|
On October 06 2013 22:30 Scarecrow wrote:Show nested quote +On October 06 2013 15:28 HappyCamper wrote:On October 06 2013 15:13 opsayo wrote: you are mad because she doesn't want to hang out with you?
she doesn't owe you jack shit
thats borderline scary that you feel this way I do not want children in here who know nothing about relationships. I'm surprised you can talk down to anyone after chatting up a girl online for 2 months and getting nowhere. Girl #2 must be thrilled to be the back-up plan. Show nested quote +On October 06 2013 12:29 HappyCamper wrote: I fucking tried giving you chance after chance to hang out but you wouldn't even fucking try. FUCK YOU. I'd say it's her loss... but it really isn't. I would agree with you if two things were not true. I have known her for three years so it isn't some "random" chick. I was single for almost nineteen years, I didn't really want a girlfriend at all until recently. I was okay with ending up as friends but I am not the type of guy you can just keep on the sidelines.
edit: so we fuckin or whaT? Cause you seem to be thrilled to be the back up plan.
|
On October 06 2013 15:57 Chairman Ray wrote:Just because a girl adds you on Facebook and texts you for two months doesn't mean she has any romantic interest in you. Girls will not often blatantly tell you "Hey, I'm not into you, if that's why you're texting me, stop pls." That's awkward as hell. Plus, most girls like having casual conversations with guys, and/or getting attention. You can definitely judge through a girl's texts if she's into you. I'm sure she was giving you signs, but you might not have picked them up. Show nested quote +Now, during this two month period. I have girls being interested in me, but I am trying to stay single so I can meet up with her since she is a really cool chick. This was torture by the way during that period. However, I am now most likely not single anymore. I say most likely because the girl that gave me the time of day has not made it official and we have not figured certain things out.
I made this blog to say guys if a girl is interested in you, but you supposedly want to give a chance to someone else. Go for the chick that gives you the time of day. If it is the one you want, go for that one. If it is the girl you are just interested in, go for her. Being ignored and having a girl absolutely not want to hang out with you is just the worse. I know, it was two months of pain Secondly, I don't like your whole attitude that being single for 2 months is torture or two months of pain, especially while other girls are asking you out, and it looks like you even went out with a girl during the time. You really need to develop a sense of independence and not have your emotional well being rest on a woman, especially one that you aren't even dating. Show nested quote +Now, during this two month period. I have girls being interested in me, but I am trying to stay single so I can meet up with her since she is a really cool chick. This was torture by the way during that period. However, I am now most likely not single anymore. I say most likely because the girl that gave me the time of day has not made it official and we have not figured certain things out. Lastly, you dated a girl for a while, fully expecting that you will finally unite with your ideal girl after 2 months. Was she just a backup option to you? You post this blog complaining about how you were supposedly led on by some girl, and yet, you lead on some girl to the point of the relationship almost being official. Were you just going to drop in one day and say "Hey listen, this other girl and I have been planning to hook up for 2 months now, and you're just here because being single is torture for me. Cya!" That's really cruel tbh.
No, you are so far off it isn't even funny. How the hell can you come to that conclusion with what I wrote? The girl that i was supposedly "dating" during that time, I didn't even know her name. It was only really until two weeks ago that we got close and I do not even know how the hell that happened.
Okay let me rephrase that, I have been single for nineteen years due to my choices, but everyone has their breaking point and mine happened to be four months ago. So, yeah it was torture for me.
So, no I was single straight up for about two months before I got taken by a really cool chick that happened. I do not even know how it happened so do not ask me. I guess I was being friendly than we got closer through that is my best guess.
|
Your name is HappyCamper.
|
A woman adds you to Facebook. That is a thing that happens on Facebook occasionally because people add "Friends" i.e. people they know. That is the design of Facebook. I know this and do not have a Facebook account.
A woman adds you to Facebook. You assume, for no real reason, she is interested romantically. If she was interested romantically, she would meet up with you the first time you ask. What's happening here is you are bombarding someone with requests to meet up, and they don't know how to let you down. They may have even just added you because Facebook has algorithms that can work out the possible relationship networks of people and make suggestions.
It bears repeating that if she was romantically interested, you don't have to ask more than once. This seems to be the crucial piece of information you skip over. All that "pain" and "torture" you endured was brought on entirely by yourself. Your advice to other people to go with someone who responds to you vs. those who don't respond to you is sound, but the situation is still warped heavily in your mind. The reason you go with people who respond to you vs. those who don't is not to be like "LOL DAT TRAIN DUN LEFT" - it's because people who don't respond to you are not interested. She has no responsibility in all this.
Based on the responses I've seen from you so far (very hostile), I can tell you're not good with criticism. So I'll just give it to you as straight and short as it comes. This is a sad, pathetic, and somewhat scary blog. Try to consider this situation from her point of view.
|
On October 06 2013 12:29 HappyCamper wrote:
I waited a long time asking her if she was free week after week. She didn't even try to give me the time so I could set up something for us to meet(edit this is more accurate). Honestly there was two reasons why. One, she wanted to stay single. Two, this only makes sense because of number one mind you, she was scared of not being single anymore.. I'm going with three: she was afraid that you'd turn her into a hat, but wasn't sure how to say this nicely
|
On October 07 2013 03:14 DefMatrixUltra wrote: A woman adds you to Facebook. That is a thing that happens on Facebook occasionally because people add "Friends" i.e. people they know. That is the design of Facebook. I know this and do not have a Facebook account.
A woman adds you to Facebook. You assume, for no real reason, she is interested romantically. If she was interested romantically, she would meet up with you the first time you ask. What's happening here is you are bombarding someone with requests to meet up, and they don't know how to let you down. They may have even just added you because Facebook has algorithms that can work out the possible relationship networks of people and make suggestions.
It bears repeating that if she was romantically interested, you don't have to ask more than once. This seems to be the crucial piece of information you skip over. All that "pain" and "torture" you endured was brought on entirely by yourself. Your advice to other people to go with someone who responds to you vs. those who don't respond to you is sound, but the situation is still warped heavily in your mind. The reason you go with people who respond to you vs. those who don't is not to be like "LOL DAT TRAIN DUN LEFT" - it's because people who don't respond to you are not interested. She has no responsibility in all this.
Based on the responses I've seen from you so far (very hostile), I can tell you're not good with criticism. So I'll just give it to you as straight and short as it comes. This is a sad, pathetic, and somewhat scary blog. Try to consider this situation from her point of view.
Okay i am getting sick of this fucking type of reply. The thing is I have known her for three fucking years. That is the main issue. If I did not know her for that long, I would agree with you. The thing is that with the situation that presented itself and the circumstances involved it was worse than usually it would be. If a random fucking chick added me to facebook, I wouldn't think twice about it. Even in the beginning i didn't think she was interested necessarily which is why i wanted to meet up. The background information is only background information. It gives you a picture of how the situation started and not necessarily reasons into it being started.
okay circumstances: 1. She wanted to stay single. 2. She was scared that I would either get with her or of turning me down. 3. I never assumed shit about her liking me. 4. I texted her for two months. It isn't like I made my advance "subtle" and it isn't like im some dumbass who cries when a girl says shes not interested in me. 5. Leading can be a few things, she accepts advances in some form or another which she did, but even than I wouldn't label it as just "leading on". 6. In the situation I was in which was there were cool as fuck chicks who are not sluts,whores,bitches, or anything like that. Each of them are high quality chicks. That is why it was torture. Eventually, one of these high quality chicks got me. 7. She never said she didn't want to hang out and only made an excuse of she wasn't free. After two months of that you do get annoyed and pissed off. Thus i vented a bit in MY BLOG on teamliquid, yeah white knights making me more frustrated and angry. Fuck you guys.
Now I have to have a conversation about how if she didn't want to hang out, all she had to do was tell me instead of giving me false hope.
STOP white knighting my fucking blog up. It is not needed and really unnecessary. I made this thread for two reasons 1. to vent a bit since it made me annoyed and pissed. Second, to tell guys to go for the girls that give you the time of day. That is it i am tired of this shit and please keep the white knighting off of my fucking blogs it is unneeded. instead im more pissed cause you fuckers have never had this happen to you apparently and literally you have no idea what you are talking about. Scary the hell you talking about? I am not stalking her at all. I have no intention of hurting her in anyway shape or form. This is literally me telling you that it was torture to me, which it fucking was. Torture is fucking subjective since you have no clue what the other person experienced.
Background information is like a setting almost.
The title, was more for interest sake than it actually being that way. So do not read into the title all that much.
|
It's more slamming your dick in a door than torture. She made it pretty clear she wasn't interested in you like that, but you gave her such a creepy vibe that she didn't wanna outright say it.
|
On October 07 2013 03:57 QuanticHawk wrote:Show nested quote +On October 06 2013 12:29 HappyCamper wrote:
I waited a long time asking her if she was free week after week. She didn't even try to give me the time so I could set up something for us to meet(edit this is more accurate). Honestly there was two reasons why. One, she wanted to stay single. Two, this only makes sense because of number one mind you, she was scared of not being single anymore.. I'm going with three: she was afraid that you'd turn her into a hat, but wasn't sure how to say this nicely Why else would you not hang out with someone you have known for three years? Granted she could potentially not want to turn me down, but that would be considered leading on which is why I put that into the title. Even though you could separate both of them into two categories of not leading me on to leading me on. I did not make my advances "subtle", my texting was very colorful in the beginning at least. As time went on, I lost patience and interest.
Edit: those fucking hat transformations man. They always scare off the ladies.
|
On October 07 2013 00:04 HappyCamper wrote:Show nested quote +On October 06 2013 15:57 Chairman Ray wrote:Just because a girl adds you on Facebook and texts you for two months doesn't mean she has any romantic interest in you. Girls will not often blatantly tell you "Hey, I'm not into you, if that's why you're texting me, stop pls." That's awkward as hell. Plus, most girls like having casual conversations with guys, and/or getting attention. You can definitely judge through a girl's texts if she's into you. I'm sure she was giving you signs, but you might not have picked them up. Now, during this two month period. I have girls being interested in me, but I am trying to stay single so I can meet up with her since she is a really cool chick. This was torture by the way during that period. However, I am now most likely not single anymore. I say most likely because the girl that gave me the time of day has not made it official and we have not figured certain things out.
I made this blog to say guys if a girl is interested in you, but you supposedly want to give a chance to someone else. Go for the chick that gives you the time of day. If it is the one you want, go for that one. If it is the girl you are just interested in, go for her. Being ignored and having a girl absolutely not want to hang out with you is just the worse. I know, it was two months of pain Secondly, I don't like your whole attitude that being single for 2 months is torture or two months of pain, especially while other girls are asking you out, and it looks like you even went out with a girl during the time. You really need to develop a sense of independence and not have your emotional well being rest on a woman, especially one that you aren't even dating. Now, during this two month period. I have girls being interested in me, but I am trying to stay single so I can meet up with her since she is a really cool chick. This was torture by the way during that period. However, I am now most likely not single anymore. I say most likely because the girl that gave me the time of day has not made it official and we have not figured certain things out. Lastly, you dated a girl for a while, fully expecting that you will finally unite with your ideal girl after 2 months. Was she just a backup option to you? You post this blog complaining about how you were supposedly led on by some girl, and yet, you lead on some girl to the point of the relationship almost being official. Were you just going to drop in one day and say "Hey listen, this other girl and I have been planning to hook up for 2 months now, and you're just here because being single is torture for me. Cya!" That's really cruel tbh. No, you are so far off it isn't even funny. How the hell can you come to that conclusion with what I wrote? The girl that i was supposedly "dating" during that time, I didn't even know her name. It was only really until two weeks ago that we got close and I do not even know how the hell that happened. Okay let me rephrase that, I have been single for nineteen years due to my choices, but everyone has their breaking point and mine happened to be four months ago. So, yeah it was torture for me. So, no I was single straight up for about two months before I got taken by a really cool chick that happened. I do not even know how it happened so do not ask me. I guess I was being friendly than we got closer through that is my best guess.
So you decided to get close with another girl just 2 weeks before you expected to go meet your 'cool chick'? Given that you said you two were about to make it official, those 2 weeks were of a romantic nature. When getting close to someone for 2 weeks, one can develop a strong emotional investment. Heck it doesn't even take 2 weeks - a lot of girls can really develop a strong emotional investment after a single day. You are obligated to tell this girl the very first time there was any romantic interest shown that you are not available. If you ran off with your 'cool chick' after 2 weeks of getting close, the other girl would have been devastated. You got lucky this time. Given that you have been single for 19 years and are inexperienced, it's forgivable, but know that the respectful thing to do would be to tell her straight away. Think about it this way, if the 'cool chick' texted you very early on that she had no interest in you and just wanted to be texting friends, would you be in this rut right now?
|
On October 07 2013 04:17 QuanticHawk wrote: It's more slamming your dick in a door than torture. She made it pretty clear she wasn't interested in you like that, but you gave her such a creepy vibe that she didn't wanna outright say it.
This could be true. However, I have known her for three years so it is highly unlikely that this is the case. If it is, not really my fault. I can do nothing short of a miracle to change her initial impression of me. Which happened three years ago thus highly unlikely she thinks im creepy.
edit: She doesn't think im creepy. I know girls that think im creepy. It is called every asian girl I have tried to get with ever. They just can't handle the pure awesome factor that I am. They feel insecure about themselves so they think im creepy. At least thats what I tell myself at night. Although they are some of the funniest fucking stories you will ever hear.
|
On October 07 2013 04:25 HappyCamper wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2013 04:17 QuanticHawk wrote: It's more slamming your dick in a door than torture. She made it pretty clear she wasn't interested in you like that, but you gave her such a creepy vibe that she didn't wanna outright say it. This could be true. However, I have known her for three years so it is highly unlikely that this is the case. If it is, not really my fault. I can do nothing short of a miracle to change her initial impression of me. Which happened three years ago thus highly unlikely she thinks im creepy.
When you say you've known her for three years, were you two friends, or classmates, or what? Did you talk with her often? Did you two do stuff together in a bigger group of friends?
|
On October 07 2013 04:19 Chairman Ray wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2013 00:04 HappyCamper wrote:On October 06 2013 15:57 Chairman Ray wrote:Just because a girl adds you on Facebook and texts you for two months doesn't mean she has any romantic interest in you. Girls will not often blatantly tell you "Hey, I'm not into you, if that's why you're texting me, stop pls." That's awkward as hell. Plus, most girls like having casual conversations with guys, and/or getting attention. You can definitely judge through a girl's texts if she's into you. I'm sure she was giving you signs, but you might not have picked them up. Now, during this two month period. I have girls being interested in me, but I am trying to stay single so I can meet up with her since she is a really cool chick. This was torture by the way during that period. However, I am now most likely not single anymore. I say most likely because the girl that gave me the time of day has not made it official and we have not figured certain things out.
I made this blog to say guys if a girl is interested in you, but you supposedly want to give a chance to someone else. Go for the chick that gives you the time of day. If it is the one you want, go for that one. If it is the girl you are just interested in, go for her. Being ignored and having a girl absolutely not want to hang out with you is just the worse. I know, it was two months of pain Secondly, I don't like your whole attitude that being single for 2 months is torture or two months of pain, especially while other girls are asking you out, and it looks like you even went out with a girl during the time. You really need to develop a sense of independence and not have your emotional well being rest on a woman, especially one that you aren't even dating. Now, during this two month period. I have girls being interested in me, but I am trying to stay single so I can meet up with her since she is a really cool chick. This was torture by the way during that period. However, I am now most likely not single anymore. I say most likely because the girl that gave me the time of day has not made it official and we have not figured certain things out. Lastly, you dated a girl for a while, fully expecting that you will finally unite with your ideal girl after 2 months. Was she just a backup option to you? You post this blog complaining about how you were supposedly led on by some girl, and yet, you lead on some girl to the point of the relationship almost being official. Were you just going to drop in one day and say "Hey listen, this other girl and I have been planning to hook up for 2 months now, and you're just here because being single is torture for me. Cya!" That's really cruel tbh. No, you are so far off it isn't even funny. How the hell can you come to that conclusion with what I wrote? The girl that i was supposedly "dating" during that time, I didn't even know her name. It was only really until two weeks ago that we got close and I do not even know how the hell that happened. Okay let me rephrase that, I have been single for nineteen years due to my choices, but everyone has their breaking point and mine happened to be four months ago. So, yeah it was torture for me. So, no I was single straight up for about two months before I got taken by a really cool chick that happened. I do not even know how it happened so do not ask me. I guess I was being friendly than we got closer through that is my best guess. So you decided to get close with another girl just 2 weeks before you expected to go meet your 'cool chick'? Given that you said you two were about to make it official, those 2 weeks were of a romantic nature. When getting close to someone for 2 weeks, one can develop a strong emotional investment. Heck it doesn't even take 2 weeks - a lot of girls can really develop a strong emotional investment after a single day. You are obligated to tell this girl the very first time there was any romantic interest shown that you are not available. If you ran off with your 'cool chick' after 2 weeks of getting close, the other girl would have been devastated. You got lucky this time. Given that you have been single for 19 years and are inexperienced, it's forgivable, but know that the respectful thing to do would be to tell her straight away. Think about it this way, if the 'cool chick' texted you very early on that she had no interest in you and just wanted to be texting friends, would you be in this rut right now?
Oh, no the situation was a bit different than that. The two months i am talking about were before the two weeks of me and the girl that I most likely will be getting with. Literally two days after I was like, "fuck this". Granted, I did fuck up a bit. I agree that you should be careful when getting to know women since anything can have a devastating effect in that case. Although romantic, not what I would describe those two weeks I had with her. I spent at most 3 days out of each week with her. However, I have learned something and you have brighten my mood a bit so there you go. Thus two months of torture followed by me being pissed off. I speak about it today cause it gets on my nerves occasionally.
I say most likely because we have yet to cover the topics of ethics, morals, and religion. If we are to different on those topics than there is nothing I can really do to make that relationship workout. Short of changing who I am which is not an option.
|
On October 07 2013 04:28 Chairman Ray wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2013 04:25 HappyCamper wrote:On October 07 2013 04:17 QuanticHawk wrote: It's more slamming your dick in a door than torture. She made it pretty clear she wasn't interested in you like that, but you gave her such a creepy vibe that she didn't wanna outright say it. This could be true. However, I have known her for three years so it is highly unlikely that this is the case. If it is, not really my fault. I can do nothing short of a miracle to change her initial impression of me. Which happened three years ago thus highly unlikely she thinks im creepy. When you say you've known her for three years, were you two friends, or classmates, or what? Did you talk with her often? Did you two do stuff together in a bigger group of friends?
We would hang out in school for the most part. On occasion I would do things with her outside of school. I wasn't super close with her but I wasn't just an acquaintance either. We would also discuss topics of abortion, government, morals, and religion sometimes in school. I was her friend, not a best friend or a close friend but just a friend. Which is why I can understand her not wanting to hang out with me but it still makes me mad which is why i vented about it a bit. Than all the white knights started white knighting makign me feel even more frustrated.
OH, we did stuff in a bigger group of friends generally. However, I would talk to her during lunch almost every day and sometimes during class when we had free time. So she knows me pretty well as far as what I think about certain things and I know her pretty well on what she thinks about most things. This is why I have no idea why she wouldn't want to hang out once in two months.
|
OP seems like a delusional guy who takes criticism very poorly. That's what i've gotten out of this blog n all the comments/replies.
Additionally, he doesn't seem like the sharpest tool in the shed. Two months, and it doesn't seem like he's able to read the "i'm not interested" message that she seemingly quite plainly sent him.
|
On October 07 2013 04:48 ffreakk wrote: OP seems like a delusional guy who takes criticism very poorly. That's what i've gotten out of this blog n all the comments/replies.
Additionally, he doesn't seem like the sharpest tool in the shed. Two months, and it doesn't seem like he's able to read the "i'm not interested" message that she seemingly quite plainly sent him.
I don't know but being called creepy, scary and outright delusional isn't criticism to me and is just plain for lack of a better word cussing me out? Like, I do not really listen or learn from people that do that and I have no reason to. If you respect me than I will respect you. If you do not respect me, why the hell should I take a single word of advice from you?
Edit: I will fuck you though. You are such a freak it turns me on. Yeah talk dirty to me baby.
|
On October 07 2013 05:02 HappyCamper wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2013 04:48 ffreakk wrote: OP seems like a delusional guy who takes criticism very poorly. That's what i've gotten out of this blog n all the comments/replies.
Additionally, he doesn't seem like the sharpest tool in the shed. Two months, and it doesn't seem like he's able to read the "i'm not interested" message that she seemingly quite plainly sent him. I don't know but being called creepy, scary and outright delusional isn't criticism to me and is just plain for lack of a better word cussing me out? Like, I do not really listen or learn from people that do that and I have no reason to. If you respect me than I will respect you. If you do not respect me, why the hell should I take a single word of advice from you? instead of creepy, scary, and delusional how about hmmmm
mysterious, intimidating, and strong-minded?
Would you take criticism from me if i called you those things? And I am only typing this out of respect for ya
|
On October 07 2013 04:48 ffreakk wrote: OP seems like a delusional guy who takes criticism very poorly. That's what i've gotten out of this blog n all the comments/replies.
Additionally, he doesn't seem like the sharpest tool in the shed. Two months, and it doesn't seem like he's able to read the "i'm not interested" message that she seemingly quite plainly sent him. CAN'T YOU SEE HE'S ENTITLED TO HIS BOOTY!?
|
On October 07 2013 05:27 Smurfett3 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2013 05:02 HappyCamper wrote:On October 07 2013 04:48 ffreakk wrote: OP seems like a delusional guy who takes criticism very poorly. That's what i've gotten out of this blog n all the comments/replies.
Additionally, he doesn't seem like the sharpest tool in the shed. Two months, and it doesn't seem like he's able to read the "i'm not interested" message that she seemingly quite plainly sent him. I don't know but being called creepy, scary and outright delusional isn't criticism to me and is just plain for lack of a better word cussing me out? Like, I do not really listen or learn from people that do that and I have no reason to. If you respect me than I will respect you. If you do not respect me, why the hell should I take a single word of advice from you? instead of creepy, scary, and delusional how about hmmmm mysterious, intimidating, and strong-minded? Would you take criticism from me if i called you those things? And I am only typing this out of respect for ya
I think you can tell from the blog that I took criticism well when people did that. If I seem hostile to them than you are a bit wrong since I had not hostility really in those specific ones. For instance the first one with chairman ray was maybe a little hostile but more so out of frustration than well no idea what the word is but not frustration?
|
On October 07 2013 05:31 HappyCamper wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2013 05:27 Smurfett3 wrote:On October 07 2013 05:02 HappyCamper wrote:On October 07 2013 04:48 ffreakk wrote: OP seems like a delusional guy who takes criticism very poorly. That's what i've gotten out of this blog n all the comments/replies.
Additionally, he doesn't seem like the sharpest tool in the shed. Two months, and it doesn't seem like he's able to read the "i'm not interested" message that she seemingly quite plainly sent him. I don't know but being called creepy, scary and outright delusional isn't criticism to me and is just plain for lack of a better word cussing me out? Like, I do not really listen or learn from people that do that and I have no reason to. If you respect me than I will respect you. If you do not respect me, why the hell should I take a single word of advice from you? instead of creepy, scary, and delusional how about hmmmm mysterious, intimidating, and strong-minded? Would you take criticism from me if i called you those things? And I am only typing this out of respect for ya I think you can tell from the blog that I took criticism well when people did that. If I seem hostile to them than you are a bit wrong since I had not hostility really in those specific ones. For instance the first one with chairman ray was maybe a little hostile but more so out of frustration than well no idea what the word is but not frustration? why were you pushed over the top with frusturation with chairman rays post? Was it the whole thing or a part of it that made you see red?
|
On October 07 2013 05:35 Smurfett3 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2013 05:31 HappyCamper wrote:On October 07 2013 05:27 Smurfett3 wrote:On October 07 2013 05:02 HappyCamper wrote:On October 07 2013 04:48 ffreakk wrote: OP seems like a delusional guy who takes criticism very poorly. That's what i've gotten out of this blog n all the comments/replies.
Additionally, he doesn't seem like the sharpest tool in the shed. Two months, and it doesn't seem like he's able to read the "i'm not interested" message that she seemingly quite plainly sent him. I don't know but being called creepy, scary and outright delusional isn't criticism to me and is just plain for lack of a better word cussing me out? Like, I do not really listen or learn from people that do that and I have no reason to. If you respect me than I will respect you. If you do not respect me, why the hell should I take a single word of advice from you? instead of creepy, scary, and delusional how about hmmmm mysterious, intimidating, and strong-minded? Would you take criticism from me if i called you those things? And I am only typing this out of respect for ya I think you can tell from the blog that I took criticism well when people did that. If I seem hostile to them than you are a bit wrong since I had not hostility really in those specific ones. For instance the first one with chairman ray was maybe a little hostile but more so out of frustration than well no idea what the word is but not frustration? why were you pushed over the top with frusturation with chairman rays post? Was it the whole thing or a part of it that made you see red?
Well, calling the current chick, a backup chick made me mad. On top of that people were telling me that I was creepy/scary. Not all of them which I am grateful to the ones that didn't. That and he seemed to misunderstand what the blog was about. It was about a friend I knew in highschool who I wanted to hang out with, but she wouldn't give me the time to do it. You can add in the interested in after that but that was the main idea behind the blog. I am not a great writer so I might not have portrayed that correctly.
edit: Since she is a girl. In my opinion, you have to be single in order to hang out especially if you have any interest in her in that way. So since I did, I tried staying single so that I could go hang out with her. If we ended up as friends, that would of been okay with me. It isn't a bad thing to have friends.
|
|
|
|