| Forum Index > SC2 General |
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37097 Posts
On January 28 2014 01:50 Proteus1983 wrote: Liquipedia already knows that final will be with 1 toss and 2 zergs http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/2014_Global_StarCraft_II_League_Season_1/Code_A#Wildcard Tournament Lol. I hope that was a joke. If so, good one  If not, then -___-;; | ||
|
Stress
United States980 Posts
On January 28 2014 01:57 Seeker wrote: Lol. I hope that was a joke. If so, good one If not, then -___-;;The hilarious part is there is a good chance that might be the outcome. | ||
Darkhorse
United States23455 Posts
On January 28 2014 01:57 Seeker wrote: Lol. I hope that was a joke. If so, good one If not, then -___-;;Green is the color of advancement and red is the color of non-advancement on liquipedia haha | ||
|
Riner1212
United States337 Posts
| ||
|
Yakikorosu
1203 Posts
ParalyzE has a good shot to win it, but he's the only "scary" Protoss in the bracket for me. If people play at about the same level they did in Code A, my money's on BrAvO. He was unlucky to run into Leenock twice (and he almost beat him). | ||
|
NovaMB
Germany9534 Posts
On January 28 2014 02:23 Yakikorosu wrote: Why is everyone advance-QQing about a Protoss win? People do realize that the best performing race in Code A in terms of % of players advancing was Zerg, not Protoss? Only reason there are (slightly) more Protoss than Zerg in Code S is because more were seeded in from last year. ParalyzE has a good shot to win it, but he's the only "scary" Protoss in the bracket for me. If people play at about the same level they did in Code A, my money's on BrAvO. He was unlucky to run into Leenock twice (and he almost beat him). http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/2014_Global_StarCraft_II_League_Season_1/Code_A_Statistics Winrates from Code A | ||
|
Quakecomm
United States344 Posts
| ||
|
beefITek
France54 Posts
The game is really balanced thanks D.Kim... The Code S will just be boring as hell, and God players like Flash won't participate .. Killing your own game ! | ||
|
orvinreyes
577 Posts
| ||
|
Yakikorosu
1203 Posts
On January 28 2014 02:30 NovaMB wrote: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/2014_Global_StarCraft_II_League_Season_1/Code_A_Statistics Winrates from Code A Yeah... again, the winrates show that Zerg had a sizeable lead in both of its non-mirror matchups, with a 57% win rate against Terran and 59% win rate against Protoss. Like I said, Zerg was the most successful Code A race unless your definition of "success" is just win rate against Terran alone? | ||
|
SC2Toastie
Netherlands5725 Posts
| ||
|
trada
Germany347 Posts
| ||
|
Goto_
France8 Posts
i hope a Terran like Hack | ||
|
vult
United States9400 Posts
Though my head says that Super will make it. | ||
|
EvanC
Canada130 Posts
| ||
|
Arkani
Austria60 Posts
some really interesting matchups .. sadly not streamed? | ||
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
| ||
|
Black Gun
Germany4482 Posts
On January 28 2014 03:12 SC2Toastie wrote: Don't skip the daedalus factor this. without that one ridiculous zerg map whose imba-level is not far from the infamous battle royal, zerg winrates and advancement-percentages would be much lower. | ||
|
k3n705
Canada134 Posts
 | ||
|
Penguinator
United States837 Posts
On January 28 2014 02:54 Yakikorosu wrote: Yeah... again, the winrates show that Zerg had a sizeable lead in both of its non-mirror matchups, with a 57% win rate against Terran and 59% win rate against Protoss. Like I said, Zerg was the most successful Code A race unless your definition of "success" is just win rate against Terran alone? If you look at the combined winrates for all the non-mirror matchups, Zerg is 41-30 (58%) and Protoss is 48-32 (60%). So, you're still wrong. Quickly, find something else to argue about so that Protoss doesn't look OP! | ||
| ||
[ Submit Event ] |
|
|
|
Replay Cast
RSL Revival
Clem vs Lambo
Scarlett vs Cure
CranKy Ducklings
Epic.LAN
IPSL
Dragon vs Hawk
RSL Revival
Classic vs Trap
herO vs SHIN
Sparkling Tuna Cup
OSC
IPSL
Bonyth vs Ret
WardiTV Weekly
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
