|
With Orlando coming up fast, here is an infographic compiled with Anaheim stats on Wins by APM, Race/Matchup, Map Popularity, and Matchups on specific maps. This breakdown and infographic are likes the ones we did for Columbus and Anaheim.
Wins by Matchup: Entire Tournament:
Race Breakdown - P: 85 - Terran: 87 - Zerg: 70
TvZ: Terran: 57% Zerg: 43% 154-115
PvZ: Protoss: 48% Zerg: 52% 106-114
PvT: Protoss: 51% Terran: 49% 149-143
APM (Calculated using in-game time):
coL.DongRaeGu: 274 oGs.NaDa: 270
Here's the full infographic and numbers: http://www.majorleaguegaming.com/news/mlg-raleigh-starcraft-2-by-the-numbers
|
To compare, here was the race matchup breakdown for Columbus and Anaheim:
Columbus:
PvZ: Protoss: 46.51% Zerg: 53.49%
PvT: Protoss: 54% Terran: 46%
TvZ: Terran: 43.21% Zerg: 56.79%
Anaheim:
PvZ: Protoss: 51.1% Zerg: 48.9% 144-138
PvT: Protoss: 48.3% Terran: 51.7% 171-183
TvZ: Terran: 56.8% Zerg: 43.2% 142-108
|
Very balanced .
|
|
I don't know why there is so much QQ lately about PvT and PvZ. I know it's just one tournament and all but the only real mu that varies a great deal is ZvT.
|
United States4126 Posts
I love these stats from MLG. Great job!
|
The only matchup I think which needs some help is TvZ. There's something Terran gets that Zerg doesn't.
|
I dont know how good these results are. Considering the top end of MLG has people of the likes as DRG/Hero, etc. While the bottom end has players at like my skill level.
Edit: id much rather see just the stats from group play and brackets.
|
On September 16 2011 02:07 Grackodile wrote: I don't know why there is so much QQ lately about PvT and PvZ. I know it's just one tournament and all but the only real mu that varies a great deal is ZvT.
These numbers aren't indicative of anything, because the discrepancy in skill is often so huge.
|
On September 16 2011 02:09 ohampatu wrote: I dont know how good these results are. Considering the top end of MLG has people of the likes as DRG/Hero, etc. While the bottom end has players at like my skill level.
Edit: id much rather see just the stats from group play and brackets.
This can't be emphasized enough.
|
On September 16 2011 02:10 Elefanto wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2011 02:07 Grackodile wrote: I don't know why there is so much QQ lately about PvT and PvZ. I know it's just one tournament and all but the only real mu that varies a great deal is ZvT. These numbers aren't indicative of anything, because the discrepancy in skill is often so huge.
You make no sense there. These numbers are indicative of alot.
I dont need to see the stats of July rolling through open bracket for instance. The stats are skewed because you have alot of good players beating alot of shitty players. Yes, apm, etc can still be found. But you cant honestly graph win/los percentage, when you have players like july/hero rolling open bracket.
|
Awesome stats, thank you. It's weird how TvZ went from 43.21% in Columbus to 57% in Raleigh.
|
On September 16 2011 02:07 Grackodile wrote: I don't know why there is so much QQ lately about PvT and PvZ. I know it's just one tournament and but the only real mu that varies a great deal is ZvT.
The stats are incredibly skewed for TvZ anyhow. There were 10 matches between koreans T's and foreigner Z's, only 3 matches between koreans Z's and foreigner T's. All of the koreans won.
Makes the win percentage rather meaningless.
On September 16 2011 02:09 Amui wrote: The only matchup I think which needs some help is TvZ. There's something Terran gets that Zerg doesn't.
Yeah, more good koreans T's playing foreigner Z's then the other way around.
|
What Derez said. People really can't gleam anything MU based from these stats. Considering who plays in open bracket and the koreans invited, cause that skews all the results. Like i said.
Do this, but only do it from the group play and championship bracket.
|
Thanks for compiling but somewhat misleading as you have a group of players (Koreans) far above everyone else who skew the ratios.
The Koreans are going to win no matter what their race.
GSL is the best thing to look at as the skill levels are more uniform.
|
serious question: what can luckyfool do with 230 apm on 1base?
|
On September 16 2011 02:38 BroboCop wrote: serious question: what can luckyfool do with 230 apm on 1base?
Lol. You should see some of the old meme's. I remember a particular one that just had a picture of flash, top part said 300 apm, bottom part said 'only 5 scv's'. Cracked me up everytime i saw it.
|
On September 16 2011 02:38 BroboCop wrote: serious question: what can luckyfool do with 230 apm on 1base?
loooooooooooooooooooooooooolllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
i like luckyfool, but that's damn funny :p
|
On September 16 2011 02:38 BroboCop wrote: serious question: what can luckyfool do with 230 apm on 1base?
Make his workers work extra hard?
|
On September 16 2011 02:41 genius_man16 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2011 02:38 BroboCop wrote: serious question: what can luckyfool do with 230 apm on 1base? Make his workers work extra hard? lol yea
|
|
|
|