|
On July 04 2013 20:42 SsDrKosS wrote: WT# did I just read...
Why people start talking about culture and even genes... genes are just right out, but culture can have a big effect.
Of course, infrastructure is the biggest thing here, but denying player ethic/culture isn't the best way to go about this.
|
On July 04 2013 20:42 SsDrKosS wrote: WT# did I just read...
Why people start talking about culture and even genes... Gotta blame their favourite foreigner not winning against Koreans on something, ya know.
|
hard work, consistent practice hours, coaches - just snowballed out of control and here we are.
|
On July 04 2013 19:19 Prog455 wrote:Show nested quote +On July 04 2013 09:04 GolemMadness wrote:On July 04 2013 08:06 Prog455 wrote:On July 04 2013 07:32 GolemMadness wrote: The longer the competitive scene goes on, the farther behind foreigners will get, just like in Brood War. Allow me to call bullshit on this one. MLG Anaheim and Raleigh 2011 were an all time low for foreign progamers. From Raleigh 2011 foreigners have consistently improved compared to Koreans. A lot of Europeans are consistently winning against Koreans. If you look at the recent Dreamhack events it is not uncommen to see well known Koreans not even making it out of the group play.Let me give you a couple of examples: Dreamhack Open: Stockholm - Xlord and TLO finishing 1st and 2nd, JYP finishing 3rd - TLO, Sase and Nerchio finishing 1st, 2nd and 3rd. Forgg finishing 4th - Naniwa finishing 2nd, Yugioh and MC finishing 3rd and 4th - Naniwa knocks out Jaedong 2-1 - Naniwa loses 2-3 to Leenock who was at the time considered atleast top 5 in the world Dreamhack Summer - not as convincing as in Stockholm - Sjow beats Life (the prodigy) 2-1 - Lucifon wins his group over Stardust, who would eventually win the tournament MLG Spring 2013 - Naniwa knocks out: Thestc (2-0), Jaedong (2-0) and Dear (2-0) - 3 Kespa players enter this tournament, finishing 5th, and 9th (twice) I don't think that Koreans are as dominant as people make them sound all the time. Let me quote Hot_Bid (from Elephant in the room threat): Maybe Leta or Sea or Best or Zero won't come into SC2 and be ultra-successful if they switch. But Jaedong and Flash? They are outliers. They do not conform to the normal rules, and everyone who has followed Brood War knows that if they switch, it's not a question of if they will dominate and win, but when.
The "different game" argument applies to 99.9% of progamers, but not for special players like Jaedong and Flash. The game doesn't matter. Whether it's BW or SC2 or checkers or minesweeper, certain players are so good they will always be at the top. I for one is still waiting to see Jaedong mob the floor with foreigners, because in spite of training under Coach Park he is still being knocked out by a Swede that has not been anywhere near a teamhouse for god knows how long. A few foreigners beating some lower-tier Koreans occasionally doesn't mean that the gap is closing. In 2011, players like Huk, Naniwa and Idra were able to beat even the top Koreans in the world. They weren't the favourites, but they were at least competitive. Now, is there even a single foreigner in the world who could compete with the very top Koreans? As someone else already said - the Koreans themselves can not even compete with the very top. Furthermore Jaedong, Life and Leenock are certainly not mid tier.
Meaning what? Plenty of Koreans who aren't amongst the very best can still remain competitive with those who are. As I said in my previous post, some foreigners used to be able to compete with the very best Koreans. If your argument to foreigners being better now is Naniwa beating Jaedong in a matchup he's notoriously bad at, Naniwa almost beating Leenock and a slumping Life dropping a couple of series, then come on.
|
Plus please don't count Jaedong as a "top tier" korean. He had a very long break from korean training style and mates, so he's probably half the man he was (not considering the aging process). But it's still pretty damn creepy, of course.
|
Polt is laughing at this thread right now.
|
On July 04 2013 07:30 PressItDown wrote: I conclude that scooby doo is the fault at hand!
Main topic: I believe that korean players, especially kespa players grew up with esports being a legitimate job, hence if they had such a dream of playing games as a job when young, it would still feel like a very solid and obtainable dream when growing up.
gaming is big in Korea, its the biggest pro-gaming scene (as compared to other areas/scenes) in the world but even there I don't think that pro-gaming is already considered as being a "legitimate" job. just go check out some interviews/trailers/movies about the daily life of Korean pro-gamers and you'll get an idea that being a pro-gamer in Korean society does not automatically mean acceptance, popularity, or financial security.
Korean gamers still take a risky life decision if they decide to pursue pro-gaming. I think this will be the case for a while until eSports gets to a more stable point. It probably won't happen with these current generation of eSports (LoL, DOTA2, SC2, WoT, etc) but maybe some day...
links to some vids about korean pro-gamers: Barbie Prime Jaedong + a random average Korean pro-gamer
i know there's a bunch more but these two were the only ones i could remember of the top of my head
|
On July 04 2013 15:55 Scarecrow wrote:Show nested quote +On July 04 2013 15:44 BronzeKnee wrote:On July 04 2013 15:39 Scarecrow wrote:On July 04 2013 15:26 BronzeKnee wrote:On July 04 2013 13:30 JeanLuc wrote: Im no expert, but... I think its reasonable to speculate that Korean genes have something to do with their success, as well as their infrastructure of course. To say outright that genes have nothing to do with it is an emotional rather than rational reaction.
Is this a joke? So you're no expert, but saying that genes have something to do with this a rational, and not an emotional reaction? Really? We have a logical explanation, infrastructure. But instead we should discount it, and decide that genes may somehow, someway play a role? Listen man, if Korean genes are so great and so much better, then it would show in more than E-Sports. And then North Korea wouldn't be such a dump. You must be trolling, because you got me. 10/10 North Korea is irrelevant, it'd be a dump regardless of gene pool. South Koreans are very strong internationally in hand-eye accuracy sports like archery/shooting and came 5th at the last Olympics in medal count despite only getting 6 medals from athletics and swimming. There results combined with a high average IQ suggests they might have a slight genetic edge in eSports. Again, so were going to discount their massive advantage in infrastructure and follow the theory that a slight advantage in genetics is going to lead to Korean dominance... Sounds reasonable to... no one with an education. Occam's razor definitely wants a word with you... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_razorThe point here is that whether or not genetic factors play any role is completely overshadowed and overpowered by the Korean infrastructure, which fully explains the Korean domination much simpler than genetics, and the infrastructure argument has been proven in other sports for centuries. No need to be obnoxious... Did I discount infrastructure? No and neither did the original post. I just said genetics might be a minor factor, which they could well be.
My obnoxious response to your argument is because your argument is founded in racism. It is an ignorant and very dangerous thing to do. And frankly I am disgusted. Your guessing genes "might be a minor factor..."
Why are we searching for minor factors when we have something that fully explains the difference in performance?
Occam's razor is applicable here because we have a reasonable and rational explanation, infrastructure, that has been shown over and over to effect performance in all sorts of competition. China has the best diving infrastructure in the world, and thus the Chinese dominate diving in the Olympics. The United States has the best basketball infrastructure in the world, the thus the United States dominates basketball. Russia has the best infrastructure for chess (the Soviet Union used to subsidize people for play), and thus they dominate chess.
That's right Russia a nation with a "lower IQ" dominates a game that is all about thinking! Why don't the Koreans dominate?
That is because the first IQ tests were meant to determine whether or not someone is mentally retarded or has a general learning disability. They were never designed to compare the intelligence of two normal individuals. The first IQ test came with an explicit warning on it regarding this. Yet it hasn't stopped people or nations from trying to one up each other or come up with some kind of test to determine intelligence. Yet these tests are all flawed, and there is a strong correlations between performance on IQ tests and malnutrition, education, literacy, life expectancy, inequality and poverty. These issues fully explain why some "races" do better than others on IQ tests. To search for some genetic or inherent factor is to ignore the obvious: if you are poor, undernourished, and have no education you're going to score worse than someone who is wealthy, is nourished and well educated. So nations with high rates of poverty and hunger and poor education systems are going to score worse. Data from across the United States also shows this, when people compare IQ by state. It has nothing to do with genes. Remember that pigs share 98% of the genes humans have. Humans and apes are 99.4% the same genetically. What Richard Lynn and Tatu Vanhanen has done is dangerous, especially with their abject lack of data.
|
The foreign tournaments have koreans and get dominated by them or they don't have koreans and the level of play is crap if you are used to watching WCS korea, PL etc. The foreigners just don't train as well as the koreans plus they don't have the proper RTS background. Infrastructure, mentality, concentration of good players, regular broadcasted games etc. all make Korea a much better training ground for talent.
|
It seems like a lot of people are agreeing that the undeniable advantage the Koreans have is the environment with the pro-scene, team houses, and just the abundance of good players/practice partners. So given the same opportunity to play with high level competition, wouldn't the foreigners be able to get better as well? If what the audiences want is for foreigners to be able to play on par as Koreans, then this WCS regional format that allows Koreans to participate in NA or EU the first step to closing the gap. Anyways, personally I am enjoying most of the games, regardless of nationality.
|
op is pretty incoherent and i dont really get what this post is to be about
|
there is a stog with artosis and catz and others that talked about this cant remember but i bet someone here has said it already or can help you find it. it was one of the last ones with artosis
|
I suspect performance enhancing drugs. We need to start testing...
|
On July 05 2013 14:16 vsportsguy wrote: I suspect performance enhancing drugs. We need to start testing...
ding ding ding, this is definitely 100% of the reason!
|
Foreigners should stop worrying about an "invisible handicap" and just get over it. It is what it is, we don't need any new regulations to force change.
|
Most foreigners lack commitment. Stephano himself said he only played for money and Stephano doesn't have the commitment to be a full time gamer over a lengthy period. He imo has burnt out but he is still good enough for wcs eu 2nd place on talent alone. Most foreigners lack the commitment to go to Korea to train under the teamhouse regime for an extended period of time. The only foreigner who has fully committed himself to becoming better in recent memory is jinro and naniwa; with naniwa being fully committed and also with the talent to back it up as recent results and historical gsl results have shown.
Look at tennis. It is dominated by Eastern European players because they are hungry for success. They barely speak any English yet are willing to go to America to live and train there for years if not their entire lives. That is true commitment. They even learn English while they are there! There are very few Americans remaining in tennis except serena and Venus because somewhere down the line the american junior tennis players lack commitment. America has the best tennis facilities but not the most committed players. Same as in sc2. If you want to be truly great you have to go to Korea and train. Learn Korean and dedicate yourself mentally and physically. It's extremly hard but the Eastern Europeans do it in tennis and they dominate tennis nowadays. If you want to view e-sports on the same level as sports such as tennis then the Americans and Europeans need to take it more seriously and be fully committed and go out of their comfort zone. Look at naniwa. He is very bad mannered but you cannot call him lazy nor can you say he lacks commitment. Naniwa is an e-sports pioneer because he is going to Korea to live breathe Starcraft 2. He is truly dedicated to sc2 and his results reflect that.
Also, I tend to notice that Americans and Europeans nerdrage a lot more than koreans which might be a partial reason why they aren't as successful as Koreans because they put more emphasis in winning a game rather than learning the game. Koreans play to learn win or lose. Americans and Europeans play to win or rather play to not lose.
It's just a poor attitude. Americans Europeans don't want to go to Korea to live train and their excuse is I don't speak Korean yet ironically in sports you have many athletes who speak no English at all going to the us to play sports or work a job and that's the bottom line. Determination. Not genetics. Not teamhouses. Not culture. Not coaches.
|
Double post please delete. Thanks
|
There should be NO region locks on any tournaments. Only the very best players should be rewarded for their results. Fabricating tournaments for selfish reasons will only cause arguements, and will only hurt you at the end of the day.
|
On July 05 2013 17:15 Xercen wrote: Most foreigners lack commitment. Stephano himself said he only played for money and Stephano doesn't have the commitment to be a full time gamer over a lengthy period. He imo has burnt out but he is still good enough for wcs eu 2nd place on talent alone. Most foreigners lack the commitment to go to Korea to train under the teamhouse regime for an extended period of time. The only foreigner who has fully committed himself to becoming better in recent memory is jinro and naniwa; with naniwa being fully committed and also with the talent to back it up as recent results and historical gsl results have shown.
Look at tennis. It is dominated by Eastern European players because they are hungry for success. They barely speak any English yet are willing to go to America to live and train there for years if not their entire lives. That is true commitment. They even learn English while they are there! There are very few Americans remaining in tennis except serena and Venus because somewhere down the line the american junior tennis players lack commitment. America has the best tennis facilities but not the most committed players. Same as in sc2. If you want to be truly great you have to go to Korea and train. Learn Korean and dedicate yourself mentally and physically. It's extremly hard but the Eastern Europeans do it in tennis and they dominate tennis nowadays. If you want to view e-sports on the same level as sports such as tennis then the Americans and Europeans need to take it more seriously and be fully committed and go out of their comfort zone. Look at naniwa. He is very bad mannered but you cannot call him lazy nor can you say he lacks commitment. Naniwa is an e-sports pioneer because he is going to Korea to live breathe Starcraft 2. He is truly dedicated to sc2 and his results reflect that. so what is it you are actually asserting? either you think koreans are genetically superior at committing to achieving tasks or you are saying korean culture is more tailored to that sort of commitment - at least that sort of commitment to starcraft. if you're saying it's cultural, that's the exact same thing as saying that foreigners are at a disadvantage because cultural influences are not the responsibility of any individual. it's not meant to take anything away from koreans, nor to give anything to foreigners, just an observation of conditions.
if foreigners "don't commit" there has to be an underlying reason, and i hope we all agree the reason is not genetic. the purpose of making that observation is ostensibly to understand why conditions are different so favorable conditions can be made available to people in all areas of the world. saying they "don't commit" isn't an insight into conditions because you still need to explain why it is that they don't commit. please understand i'm not trying to insert gender politics into this discussion, but look at women in positions like politics, science, even gaming. once, there was a time when women were not active in those fields, and it was considered that they just weren't "for women" or that women weren't good at them. the reality of the situation was/is that women trying to break into a field dominated by men were subject to more scrutiny, criticism and disrespect, which reduced the incentive for them to try. in starcraft, foreigners seem to lack incentive because of culture. the less incentive you have, the more you have to commit. and again, not trying to start a debate about feminism, just using what i think is an apt analogy
Also, I tend to notice that Americans and Europeans nerdrage a lot more than koreans which might be a partial reason why they aren't as successful as Koreans because they put more emphasis in winning a game rather than learning the game. Koreans play to learn win or lose. Americans and Europeans play to win or rather play to not lose.
It's just a poor attitude. Americans Europeans don't want to go to Korea to live train and their excuse is I don't speak Korean yet ironically in sports you have many athletes who speak no English at all going to the us to play sports or work a job and that's the bottom line. Determination. Not genetics. Not teamhouses. Not culture. Not coaches. first, i'm not sure i would believe offhand that "foreigners nerdrage more," and i wonder how you would go about proving that scientifically. i'm sure you can understand if i don't accept your anecdotal experience as hard evidence. and once again, everything you describe/claim about foreigners must be tied to culture unless you are claiming the difference is genetic. large samples of people from a particular area don't simply act a certain way for no reason, and the reason is usually referred to as "culture"
to put it all another way: if you're saying "koreans are more determined," but you claim that determination is not related to genetics nor culture, what IS it related to? do you really think the randomness of the universe just assigned koreans a disproportionate amount of starcraft determination 15-20 years ago when these guys were born? how can you separate "koreans being well-determined" from culture?
|
is op even active in this discussion?
|
|
|
|