|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On January 20 2015 07:27 Wile E. Coyote wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2015 07:24 Holyflare wrote:On January 20 2015 02:10 Wile E. Coyote wrote:
##Vote Marvellosity On January 20 2015 02:15 Vivax wrote:On January 20 2015 02:13 Damdred wrote:
I really don't think that Marv cba as mafia three games in a row especially last game.
Part of the reason I see you doing this is to vet his alignment and see if he comes in marv!town. If he doesn't and cba we get a mafia if he does we at least have lowered the lynch pool.
And lynching marv is fun I like this reason. Wyle isn't up to date with recent events so he probably thinks we're just doing this for trolling. But just keep piling up the votes in my absence and see what happens. You join vivax's train onto marv. Damdred gives his reasons to be on it which vivax agrees with. You maintain your vote on marv. You know their wagon is to pressure marv too see if he does anything and if he does he's probably not mafia - or at least might not be. You know this because you are reading the game and commented on their follow up posts. Yet, later you continue to go onto damdred points with things like: On January 20 2015 06:13 Wile E. Coyote wrote:
Sounds to me like KelsierSC's point is that damdred sets himself up to townread Marv as soon as he starts yelling/being loud. you add to kelsier point, you don't particularly weigh in but this comment looks like an agreement/criticism. Yet, we're still on you voting for marv despite you seemingly agreeing with kelsier about damd. It's weird that you stay on the marv wagon and even point out the damdred thing but still stay on the wagon which was made specifically for the reason damd pointed out Did my vote on Marvellosity seem very serious to you? Maybe you should have added this post to your little collection: Show nested quote +On January 20 2015 02:13 Wile E. Coyote wrote:On January 20 2015 02:11 Vivax wrote:
Time for some looking around all of this: Why do you think I'm trying to start t´his wagon?
@ wyle and Damdred I don't really care all that much.
So then why are you still voting for him with the person you're arguably most against?
|
On January 20 2015 07:33 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2015 07:27 Wile E. Coyote wrote:On January 20 2015 07:24 Holyflare wrote:On January 20 2015 02:10 Wile E. Coyote wrote:
##Vote Marvellosity On January 20 2015 02:15 Vivax wrote:On January 20 2015 02:13 Damdred wrote:
I really don't think that Marv cba as mafia three games in a row especially last game.
Part of the reason I see you doing this is to vet his alignment and see if he comes in marv!town. If he doesn't and cba we get a mafia if he does we at least have lowered the lynch pool.
And lynching marv is fun I like this reason. Wyle isn't up to date with recent events so he probably thinks we're just doing this for trolling. But just keep piling up the votes in my absence and see what happens. You join vivax's train onto marv. Damdred gives his reasons to be on it which vivax agrees with. You maintain your vote on marv. You know their wagon is to pressure marv too see if he does anything and if he does he's probably not mafia - or at least might not be. You know this because you are reading the game and commented on their follow up posts. Yet, later you continue to go onto damdred points with things like: On January 20 2015 06:13 Wile E. Coyote wrote:
Sounds to me like KelsierSC's point is that damdred sets himself up to townread Marv as soon as he starts yelling/being loud. you add to kelsier point, you don't particularly weigh in but this comment looks like an agreement/criticism. Yet, we're still on you voting for marv despite you seemingly agreeing with kelsier about damd. It's weird that you stay on the marv wagon and even point out the damdred thing but still stay on the wagon which was made specifically for the reason damd pointed out Did my vote on Marvellosity seem very serious to you? Maybe you should have added this post to your little collection: On January 20 2015 02:13 Wile E. Coyote wrote:On January 20 2015 02:11 Vivax wrote:
Time for some looking around all of this: Why do you think I'm trying to start t´his wagon?
@ wyle and Damdred I don't really care all that much. So then why are you still voting for him with the person you're arguably most against?
Why are you constantly overinterpreting the things I say? You are scraping the bottom of the barrel friend.
|
And why is it a problem that I am voting Marv together with Damdred if you said yourself that his scumbuddies would probably bus him?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Look, you've done literally nothing. Most people have done nothing. You do something that's inconsistent with the miniscule amount of nothingness that is provided and I'm going to push it until you come up with a coherent reason why you're doing your inconsistency and then I can move onto the next person who is being quite clearly obnoxious for no apparent reason.
I want your thoughts on damdred that don't involve his post on oats that he hasn't explained yet. All I've seen is you agreeing that he wants to give an easy reason to town read marv later but fail to acknowledge the fact that that was what the wagon was about in the first place and instead ignore everything kelsier is pushing about it to have some kind of quarrel with me instead of just being transparent.
|
On January 20 2015 07:43 Holyflare wrote:
Look, you've done literally nothing. Most people have done nothing. You do something that's inconsistent with the miniscule amount of nothingness that is provided and I'm going to push it until you come up with a coherent reason why you're doing your inconsistency and then I can move onto the next person who is being quite clearly obnoxious for no apparent reason.
I want your thoughts on damdred that don't involve his post on oats that he hasn't explained yet. All I've seen is you agreeing that he wants to give an easy reason to town read marv later but fail to acknowledge the fact that that was what the wagon was about in the first place and instead ignore everything kelsier is pushing about it to have some kind of quarrel with me instead of just being transparent.
There is no inconsistency. I agreed with the first argument Kelsier raised about Damdred. Later I clarified what he meant in one of his other posts because someone (you?) did not understand it. I did not say if I agree with it and to be frank I don't even know if I do.
You want my thoughts on Damdred? He barely did anything. He weirdly jumped on oats when he was brought up and that's about it.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
I'll make it really simple for you because I can sense some sarcastic drivel being posted next.
1. Do you town/scum/null/null-townscum read damdred?
2. Do you think his push on marv is scummy because he's giving him an out?
a) If so, why aren't you talking about vivax?
b) Do you know marv's meta? What is there to disagree about in damdred's points?
3. Why are you being so obnoxious? In the first place you say that your vote on marv was a joke, yet in the second instance you say it shouldn't matter if your vote is on him if his team mates are bussing him. This implies that marv IS mafia when he hasn't even posted anything yet?
Number 3 is very important because if your vote was simply a joke vote and you agreed that damd is giving marv an out if he just puts in work then you are saying that damd is scummy and giving a provision for marv to be town because a town marv would step up but yet you're still voting for marv and not damd.
|
so yea I think kelsier is mafia any opinions on that guys
|
On January 20 2015 07:52 VayneAuthority wrote:
so yea I think kelsier is mafia any opinions on that guys
because of anything I said or other stuff? Want to vote him with me?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On January 20 2015 07:52 VayneAuthority wrote:
so yea I think kelsier is mafia any opinions on that guys
thinking the opposite at the moment but the day is young, not really seen him make a push on people like that in my 1 mafia games of experience with him even if I disagree with it
|
On January 20 2015 07:51 Holyflare wrote:
I'll make it really simple for you because I can sense some sarcastic drivel being posted next.
1. Do you town/scum/null/null-townscum read damdred?
2. Do you think his push on marv is scummy because he's giving him an out?
a) If so, why aren't you talking about vivax?
b) Do you know marv's meta? What is there to disagree about in damdred's points?
3. Why are you being so obnoxious? In the first place you say that your vote on marv was a joke, yet in the second instance you say it shouldn't matter if your vote is on him if his team mates are bussing him. This implies that marv IS mafia when he hasn't even posted anything yet?
Number 3 is very important because if your vote was simply a joke vote and you agreed that damd is giving marv an out if he just puts in work then you are saying that damd is scummy and giving a provision for marv to be town because a town marv would step up but yet you're still voting for marv and not damd.
1. I don't have a read on any player at this point.
2. His push on marv is not alignment indicative. I am familiar with marv's meta.
3. You are the one being obnoxious towards me. I am asking you why it matters because you are implying that I shouldn't be voting marv for the mentioned reason when earlier you said marv would be bussed. This question is not about them or me but about you because what you are saying makes no sense.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On January 20 2015 07:58 Wile E. Coyote wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2015 07:51 Holyflare wrote:
I'll make it really simple for you because I can sense some sarcastic drivel being posted next.
1. Do you town/scum/null/null-townscum read damdred?
2. Do you think his push on marv is scummy because he's giving him an out?
a) If so, why aren't you talking about vivax?
b) Do you know marv's meta? What is there to disagree about in damdred's points?
3. Why are you being so obnoxious? In the first place you say that your vote on marv was a joke, yet in the second instance you say it shouldn't matter if your vote is on him if his team mates are bussing him. This implies that marv IS mafia when he hasn't even posted anything yet?
Number 3 is very important because if your vote was simply a joke vote and you agreed that damd is giving marv an out if he just puts in work then you are saying that damd is scummy and giving a provision for marv to be town because a town marv would step up but yet you're still voting for marv and not damd. 1. I don't have a read on any player at this point. 2. His push on marv is not alignment indicative. I am familiar with marv's meta. 3. You are the one being obnoxious towards me. I am asking you why it matters because you are implying that I shouldn't be voting marv for the mentioned reason when earlier you said marv would be bussed. This question is not about them or me but about you because what you are saying makes no sense.
You were pointing out things that make damdred look scummy. You were voting marv for a joke. You then pointed out things that make damdred's vote and talk about marv seem like it was easy to town read marv because he knows it's a town marv. You then say marv can be bussed and that's why your vote was still on him (even though it was a joke)? wut? by everything you were talking about and pointing out it looks like you would be thinking marv was town and damd mafia but maintained your vote on marv for no reason.
^ that's where the disconnect is happening. So, whatever, I'll leave you alone since you've explained your stuff.
|
I'm here to clear things up.
I meant to vote marv before I left but voting on a phone is really painful at points.
I missed oats post, while I was rereading.
Willie is being a bit dodgy here.
|
On January 20 2015 08:03 Damdred wrote:
I'm here to clear things up.
I meant to vote marv before I left but voting on a phone is really painful at points.
I missed oats post, while I was rereading.
Willie is being a bit dodgy here.
Is KSC misrepresenting you? Who's early vote was the best yours, vivax, or HF?
|
I think ksc is misrepresenting what was happening during the early portion of the day.
Out of all three I think HF vote is the best, and it sparked discussion rather than afk on marv till he showed up
|
On January 20 2015 07:55 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2015 07:52 VayneAuthority wrote:
so yea I think kelsier is mafia any opinions on that guys because of anything I said or other stuff? Want to vote him with me?
uh yea that post is one reason. that seems really really forced, like i cant even begin to fathom a town person ever making that post it just makes no sense. His filter reads like the script for a new simpsons episode.
On January 20 2015 05:25 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2015 05:24 Damdred wrote:
Never to early, and what oats did is pretty crappy in retrospect. why didn't you comment on it being crappy earlier? especially when he calls you out specifically?
lel who cares
rest is mainly filler/unimportant but you can look through it yourselves if you want. idk maybe he's an awkward fellow its early to classify anyone as scum but just throwin it out there
|
On January 20 2015 08:02 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2015 07:58 Wile E. Coyote wrote:On January 20 2015 07:51 Holyflare wrote:
I'll make it really simple for you because I can sense some sarcastic drivel being posted next.
1. Do you town/scum/null/null-townscum read damdred?
2. Do you think his push on marv is scummy because he's giving him an out?
a) If so, why aren't you talking about vivax?
b) Do you know marv's meta? What is there to disagree about in damdred's points?
3. Why are you being so obnoxious? In the first place you say that your vote on marv was a joke, yet in the second instance you say it shouldn't matter if your vote is on him if his team mates are bussing him. This implies that marv IS mafia when he hasn't even posted anything yet?
Number 3 is very important because if your vote was simply a joke vote and you agreed that damd is giving marv an out if he just puts in work then you are saying that damd is scummy and giving a provision for marv to be town because a town marv would step up but yet you're still voting for marv and not damd. 1. I don't have a read on any player at this point. 2. His push on marv is not alignment indicative. I am familiar with marv's meta. 3. You are the one being obnoxious towards me. I am asking you why it matters because you are implying that I shouldn't be voting marv for the mentioned reason when earlier you said marv would be bussed. This question is not about them or me but about you because what you are saying makes no sense. You were pointing out things that make damdred look scummy. You were voting marv for a joke. You then pointed out things that make damdred's vote and talk about marv seem like it was easy to town read marv because he knows it's a town marv. You then say marv can be bussed and that's why your vote was still on him (even though it was a joke)? wut? by everything you were talking about and pointing out it looks like you would be thinking marv was town and damd mafia but maintained your vote on marv for no reason. ^ that's where the disconnect is happening. So, whatever, I'll leave you alone since you've explained your stuff.
You are still putting words into my mouth. I will show you the timeline once last time:
I voted Marvellosity. It was not a very serious vote which should be really really obvious if you read the thread.
I pointed out something that makes damdred look scummy or rather I agreed with Kelsier about his point. -> the oats thing
I told you the meaning of a different post by Kelsier which you did not seem to understand. Without giving any opinion on it.
You attacked me for my vote since Damdred is voting for the same player after saying earlier that scum would probably bus marv. So why would you have a problem with my vote if you actually believed that I was serious about my vote and also strongly scumreading Damdred?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On January 20 2015 08:11 Wile E. Coyote wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2015 08:02 Holyflare wrote:On January 20 2015 07:58 Wile E. Coyote wrote:On January 20 2015 07:51 Holyflare wrote:
I'll make it really simple for you because I can sense some sarcastic drivel being posted next.
1. Do you town/scum/null/null-townscum read damdred?
2. Do you think his push on marv is scummy because he's giving him an out?
a) If so, why aren't you talking about vivax?
b) Do you know marv's meta? What is there to disagree about in damdred's points?
3. Why are you being so obnoxious? In the first place you say that your vote on marv was a joke, yet in the second instance you say it shouldn't matter if your vote is on him if his team mates are bussing him. This implies that marv IS mafia when he hasn't even posted anything yet?
Number 3 is very important because if your vote was simply a joke vote and you agreed that damd is giving marv an out if he just puts in work then you are saying that damd is scummy and giving a provision for marv to be town because a town marv would step up but yet you're still voting for marv and not damd. 1. I don't have a read on any player at this point. 2. His push on marv is not alignment indicative. I am familiar with marv's meta. 3. You are the one being obnoxious towards me. I am asking you why it matters because you are implying that I shouldn't be voting marv for the mentioned reason when earlier you said marv would be bussed. This question is not about them or me but about you because what you are saying makes no sense. You were pointing out things that make damdred look scummy. You were voting marv for a joke. You then pointed out things that make damdred's vote and talk about marv seem like it was easy to town read marv because he knows it's a town marv. You then say marv can be bussed and that's why your vote was still on him (even though it was a joke)? wut? by everything you were talking about and pointing out it looks like you would be thinking marv was town and damd mafia but maintained your vote on marv for no reason. ^ that's where the disconnect is happening. So, whatever, I'll leave you alone since you've explained your stuff. You are still putting words into my mouth. I will show you the timeline once last time: I voted Marvellosity. It was not a very serious vote which should be really really obvious if you read the thread. I pointed out something that makes damdred look scummy or rather I agreed with Kelsier about his point. -> the oats thing I told you the meaning of a different post by Kelsier which you did not seem to understand. Without giving any opinion on it. You attacked me for my vote since Damdred is voting for the same player after saying earlier that scum would probably bus marv. So why would you have a problem with my vote if you actually believed that I was serious about my vote and also strongly scumreading Damdred?
I was just telling you what I saw and how I interpreted it. Drop it since you've already explained yourself. The problem is because if you were serious about the marv vote the point about damdred didn't make sense. (which you've already said wasn't a point you were agreeing with hence it's now irrelevant)
|
Stop making me wake up early with these deadlines...
|
Obligatory sl vote is in order
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
Dam why didn't you respond earlier to oats when he called your read bad , why didn't you say anything about him until hf brought it up?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
