EPTBlizzard negotiating SC2 with KeSPA directly - Page 6
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
Knock off the SC2 vs BW vs LoL vs whatever crap please. | ||
|
Betelgeuse
Canada210 Posts
| ||
Falling
Canada11452 Posts
On March 25 2012 02:11 nokz88 wrote: An unnamed Korean industry insider said "There is a strong possibility that the next season of Proleague will have both SCBW and SC2, and the next one after that will have only SC2". Well the first part is good news but this part kills all my excitement. I assume this is the same insider as the other thread about Rumours? I hope it's just nasty rumours from some disgruntled employee because otherwise gg no re. What if SC2 continues to struggle with numbers and LoL catches fire? Lose BW proleague and see BW pro's follow Kim Carrier to LoL? I don't know if it's so simple as BW proleague shuts down, Bisu will play SC2 forever and ever. If they're doing it for the money, they will probably follow the money. | ||
|
Noro
Canada991 Posts
On March 25 2012 03:15 Bagi wrote: Why do posts like this one get warnings, when people in the BW forum are free to call SC2 a shit game with no future? This, someone explain this to me.. | ||
|
Deleted User 135096
3624 Posts
| ||
|
Vehemus
United States586 Posts
On March 25 2012 03:21 NoDDiE wrote: i agree with that guy. sc2 flaming = fine bw flaming = warning ? how is this supposed to be fair ? Because Team Liquid was founded on Brood War and grew on Brood War. | ||
|
Roblin
Sweden948 Posts
On March 25 2012 02:51 BLinD-RawR wrote: whats the point of esports if it can't last forever and everyone has to move to a new and shiny game,so i'm not hating on SC2 or anything i'm just saying. bw will not last forever, hopefully it will be replaced by a worthy successor (IMO: SC2 is not a worthy successor, yet.) SC2 will not last forever, hopefully it will be replaced by a worthy successor. Esports may last for the duration of intelligent life on earth, it might not, if it doesn't, that will probably be because a worthy successor came along. intelligent life on earth will not last forever. life on earth will not last forever. earth will not last forever. the sun will not last forever. our solar system will not last forever. the milky way will not last forever. our galaxyheap will not last forever. depending on definitions, the universe may or may not last forever. almost nothing last forever, the best that can possibly happen for a game is to live for thousands or perhaps a few millions of years, but in comparison to infinity, billions of years is still no more than an instant. bw lasted for what? 10-15 years? chess have lasted for something like 1000 years, why? the boardgame "go" are known to have been played more than 2500 years ago, its probably way older, why do people still play it today? the concept of esports is extremely new, if we were to analyse how complex and awesome the future esports games will become, we can first compare our early esports games with the first non-esports games. what was the first non-esport game? tic tac toe perhaps? or rock-paper-scissors? as a matter of fact, these have fairly complex rule sets, so the first games are probably thousands of years older than those. I can imagine the first game in the world to be something like: "I win" heres the rules for "I win": whomever initializes the game through any method agreed upon by all parties wins. now, lets state the following: "I win" relates to competitive pong as: rock-paper-scissors relates to starcraft broodwar as tic-tac-toe relates to SC2 as chess relates to the esports games of the future. did you really expect SCBW to last forever? | ||
|
jmbthirteen
United States10734 Posts
| ||
|
Kralic
Canada2628 Posts
On March 25 2012 03:15 Bagi wrote: Why do posts like this one get warnings, when people in the BW forum are free to call SC2 a shit game with no future? On March 25 2012 03:21 NoDDiE wrote: i agree with that guy. sc2 flaming = fine bw flaming = warning ? how is this supposed to be fair ? http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/index.php?show_part=7 would probably be the best way to ask this instead of posting it in a thread not related to how moderation is handled. | ||
|
hunts
United States2113 Posts
On March 25 2012 03:21 NoDDiE wrote: i agree with that guy. sc2 flaming = fine bw flaming = warning ? how is this supposed to be fair ? I'm curious too, but It probably has something to do with the fact that TL.net started out as a BW site, so obviously all the mods and original members are BW fans and are biased in that way. Meh, I've played BW since day1, I remember saving up allowance to buy BW when it came out, it's sad to see it die. But honestly, the way a lot of the BW fans act about it and SC2 on these forums, I'm almost glad. | ||
|
Noro
Canada991 Posts
You're delusional to think that those mainstream sports haven't changed at all since then. SC2 is just the new look of an old game. go look at a picture of baseball 100 years ago and tell me it looks the same now. | ||
|
maybenexttime
Poland5766 Posts
On March 25 2012 03:25 Megaliskuu wrote: I don't get why all the BW people are so pissed about it, I think BW>>>>>>>>SC2 but being less than perfect aint all that bad, I think its a pretty cool idea and suggested it a long time ago. Because it makes the whole league a farce? Something that used to be the epitome of BW - a match of ProLeague - potentially being decided by a game of SC2? | ||
|
Kordox
Denmark142 Posts
On March 25 2012 03:13 Golgotha wrote: Nope, can't really recall a game that isn't blob v blob unless it is TvT. Most of them are blob v blob cuz it would be stupid to split your forces and play at such a disadvantage when grouping all your units into one army is the most effective. I follow both games and zvp, zvt and tvp are still blob vs blob. How is keeping your units in a single group better? You're more vulnurable to splash damage, and effectively engaging the enemy becomes harder to do. The better players are starting to move away from the blob style, and are doing more to position and split their armies properly to avoid splash, form concaves, protect key units etc. I don't see why it won't become standard as players always have to keep improving to beat each other. | ||
|
Tryxtira
Sweden572 Posts
| ||
|
Theovide
Sweden914 Posts
| ||
|
neek
Netherlands51 Posts
| ||
|
oBlade
United States5959 Posts
A little BW affirmative action won't bankrupt MLG. | ||
|
a9arnn
United States1537 Posts
 . That would suck if there was no more BW at all... this is really crunch time for ZerO to win the next OSL :O. This should help for the stability of SC2 though, so I suppose that's good. | ||
|
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
On March 25 2012 03:29 Sentient66 wrote: As much as I hate to see BW on its last legs, a SC2 version of Proleague makes me super excited for the future. Me to and I pray to god they make it 1v1 + ace not winners league. I wish gom would switch on and off from winners league to normal or whatever but they only do winners league | ||
|
Phenny
Australia1435 Posts
Kinda glad my interest in SC2 has been dying now. That said MLG had just started rebuilding it past 2 days | ||
|
storkfan
493 Posts
On March 25 2012 03:21 NoDDiE wrote: i agree with that guy. sc2 flaming = fine bw flaming = warning ? how is this supposed to be fair ? Do you throw insults at your grandpa? No dude, its just not right.. Its not like with buddies busting each others balls. When it comes to elders, one must respect and understand what they have done. | ||
| ||
