|
Vengeful Mini Mafia!Flavor from the movies of Quentin Tarantino.
Created/Hosted by Hapahauli and Yamato77
Cohosted by Aquanim and Xatalos
The Basics:
- Six Vanilla Townies vs. Three Mafia Goons
- Everyone is vengeful! If you die, you get to shoot someone in the face!
- Alignments of lynched players are NOT revealed! Shot players alignments are revealed!
- No day cycle limits.
The Night Cycle:
- Nights are silent.
- Mafia have no night kills.
- The night will last until the vengeful shot is submitted to the hosts (by PM or in-thread).
- If no shot is submitted in 24 hours, no shot will be made.
Voting:
- All voting is done in-thread. Standard formatting (##Vote: <Player>).
- Instant majority lynch. A player is lynched as soon as he reaches a clear majority of votes.
- After a player is lynched, no posting is allowed until the next daypost.
House Rules:
- You must make a good-faith effort to participate in the game, and you must play to win.
- Don't cheat. See the TL Mafia Model OP (click!) for details.
- Don't be a dick. If anyone has problems with in-thread behavior, PM one of the hosts.
- For rule violations, you will get one warning. A repeat violation will get you force-replaced out of the game.
|
|
FAQ // Player Questions:
Mafia's Win-Condition:
The game ends in a mafia victory when the following two conditions are fulfilled: 1) The # of Mafia is greater than or equal to the # of Town. 2) The town has no possible way to change the balance back in its favor.
Deadlines:
There is NO day time limit. However the hosts reserve the right to set a deadline should things get out of hand (i.e. 2 week day w/out discussion).
|
I'm quite busy at the moment, but I think I could participate by co-hosting. At least I could make some votecounts and such.
|
What is "Good-Faith" effort?
|
On January 27 2014 22:03 Mocsta wrote: What is "Good-Faith" effort?
Putting in as much effort as you can (while you have time to play)?
|
|
|
|
11589 Posts
On January 27 2014 22:03 Mocsta wrote: What is "Good-Faith" effort? Basically, we leave it up to our judgment of your play relative to the play of everyone else in the game. If we feel like your activity or effort is significantly dragging down the game as a whole, we may ask you to step it up, or perhaps replace you if we feel the need.
On January 28 2014 00:52 Balla24 wrote: /obs dang this looks fun
We may do something else for observers besides an obs qt. We haven't worked out the details yet, but since some players will not have their alignments revealed on death, and obs qts are generally dead most of the time, i'm interested in a different format for observers.
On January 28 2014 02:00 LSB wrote: /in
Also, while we are not taking sign ups for the official game, we are taking replacements. I will consider this as such.
|
On January 28 2014 04:09 yamato77 wrote:Basically, we leave it up to our judgment of your play relative to the play of everyone else in the game. If we feel like your activity or effort is significantly dragging down the game as a whole, we may ask you to step it up, or perhaps replace you if we feel the need. i think its a bad idea having an ambiguous rule like that.
|
Whatever format you decide: /obs
|
11589 Posts
On January 28 2014 04:13 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2014 04:09 yamato77 wrote:On January 27 2014 22:03 Mocsta wrote: What is "Good-Faith" effort? Basically, we leave it up to our judgment of your play relative to the play of everyone else in the game. If we feel like your activity or effort is significantly dragging down the game as a whole, we may ask you to step it up, or perhaps replace you if we feel the need. i think its a bad idea having an ambiguous rule like that. I very highly doubt it will become a problem in the first place.
|
On January 28 2014 04:20 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2014 04:13 iamperfection wrote:On January 28 2014 04:09 yamato77 wrote:On January 27 2014 22:03 Mocsta wrote: What is "Good-Faith" effort? Basically, we leave it up to our judgment of your play relative to the play of everyone else in the game. If we feel like your activity or effort is significantly dragging down the game as a whole, we may ask you to step it up, or perhaps replace you if we feel the need. i think its a bad idea having an ambiguous rule like that. I very highly doubt it will become a problem in the first place. That's the fun of invite-only games.
|
On January 27 2014 22:03 Mocsta wrote: What is "Good-Faith" effort?
Basically, we want you to actually try to play the game. If you are not putting effort into the game at all, we don't want you playing. If it ever becomes an issue with anyone, we'll be pretty explicit about things, though our standards aren't too high.
On January 28 2014 04:13 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2014 04:09 yamato77 wrote:On January 27 2014 22:03 Mocsta wrote: What is "Good-Faith" effort? Basically, we leave it up to our judgment of your play relative to the play of everyone else in the game. If we feel like your activity or effort is significantly dragging down the game as a whole, we may ask you to step it up, or perhaps replace you if we feel the need. i think its a bad idea having an ambiguous rule like that.
I'm pretty comfortable with ambiguous rules in an invite setup. If this were a larger, open game, I'd definitely agree with you though.
Though as long as you don't afk lurk, you wont be breaking that rule.
|
/obs however you do that, this looks awesome
|
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On January 29 2014 10:51 Artanis[Xp] wrote: /in
let's start!
|
|
/obs please
|
|
|
|