• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 21:03
CET 03:03
KST 11:03
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10
Community News
BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced11[BSL21] Ro.16 Group Stage (C->B->A->D)4Weekly Cups (Nov 17-23): Solar, MaxPax, Clem win3RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket13Weekly Cups (Nov 10-16): Reynor, Solar lead Zerg surge2
StarCraft 2
General
BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA When will we find out if there are more tournament Weekly Cups (Nov 17-23): Solar, MaxPax, Clem win Weekly Cups (Nov 10-16): Reynor, Solar lead Zerg surge
Tourneys
Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest RSL Revival: Season 3 Tenacious Turtle Tussle [Alpha Pro Series] Nice vs Cure $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 501 Price of Progress Mutation # 500 Fright night Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone Which season is the best in ASL? soO on: FanTaSy's Potential Return to StarCraft
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] RO16 Group B - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO16 Group C - Saturday 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Game Theory for Starcraft How to stay on top of macro? Current Meta PvZ map balance
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread The Perfect Game Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread The Big Programming Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Artificial Intelligence Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Where to ask questions and add stream? The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Esports Earnings: Bigger Pri…
TrAiDoS
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1211 users

Patch 1.3.3 PTR - Page 214

Forum Index > SC2 General
4401 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 212 213 214 215 216 221 Next
Massive units are not affected by concussive shells. If you think they are, you are wrong.
It's SPORE crawlers that are being changed, not SPINE. Please read carefully.
ScorpEUs
Profile Joined November 2010
Germany61 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-09 15:37:50
May 09 2011 15:37 GMT
#4261
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Somehow i don't think the incoming patch will change pvp as far as blizzard and the players do expect.
correct me, but i think 4 gate was already during the beta really strong and i think a lot of changes planned for the next patches to fix pvp where already made in some way before - but pvp only got more 4gate-heavy.

i would really appreciate a "refreshed" pvp.
"Evolution means death to the righteous"
Mercury-
Profile Joined December 2010
Great Britain804 Posts
May 09 2011 15:38 GMT
#4262
On May 10 2011 00:23 tdt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 00:20 Mali__Slon wrote:
On May 10 2011 00:11 tdt wrote:
On May 09 2011 12:59 Mykill wrote:
Fungal growth should not be able to stack casted imo. Thats the only thing I would add to this patch.

I didn't realize FG stacked?

IMO the thing missing is for blizz to figure out how to get carriers in the game. It's ridiculous such a venerable unit from SC1 and toss top tier capital ship is never used. Granted BC's/Ultra are not used much either but they are found in games 100x more than carrier.


BCs are used? Lol. I only see them late game tvt. Z and P have so good counters for them, so making BCs against Z or P is like typing GG.

I see em all the time. Like I just watched a game yesterday where goody used like 8 vs nani and rolled him.

Do you mean the game where Goody opened proxy rax against Nexus first and was extremely far ahead in worker count the entire game?

Yeah that's a good situation to use BCs in.
tdt
Profile Joined October 2010
United States3179 Posts
May 09 2011 15:38 GMT
#4263
On May 10 2011 00:33 Mataza wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 00:01 tdt wrote:
On May 09 2011 02:47 Theberlinwall wrote:
As a Terran player i actually have to say i overall really like this patch, however the one thing i really don't like is the the Thor change. I'm in masters(was 3400+, season 1) and i have been tinkering with Mech a lot recently, with some success.

The fact it is that immortals just about own lone tanks, and although 1 on 1 agasint a thor (no cannons), the Thor will win, immortals are still extremely cost efficent vs mech, that being said i actually feel the strike cannons is required when facing an immortal, chargelot, collosi based army.

i actually will be concerned about the future viability of mech if this change makes it past the the ptr and onto the ladder, too me the strike cannon(with no energy) was a good balance between its absolute devastation and the cost effectiveness of the immortals. Now with an energy bar, not only are thors susceptible to feedback damage but this will also render the Thor without cannons, which i feel are imperative.

i really want to see mech become more viable and not less. i really dont want the thor to become the next reaper.

That's why they lowered the gas cost of Ghosts so you could go mech and BC's. I think this patch will increase dynamics because Ghost will become so integral.

Likewise toss needs HT's to deal with mech rather than just spam immos. Immortals are just terrible vs thor with strike cannon and SCVs on repair. Try it yourself in unit tester. Take only 8 thor vs 16 immos. Strike Cannon first 8 and you will kill off the rest of the immos with normal attack and only lose 3 Thor, you'll find the cost effectiveness you speak of disappears when massing hence the need for feedback since unit designed to counter fails miserably.

I don´t know how you tested this, but in my test the immortals utterly destroyed the Thors in a 2v1 ratio.
First you must ball them up, since that´s the natural state of any army in SC2. If you preposition the Thors in a way so they have superior position it won´t count.

Immortals are much smaller and much faster than Thors, also Strike cannons take 2 full seconds before showing any effect.
You can hardly micro Thors since they block each other and a second row Thor might as well not be there(Thor at least has a length of 2 attack range, maybe even 3).

I just redid the test again. Shiftclicking the Thors from afar, Immos won even with Thors having a concave.

The only way 1 thor wins against 2 Immortals is when some shit stands inbetween and the Immortals hits that.


I personally think they should remove Strike cannons. It´s a terrible upgrade. It was a hardcounter to Ultralisks originally, but now it´s only really worth it against Immortals, pfortresses and other Thors.
After 1 Mech upgrade, the autohit of the Thor does more damage per second than the cannons.
It stuns your enemy for 6 seconds and your Thor for 10.
Since Colossi have range 9 and Ultras are stunimmune, you only get small units reliably into range meaning Strike Cannons overkill nearly always.

How bad is all that together?

How do I record video of me playing in unit tester and I'll show you? I did 8 thor with 3 armor in an open area vs 16 immos on A move into thor and SC the first 8 immos and killed off the rest with normal attack.
MC for president
Mataza
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Germany5364 Posts
May 09 2011 15:40 GMT
#4264
On May 10 2011 00:38 tdt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 00:33 Mataza wrote:
On May 10 2011 00:01 tdt wrote:
On May 09 2011 02:47 Theberlinwall wrote:
As a Terran player i actually have to say i overall really like this patch, however the one thing i really don't like is the the Thor change. I'm in masters(was 3400+, season 1) and i have been tinkering with Mech a lot recently, with some success.

The fact it is that immortals just about own lone tanks, and although 1 on 1 agasint a thor (no cannons), the Thor will win, immortals are still extremely cost efficent vs mech, that being said i actually feel the strike cannons is required when facing an immortal, chargelot, collosi based army.

i actually will be concerned about the future viability of mech if this change makes it past the the ptr and onto the ladder, too me the strike cannon(with no energy) was a good balance between its absolute devastation and the cost effectiveness of the immortals. Now with an energy bar, not only are thors susceptible to feedback damage but this will also render the Thor without cannons, which i feel are imperative.

i really want to see mech become more viable and not less. i really dont want the thor to become the next reaper.

That's why they lowered the gas cost of Ghosts so you could go mech and BC's. I think this patch will increase dynamics because Ghost will become so integral.

Likewise toss needs HT's to deal with mech rather than just spam immos. Immortals are just terrible vs thor with strike cannon and SCVs on repair. Try it yourself in unit tester. Take only 8 thor vs 16 immos. Strike Cannon first 8 and you will kill off the rest of the immos with normal attack and only lose 3 Thor, you'll find the cost effectiveness you speak of disappears when massing hence the need for feedback since unit designed to counter fails miserably.

I don´t know how you tested this, but in my test the immortals utterly destroyed the Thors in a 2v1 ratio.
First you must ball them up, since that´s the natural state of any army in SC2. If you preposition the Thors in a way so they have superior position it won´t count.

Immortals are much smaller and much faster than Thors, also Strike cannons take 2 full seconds before showing any effect.
You can hardly micro Thors since they block each other and a second row Thor might as well not be there(Thor at least has a length of 2 attack range, maybe even 3).

I just redid the test again. Shiftclicking the Thors from afar, Immos won even with Thors having a concave.

The only way 1 thor wins against 2 Immortals is when some shit stands inbetween and the Immortals hits that.


I personally think they should remove Strike cannons. It´s a terrible upgrade. It was a hardcounter to Ultralisks originally, but now it´s only really worth it against Immortals, pfortresses and other Thors.
After 1 Mech upgrade, the autohit of the Thor does more damage per second than the cannons.
It stuns your enemy for 6 seconds and your Thor for 10.
Since Colossi have range 9 and Ultras are stunimmune, you only get small units reliably into range meaning Strike Cannons overkill nearly always.

How bad is all that together?

How do I record video of me playing in unit tester and I'll show you? I did 8 thor with 3 armor in an open area vs 16 immos on A move into thor and SC the first 8 immos and killed off the rest with normal attack.

You can upload the replay on sc2 replayed or some other site

The Thors get 3 armor and the Immos don´t?
If nobody hates you, you´re doing something wrong. However someone hating you doesn´t make you right
Antisocialmunky
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States5912 Posts
May 09 2011 15:48 GMT
#4265
On May 10 2011 00:23 tdt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 00:20 Mali__Slon wrote:
On May 10 2011 00:11 tdt wrote:
On May 09 2011 12:59 Mykill wrote:
Fungal growth should not be able to stack casted imo. Thats the only thing I would add to this patch.

I didn't realize FG stacked?

IMO the thing missing is for blizz to figure out how to get carriers in the game. It's ridiculous such a venerable unit from SC1 and toss top tier capital ship is never used. Granted BC's/Ultra are not used much either but they are found in games 100x more than carrier.


BCs are used? Lol. I only see them late game tvt. Z and P have so good counters for them, so making BCs against Z or P is like typing GG.

I see em all the time. Like I just watched a game yesterday where goody used like 8 vs nani and rolled him.


BCs are pretty good vs Protoss if you can get the at the right time
[゚n゚] SSSSssssssSSsss ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Marine/Raven Guide:http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=163605
Mali__Slon
Profile Joined October 2010
Senegal163 Posts
May 09 2011 15:50 GMT
#4266
On May 10 2011 00:48 Antisocialmunky wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 00:23 tdt wrote:
On May 10 2011 00:20 Mali__Slon wrote:
On May 10 2011 00:11 tdt wrote:
On May 09 2011 12:59 Mykill wrote:
Fungal growth should not be able to stack casted imo. Thats the only thing I would add to this patch.

I didn't realize FG stacked?

IMO the thing missing is for blizz to figure out how to get carriers in the game. It's ridiculous such a venerable unit from SC1 and toss top tier capital ship is never used. Granted BC's/Ultra are not used much either but they are found in games 100x more than carrier.


BCs are used? Lol. I only see them late game tvt. Z and P have so good counters for them, so making BCs against Z or P is like typing GG.

I see em all the time. Like I just watched a game yesterday where goody used like 8 vs nani and rolled him.


BCs are pretty good vs Protoss if you can get the at the right time


Totally agree, T's totally dominate ladder with them. Maybe the next patch will fix this issue.
no.1 kissy boy
Profile Joined April 2011
Slovenia19 Posts
May 09 2011 15:51 GMT
#4267
On May 10 2011 00:36 Whitewing wrote:

I think it had a lot more to do with the 1-2 thor rushes that automatically killed any fast expanding protoss because you could strike cannon the one or two immortals out and just mass repair the thors after that.

Yeah but aren't there like a million builds that you can do to instantly kill a FE protoss as terran? And same vice versa if the terran doesn't bunker up like a boss.
KaiserJohan
Profile Joined May 2010
Sweden1808 Posts
May 09 2011 15:52 GMT
#4268
It has probably been asked before but why the hell did they change Thor back to energy? Its not like they are OP TvP...?
England will fight to the last American
Whitewing
Profile Joined October 2010
United States7483 Posts
May 09 2011 15:54 GMT
#4269
On May 10 2011 00:51 no.1 kissy boy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 00:36 Whitewing wrote:

I think it had a lot more to do with the 1-2 thor rushes that automatically killed any fast expanding protoss because you could strike cannon the one or two immortals out and just mass repair the thors after that.

Yeah but aren't there like a million builds that you can do to instantly kill a FE protoss as terran? And same vice versa if the terran doesn't bunker up like a boss.


No, there aren't a lot of builds that just straight up kill a FE with no chance of keeping the expo at all. There are one base plays that can punish a FE, but generally they don't straight up auto-win.
Strategy"You know I fucking hate the way you play, right?" ~SC2John
ihavetofartosis
Profile Joined January 2011
1277 Posts
May 09 2011 15:56 GMT
#4270
On May 10 2011 00:52 KaiserJohan wrote:
It has probably been asked before but why the hell did they change Thor back to energy? Its not like they are OP TvP...?

According to Blizzard, they are. And having HT counter nearly every Terran unit used in TvP is fine.

Get HT, storm marines and marauders, feedback ghosts, medivacs, ravens, banshees, and now Thors. Personally I find it ridiculous, and have no idea where Blizzard gets the idea that thors are imba but colossus are fine, but then again I didn't make the game so....... what can ya do.
Mali__Slon
Profile Joined October 2010
Senegal163 Posts
May 09 2011 15:56 GMT
#4271
On May 10 2011 00:54 Whitewing wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 00:51 no.1 kissy boy wrote:
On May 10 2011 00:36 Whitewing wrote:

I think it had a lot more to do with the 1-2 thor rushes that automatically killed any fast expanding protoss because you could strike cannon the one or two immortals out and just mass repair the thors after that.

Yeah but aren't there like a million builds that you can do to instantly kill a FE protoss as terran? And same vice versa if the terran doesn't bunker up like a boss.


No, there aren't a lot of builds that just straight up kill a FE with no chance of keeping the expo at all. There are one base plays that can punish a FE, but generally they don't straight up auto-win.


3 rax shuts it down real easy.
ihavetofartosis
Profile Joined January 2011
1277 Posts
May 09 2011 15:57 GMT
#4272
On May 10 2011 00:56 Mali__Slon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 00:54 Whitewing wrote:
On May 10 2011 00:51 no.1 kissy boy wrote:
On May 10 2011 00:36 Whitewing wrote:

I think it had a lot more to do with the 1-2 thor rushes that automatically killed any fast expanding protoss because you could strike cannon the one or two immortals out and just mass repair the thors after that.

Yeah but aren't there like a million builds that you can do to instantly kill a FE protoss as terran? And same vice versa if the terran doesn't bunker up like a boss.


No, there aren't a lot of builds that just straight up kill a FE with no chance of keeping the expo at all. There are one base plays that can punish a FE, but generally they don't straight up auto-win.


3 rax shuts it down real easy.

Kind of like how 4gate destroys terran FE? I don't see what your point is.
FeyFey
Profile Joined September 2010
Germany10114 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-09 16:00:48
May 09 2011 15:57 GMT
#4273
sigh immortals and thors are quiet even with the 250mm, 250mm strike canon is just like the yamato. It takes out parts of the opponent army before the fight even starts. Though the 250mm works a bit different. And it makes immortals not as hardcore against thors as it would be otheriwse. without the strike canons immortals could win with near 0 losses against an equal ammount of thors via hitn run. And its still really good against ultras and other thors.
Also no one with a clear mind would fight thors with immortals. (marines or hellions will accompany thors and block the immortals from reaching the thors, so a better choice would be voidrays first to force vikings as the marine force can be teared down with voidrays and stalkers until the thors are unprotected and if there are no tanks on the ground to protect the thors immortals can shine )

Well with the ghost change its more viable for mech less viable for bio so you will probably see ghosts in the thor mix as well ^^ and i guess you don't want to use immortals if they have no shields (would look like tanks with no range would fight thors hehe.)

edit: right blizzard will probably release a justification shortly after the patch, so i guess waiting a lil more should help. I really wonder on how much reasons i guessed right hehe.
Srule
Profile Joined October 2010
Canada181 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-09 16:02:34
May 09 2011 15:59 GMT
#4274
So high templer now counter nearly all Terran units? Thors, BC, Bio, banshee, hellions, medivac... I guess this forces us to make tanks. Oh and ghost taking away a max of 100 energy means they can still own my army after i pull off perfect emps.
Whitewing
Profile Joined October 2010
United States7483 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-09 16:01:21
May 09 2011 16:00 GMT
#4275
On May 10 2011 00:57 ihavetofartosis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 00:56 Mali__Slon wrote:
On May 10 2011 00:54 Whitewing wrote:
On May 10 2011 00:51 no.1 kissy boy wrote:
On May 10 2011 00:36 Whitewing wrote:

I think it had a lot more to do with the 1-2 thor rushes that automatically killed any fast expanding protoss because you could strike cannon the one or two immortals out and just mass repair the thors after that.

Yeah but aren't there like a million builds that you can do to instantly kill a FE protoss as terran? And same vice versa if the terran doesn't bunker up like a boss.


No, there aren't a lot of builds that just straight up kill a FE with no chance of keeping the expo at all. There are one base plays that can punish a FE, but generally they don't straight up auto-win.


3 rax shuts it down real easy.

Kind of like how 4gate destroys terran FE? I don't see what your point is.


Just as you say, yeah, they can kill FE, but they don't auto-win. Decent forcefields can hold the bio at bay long enough to get the necessary units up, you can hold a 3 gate expand against a 3 rax. You can hold a fast CC as terran against a 4 gate too. It's not auto-win though, like the 1-2 thor rush is, since barracks units don't negate forcefields.
Strategy"You know I fucking hate the way you play, right?" ~SC2John
Daralii
Profile Joined March 2010
United States16991 Posts
May 09 2011 16:01 GMT
#4276
On May 10 2011 00:52 KaiserJohan wrote:
It has probably been asked before but why the hell did they change Thor back to energy? Its not like they are OP TvP...?

I assume they want to push toward ghost/mech builds, and fear that the ghost change wouldn't give P enough leeway if the T can deny scouting. It might also be to simply encourage templar play PvT.
Fear is freedom! Subjugation is liberation! Contradiction is truth!
Mali__Slon
Profile Joined October 2010
Senegal163 Posts
May 09 2011 16:04 GMT
#4277
On May 10 2011 00:57 ihavetofartosis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 00:56 Mali__Slon wrote:
On May 10 2011 00:54 Whitewing wrote:
On May 10 2011 00:51 no.1 kissy boy wrote:
On May 10 2011 00:36 Whitewing wrote:

I think it had a lot more to do with the 1-2 thor rushes that automatically killed any fast expanding protoss because you could strike cannon the one or two immortals out and just mass repair the thors after that.

Yeah but aren't there like a million builds that you can do to instantly kill a FE protoss as terran? And same vice versa if the terran doesn't bunker up like a boss.


No, there aren't a lot of builds that just straight up kill a FE with no chance of keeping the expo at all. There are one base plays that can punish a FE, but generally they don't straight up auto-win.


3 rax shuts it down real easy.

Kind of like how 4gate destroys terran FE? I don't see what your point is.


You dont? It seems pretty selfexplanatory, but alright i ll try to simplify. If I scout FE toss i'd ruther go 2 rax pressure into 3 rax, then bulid factory, then armory, then 150/150 for canons and wait for thor to kill the toss.

3 rax is much safer way to do it. So in my opinion thats no reason the nerf the cannons.
Mali__Slon
Profile Joined October 2010
Senegal163 Posts
May 09 2011 16:08 GMT
#4278
On May 10 2011 01:00 Whitewing wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2011 00:57 ihavetofartosis wrote:
On May 10 2011 00:56 Mali__Slon wrote:
On May 10 2011 00:54 Whitewing wrote:
On May 10 2011 00:51 no.1 kissy boy wrote:
On May 10 2011 00:36 Whitewing wrote:

I think it had a lot more to do with the 1-2 thor rushes that automatically killed any fast expanding protoss because you could strike cannon the one or two immortals out and just mass repair the thors after that.

Yeah but aren't there like a million builds that you can do to instantly kill a FE protoss as terran? And same vice versa if the terran doesn't bunker up like a boss.


No, there aren't a lot of builds that just straight up kill a FE with no chance of keeping the expo at all. There are one base plays that can punish a FE, but generally they don't straight up auto-win.


3 rax shuts it down real easy.

Kind of like how 4gate destroys terran FE? I don't see what your point is.


Just as you say, yeah, they can kill FE, but they don't auto-win. Decent forcefields can hold the bio at bay long enough to get the necessary units up, you can hold a 3 gate expand against a 3 rax. You can hold a fast CC as terran against a 4 gate too. It's not auto-win though, like the 1-2 thor rush is, since barracks units don't negate forcefields.


3 gate exp is in no way FE.

Secondly if terran kills your FE, you will be so far behind == loss. I still havent lost a game where i killed toss FE, I mean you are free to camp and to get your own expansion going.
Mataza
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Germany5364 Posts
May 09 2011 16:17 GMT
#4279
So I guess we go back to defensive emps on Thors so Templars don´t feedback half their life away.
PvT will probably move to Ghost, Ghost, Scan Observersnipe and Ghost on the one terran side and Gateway/Colossi/Templar on the other side.

If I am not entirely wrong HT now counter every terran unit besides Tanks, Hellions and Ghosts, the Ghost only being viable because you can sneak in invisible when they skimp on observers.
If nobody hates you, you´re doing something wrong. However someone hating you doesn´t make you right
ArtOfficial
Profile Joined April 2011
United States2 Posts
May 09 2011 16:24 GMT
#4280
So I guess we go back to defensive emps on Thors so Templars don´t feedback half their life away.
PvT will probably move to Ghost, Ghost, Scan Observersnipe and Ghost on the one terran side and Gateway/Colossi/Templar on the other side.

If I am not entirely wrong HT now counter every terran unit besides Tanks, Hellions and Ghosts, the Ghost only being viable because you can sneak in invisible when they skimp on observers.


You guys keep saying this but it's not like Ghosts don't counter every Protoss unit.
Prev 1 212 213 214 215 216 221 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 7h 58m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
NeuroSwarm 324
Nathanias 109
StarCraft: Brood War
NaDa 77
Dota 2
monkeys_forever366
XaKoH 255
Other Games
summit1g16722
Mew2King137
ToD76
ViBE57
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1900
BasetradeTV340
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream199
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 85
• davetesta23
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• RayReign 22
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22531
League of Legends
• Doublelift4224
• Rush588
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
7h 58m
WardiTV Korean Royale
9h 58m
Zoun vs SHIN
TBD vs Reynor
TBD vs herO
Solar vs TBD
BSL 21
17h 58m
Hawk vs Kyrie
spx vs Cross
Replay Cast
21h 58m
Wardi Open
1d 9h
Monday Night Weeklies
1d 14h
StarCraft2.fi
1d 14h
Replay Cast
1d 21h
Wardi Open
2 days
StarCraft2.fi
2 days
[ Show More ]
PiGosaur Monday
2 days
Wardi Open
3 days
StarCraft2.fi
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
6 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
SC Evo League
6 days
BSL 21
6 days
Sziky vs OyAji
Gypsy vs eOnzErG
Liquipedia Results

Completed

SOOP Univ League 2025
RSL Revival: Season 3
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
CSCL: Masked Kings S3
Slon Tour Season 2
META Madness #9
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
Kuram Kup
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.