4. You may vote for yourself. You may not vote for anyone dead or outside the game.
Kville do you want to be lynched/replaced/modkilled?
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
4. You may vote for yourself. You may not vote for anyone dead or outside the game. Kville do you want to be lynched/replaced/modkilled? | ||
Kreb
4834 Posts
Possibly off topic: + Show Spoiler + English might not be my first languege, but I consider myself quite well versed. But I still have no idea what this means (I understand the words, not the meaning). On September 04 2012 04:47 Kville wrote: proves and shows any connections to the game How does one "prove and show connection to a game"? | ||
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On September 04 2012 05:05 Kreb wrote: I'll probably not vote Kville for the reason that he should be replaced. But that reply after saying like 10 words in 40 hours sure as hell doesnt make him look better. Possibly off topic: + Show Spoiler + English might not be my first languege, but I consider myself quite well versed. But I still have no idea what this means (I understand the words, not the meaning). On September 04 2012 04:47 Kville wrote: proves and shows any connections to the game How does one "prove and show connection to a game"? He's saying that a D1 lynch will not help us get reads on anyone.....which is not true. | ||
Stutters695
2610 Posts
By the same token I'd support a lynch on Kville if we can consolidate enough votes on him. There is at least one person who said they probably won't be back before lynch who is on Cubu and we can't trust Kville's vote on himself. Because of that I have to go with Cubu but I'm open to switching if there is support. ##Vote Cubu | ||
Kville
United States173 Posts
On September 04 2012 05:03 thrawn2112 wrote: From the OP: 4. You may vote for yourself. You may not vote for anyone dead or outside the game. Kville do you want to be lynched/replaced/modkilled? What seems tobe the problem.? It says I may vote for my self. Correct? I am making a statement. If you wanna have a vote from me today then it will be the same as voting for myself. becuase eitjer way we are going to losea town today. | ||
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On September 04 2012 04:56 Stutters695 wrote: We know you know how to play Kville. So start explaining. Currently it seems like you're lying because your 3rd post on Day 1 in NMIII was a vote on Marvellosity. Even if you are telling the truth about your thoughts on d1 lynches your play is so anti-town we honestly would be better off without you Actually I'm in agreement with this, especially the bolded part. Kville answer this question. You have played extremely poorly, broken a rule, and there is the evidence in the replacement thread that suggest you wanted to be removed from the game. Do you want to play or not? If you do, then why are you purposely playing so extremely anti-town? I say your bad play is intentional because here are your actions: -Lurk on 1 post until near voting deadline -Broke a rule by self-voting -Make an statement about non-lynching so illogical I don't think anyone would have it as an honest opinion So why play intentionally bad if you are town? | ||
Stutters695
2610 Posts
| ||
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
KillingTime
France101 Posts
I am ignoring Kville for the moment... I think the quality of his posts is self evident, but he is just a distraction atm. | ||
Kreb
4834 Posts
In summary: :-( | ||
Sonic Death Monkey
Sweden991 Posts
On September 04 2012 04:25 Stutters695 wrote: Alright, a couple of thoughts. First, why has no one called KVille out on the fact that all he's done is avoided a modkill two days ago and posted zip since then? At the very least step up and say that if he doesn't step up his game he's going to die D2 or something in case he really has been busy. Golbat lived til D4 like this last game as a scum doing the exact same thing. He's managed to drop 6 posts in his other game of mafia but he can't spend 5 minutes here? This has been addressed, read the last couple of pages. On September 04 2012 04:25 Stutters695 wrote: @Sonic Death Monkey So your case against me consists of determining I have "pseudo-helpful posts." What part of my post was "pseudo-helpful"? The fact that if I point out things that don't necessarily mean scumtells because I don't want to see the town go down the same road as it did in XXIV? Fair enough it hasn't been the most helpful but your entire case on lynching me is off of a lack of contribution. The case is based on you contributing a few times without any valuable reads or questions. Your contributions have been about: 1) Lynching lurkers. 2) Low post counts not necessarily being scummy. 3) List-making. You've only covered the most generic questions possible and without helping out on reads and who to actually lynch. You've been in the thread but you're the definition of laying low. Put yourself in my shoes, reading your own posts, why wouldn't my read be that you're scummy? As for XXIV, I haven't followed TL maffia threads. You'll have to enlighten me as to why your posts in this thread was meant to avoid whatever happened in that thread. On September 04 2012 04:25 Stutters695 wrote: Like others are saying why am I a better lynch than Cubu? He's said he's suspicious of Drazak for one post (which could easily be a misunderstanding of the rules) and is asking people to kill off Kville instead of him because he isn't there. Not providing reads to show why he'll be helpful day2, he just should live because there is someone afk. You bring up how a lurking scum tends to be more rational without any explanation as to why you say that (except to further your own case) and justify not lynching Cubu. Spazzes have been scum before in newbie games (DrWiggl3s, YourHarry) and the only reason they've lived was due to giving them the benefit of the doubt for days (Got Vig Thrawn lynched instead of Scum YH in XXIV). It's based on experience and what I believe to be fairly sound logic. The first is obviously my personal observations of games, admittedly limited to 4-5 games, mostly newbie. The second is covered in the quote in my last post. The inexperienced town newbie knows he's townie and he usually underestimates the difficulty of getting this information across (it's really hard). This leads him to 1) underestimate the risk of getting into a sticky situation and 2) overestimates his chances of getting out of those situations. The reverse is true for an inexperienced scum. I'm obviously working with probabilities here, the fact that there are exceptions doesn't mean the analysis is invalid. On September 04 2012 04:25 Stutters695 wrote: You also say Show nested quote + If you think Drazark is more scummy why would you ever consider Cubu over him? It's not like a flip on Cubu confirms anyone else's alignment this early in the game. Explain.The low level of Cubu's contributions makes him a better lynch candidate even though I think Drazark may be a more likely scum. Because if we keep Cubu around I'm worried he'll just keep his nonsensical posts coming. Since Drazark is more active and tries to contribute in an intelligent way, keeping him there's a good chance we can get a better read later (in either direction). There's a decent risk Cubu will remain a black-box. On September 04 2012 04:25 Stutters695 wrote: (As a side note I've just contributed as much as Cubu in terms of scumreads, but you're missing my point from earlier still. It isn't how often you contribute its the intent and what you contribute.) I don't think so. What was the intent of your contributions? Like I said, it seems like your posts are trying to look like contributing without actually adding much value at all. The case against you isn't rock solid, but as I've just explained, it's the wagon I like best. You've mostly stayed out of the thread for ~40 hours and now show up for EOD, why haven't posted anything of value earlier? You've put yourself in a shitty situation because not everyone will be around for EOD (as a Euro I need to go to sleep now). I still like your wagon better than Cubu's so I'm leaving my vote on. If you're really townie I hope you survive and give me a chance to change my mind d2. | ||
Sonic Death Monkey
Sweden991 Posts
| ||
Kville
United States173 Posts
On September 04 2012 05:19 thrawn2112 wrote: Show nested quote + On September 04 2012 04:56 Stutters695 wrote: We know you know how to play Kville. So start explaining. Currently it seems like you're lying because your 3rd post on Day 1 in NMIII was a vote on Marvellosity. Even if you are telling the truth about your thoughts on d1 lynches your play is so anti-town we honestly would be better off without you Actually I'm in agreement with this, especially the bolded part. Kville answer this question. You have played extremely poorly, broken a rule, and there is the evidence in the replacement thread that suggest you wanted to be removed from the game. Do you want to play or not? If you do, then why are you purposely playing so extremely anti-town? I say your bad play is intentional because here are your actions: -Lurk on 1 post until near voting deadline -Broke a rule by self-voting -Make an statement about non-lynching so illogical I don't think anyone would have it as an honest opinion So why play intentionally bad if you are town? Over analyzing is cute and can be a feature of a scum. It is day one and it seem as if you are in desperate need for a lynch. so desperate in fact that you are over reading the rulebook and calling me a cheater. | ||
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On September 04 2012 05:53 Kville wrote: Show nested quote + On September 04 2012 05:19 thrawn2112 wrote: On September 04 2012 04:56 Stutters695 wrote: We know you know how to play Kville. So start explaining. Currently it seems like you're lying because your 3rd post on Day 1 in NMIII was a vote on Marvellosity. Even if you are telling the truth about your thoughts on d1 lynches your play is so anti-town we honestly would be better off without you Actually I'm in agreement with this, especially the bolded part. Kville answer this question. You have played extremely poorly, broken a rule, and there is the evidence in the replacement thread that suggest you wanted to be removed from the game. Do you want to play or not? If you do, then why are you purposely playing so extremely anti-town? I say your bad play is intentional because here are your actions: -Lurk on 1 post until near voting deadline -Broke a rule by self-voting -Make an statement about non-lynching so illogical I don't think anyone would have it as an honest opinion So why play intentionally bad if you are town? Over analyzing is cute and can be a feature of a scum. It is day one and it seem as if you are in desperate need for a lynch. so desperate in fact that you are over reading the rulebook and calling me a cheater. Ok cool but again, why are you playing intentionally bad town? | ||
drazak
United States479 Posts
| ||
Kreb
4834 Posts
You started off by ignoring this: On September 04 2012 02:04 Kreb wrote: Show nested quote + On September 03 2012 23:57 KillingTime wrote: On a percentage basis I think it is more likely that cuba or weetee or stutters (who never asked those "questions" he was promising) or drazak are scum who have realised their mistake and are trying to cover for it - rather than kville who is being such a blatant lurk. Good catch, forgot about that. Any comments on this, Stutters? Then you follow it up by posting this: Part 2 Incoming. I just wanted to address the case against me first to give you guys times to look it over. So, we got this part 2 coming anytime soon? Or are you, for the second time, saying you will do something and then just ignore it? | ||
Stutters695
2610 Posts
On September 04 2012 05:35 Sonic Death Monkey wrote: Show nested quote + On September 04 2012 04:25 Stutters695 wrote: Alright, a couple of thoughts. On September 02 2012 22:57 Kville wrote: Im not lurking! I just woke up! First, why has no one called KVille out on the fact that all he's done is avoided a modkill two days ago and posted zip since then? At the very least step up and say that if he doesn't step up his game he's going to die D2 or something in case he really has been busy. Golbat lived til D4 like this last game as a scum doing the exact same thing. He's managed to drop 6 posts in his other game of mafia but he can't spend 5 minutes here? This has been addressed, read the last couple of pages. Show nested quote + On September 04 2012 04:25 Stutters695 wrote: @Sonic Death Monkey So your case against me consists of determining I have "pseudo-helpful posts." What part of my post was "pseudo-helpful"? The fact that if I point out things that don't necessarily mean scumtells because I don't want to see the town go down the same road as it did in XXIV? Fair enough it hasn't been the most helpful but your entire case on lynching me is off of a lack of contribution. The case is based on you contributing a few times without any valuable reads or questions. Your contributions have been about: 1) Lynching lurkers. 2) Low post counts not necessarily being scummy. 3) List-making. You've only covered the most generic questions possible and without helping out on reads and who to actually lynch. You've been in the thread but you're the definition of laying low. Put yourself in my shoes, reading your own posts, why wouldn't my read be that you're scummy? As for XXIV, I haven't followed TL maffia threads. You'll have to enlighten me as to why your posts in this thread was meant to avoid whatever happened in that thread. Show nested quote + On September 04 2012 04:25 Stutters695 wrote: Like others are saying why am I a better lynch than Cubu? He's said he's suspicious of Drazak for one post (which could easily be a misunderstanding of the rules) and is asking people to kill off Kville instead of him because he isn't there. Not providing reads to show why he'll be helpful day2, he just should live because there is someone afk. You bring up how a lurking scum tends to be more rational without any explanation as to why you say that (except to further your own case) and justify not lynching Cubu. Spazzes have been scum before in newbie games (DrWiggl3s, YourHarry) and the only reason they've lived was due to giving them the benefit of the doubt for days (Got Vig Thrawn lynched instead of Scum YH in XXIV). It's based on experience and what I believe to be fairly sound logic. The first is obviously my personal observations of games, admittedly limited to 4-5 games, mostly newbie. The second is covered in the quote in my last post. The inexperienced town newbie knows he's townie and he usually underestimates the difficulty of getting this information across (it's really hard). This leads him to 1) underestimate the risk of getting into a sticky situation and 2) overestimates his chances of getting out of those situations. The reverse is true for an inexperienced scum. I'm obviously working with probabilities here, the fact that there are exceptions doesn't mean the analysis is invalid. Show nested quote + On September 04 2012 04:25 Stutters695 wrote: You also say The low level of Cubu's contributions makes him a better lynch candidate even though I think Drazark may be a more likely scum. If you think Drazark is more scummy why would you ever consider Cubu over him? It's not like a flip on Cubu confirms anyone else's alignment this early in the game. Explain.Because if we keep Cubu around I'm worried he'll just keep his nonsensical posts coming. Since Drazark is more active and tries to contribute in an intelligent way, keeping him there's a good chance we can get a better read later (in either direction). There's a decent risk Cubu will remain a black-box. Show nested quote + On September 04 2012 04:25 Stutters695 wrote: (As a side note I've just contributed as much as Cubu in terms of scumreads, but you're missing my point from earlier still. It isn't how often you contribute its the intent and what you contribute.) I don't think so. What was the intent of your contributions? Like I said, it seems like your posts are trying to look like contributing without actually adding much value at all. The case against you isn't rock solid, but as I've just explained, it's the wagon I like best. You've mostly stayed out of the thread for ~40 hours and now show up for EOD, why haven't posted anything of value earlier? You've put yourself in a shitty situation because not everyone will be around for EOD (as a Euro I need to go to sleep now). I still like your wagon better than Cubu's so I'm leaving my vote on. If you're really townie I hope you survive and give me a chance to change my mind d2. Sorry what's EOD? I haven't heard that expression before. Regarding XXIV: In XXIV we went from lynching a lurker D1 to lynching our most vocal town. Day 2 we lynched a claimed Vig Thrawn over a scum YourHarry. This happened because instead of focusing on motives and what was said everyone except 3 of us just assumed YH was so bad he had to be good. The intent of that post is showing you how you've spent all of day 1 tunneling me off of one post instead of checking other people. I'm not saying you're wrong for questioning me but you're going to be sorely disappointed if I get bandwagoned, flip town and you're the only person who has interacted with me at all. | ||
KillingTime
France101 Posts
Yawn - Ok... I am going to ignore Kville for the moment because his posting is useless. At this point I am happy to get on Kush's Cubu wagon. He has made a cogent case for why Cubu is a decent lynch and has offered up a plausible reason (meta) why he prefers him to Weetee. I have said already that I am sceptical of the value of meta in a newbie game, but looking back at the thread I can't honestly say I have a better case on Weetee than Kush does on Cubu and all day 1 reads are fairly weak by necessity. Weetee still remains in my mind though and I certainly will want to examine him again D2. He has ignored/not seen/not yet answered my request, but I assume he will see it when he comes to vote soonish assuming he does not want to get modkilled. As I will be asleep for the lynch - gl town. | ||
Stutters695
2610 Posts
On September 04 2012 06:12 Kreb wrote: Stutters You started off by ignoring this: Show nested quote + On September 04 2012 02:04 Kreb wrote: On September 03 2012 23:57 KillingTime wrote: On a percentage basis I think it is more likely that cuba or weetee or stutters (who never asked those "questions" he was promising) or drazak are scum who have realised their mistake and are trying to cover for it - rather than kville who is being such a blatant lurk. Good catch, forgot about that. Any comments on this, Stutters? Then you follow it up by posting this: Show nested quote + Part 2 Incoming. I just wanted to address the case against me first to give you guys times to look it over. So, we got this part 2 coming anytime soon? Or are you, for the second time, saying you will do something and then just ignore it? Sorry I didn't see your post about that. Regardless I fell asleep as it was like 4am my time when I posted that. Other people have since covered what I would have questioned them about. Part 2 was my post on Cubu and Kville. | ||
WeeTee
Australia24 Posts
My vote in this situation goes to ##Vote Cubu With seemingly all the opportunity to defend it self, the lack of content is my best glancing bet. Hopefully you give my replacement a chance to play annnd i'm out. | ||
| ||
Next event in 5h 57m
[ Submit Event ] |
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games tarik_tv12724 Grubby4513 FrodaN1363 B2W.Neo940 C9.Mang0640 Beastyqt472 Mew2King414 ZombieGrub380 Fuzer 105 QueenE100 Trikslyr90 KnowMe56 Organizations
StarCraft 2 • intothetv StarCraft: Brood War• IndyKCrew • sooper7s • Migwel • AfreecaTV YouTube • Laughngamez YouTube • LaughNgamezSOOP • Kozan League of Legends Other Games |
Korean StarCraft League
OlimoLeague
SC Evo Complete
PassionCraft
Online Event
BSL: ProLeague
Dewalt vs XuanXuan
Cross vs Xin
CSO Cup
Sparkling Tuna Cup
SOOP
ByuN vs Rogue
SC Evo Complete
[ Show More ] WardiTV Invitational
PassionCraft
Online Event
BSL: ProLeague
Mihu vs kogeT
Sziky vs JDConan
Wardi Open
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
The PondCast
Replay Cast
|
|