Code S Group of Death, PartinG vs Life, game speed - Page 11

On May 18 2013 02:44 Keeemy wrote:

Like I said a bit earlier, the speed changed during Life's introduction (about 1:05 to 1:25 game time).

On May 18 2013 03:05 Mortal wrote:
I'm still saying this isn't true. Players that pause when their monitor isn't exactly perfect and are so anal about every little detail don't notice the GAME SPEED? I mean get real. Maybe casters just play it off, spectators are lulled into a daze, but the pros wouldn't miss this.

On May 18 2013 03:06 ch33psh33p wrote:


I'm not sure how you can be in such denial when there's blinding evidence, video, image, and calculations in every page of this thread.

On May 18 2013 03:05 Mortal wrote:
I'm still saying this isn't true. Players that pause when their monitor isn't exactly perfect and are so anal about every little detail don't notice the GAME SPEED? I mean get real. Maybe casters just play it off, spectators are lulled into a daze, but the pros wouldn't miss this.

On May 18 2013 03:10 vndestiny wrote:


Then how would you explain the evidence ? So many ppl just go here and all they could say is "I dont believe it man. Someone must have notice it back then". Anyone of those ppl even look at the evidences ? It's kinda solid, and there's even a video proof on some of the first few pages. Like a child in denial stage.

On May 18 2013 03:09 Mortal wrote:

guess I'm just ignorant. maybe it did happen, but for both players to not say or do anything about it while playing such an important game seems literally impossible. they've played thousands and thousands of games. they know their shit better than basically anyone. they had to have noticed.

On May 18 2013 03:09 Mortal wrote:

guess I'm just ignorant. maybe it did happen, but for both players to not say or do anything about it while playing such an important game seems literally impossible. they've played thousands and thousands of games. they know their shit better than basically anyone. they had to have noticed.

On May 18 2013 03:11 Liquid`Nazgul wrote:
This is a fairly big deal in terms of playing conditions. If I'm a player with 150apm against a player with 300apm then a slower gamespeed will benefit me. Similarly there are situations where the micro intensive unit composition benefits more from such a situation. It is impossible to say whether it influenced the outcome of this game, but it did influence the game in some way that we can't measure.

However theoretically it may suck for Life, it is even more unfair to PartinG to change the outcome now. At this point all you have is a choice between the lesser of two evils, which I think is let the result stand. Hopefully Life gets an apology of some sort. Take notice, improve, and move on. Preferably without too much drama as we have enough of that already.

On May 18 2013 03:14 StyLeD wrote:

Rofl you're more than ignorant, you're stupid and prideful to a fault if you won't admit your original assessment was wrong.

On May 18 2013 03:13 Mortal wrote:

how about you read what I wrote above before making silly jabs? I said maybe it did happen, but these two players had to have noticed. why they wouldn't have said anything is completely beyond me. I understand casters and spec's not noticing, but these two know the game better than anyone in the world (among a select few others obviously).

On May 18 2013 03:16 jianming wrote:


Agreed. 0% result will be overturned aynway. This feels similar to that Nestea vs Byun(?) game where Nestea got the bottom of his ramp blocked because there was no neutral depot there.