• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 14:21
CEST 20:21
KST 03:21
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12TL.net Map Contest #22 - Voting & Ladder Map Selection7Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO8 Preview8
Community News
MC vs IdrA, Boxer vs Nal_rA to be Legacy Matches @ BlizzCon175.0.16 Hotfix (June 30) - Balance + Bug Fixes22Weekly Cups (June 22-28): Zergs thrive in new patch2[TLMC] Summer 2026 Ladder Map Rotation05.0.16 patch for SC2 goes live (8 worker start)99
StarCraft 2
General
5.0.16 Hotfix (June 30) - Balance + Bug Fixes MC vs IdrA, Boxer vs Nal_rA to be Legacy Matches @ BlizzCon 5.0.16 patch for SC2 goes live (8 worker start) Is the larve respawn broken? ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event Douyu Cup 2026: $20,000 Legends Event (June 26-28) Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule ! INu's Battles#17 <BO.9> Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
New Map Maker - Looking for Advice - Love or Hate Work In Progress Melee Maps [D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 532 Nuclear Family Mutation # 531 Experimental Artillery Mutation # 530 One For All
Brood War
General
ASL 22 Proposed Map Pool Starcraft vs Retro Category on Twitch ProGamer Paychecks Story BW General Discussion Best thing happen to StarCraft since Remastered?
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL21] Grand Finals The Casual Games of the Week Thread [BSL22] GosuLeague Casts - Tue & Thu 22:00 CEST
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Creating a full chart of Zerg builds Relatively freeroll strategies Why doesn't anyone use restoration?
Other Games
General Games
ZeroSpace at Steam NextFest - Last free demo Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
[94721]Better Good-Health Signs Than 3-15 Bans/Yea TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Men's Fashion Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
The HerO Fan Club! The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Series you have seen recently... [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [TV/BOOK] *SPOILERS* Game of Thrones Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion McBoner: A hockey love story Cricket [SPORT]
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
How to clean a TTe Thermaltake keyboard? Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Listen To The Coaches!
TrAiDoS
An Exploration of th…
waywardstrategy
I'm an arrogant trash talke…
FlaShFTW
Gauntlet SC2: A Retrospectiv…
Ctone23
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 4711 users

Mineral boost trick (works in 1.5!) - Page 11

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 9 10 11 12 13 28 Next All
Arctura42
Profile Joined June 2012
United States1 Post
August 14 2012 22:17 GMT
#201
Guys...what about mules?
FrostedMiniWeet
Profile Joined July 2009
United States636 Posts
August 14 2012 22:18 GMT
#202
It looks like you could do the same trick when returning minerals to the CC as well, as the scv decelerates before dropping them off. Can somebody verify if it works both ways?
thezanursic
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
5500 Posts
August 14 2012 22:18 GMT
#203
On August 15 2012 07:12 TheWisp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2012 07:06 thezanursic wrote:
REPOST: because I edited with further information assuming you 1 raxx expand I calculated that with minor error if you micro 6 workers you can put down an extra raxx at 3:35 when the CC is supposed to go down (If 5 workers are micro'd perfectly and 6 with minor error) 192M extra if 6 and 160M if 5 at 3:35 (no errors) 3:35 IS THE 1 RAXX CC TIMING!!!

TERRAN:

12 supply= 1:30 = 5 worker micro= 100

When the first supply depot is finished you usually have 80 minerals if you micro at least 4 workers you have 150 and you can put down your raxx 6-7 FUKING SECONDS SOONER!!!

Now further more a Terran usually scouts at 2:05 14 supply so nothing to do before that you have at least 2 minutes to only micro and build a supply/raxx that's 100 minerals for 5 SCVs and 120 for 6 (I'm assuming this is about how much could be managed) and your CC is down at 3:35 now let's assume that you scout your opponent on the last try (or you don't have to micro it much only patrol which doesn't occupy APM)

3:35 that is around the time CC should go down. Soo assuming that you don't micro each SCV will bring in 140 minerals by the time. If SCVs are micro'd they would bring in about 172 minerals. Soo let's assume that we can only gain 28 extra minerals for each SCV (errors) and we do that for 5 SCVs you receive a bonus of 140 if you do that for 6 you get an extra of 168 now.

168 minerals is an extra raxx you could theoretically pull of the same build order, but add another raxx a couple of seconds before expanding or right just so the first marine starts after the CC (If you did it with more or you wouldn't account my errors.

Soo if you were really good you could have put down a CC and a raxx both at 3:35 and still be even with the other guy doing the same build order (You could put it down earlier, but everything would need to be recalculated because of the mining time lost)

If I made a big a error please correct and comment.


PEOPLE THIS IS FUCKING HUGE DON'T MAKE IT OUT TO BE NOTHING. 2 RAXX CC (CC and raxx are simulatinous) IS NOW = NO MICRO 1 RAXX CC


Someone mind making a test under slowest speed for minimum mistake?


No on minimum speed you could micro a lot more. We need someone on Fastest to try to maximize the amount of workers someone with high APM can micro. It would be useful if everybody goes and tries it and posts how many they can maintain in the first 3-4 mins. I would do it personally, but my computer with SC2 is in repairs and I personally am a pretty high APM player 250ish (Actual APM not reffering to Blizzard time)
http://i45.tinypic.com/9j2cdc.jpg Let it be so!
Martyrc
Profile Joined May 2012
217 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-08-14 22:28:40
August 14 2012 22:19 GMT
#204
On August 15 2012 06:14 r.Evo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2012 06:01 Mairou wrote:
People who think this feature is good because it can increase the possible skill gap between amateur and pro are wrong. This is not good way to add skill to the game.

First of all most people will never even know about this and Blizzard would never make this official game feature because its based on glitch. Secondly for spectators this would be like invisible war, because no one can actually see who is microing their workers better.

Microing your workers to close mineral patch is enough to do in early game. Later on you can deny enemy mining from close mineral patch with your scouting worker. It's much more efficient way to get ahead in economy, but even in code S most of the players don't do that yet. But that kind of feature is good way to add skill to the game and there should be more features like that.


I can't remember any popular game which offered the ability to gain advantages with small glitches like that. Not a single one.

(Q3, CS, SCBW just off the top of my head. In fact, sometimes glitches create way better mechanics than actual design because, well.. no one thought about it before.)

EDIT: I'm sorry
¨First in, last out.¨
SoniStreet
Profile Joined October 2010
Macedonia98 Posts
August 14 2012 22:20 GMT
#205
On August 15 2012 07:17 Arctura42 wrote:
Guys...what about mules?

Works with mules too ofc, everything works the same with actions set before it arrives, example: SCV with action to mine before it arives, SCV to build rax before it arrives etc, as OP stated, you can do this trick for building too, example: tell SCV to go to location while it's going the SHIFT + build rax at the location it's suposed to arrive to. Normally the SCV would deaccelerate before building, with this trick it will place the rax down right away.
Do the thing you fear and the death of fear is certain
TheWisp
Profile Joined July 2012
45 Posts
August 14 2012 22:21 GMT
#206
On August 15 2012 07:18 thezanursic wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2012 07:12 TheWisp wrote:
On August 15 2012 07:06 thezanursic wrote:
REPOST: because I edited with further information assuming you 1 raxx expand I calculated that with minor error if you micro 6 workers you can put down an extra raxx at 3:35 when the CC is supposed to go down (If 5 workers are micro'd perfectly and 6 with minor error) 192M extra if 6 and 160M if 5 at 3:35 (no errors) 3:35 IS THE 1 RAXX CC TIMING!!!

TERRAN:

12 supply= 1:30 = 5 worker micro= 100

When the first supply depot is finished you usually have 80 minerals if you micro at least 4 workers you have 150 and you can put down your raxx 6-7 FUKING SECONDS SOONER!!!

Now further more a Terran usually scouts at 2:05 14 supply so nothing to do before that you have at least 2 minutes to only micro and build a supply/raxx that's 100 minerals for 5 SCVs and 120 for 6 (I'm assuming this is about how much could be managed) and your CC is down at 3:35 now let's assume that you scout your opponent on the last try (or you don't have to micro it much only patrol which doesn't occupy APM)

3:35 that is around the time CC should go down. Soo assuming that you don't micro each SCV will bring in 140 minerals by the time. If SCVs are micro'd they would bring in about 172 minerals. Soo let's assume that we can only gain 28 extra minerals for each SCV (errors) and we do that for 5 SCVs you receive a bonus of 140 if you do that for 6 you get an extra of 168 now.

168 minerals is an extra raxx you could theoretically pull of the same build order, but add another raxx a couple of seconds before expanding or right just so the first marine starts after the CC (If you did it with more or you wouldn't account my errors.

Soo if you were really good you could have put down a CC and a raxx both at 3:35 and still be even with the other guy doing the same build order (You could put it down earlier, but everything would need to be recalculated because of the mining time lost)

If I made a big a error please correct and comment.


PEOPLE THIS IS FUCKING HUGE DON'T MAKE IT OUT TO BE NOTHING. 2 RAXX CC (CC and raxx are simulatinous) IS NOW = NO MICRO 1 RAXX CC


Someone mind making a test under slowest speed for minimum mistake?


No on minimum speed you could micro a lot more. We need someone on Fastest to try to maximize the amount of workers someone with high APM can micro. It would be useful if everybody goes and tries it and posts how many they can maintain in the first 3-4 mins. I would do it personally, but my computer with SC2 is in repairs and I personally am a pretty high APM player 250ish (Actual APM not reffering to Blizzard time)

Just POC, to be honest i don't believe it can spare me a rax at 3 min...
DrDevice
Profile Joined December 2010
Canada132 Posts
August 14 2012 22:21 GMT
#207
This is a really cool discovery but IMO there is no reason to get too excited about it. Blizzard will probably just patch this so that it no longer affects mining efficiency. Although this trick works differently from the old "sockfolding", I think their point of view will probably be the same - that it should be "fixed."
Opec
Profile Joined June 2011
42 Posts
August 14 2012 22:22 GMT
#208
On August 15 2012 07:19 Martyrc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2012 06:14 r.Evo wrote:
On August 15 2012 06:01 Mairou wrote:
People who think this feature is good because it can increase the possible skill gap between amateur and pro are wrong. This is not good way to add skill to the game.

First of all most people will never even know about this and Blizzard would never make this official game feature because its based on glitch. Secondly for spectators this would be like invisible war, because no one can actually see who is microing their workers better.

Microing your workers to close mineral patch is enough to do in early game. Later on you can deny enemy mining from close mineral patch with your scouting worker. It's much more efficient way to get ahead in economy, but even in code S most of the players don't do that yet. But that kind of feature is good way to add skill to the game and there should be more features like that.


I can't remember any popular game which offered the ability to gain advantages with small glitches like that. Not a single one.

(Q3, CS, SCBW just off the top of my head. In fact, sometimes glitches create way better mechanics than actual design because, well.. no one thought about it before.)

Tribes....


All the games he mentioned had glitches that eventually became standard in play. He was being sarcastic.
Reborn8u
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
United States1761 Posts
August 14 2012 22:22 GMT
#209
If they fix this, I really hope they fix the mining AI too. It drives me CRAZY when I have to fight the AI to mine efficiently. I set up mining pairs on close mineral patches, they make 2 or so trips and then the ai moves one of them to a further but empty patch. Why does the AI make my mining less efficient?
:)
darthcaesar
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States475 Posts
August 14 2012 22:23 GMT
#210
I tried this and I couldn't get very far with just one SCV. In two minutes, I returned 80 minerals on the same mineral patch. It probably makes more of a distance on mineral patches that are further from the CC (I experimented on the close patches on Daybreak). That said, I think that this method would screw up any mineral stacking, which is also pretty damn beneficial. I know that I won't be able to both mineral stack AND do this shift queue trick effectively. It comes down to the map a bit, because mineral patches that are further away make more of a difference, whereas doing this on close patches could screw up a 2 SCV stack and ultimately be worse.
He is wisest who knows he does not know. | (┛OДO)┛彡┻━┻
Secret05
Profile Joined August 2010
United States342 Posts
August 14 2012 22:24 GMT
#211
I only see posts about scvs, does this work for all three races?
Michigan Zerg Player
Fearlezz
Profile Joined April 2010
Croatia176 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-08-14 22:26:15
August 14 2012 22:24 GMT
#212
On August 15 2012 06:14 r.Evo wrote:
I can't remember any popular game which offered the ability to gain advantages with small glitches like that. Not a single one.

I wonder how you would classify BW mutalisk stacking

edit: Oh I see what you did there well played
Umpteen
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United Kingdom1570 Posts
August 14 2012 22:26 GMT
#213
I don't know if they'll bother, but this could be easily fixed without breaking anything else. Simply measure the distance between the shift-clicked waypoints and apply deceleration towards the first waypoint if the second is within the normal deceleration distance.

In other words:

"SCV: to A, then Zee! No need to slow, just go go go!"
But SCV, a union man, was wise to boss-man's wiley plan
"Before I start, how far apart," the worker said, "Are A and Zed?"
"They're pretty close," the boss confessed.
"At A I'll take my scheduled rest!"
The existence of a food chain is inescapable if we evolved unsupervised, and inexcusable otherwise.
arew
Profile Blog Joined September 2006
Lithuania1861 Posts
August 14 2012 22:27 GMT
#214
Nice stuff! Already tried this
750/750 emotions fully stacked
syriuszonito
Profile Joined June 2011
Poland332 Posts
August 14 2012 22:27 GMT
#215
Thats a sick find but dont get too excited about it, its too apm heavy to make a huge difference
The one || My stream http://www.teamliquid.net/video/streams/syriuszonito
graNite
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Germany4434 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-08-14 22:31:44
August 14 2012 22:27 GMT
#216
ok guys i am challenging you all:

who can beat my barracks timing?
http://drop.sc/238828
very early 1:34, nearly 1:33

no worker cutting of course, just mineral stacking and the new mineral boost.
i think 1:33 is possible.
"Oink oink, bitches" - Tasteless on Pigbaby winning a map against Flash
czaku
Profile Joined June 2011
Poland429 Posts
August 14 2012 22:32 GMT
#217
Will bw pros make it viable?
Also, if it works with protoss, will we see rebirth of 4 gate? Build isnt too apm heavy until the engage, it opens some window....
Martyrc
Profile Joined May 2012
217 Posts
August 14 2012 22:34 GMT
#218
On August 15 2012 07:32 astor wrote:
Will bw pros make it viable?
Also, if it works with protoss, will we see rebirth of 4 gate? Build isnt too apm heavy until the engage, it opens some window....

No, for 2 reasons:

1: At low level play, no-one has enough APM to use this effectively.
2: The defender has the same advantage, you will have everything faster too.

Also for all those wondering: It should work for Probes and Drones too. I don't see why not. They have the same AI as SCV's as far as mining is concerned.
¨First in, last out.¨
[UoN]Sentinel
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
United States11320 Posts
August 14 2012 22:34 GMT
#219
On August 15 2012 07:32 astor wrote:
Will bw pros make it viable?
Also, if it works with protoss, will we see rebirth of 4 gate? Build isnt too apm heavy until the engage, it opens some window....


Oh god no, dear lord no

PATCH THIS SHIT ASAP
Нас зовет дух отцов, память старых бойцов, дух Москвы и твердыня Полтавы
boomudead1
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
United States186 Posts
August 14 2012 22:35 GMT
#220
On August 15 2012 07:17 Arctura42 wrote:
Guys...what about mules?

wow nice idea. im thinking if u can do it once or twice on the mule and it will return minerals during last trip
Prev 1 9 10 11 12 13 28 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 5h 39m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RushiSC 108
BRAT_OK 76
MindelVK 16
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 16856
Dewaltoss 128
BeSt 99
Zeus 63
Pusan 54
Mong 31
Free 26
scan(afreeca) 24
Rock 22
Bale 20
[ Show more ]
zelot 17
Sacsri 9
Dota 2
qojqva1975
420jenkins270
LuMiX1
Counter-Strike
fl0m1836
adren_tv102
edward101
kRYSTAL_62
Other Games
Grubby3428
FrodaN1411
B2W.Neo1015
Dendi706
Beastyqt681
C9.Mang0226
UpATreeSC62
Mew2King59
Trikslyr51
JuggernautJason27
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream197
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix11
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis3834
• TFBlade858
Other Games
• imaqtpie690
• Shiphtur408
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
5h 39m
CrankTV Team League
16h 39m
Bombastic Starleague
1d 1h
The PondCast
1d 15h
HomeStory Cup
1d 16h
Replay Cast
2 days
HomeStory Cup
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
HomeStory Cup
3 days
OSC
3 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
WardiTV Weekly
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

YSL S3
Douyu Cup 2026
Murky Cup 2026

Ongoing

IPSL Spring 2026
Acropolis #4
CSL Season 21: Qualifier 2
SCTL 2026 Spring
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026

Upcoming

CSL 2026 Summer (S21)
ASL Season 22:Wild Card Qualifier
CSLAN 4
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Revival: Season 6
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
HSC XXIX
Light Tournament 2026
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale
Heroes Pulsing #3
Eternal Conflict S2 E1
FISSURE Playground #5
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.