| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
SpiZe
Canada3640 Posts
On March 13 2011 08:01 Sein wrote: Would you please report that guy for the benefit of the starcraft community? I did actually, as well as another of my friend who is using the same one. I don't know him in real life so I couldn't care less if he can't play anymore. | ||
|
TommyLove
United States24 Posts
On March 13 2011 08:00 ProTech wrote: TommyLove, are you really asking someone that question? Google Chrome is my default browser. It's 2011 bro, who in the WORLD does NOT know how to use google who uses the internet?!?!?!? R O F L you. you had to drop out of high school, so u had to get ur GED so you can enroll in the military... i didn't the armed forces taught u how to use google S O R R Y | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
On March 13 2011 08:04 TooL wrote: daphreak has to be trolling. can't possibly be that stupid. brilliant post. thanks for the contribution. | ||
|
NrT.RuSH
Germany214 Posts
| ||
|
ProTech
United States490 Posts
if you can just nuke these posts from tommy, he's off topic and trolling this thread like crazy | ||
|
NrT.RuSH
Germany214 Posts
| ||
|
Nemireck
Canada1875 Posts
On March 13 2011 08:01 Sein wrote: Would you please report that guy for the benefit of the starcraft community? The problem is that reporting him won't actually help anything unless Blizzard starts to take action on investigating reported hackers. I sent them a report on a guy I know personally that was using a maphack back in BETA and he wasn't banned until the first wave of bans that occurred after the game was officially released. | ||
|
Sein
United States1811 Posts
| ||
|
Valckrie
United Kingdom533 Posts
On March 13 2011 07:56 SpiZe wrote: Juts googling the name of the hack has gotten me like 10 download links. I cannot belive Blizzard doesn't know about those website. It's not even private! Nothing stops them from downloading it and fiding a way to fix it or find a way to caugh people that are using it. Guess there will always be hackers, no matter what you do. It's kind of sad if you think about it. I doubt Blizzard are that ignorant of such hacks. As we know, bans come in waves and they are probably trying to fix it right now, it just takes some time perhaps? | ||
|
SpiZe
Canada3640 Posts
On March 13 2011 08:08 Valckrie wrote: I doubt Blizzard are that ignorant of such hacks. As we know, bans come in waves and they are probably trying to fix it right now, it just takes some time perhaps? I think that banning in waves is a terrible idea. Why should we have to endure people that hacks for like 2-3 months before they finnally get banned. If I steal a car I will get arrested as soon as the police finds evidence that it was i that stole the car, not afther 3 months when they decide that it is time to arrest everyone that commit in crime in the past 6 months. | ||
|
TommyLove
United States24 Posts
On March 13 2011 08:06 ProTech wrote: To admins: if you can just nuke these posts from tommy, he's off topic and trolling this thread like crazy i'm an high templar, i can just feedback the ghosts because i told the truth | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
On March 12 2011 22:32 Pete! wrote: Town wins! This game seemed to have a pretty unfair Red:Blue ratio if my estimates are correct. Mafia almost succeeded in misguiding several Greens and Blues but clearly not enough. Either way, my best guesses: iGware - Godfather Sorcery - Mafia VertigoX23 - Mafia(?) Greenworld - Mafia(?) Liquid`Nazgul - Mayor Liquid`Ret - Bodyguard Liquid`HuK - Bodyguard bLuR - Veteran drewbie.root - Veteran CatZ.root - Veteran PinkPrincess - Medic(?) Everyone else - Vanilla  In all seriousness, however good it is for the community to be able to thwart cheaters like this, I'd recommend caution to everyone who feels the need to express themselves so caustically, regardless of which 'side' they're representing. A vast majority of the posts in this thread seem unnecessary and many don't move the discussion forward in either direction - be it a lynch or a save. (In fact, more than one person who was correct about iGware has embarrassed themselves through their behaviour in this thread.) Actually, I'm fairly sure it ended in a lyncher win for ProTech, get your facts straight  I would have listed PinkPrincess as a traitor... if they were a medic, though, definitely a VI In all seriousness, though, this doesn't surprise me. Ret's post was where I decided "this guy is definitely hacking", for the record. Sending a probe to scout an overlord you should have known you could see is like wtf. NOONE QUOTED IT either, and PinkPrincess + Show Spoiler + (who would make that name as a guy... serious problem there, but that can be addressed personally) Considering PinkPrincess said if the guy was caught hacking, you could ban him, I would honestly support a 2 day ban for him. This is sad to see because I hadn't really associated SC2 with hacking, and having played on USEast in BW more than any other server, it was sort of refreshing. I guess I was naive. | ||
|
Nemireck
Canada1875 Posts
On March 13 2011 08:11 SpiZe wrote: I think that banning in waves is a terrible idea. Why should we have to endure people that hacks for like 2-3 months before they finnally get banned. If I steal a car I will get arrested as soon as the police finds evidence that it was i that stole the car, not afther 3 months when they decide that it is time to arrest everyone that commit in crime in the past 6 months. It's not about stopping the hacks, it's about perception. It impresses more people when Blizzard is able to say "We banned over 9000 accounts this month that we caught hacking." instead of quietly staying on top of the problem. I think that Blizzard believes that making grand announcements will scare more people into avoiding the use of hacks in the first place, when really, the best defense against hacks is a quick response before it gets out of hand. | ||
|
TooL
Canada275 Posts
| ||
|
nalgene
Canada2153 Posts
| ||
|
NrT.RuSH
Germany214 Posts
| ||
|
gosuMalicE
Canada676 Posts
On March 13 2011 05:28 BALIstik916 wrote: Hacking pisses me off too, but cmon worse than steroids in baseball? You are being a little overdramatic, this is nowhere near the same thing... Actually knowing a little about steroids it would not surprise me if the majority of baseball players did a cycle of growth hormones a few years before they went pro. I don't know any baseball players but I do know a lot of hockey players and the majority of them did that in high school. They are completely undetectable a year or so after the fact and you only need to use them once. The public just has this preconception that their sports heroes are all clean and pure and they freak out when the blatantly obvious is publicly revealed. I would say you would be hard pressed to find more then 1 in 10 pro athletes that hasn't juiced at some point in their lives. | ||
|
Nemireck
Canada1875 Posts
On March 13 2011 08:15 TooL wrote: You catch more cheaters that way. You can prevent people from cheating in the first place if the first 10 people caught using the hack are banned immediately and cause the creator of the program to go back to the drawing board. It's great that Blizzard waits in order to catch all the people that WANT to hack (and who eventually do once they think they've found an undetectable program), but I would personally prefer that they never get the chance to use that program to begin with. | ||
|
SpiZe
Canada3640 Posts
On March 13 2011 08:15 nalgene wrote: Because if they ban one guy... they lose the possibility of banning hundreds more... if they go and report that X/Y/Z offsets is/are detected... Well, maybe that 50 out of those 100 hackers were told by others hackers that it was safe since they weren't banned. Wich is obviously not true. | ||
|
lac29
United States1485 Posts
On March 13 2011 08:15 Nemireck wrote: It's not about stopping the hacks, it's about perception. It impresses more people when Blizzard is able to say "We banned over 9000 accounts this month that we caught hacking." instead of quietly staying on top of the problem. I think that Blizzard believes that making grand announcements will scare more people into avoiding the use of hacks in the first place, when really, the best defense against hacks is a quick response before it gets out of hand. I don't think it's necessarily about perception ... because you can always ban in smaller waves and just announce after 6 months ... "we've banned over 9000 accounts". You can still do things incrementally and then announce after a certain period of time that you've banned a certain impressive number of accounts. | ||
| ||
|
|
Kung Fu Cup
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
OSC
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
OSC
Replay Cast
RSL Revival
Serral vs Bunny
ByuN vs GgMaChine
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
