EPTIll look when I'm not on my phone.
[I][T][M] Vengeful Mini Mafia! - Page 5
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
Ill look when I'm not on my phone. | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On February 04 2014 08:23 marvellosity wrote: Given this is a vengeful game, this is probably the stupidest thing you could possibly have written. Every single person that gets lynched can shoot me if they so please. Oh marvy. Y so srs | ||
|
iamperfection
United States9634 Posts
On February 04 2014 08:23 marvellosity wrote: iamp, you're with me for now. Way to early to be suggesting mind meld. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On February 04 2014 08:21 iamperfection wrote: Are you being serious holy? of course not | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
The rest of you are boring. | ||
|
iamperfection
United States9634 Posts
| ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12968 Posts
On February 04 2014 08:26 iamperfection wrote: Hrm wave are you being serious? Was wondering the same thing. Accuses marv of taking a joke too seriously right before taking a joke too seriously himself. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On February 04 2014 08:23 WaveofShadow wrote: Also I'd be totally in favour of lynching scumclainers. There does seem to be some truth to holy's 'case,k though the only examle I can think of was ## maybe? Ill look when I'm not on my phone. I don't get it? There's some truth to my case but you can only think of 1 example? Those 2 things are contradicting statements. | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On February 04 2014 08:26 iamperfection wrote: Hrm wave are you being serious? Bout marv, no. Bout holy/artanis, yes. Gimme a while and ill find examples. It always seemed to me to be more likely to joke about being scum AS scum because it would be seen at endgame to be ballsy as hell even though nobody ever takes it to be alignment indicative. | ||
|
iamperfection
United States9634 Posts
On February 04 2014 08:27 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Was wondering the same thing. Accuses marv of taking a joke too seriously right before taking a joke too seriously himself. He could be scum misreading the thread thinking the stuff on you was somewhat legitimate and trying to position for later. | ||
|
iamperfection
United States9634 Posts
On February 04 2014 08:30 WaveofShadow wrote: Bout marv, no. Bout holy/artanis, yes. Gimme a while and ill find examples. It always seemed to me to be more likely to joke about being scum AS scum because it would be seen at endgame to be ballsy as hell even though nobody ever takes it to be alignment indicative. It gives me pause because it is so different than what I'm thinking. | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On February 04 2014 08:30 iamperfection wrote: He could be scum misreading the thread thinking the stuff on you was somewhat legitimate and trying to position for later. LOL Oh please. Nobody but me would ever take that angle seriously. | ||
|
iamperfection
United States9634 Posts
| ||
|
iamperfection
United States9634 Posts
On February 04 2014 08:32 WaveofShadow wrote: LOL Oh please. Nobody but me would ever take that angle seriously. Well we will see what you do when at computer. Brb dinner | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12968 Posts
On February 04 2014 08:33 iamperfection wrote: Wait lynched people don't flip that seems backwards Yeah. My idea was that we should lynch the person we think is the second likeliest to be scum and tell him to shoot the person we think is likeliest to be scum. If he doesn't agree then he's claiming scum. Problem with this is that part of the fun in this game is to shoot who you want to shoot and I'm not prepared to sacrifice that so I'm kinda against my own plan. Bit of an objectively best plan vs most fun kinda deal. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On February 04 2014 08:33 iamperfection wrote: Wait lynched people don't flip that seems backwards it's not, however, there are a few simple solutions to this that we can do! 1. Whoever we lynch we tell them who to shoot. That way if the person follows with our consensus then they are most likely town. If they don't then you can most likely attribute the shot to scum. This option allows a scum to hide by shooting a towny though. 2.We lynch our 2nd top scum suspect and then get him to shoot our first top scum suspect thus revealing a flip on our intended target. I'm sure there are other ways just those are the 2 we have tended to use on voice | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12968 Posts
On February 04 2014 08:36 Holyflare wrote: it's not, however, there are a few simple solutions to this that we can do! 1. Whoever we lynch we tell them who to shoot. That way if the person follows with our consensus then they are most likely town. If they don't then you can most likely attribute the shot to scum. This option allows a scum to hide by shooting a towny though. 2.We lynch our 2nd top scum suspect and then get him to shoot our first top scum suspect thus revealing a flip on our intended target. I'm sure there are other ways just those are the 2 we have tended to use on voice What's the difference between 1 and 2? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On February 04 2014 08:38 Artanis[Xp] wrote: What's the difference between 1 and 2? In 1 we don't get to see the alignment of our top suspect and things could fuck up because he wouldn't flip and if we tell him to shoot someone who is town he would do it as scum anyway. In number 2 we can get our suspect shot and revealed while proving if the 2nd suspect is also town or scum while doing it. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12968 Posts
| ||
| ||
