|
On April 22 2013 20:32 JustPassingBy wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 20:27 GizmoPT wrote:On April 22 2013 20:26 pmp10 wrote:On April 22 2013 20:19 JustPassingBy wrote:
So let's put the statement of the MLG and the statement of the ESL side by side:
There is no MLG statement yet. Just a announcement of one. bullshit takes time to write :D Wait that was an announcement? Lol, I though the one liner was the statement... Idiot me... <.<
Sundance later tweeted again blaming coffee and being sleepy. It was obvious that wasn't the statement but poor writing got the best of him lol.
|
When did sc2 fans become bitter, angry spoiled crybabies? Did you seriously expect everything to go 100% smooth the first time around? of course there will be adjustments though some points are just silly.
things like downtime in between matches could easily be fixed, complaints about not knowing about hackers even though forums have been writing about them is just stupid, does anyone seriously think that MLG would eliminate guys without more "official" proof?
|
On April 22 2013 20:40 NEEDZMOAR wrote:
When did sc2 fans become bitter, angry spoiled crybabies? Did you seriously expect everything to go 100% smooth the first time around? of course there will be adjustments though some points are just silly.
things like downtime in between matches could easily be fixed, complaints about not knowing about hackers even though forums have been writing about them is just stupid, does anyone seriously think that MLG would eliminate guys without more "official" proof?
Are you seriously calling that tournament fine, but not 100% smooth? It literally could not have been run worse.
|
This has turned into a complete trainwreck. How the hell is it possible to mess up so much..This whole WCS thing is a complete joke and makes sc2 look bad in every way.
|
United States33495 Posts
On April 22 2013 20:41 Type|NarutO wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 20:40 NEEDZMOAR wrote:
When did sc2 fans become bitter, angry spoiled crybabies? Did you seriously expect everything to go 100% smooth the first time around? of course there will be adjustments though some points are just silly.
things like downtime in between matches could easily be fixed, complaints about not knowing about hackers even though forums have been writing about them is just stupid, does anyone seriously think that MLG would eliminate guys without more "official" proof? Are you seriously calling that tournament fine, but not 100% smooth? It literally could not have been run worse.
Argh, stop using literally wrong 
there's a lot of ways it could have been run worse, like they could have held the entire tournament on gold base antiga shipyard
|
On April 22 2013 20:40 NEEDZMOAR wrote:
When did sc2 fans become bitter, angry spoiled crybabies? Did you seriously expect everything to go 100% smooth the first time around? of course there will be adjustments though some points are just silly.
things like downtime in between matches could easily be fixed, complaints about not knowing about hackers even though forums have been writing about them is just stupid, does anyone seriously think that MLG would eliminate guys without more "official" proof?
It's not okay when you had ESL ran the same type of qualifier for the same tournament in a different region with a better job. They had examples and mistakes to learn from, but this is going backwards taking all the positive points and turned it around into a big mess. It's mistake after mistake after mistake, and no communication at all amongst themselves, to the players/teams, or to the audience.
|
On April 22 2013 20:42 Waxangel wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 20:41 Type|NarutO wrote:On April 22 2013 20:40 NEEDZMOAR wrote:
When did sc2 fans become bitter, angry spoiled crybabies? Did you seriously expect everything to go 100% smooth the first time around? of course there will be adjustments though some points are just silly.
things like downtime in between matches could easily be fixed, complaints about not knowing about hackers even though forums have been writing about them is just stupid, does anyone seriously think that MLG would eliminate guys without more "official" proof? Are you seriously calling that tournament fine, but not 100% smooth? It literally could not have been run worse. Argh, stop using literally wrong there's a lot of ways it could have been run worse, like they could have held the entire tournament on gold base antiga shipyard
No they couldnt! Map pool is one of the things that blizzard has determined for wcs and is not in the power of mlg to screw up.
|
On April 22 2013 20:42 Waxangel wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 20:41 Type|NarutO wrote:On April 22 2013 20:40 NEEDZMOAR wrote:
When did sc2 fans become bitter, angry spoiled crybabies? Did you seriously expect everything to go 100% smooth the first time around? of course there will be adjustments though some points are just silly.
things like downtime in between matches could easily be fixed, complaints about not knowing about hackers even though forums have been writing about them is just stupid, does anyone seriously think that MLG would eliminate guys without more "official" proof? Are you seriously calling that tournament fine, but not 100% smooth? It literally could not have been run worse. Argh, stop using literally wrong there's a lot of ways it could have been run worse, like they could have held the entire tournament on gold base antiga shipyard
Literally was perfectly fine here if you don't make up for artificial scenarios or do you feel the need to point out that literally in this case could only be used for the worst case possible?
|
It literally is not perfectly fine
|
On April 22 2013 20:27 GizmoPT wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 20:26 pmp10 wrote:On April 22 2013 20:19 JustPassingBy wrote:
So let's put the statement of the MLG and the statement of the ESL side by side:
There is no MLG statement yet. Just a announcement of one. bullshit takes time to write :D
They should hire Plansix who I've heard is a great lawyer.
MLG will bring some smoke I think and we will all happily forget about everything. A guy like Sundance doesn't reach far if he is not likeable and Sundace surely is.
|
On April 22 2013 20:45 SpikeStarcraft wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 20:42 Waxangel wrote:On April 22 2013 20:41 Type|NarutO wrote:On April 22 2013 20:40 NEEDZMOAR wrote:
When did sc2 fans become bitter, angry spoiled crybabies? Did you seriously expect everything to go 100% smooth the first time around? of course there will be adjustments though some points are just silly.
things like downtime in between matches could easily be fixed, complaints about not knowing about hackers even though forums have been writing about them is just stupid, does anyone seriously think that MLG would eliminate guys without more "official" proof? Are you seriously calling that tournament fine, but not 100% smooth? It literally could not have been run worse. Argh, stop using literally wrong there's a lot of ways it could have been run worse, like they could have held the entire tournament on gold base antiga shipyard No they couldnt! Map pool is one of the things that blizzard has determined for wcs and is not in the power of mlg to screw up.
Nope, why do you think they still had Cloud kingdom 
|
On April 22 2013 20:47 syllogism wrote:
It literally is not perfectly fine
If I look up German meaning of it, it seems to be. Explain to me how my scenario would have looked then ?
|
United States33495 Posts
On April 22 2013 20:46 Type|NarutO wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 20:42 Waxangel wrote:On April 22 2013 20:41 Type|NarutO wrote:On April 22 2013 20:40 NEEDZMOAR wrote:
When did sc2 fans become bitter, angry spoiled crybabies? Did you seriously expect everything to go 100% smooth the first time around? of course there will be adjustments though some points are just silly.
things like downtime in between matches could easily be fixed, complaints about not knowing about hackers even though forums have been writing about them is just stupid, does anyone seriously think that MLG would eliminate guys without more "official" proof? Are you seriously calling that tournament fine, but not 100% smooth? It literally could not have been run worse. Argh, stop using literally wrong there's a lot of ways it could have been run worse, like they could have held the entire tournament on gold base antiga shipyard Literally was perfectly fine here if you don't make up for artificial scenarios or do you feel the need to point out that literally in this case could only be used for the worst case possible?
look, just because you couldn't defeat England in a war doesn't mean you have to try to destroy their language decades later
Yes I'm aware of all the flaws in this statement, it's a joke
|
On April 22 2013 20:35 Godwrath wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 20:32 JustPassingBy wrote:On April 22 2013 20:27 GizmoPT wrote:On April 22 2013 20:26 pmp10 wrote:On April 22 2013 20:19 JustPassingBy wrote:
So let's put the statement of the MLG and the statement of the ESL side by side:
There is no MLG statement yet. Just a announcement of one. bullshit takes time to write :D Wait that was an announcement? Lol, I though the one liner was the statement... Idiot me... <.< Sundance later tweeted again blaming coffee and being sleepy. It was obvious that wasn't the statement but poor writing got the best of him lol.
Sundance doesn't care much about PR as we've learned (silly him).
On the topic:
The biggest mistake MLG made was having just 1 qualifier; While ESL was able to improve on their mistakes (that are for the most part understandable considering the amount of players and the little time they had) , MLG is now left with this rather unfortunate situation.
|
On April 22 2013 20:49 Waxangel wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 20:46 Type|NarutO wrote:On April 22 2013 20:42 Waxangel wrote:On April 22 2013 20:41 Type|NarutO wrote:On April 22 2013 20:40 NEEDZMOAR wrote:
When did sc2 fans become bitter, angry spoiled crybabies? Did you seriously expect everything to go 100% smooth the first time around? of course there will be adjustments though some points are just silly.
things like downtime in between matches could easily be fixed, complaints about not knowing about hackers even though forums have been writing about them is just stupid, does anyone seriously think that MLG would eliminate guys without more "official" proof? Are you seriously calling that tournament fine, but not 100% smooth? It literally could not have been run worse. Argh, stop using literally wrong there's a lot of ways it could have been run worse, like they could have held the entire tournament on gold base antiga shipyard Literally was perfectly fine here if you don't make up for artificial scenarios or do you feel the need to point out that literally in this case could only be used for the worst case possible? look, just because you couldn't defeat England in a war doesn't mean you have to try to destroy their language decades later Yes I'm aware of all the flaws in this statement, it's a joke
See pm
|
On April 22 2013 20:48 Godwrath wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 20:45 SpikeStarcraft wrote:On April 22 2013 20:42 Waxangel wrote:On April 22 2013 20:41 Type|NarutO wrote:On April 22 2013 20:40 NEEDZMOAR wrote:
When did sc2 fans become bitter, angry spoiled crybabies? Did you seriously expect everything to go 100% smooth the first time around? of course there will be adjustments though some points are just silly.
things like downtime in between matches could easily be fixed, complaints about not knowing about hackers even though forums have been writing about them is just stupid, does anyone seriously think that MLG would eliminate guys without more "official" proof? Are you seriously calling that tournament fine, but not 100% smooth? It literally could not have been run worse. Argh, stop using literally wrong there's a lot of ways it could have been run worse, like they could have held the entire tournament on gold base antiga shipyard No they couldnt! Map pool is one of the things that blizzard has determined for wcs and is not in the power of mlg to screw up. Nope, why do you think they still had Cloud kingdom
Whaaat? Pitchforks!! :D
|
On April 22 2013 20:49 Waxangel wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 20:46 Type|NarutO wrote:On April 22 2013 20:42 Waxangel wrote:On April 22 2013 20:41 Type|NarutO wrote:On April 22 2013 20:40 NEEDZMOAR wrote:
When did sc2 fans become bitter, angry spoiled crybabies? Did you seriously expect everything to go 100% smooth the first time around? of course there will be adjustments though some points are just silly.
things like downtime in between matches could easily be fixed, complaints about not knowing about hackers even though forums have been writing about them is just stupid, does anyone seriously think that MLG would eliminate guys without more "official" proof? Are you seriously calling that tournament fine, but not 100% smooth? It literally could not have been run worse. Argh, stop using literally wrong there's a lot of ways it could have been run worse, like they could have held the entire tournament on gold base antiga shipyard Literally was perfectly fine here if you don't make up for artificial scenarios or do you feel the need to point out that literally in this case could only be used for the worst case possible? look, just because you couldn't defeat England in a war doesn't mean you have to try to destroy their language decades later
Godwin's law, really?
|
On April 22 2013 20:49 Waxangel wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 20:46 Type|NarutO wrote:On April 22 2013 20:42 Waxangel wrote:On April 22 2013 20:41 Type|NarutO wrote:On April 22 2013 20:40 NEEDZMOAR wrote:
When did sc2 fans become bitter, angry spoiled crybabies? Did you seriously expect everything to go 100% smooth the first time around? of course there will be adjustments though some points are just silly.
things like downtime in between matches could easily be fixed, complaints about not knowing about hackers even though forums have been writing about them is just stupid, does anyone seriously think that MLG would eliminate guys without more "official" proof? Are you seriously calling that tournament fine, but not 100% smooth? It literally could not have been run worse. Argh, stop using literally wrong there's a lot of ways it could have been run worse, like they could have held the entire tournament on gold base antiga shipyard Literally was perfectly fine here if you don't make up for artificial scenarios or do you feel the need to point out that literally in this case could only be used for the worst case possible? look, just because you couldn't defeat England in a war doesn't mean you have to try to destroy their language decades later Yes I'm aware of all the flaws in this statement, it's a joke
Yes the flaw is that its a racist joke.
|
On April 22 2013 20:54 SpikeStarcraft wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 20:49 Waxangel wrote:On April 22 2013 20:46 Type|NarutO wrote:On April 22 2013 20:42 Waxangel wrote:On April 22 2013 20:41 Type|NarutO wrote:On April 22 2013 20:40 NEEDZMOAR wrote:
When did sc2 fans become bitter, angry spoiled crybabies? Did you seriously expect everything to go 100% smooth the first time around? of course there will be adjustments though some points are just silly.
things like downtime in between matches could easily be fixed, complaints about not knowing about hackers even though forums have been writing about them is just stupid, does anyone seriously think that MLG would eliminate guys without more "official" proof? Are you seriously calling that tournament fine, but not 100% smooth? It literally could not have been run worse. Argh, stop using literally wrong there's a lot of ways it could have been run worse, like they could have held the entire tournament on gold base antiga shipyard Literally was perfectly fine here if you don't make up for artificial scenarios or do you feel the need to point out that literally in this case could only be used for the worst case possible? look, just because you couldn't defeat England in a war doesn't mean you have to try to destroy their language decades later Yes I'm aware of all the flaws in this statement, it's a joke Yes the flaw is that its a racist joke.
ya, defintlity Godwin's law, Nazi Germany here we come!
|
On April 22 2013 20:54 SpikeStarcraft wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 20:49 Waxangel wrote:On April 22 2013 20:46 Type|NarutO wrote:On April 22 2013 20:42 Waxangel wrote:On April 22 2013 20:41 Type|NarutO wrote:On April 22 2013 20:40 NEEDZMOAR wrote:
When did sc2 fans become bitter, angry spoiled crybabies? Did you seriously expect everything to go 100% smooth the first time around? of course there will be adjustments though some points are just silly.
things like downtime in between matches could easily be fixed, complaints about not knowing about hackers even though forums have been writing about them is just stupid, does anyone seriously think that MLG would eliminate guys without more "official" proof? Are you seriously calling that tournament fine, but not 100% smooth? It literally could not have been run worse. Argh, stop using literally wrong there's a lot of ways it could have been run worse, like they could have held the entire tournament on gold base antiga shipyard Literally was perfectly fine here if you don't make up for artificial scenarios or do you feel the need to point out that literally in this case could only be used for the worst case possible? look, just because you couldn't defeat England in a war doesn't mean you have to try to destroy their language decades later Yes I'm aware of all the flaws in this statement, it's a joke Yes the flaw is that its a racist joke.
Making fun of another country is not racist. That statement is litererally no reason to be thin-skinned 
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
