank you On May 29 2016 07:03 raynpelikoneet wrote: Night 2
Marvellosity the 2-shot tracker was lynched.
Day 2 Final Votecount
marvellosity (8): Palmar, Damdred, justanothertownie, sicklucker, Vivax, Rels, LightningStrike, Damdred, Superbia Superbia (1): Tumblewood, sicklucker Vivax (1): marvellosity nnn_thekushmountains (0): Damdred Rels: (1) nnn_thekushmountains Damdred (0): nnn_thekushmountains, marvellosity
Not Voting (0):
It's now night 2.
Night ends Sunday, May 29 10:00pm GMT (GMT+00:00). You have to get in your actions.Moral of the story is I see lots of sr's on me while only TT (and maybe btdt) shows a reasoning behind it.
Okay? Who's the scum pushing on you?
What did the "strategical afk" mean?
|
On June 08 2016 01:42 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On June 08 2016 01:17 Jealous wrote:On June 07 2016 19:23 Superbia wrote: Who do you think is scum jelly? Seems like I need to see another day's votes and results to solidify my scum reads, but I feel like my town reads are becoming more solid because of a new approach I am using. However, given my superfail read Day 1, I would like to withhold reading anyone until Day 2 ends. Why do you reach this conclusion now? As I said it is a new approach I am using while looking at the data I've collected and I will know how reliable it is after a few more results are made apparent.
|
On June 08 2016 01:47 Jealous wrote:Show nested quote +On June 08 2016 01:42 Superbia wrote:On June 08 2016 01:17 Jealous wrote:On June 07 2016 19:23 Superbia wrote: Who do you think is scum jelly? Seems like I need to see another day's votes and results to solidify my scum reads, but I feel like my town reads are becoming more solid because of a new approach I am using. However, given my superfail read Day 1, I would like to withhold reading anyone until Day 2 ends. Why do you reach this conclusion now? As I said it is a new approach I am using while looking at the data I've collected and I will know how reliable it is after a few more results are made apparent.
You really need to reach conclusions dude. It's my main problem with you.
|
Like from my perspective you just made humongous posts about absolutely nothing. Especially the whole who reads what overview during the night.
|
Seems like you're contributing a shitload but in reality it really did nothing.
|
Also you didn't seem to care about being wrong whatsoever. Completely emotionless at EoD.
|
If you're town then very likely at least 1 mafia just piled onto your case on quicky. Who do you think that person is?
|
On June 08 2016 01:49 Superbia wrote: Also you didn't seem to care about being wrong whatsoever. Completely emotionless at EoD. The datadump wasn't just for my benefit, otherwise I wouldn't have posted it or made it presentable. I did that so that others could have a tool to use if they want to.
I was actually the only person to respond to, I believe Tictock and FecalFeast, who asked for an explanation on people's votes on QT. I posted my reasoning behind it. I don't see a point to being emotional about it, it was a Day 1 lynch and a bad misread and I'm a newbie. I did feel a slight apprehension at first after the flop because people might misread me as a result of it, but I figured come what may I will let my posts and reasoning speak for themselves. The way I see it, there is no reason to be emotional because I'm not scum and therefore I view it as a learning experience instead. This is part of the reason why I don't want to submit any reads right now and wait until more posts are made.
I took a very active role on Day 1, somewhat so on Night 1, and made a few mistakes, so I think it's time for me to say less and read more.
|
Aren't you annoyed that I called your huge post useless?
|
|
|
|