|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On February 04 2014 08:43 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
But aren't they both just the same option with the only difference being that in option 2 we're going with our second strongest scumspect instead of our strongest? It's the same strategy, just a different lynch target.
.......................thereby a different strategy............?
|
The point is you didn't need to describe the same tactic behind it twice. Anyway, this discussion is irrelevant. The question is if the players will listen to the person you want to lynch. I can guarantee I'm going to vigilante it because it's part of the enjoyment and why I signed up.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
I signed up to win thanks.
|
On February 04 2014 08:23 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2014 08:19 WaveofShadow wrote:
So close.
I was so damn close, and then reroll.
Anyway, ##vote: marv 'cause policy. We can't have someone of your apparent unlynchability running around these parts so it will be my job to draw any and all attention to you as necessary. Given this is a vengeful game, this is probably the stupidest thing you could possibly have written. Every single person that gets lynched can shoot me if they so please.
I have to admit. The VERY first thing I thought of when I heard you were playing was just shooting you for the fun of it.
|
On February 04 2014 08:50 Holyflare wrote:
I signed up to win thanks.
I signed up to win while having fun. I'm not planning on sacrificing either of those.
|
Well. WE should lynch artanis. The dude claimed scum. If someone claims scum, you lynch them. Pretty easy right>?
|
Did everyone leave as soon as I arrived?
|
On February 04 2014 08:23 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2014 08:19 WaveofShadow wrote:
So close.
I was so damn close, and then reroll.
Anyway, ##vote: marv 'cause policy. We can't have someone of your apparent unlynchability running around these parts so it will be my job to draw any and all attention to you as necessary. Given this is a vengeful game, this is probably the stupidest thing you could possibly have written. Every single person that gets lynched can shoot me if they so please.
That was clearly a joke right? Dno why you would treat it like it meant something.
|
Whoa.
Weird how DP is apparently on the same page as me.
|
On February 04 2014 08:59 WaveofShadow wrote:
Whoa.
Weird how DP is apparently on the same page as me.
Lel. I guess I expect more than rank stupidity from you wave. <3
|
On February 04 2014 09:01 DarthPunk wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2014 08:59 WaveofShadow wrote:
Whoa.
Weird how DP is apparently on the same page as me. Lel. I guess I expect more than rank stupidity from you wave. <3
You should never expect more than that.
Just be pleasantly surprised.
|
Also a couple of Policy things.
First, before we lynch someone we should make sure we know who they are going to shoot.
Second, we should extend the days for as long as possible. If someone quick hammers I will be fucking furious.
(looking at you rayn)
|
On February 04 2014 09:02 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2014 09:01 DarthPunk wrote:On February 04 2014 08:59 WaveofShadow wrote:
Whoa.
Weird how DP is apparently on the same page as me. Lel. I guess I expect more than rank stupidity from you wave. <3 You should never expect more than that. Just be pleasantly surprised.
lol, I like that philosophy.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Now, this is the guy I want to draw your attention to. Notice his first post:
On February 04 2014 08:51 DarthPunk wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2014 08:23 marvellosity wrote:On February 04 2014 08:19 WaveofShadow wrote:
So close.
I was so damn close, and then reroll.
Anyway, ##vote: marv 'cause policy. We can't have someone of your apparent unlynchability running around these parts so it will be my job to draw any and all attention to you as necessary. Given this is a vengeful game, this is probably the stupidest thing you could possibly have written. Every single person that gets lynched can shoot me if they so please. I have to admit. The VERY first thing I thought of when I heard you were playing was just shooting you for the fun of it.
Now, compare this with every first post in games where he has been scum.
On October 04 2012 10:12 DarthPunk wrote:
LOL. Just read the day post.
##Vote: Marvellosity
On September 04 2012 08:44 DarthPunk wrote:
Things seem to have progressed quickly. I thought I would post to let you guys know I had popped into the thread. I look forward to playing with you all. (especially my XXIV alum.)
On July 27 2012 09:25 DarthPunk wrote:
Hi Guys! Very excited to finally be playing. I slept in, so at the moment it is ~10:20 my time which is AEST if you ever want to check.
The deadlines are at 6am my time so I will probably be inactive for a few hours after each and before because I will be asleep.
Depending on the situation beforehand I can/will stay up for them but I really don't want that to be a regular thing.
OK now that is out of the way I am going to go back and actually read what has happened in the thread since I went to sleep LOL.
GLHF
<3<3<3.
On November 01 2012 12:16 DarthPunk wrote:Sup Guys. Just caught up with the thread. So I have a town read on Kush, Unless he has put a great deal of effort into shifting his meta he is playing his town meta this game. So unless something drastic changes I guess that this is the first time I will not be gunning for you buddy. ^_^ If you are a miller you should claim. But I will be wary of such a claim as there have been times in the past in which an uncontested miller claim day one has sealed the win for scum. So we should exercise our judgement on such claims rather than put blind faith on their townieness. From my first read through Release is looking suspicious. Firstly he is tunnelling townie kush, although he may be unaware of kush's meta he has a scum read over something which is at worst a null tell. Secondly his posting feels off somehow this post in particular is scummy as shit. Show nested quote +On November 01 2012 11:20 Release wrote:
Do not use this post later to claim that i am shifting attention off myself. I acknowledge that I am under suspicion.
So in the flurry of comment regarding the claiming, we seem to have dismissed the possibility of enacting a Lynch-all-liars policy. The main con i see if we do enact it is that we can't pull use fishing for reactions as freely. The main pro, however, is that people can't claim to be fishing for reactions. Another consequence is that more information is in the thread. Both town and mafia know more about true intentions and can react accordingly.
Personally, i am against such a policy because people can very easily say "i changed my mind" and blame/vindication will tend to be imposed base on a town/scum flip. So after acknowledging that this post is a distraction from the suspicions on himself he attempts to create a tangent discussion on policy. And he proposes a lynch all liars policy that he talks about for a good deal and then decides he is against? It was fluffy and served to distract the thread from pursuing him. Claiming that you are not doing that does not cause it to be untrue, rather it speaks as if he was guilty of doing EXACTLY THAT.
On June 21 2013 12:54 DarthPunk wrote:
LOL you guys are so silly. Only person I would want to lynch is oats for wanting to lynch cora.
On March 14 2013 23:23 DarthPunk wrote:
Hi Guys <3
I haven't read the thread at all so I am going to go start doing that.
The meta evidence is incredibly overwhelming, look at the super similarities between each opening post and this one here! Conclusive evidence that DP is in fact playing to his scum meta.
##Unvote
##Vote DarthPunk
+ Show Spoiler +you don't even need to check his town game openers, that would just be overkill at this point
|
Artanis. For what reason did you claim scum? Do you think town is more likely to claim scum or that mafia are. What reason does town have to claim mafia ever?
|
I am going to assume you are trying to troll me holyflare because you are pushing all my buttons right now.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On February 04 2014 09:08 DarthPunk wrote:
I am going to assume you are trying to troll me holyflare because you are pushing all my buttons right now.
Troll...? No? I quite clearly meta'd you and you are playing identically to your scum meta. Now, shoot artanis the other claimed scum when you die.
|
On February 04 2014 09:03 DarthPunk wrote:
Also a couple of Policy things.
First, before we lynch someone we should make sure we know who they are going to shoot.
Second, we should extend the days for as long as possible. If someone quick hammers I will be fucking furious.
(looking at you rayn)
As much as I love quickhammering 'cause hilarious (especially when Ace is involved), /agree.
Anyway regarding my earlier stuff, this is from Thug Life:
On September 27 2013 05:24 Palmar wrote:
I'm member of one of the mafia teams. I'm requesting one person from the other team PM me, or if that's not allowed, just claim in the thread so we can work together.
And look at the reaction from town:
On September 27 2013 05:30 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On September 27 2013 05:24 Palmar wrote:
I'm member of one of the mafia teams. I'm requesting one person from the other team PM me, or if that's not allowed, just claim in the thread so we can work together. Hello Palmar, I am eager to help your mafia organization. Please tell me your mafia teammates so that I know not to shoot them tonight.
Ehhh...
Trying to find another 'cause I swear it happened in another game I was a part of but I can't think of it right now.
So mebbe not as much evidence as I thought.
Still lookin tho
|
The difference with those claims is the undertone of fake claiming mafia in order for mafia to out themselves.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On February 04 2014 08:29 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2014 08:23 WaveofShadow wrote:
Also I'd be totally in favour of lynching scumclainers. There does seem to be some truth to holy's 'case,k though the only examle I can think of was ## maybe?
Ill look when I'm not on my phone. I don't get it? There's some truth to my case but you can only think of 1 example? Those 2 things are contradicting statements.
Wave I still want you to address this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
