|
On April 22 2013 20:49 Waxangel wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 20:46 Type|NarutO wrote:On April 22 2013 20:42 Waxangel wrote:On April 22 2013 20:41 Type|NarutO wrote:On April 22 2013 20:40 NEEDZMOAR wrote: When did sc2 fans become bitter, angry spoiled crybabies? Did you seriously expect everything to go 100% smooth the first time around? of course there will be adjustments though some points are just silly.
things like downtime in between matches could easily be fixed, complaints about not knowing about hackers even though forums have been writing about them is just stupid, does anyone seriously think that MLG would eliminate guys without more "official" proof? Are you seriously calling that tournament fine, but not 100% smooth? It literally could not have been run worse. Argh, stop using literally wrong there's a lot of ways it could have been run worse, like they could have held the entire tournament on gold base antiga shipyard Literally was perfectly fine here if you don't make up for artificial scenarios or do you feel the need to point out that literally in this case could only be used for the worst case possible? look, just because you couldn't defeat England in a war doesn't mean you have to try to destroy their language decades later Yes I'm aware of all the flaws in this statement, it's a joke
hahaha. Nice one.
|
On April 22 2013 20:41 Type|NarutO wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 20:40 NEEDZMOAR wrote: When did sc2 fans become bitter, angry spoiled crybabies? Did you seriously expect everything to go 100% smooth the first time around? of course there will be adjustments though some points are just silly.
things like downtime in between matches could easily be fixed, complaints about not knowing about hackers even though forums have been writing about them is just stupid, does anyone seriously think that MLG would eliminate guys without more "official" proof? Are you seriously calling that tournament fine, but not 100% smooth? It literally could not have been run worse.
I can come up with a few suggestions as to how the tournament "literally" could've been worse, they couldve made it an offline tournament on the top of a dead elephant, gamers would have to be high on meth before they played and then the elephant was on fire, how about that? (:
|
On April 22 2013 20:54 SpikeStarcraft wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 20:49 Waxangel wrote:On April 22 2013 20:46 Type|NarutO wrote:On April 22 2013 20:42 Waxangel wrote:On April 22 2013 20:41 Type|NarutO wrote:On April 22 2013 20:40 NEEDZMOAR wrote: When did sc2 fans become bitter, angry spoiled crybabies? Did you seriously expect everything to go 100% smooth the first time around? of course there will be adjustments though some points are just silly.
things like downtime in between matches could easily be fixed, complaints about not knowing about hackers even though forums have been writing about them is just stupid, does anyone seriously think that MLG would eliminate guys without more "official" proof? Are you seriously calling that tournament fine, but not 100% smooth? It literally could not have been run worse. Argh, stop using literally wrong there's a lot of ways it could have been run worse, like they could have held the entire tournament on gold base antiga shipyard Literally was perfectly fine here if you don't make up for artificial scenarios or do you feel the need to point out that literally in this case could only be used for the worst case possible? look, just because you couldn't defeat England in a war doesn't mean you have to try to destroy their language decades later Yes I'm aware of all the flaws in this statement, it's a joke Yes the flaw is that its a racist joke. Indeed, that edit sure does make the racism acceptable though... bad Waxy, bad....
No it doesn't make it acceptable...
|
United States32977 Posts
back on topic, HyuN says he received the information about the Challenger Qualifier date being on April 27th from an MLG admin via email
|
United States97274 Posts
I thought we already knew it would be this weekend and would conflict with DreamHack?
|
|
United States32977 Posts
|
United States97274 Posts
ah. I had just seen people posting that it was supposed to be next weekend. I think a MLG admin might have said it. let me see if I can find it. whelp I tried looking for a few seconds but couldnt find it. maybe I'm wrong. I just thought I remembered people saying it was invite only qualifier next week with #9-40 from this tournament but maybe I just added things together as I read them.
|
On April 22 2013 21:09 Waxangel wrote: back on topic, HyuN says he received the information about the Challenger Qualifier date being on April 27th from an MLG admin via email
I thought MLG and Dreamhack some time ago agreed to avoid scheduling conflicts. But maybe I don't remember correctly.
Anyway seems strange to have the challenger qualifier on a saturday. I mean, on what days during the week are non WCS events supposed to take place?
|
On April 22 2013 21:12 FSKi wrote:I came to this thread expecting to see how well the qualifiers were going and who qualified, but crap was I in for a surprise Yeah, things didn't go too well yesterday I have to tell ya. But on the bright side: The disqualifiers did great! this is also a joke and not a very original one, I know
|
On April 22 2013 21:04 NEEDZMOAR wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 20:41 Type|NarutO wrote:On April 22 2013 20:40 NEEDZMOAR wrote: When did sc2 fans become bitter, angry spoiled crybabies? Did you seriously expect everything to go 100% smooth the first time around? of course there will be adjustments though some points are just silly.
things like downtime in between matches could easily be fixed, complaints about not knowing about hackers even though forums have been writing about them is just stupid, does anyone seriously think that MLG would eliminate guys without more "official" proof? Are you seriously calling that tournament fine, but not 100% smooth? It literally could not have been run worse. I can come up with a few suggestions as to how the tournament "literally" could've been worse, they couldve made it an offline tournament on the top of a dead elephant, gamers would have to be high on meth before they played and then the elephant was on fire, how about that? (: MLG was still worse.
|
I'm just a fan, but I feel like sharing my experience here.
I wanted to know how Demuslim was doing. I couldn't find anything relevant on google. WCS NA qualifiers returned results from last year. No info! Well, off to Twitch. Ahah, the qualifiers! I start watching the stream. Axeltoss and Axslav don't work well together, at all. Also, Axel-who? What is he doing there? Who are these people whose game I'm watching? Which round is it? Did Demu play already? Was he eliminated? Ah, I've heard of HIM! (not sure Axeltoss has, though). Demu coming up! He doesn't get introduced properly and neither does his opponent. Idra mentions on his stream that Demu is playing Jaedong soon, so he's gonna win this. Well, great. I'm definitely staying to watch even though it's past 4 am. The stream ends (but doesn't really for a while)... What just happened?!
This morning I learn here that Muslim somehow beat Jaedong, but apparently ultimately lost to another Korean. Did he really? Is this screenshot from Demu's Twitter real? When would these games be broadcast? Why is this such a colossal clusterkitty?!
|
On April 22 2013 21:23 ltkAlpha wrote: I'm just a fan, but I feel like sharing my experience here.
I wanted to know how Demuslim was doing. I couldn't find anything relevant on google. WCS NA qualifiers returned results from last year. No info! Well, off to Twitch. Ahah, the qualifiers! I start watching the stream. Axeltoss and Axslav don't work well together, at all. Also, Axel-who? What is he doing there? Who are these people whose game I'm watching? Which round is it? Did Demu play already? Was he eliminated? Ah, I've heard of HIM! (not sure Axeltoss has, though). Demu coming up! He doesn't get introduced properly and neither does his opponent. Idra mentions on his stream that Demu is playing Jaedong soon, so he's gonna win this. Well, great. I'm definitely staying to watch even though it's past 4 am. The stream ends (but doesn't really for a while)... What just happened?!
This morning I learn here that Muslim somehow beat Jaedong, but apparently ultimately lost to another Korean. Did he really? Is this screenshot from Demu's Twitter real? When would these games be broadcast? Why is this such a colossal clusterkitty?!
I love this post ^^
|
|
On April 22 2013 21:23 ltkAlpha wrote: I'm just a fan, but I feel like sharing my experience here.
I wanted to know how Demuslim was doing. I couldn't find anything relevant on google. WCS NA qualifiers returned results from last year. No info! Well, off to Twitch. Ahah, the qualifiers! I start watching the stream. Axeltoss and Axslav don't work well together, at all. Also, Axel-who? What is he doing there? Who are these people whose game I'm watching? Which round is it? Did Demu play already? Was he eliminated? Ah, I've heard of HIM! (not sure Axeltoss has, though). Demu coming up! He doesn't get introduced properly and neither does his opponent. Idra mentions on his stream that Demu is playing Jaedong soon, so he's gonna win this. Well, great. I'm definitely staying to watch even though it's past 4 am. The stream ends (but doesn't really for a while)... What just happened?!
This morning I learn here that Muslim somehow beat Jaedong, but apparently ultimately lost to another Korean. Did he really? Is this screenshot from Demu's Twitter real? When would these games be broadcast? Why is this such a colossal clusterkitty?! NA premier qualifier in a nutshell.
|
i had the exact same problem itkalpha! there is no storytelling from MLG at all. the games they cast seem very random. i wish blizzard would have made a better job selecting the partners for each region. NASL should have been asked!
|
On April 22 2013 21:09 Waxangel wrote: back on topic, HyuN says he received the information about the Challenger Qualifier date being on April 27th from an MLG admin via email
Let's get ready to bumble!!!
|
On April 22 2013 20:49 Waxangel wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 20:46 Type|NarutO wrote:On April 22 2013 20:42 Waxangel wrote:On April 22 2013 20:41 Type|NarutO wrote:On April 22 2013 20:40 NEEDZMOAR wrote: When did sc2 fans become bitter, angry spoiled crybabies? Did you seriously expect everything to go 100% smooth the first time around? of course there will be adjustments though some points are just silly.
things like downtime in between matches could easily be fixed, complaints about not knowing about hackers even though forums have been writing about them is just stupid, does anyone seriously think that MLG would eliminate guys without more "official" proof? Are you seriously calling that tournament fine, but not 100% smooth? It literally could not have been run worse. Argh, stop using literally wrong there's a lot of ways it could have been run worse, like they could have held the entire tournament on gold base antiga shipyard Literally was perfectly fine here if you don't make up for artificial scenarios or do you feel the need to point out that literally in this case could only be used for the worst case possible? look, just because you couldn't defeat England in a war doesn't mean you have to try to destroy their language decades later Yes I'm aware of all the flaws in this statement, it's a joke
at least we destroy them regularly in football (soccer) matches
|
On April 22 2013 21:30 fabstr wrote: i had the exact same problem itkalpha! there is no storytelling from MLG at all. the games they cast seem very random. i wish blizzard would have made a better job selecting the partners for each region. NASL should have been asked!
Obviously they chose mlg because they can show the new yorker skyline inbetween games.
|
i can see how that is more important than good casters with personality, online tournament experience and the ability to produce fun content for downtime ^^
|
|
|
|