| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
First for sheeping, I can say that I won't deny that I sheeped, many others did also, especcialy(DUN DUN DUN CCCALF) Next, as for meta, others have said that my scum meta does NOT match this game, as ana example why, in the first page of my filter I didnt give my reads, but here I consistently shared my reads. | ||
|
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On March 29 2012 09:15 johnnywup wrote: c^3, although he posted, is clearly trying to get around the 1 post a day/night cycle... he should be modkilled imo I strongly disagree with this. I don't like the way 3C has played, I think it's scummy, but he has not violated the rules of the game. As stated, they are: You must post in this thread once per day/night cycle and vote every day while you are alive. If you fail to do so, you will be modkilled. Is 3C being scummy as hell? sure. Is he barely following the requirements? yes. but he IS following them. Maybe you could even Warn him if you as the host believe that to be valid. However, he has not failed to follow the written activity requirements, and thus should not be modkilled, in my personal opinion. Still want a vigi to shoot him though. | ||
|
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
| ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5202 Posts
1 2 3 4+5 night time is a good time to review what happened the previous day; don't let actions/statements of the past be pushed under the rug sloosh where u @? i need more ppl i recognize T_T oh and blzinghand i think you've referred to "VE" as "ET" a few times. together we make "VET" but i dont think that's what ur goin for | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On March 29 2012 12:08 EchelonTee wrote: oh and blzinghand i think you've referred to "VE" as "ET" a few times. together we make "VET" but i dont think that's what ur goin for That's literally untrue. I challenge you to point out an occasion where this has happened. | ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
VE, will you stop being a bully and start making some sense? Your "Prove yourself town to me and vote C_C" shit was retarded and you should have known it. On March 29 2012 06:58 EchelonTee wrote: RE: gonzaw's inquiries That comment was a jab at your overall playing style; i've already said that i don't like your super large posts but that's irrelevant to alignment. do i think you're a scummy scum from scumville? no. do I think you're suspicious? yep, mostly for your tone and the subjects you are choosing to talk about. am I going to put up a case on you right now? nope. I don't like your case on blue, b/c as a bunch of ppl have said, he's not acting like he did in Aperture perse and that's the basis of your argument. him writing "one liners" and looking "confused" isn't convincing enough, and I feel that you were just trying to push forward a new wagon on a player that lots of people criticize. Wtf is up with the 2 bolded points? You don't think I'm scum in the 1st point, but you think I'm pushing a wagon on a player as if was scum in the 2nd one? Make up your mind, am I scum or not? On March 29 2012 06:42 Nemesis wrote: His main case against bluelightz is that he is sheeping and playing like he did in Aperture Mafia. I checked his filter in aperture mafia, no he is not playing the same way. Bluelightz is giving out his reads in here, while in Aperture he just posted a bunch of fluff. Gonzaw, can you explain what is similar between bluelightz's player there as mafia, and his play here right now, because frankly,I don't see it. Maybe people are resisting, because there isn't a strong case against him? In both games he posts "innocent" stuff like smileys, for instance "O_O" or ":O" or "D:" or whatever. He doesn't look confident, he posts just to look active, etc. The important thing for me is that this is the next game he plays since Aperture, and I think he's playing very similarly. He's recent posting hasn't done anything to convince me otherwise either. And to those that say "Oh Blue is always scummy bla bla bla", well, there are plenty of games where he acts "scummy", but if you look closely you can see he's town. That's not one of those games. Apart from his bad posting, sheeping, flip-flopping regarding that ET vote, then yes, I'm basing my argument on meta, but I think that's enough. On March 29 2012 06:06 slOosh wrote: Gonzaw, out of the people who have called you out, who do you think is most suspicious? I'm most suspicious of Zentor. After rereading his filter, there are a few things that caught my eye: On March 27 2012 23:34 MrZentor wrote: *cough* you're *cough* EchelonTee seems to be behaving rather erratically. He starts by being helpful and explaining how he would treat the game. He continues his good townie streak by questioning BH's play with reasons. He then starts to go crazy. He then transitions from crazy back to normal good townie in this post. He does this a few times throughout his posts. To be honest, I can't decide if this is town or mafia behavior. He could be a town who is mixing BH's and VE's styles. He could be scum trying to make it seem like he is helping town while sowing chaos. I'll let somebody else decide. :/ What is this? He just points out ET's style of play, and puts a bunch of quotes; only to say that this doesn't matter later? Okay, I could let this pass, since he was just asked about his thoughts on ET, but what catches my attention is the bolded part. Not only he's wishy washy against him (a simple "He's null to me" would have sufficed), but he asks somebody else to decide? What possible motivation would he have to post that? His next post is just a rehash of VE's case against me, pointing out the "flag" stuff and the spaces from my posting (which as you have seen, I'm trying to improve). He then posts this referencing my post: His last post doesn't seem nearly as suspicious as his first two. Then after VE just points out some stuff about said post (which was weak stuff again), he immediately posts this: I will admit that it is more suspicious than I thought it was, but I still think the second post I cited is the most suspicious. When I asked why he suddenly thought it was suspicious, only by sheeping VE's post, he posts: He pointed out that it was suspicious. I agreed. I told you what I think about that post you made. Now this is clearly a lie since he never mentioned anything about that post, so when I call him out he posts: You only asked what I thought of it, not why I thought what I thought of it. ?? Seriously, that last sentence is so wrong. So if someone asks you what you think, then you shouldn't justify it just because they didn't specifically ask you why you think what you think? Really? It's obvious that when someone asks pressures you for your thoughts, you not only post your thoughts but also post the reasons for thinking that; that's the point of asking in the first place, to get people to post their thought process and reasoning. What's worse is even though he posted that, he never said why he thought about it either, he just points out I didn't ask him why he thought that, and instead of clearing doubts and posting exactly that, he just ignores it completely. Another thing that caught my eye, and he never responded either was this: In one of his earlier posts, he posted this: VE seems to be promoting a good townie environment and being a lot calmer than BH. I am most afraid of him being scum, because if he were, I would never know. He says he is afraid of VE being scum. I suppose this means he will put everything VE says under scrutiny, pressure him and keep an eye out on him in case he's scum, right? But then the only thing he does is agree with VE about everything, and not even hint at him being scum, not ever putting him under scrutiny, nothing. He only posts this (when I pressured him to): Actually, I analyze everything VE says, and, so far, I've agreed with *almost* everything he has said. I never saw anything that implied he was "analyzing" VE, nor his thoughts about him, nothing. He just immediately agreed on VE, sheeped his case on me, and when asked about said behaviour said he "analyses everything VE says". That seems bullshit to me. Him defending Bluelightz and saying he played "pro-town" isn't very good either. Oh, here's the kicker: On March 28 2012 23:18 MrZentor wrote: ##Vote Cyber_Cheese I'm voting for reasons I explained very early in the thread. Please search his filter for those "reasons". Didn't find them? here: I do agree that his initial accusation looks suspicious. The flag is really bizarre, because I couldn't imagine posting it as mafia or towns person. If I were mafia, why would I call attention to myself with a conspicuous flag? If I were a towns person, why would I give the mafia a hint at my nationality? Currently, he does seem like the scummiest player, because of the subtle accusation accompanied with his other posts. The ONLY time he posts his thoughts on C_C, which is basically at the start-middle of Day 1, and they are not very strong. He basically says he "looks suspicious" because of his accusation, and nothing else (even says the flag thing is a null tell to him). He never posted any of his thoughts on C_C's recent posting either. I'd be willing to lynch either him or Blue tomorrow, if a vig doesn't want to do me the favour and shoot one of them tonight. I don't like Sinensis' lack of participation and activity though. Will ccalf get replaced? He doesn't look good at all with that ninja-vote. If he doesn't post anything at all this night, then yes a vig should just shoot him, if not we will waste all D2 on him. Blazinghand my dear, would you make my day and respond to that post I made eons ago? Basically, what do you think about me? What do you think about the case made against me? Most importantly, what do you think about Blue and Zentor? | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I'm taking a look at the C_C wagon. At the very least 2 and probably more scum are on the wagon. | ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
On March 29 2012 13:26 VisceraEyes wrote: Sorry for being a bully guys, I'll try to stop. I make no guarantees. I'm taking a look at the C_C wagon. At the very least 2 and probably more scum are on the wagon. Cyber_Cheese (12): VisceraEyes (1): cccalf (1): Blazinghand ....are you kidding me? >_> lol | ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
I still want to know what you think about Blue, I don't think you ever stated what you thought about him previously. | ||
|
Sinensis
United States2513 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On March 29 2012 13:45 Sinensis wrote: Maybe I am being overly simplistic, but I think we should lynch Blazinghand because I do not believe all 4 scum would vote for the same townie when it was certain the townie was dying anyway. Not overly simplistic: moronical. Provide me with legitimate analysis and I'll address it. I see no reason to respond to garbage posts though. | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5202 Posts
On March 27 2012 16:32 Blazinghand wrote: ET: I'll examine C_C after I finish writing up and posting the case. Thanks for bringing that to our attention. VE mentioned C_C that time On March 28 2012 10:13 Blazinghand wrote: Good evening gents! I'm currently putting together a 4-course meal today. On the prix fixe menu today: Amuse Bouche cccalf Entree JW Plats Principaux ET CC Desserts Voting someone might've been me that time but u never posted anything about me after that, unless i missed it | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On March 29 2012 13:43 gonzaw wrote: EBWOP: Great, I'm waiting on your analysis BH. I still want to know what you think about Blue, I don't think you ever stated what you thought about him previously. I haven't made any statements about Bluelightz other than noting that he typically posts unhelpful lists as town. I'll add to that: he posts almost nothing as scum. Any analysis will be posted minutes before daybreak. | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5202 Posts
On March 29 2012 13:52 Blazinghand wrote: Any analysis will be posted minutes before daybreak. +1 | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On March 29 2012 13:50 EchelonTee wrote: VE mentioned C_C that time might've been me that time but u never posted anything about me after that, unless i missed it In the former, I wasn't making a case on you. In the latter, I was considering analyzing your posting, but did not. You'll note I didn't post anything about VE in the latter case either until he went mad with power. | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5202 Posts
On March 29 2012 13:26 VisceraEyes wrote: I'm taking a look at the C_C wagon. At the very least 2 and probably more scum are on the wagon. I have a sneaking suspicion that there is definitely 3 scum on the wagon. wait lemme do the math .... yeah there's at least 3 scum on the wagon. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On March 29 2012 13:55 EchelonTee wrote: I have a sneaking suspicion that there is definitely 3 scum on the wagon. wait lemme do the math .... yeah there's at least 3 scum on the wagon. In fact, unless you think I am scum (or claimed scum, heh) there is 4 scum on that wagon. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Other Games |
|
OlimoLeague
StarCraft2.fi
StarCraft2.fi
The PondCast
StarCraft2.fi
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://i.minus.com/iUBP2UtMo1zk2.gif)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/FIZjv.gif)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/z8LzZ.gif)
