| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
FiWiFaKi
Canada9859 Posts
Poll: Do you like the NASL way of picking players? No (59) Yes (35) Don't Care (Just want good games) (18) 112 total votes Your vote: Do you like the NASL way of picking players? (Vote): Yes | ||
|
LuckyFool
United States9015 Posts
On February 22 2011 09:53 avilo wrote: Really disappointed that you have to get "votes" to be able to get higher chances to get in this league. A player like me is not currently on a team, yet capable and has beaten literally tons of the players on the list. So yeah, it does seem like a lot of popularity is needed since that is the entire point of a "vote" system. Obviously high profile players are going to have tons of votes, but it makes it very much a popularity contest. With that said, VOTE FOR ME I WANT TO GET IN THIS LEAGUE AND OWN IT UP. 17th place MLG Raliegh, 12th MLG DC, top 200 on planet earth! Gotta list everything now to get in! I bet I could beat you in a popularity contest avilo!! LOL | ||
|
Stolat
Poland241 Posts
On February 22 2011 09:34 MuteZephyr wrote: That's the only way it should be. The good players who have won lots of tournaments are the popular ones and the ones people want to watch the most. I don't want to watch a bunch of people who just managed to cheese their way into a spot. You gotta work hard for this tournament, the way it should be. GO GO ACTIONJEZUS fameous Danish 6pooler!  Voting Mana and Tarson  | ||
|
Krehlmar
Sweden1149 Posts
But yeah I wish they'd find a somewhat better format. | ||
|
Hdizz
Canada93 Posts
| ||
|
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On February 22 2011 09:57 Shikyo wrote: TLO is 4th. He's far from 4th in the world in actual skill, but he's so creative that he's popular. CatZ also is way higher than where he should be, as is Kiwikaki, QXC, Destiny, Demuslim, Dimaga... Overall, if they choose the players via voting it's going to be really unfair. TLO for instance isn't even in the top 16 but is creative, whereas there are players like Morrow that are less popular but who I'd still pick over many of those players any day of the week. That being said, still excited about this tournament. I still don't think that players should be chosen with voting, and that qualifiers should be ran. Everyone needs a chance, even if they aren't currently well-known. I would rather watch creative, interesting, and exciting play rather than see piqliq cannon rush his way to the top of the ladder. Or than see Morrow do the exact same build every single game. Being a boring but solid player is just that - boring but solid. They can go win open tournaments but they don't make for exciting TV. | ||
bkrow
Australia8532 Posts
On February 22 2011 09:57 Swerc wrote: Ok then why is the poll even there? It specifically says "to increase their chances" of getting in.. NOT we will solely be basing our decisions on this poll.. i think there is a very particular choice in language that they have done deliberately.. | ||
|
raser
Norway301 Posts
On February 22 2011 09:57 Aegeis wrote: Athene is rising up really fast, I wonder if NASL will take them seriously. hope not | ||
|
hmunkey
United Kingdom1973 Posts
Well-liked players should not take precedence to good players. This also means people who can win the qualification tournament should carry more weight than those who just get a free pass in for their name. | ||
|
Tristy
Norway172 Posts
| ||
|
mprs
Canada2933 Posts
... Yell0w was unsuccessful? | ||
|
BaronFel
United States155 Posts
| ||
|
avilo
United States4100 Posts
| ||
|
Aegeis
United States1619 Posts
| ||
|
Xeris
Iran17695 Posts
 | ||
|
Rasky
United States406 Posts
| ||
|
ImHuko
United States996 Posts
| ||
|
billyX333
United States1360 Posts
although obviously, on average, the most competitive players will get in but seriously this is like american idol. i can imagine some undeserving players slipping in and some seriously legit but less popular players getting snubbed | ||
|
feanor1
United States1899 Posts
On February 22 2011 09:53 Swerc wrote: Yeah but paid for so don't waste our time with this junk Its not fully paid for, and BratOK has missed multiple....multiple tournaments with visa issues. | ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
On February 22 2011 09:59 strongandbig wrote: I would rather watch creative, interesting, and exciting play rather than see piqliq cannon rush his way to the top of the ladder. Or than see Morrow do the exact same build every single game. Being a boring but solid player is just that - boring but solid. They can go win open tournaments but they don't make for exciting TV. Morrow a boring player? He's pretty much been re-inventing Zerg these past months. Also, "creative interesting and exciting play" often happens to be cannon-rushing and cheese. I'm not sure why a TLO cannon rush and Piqliq cannon rush are any different. If you want to see exciting play instead of people playing to win, you can watch funday monday. | ||
| ||
|
|
Kung Fu Cup
Replay Cast
The PondCast
OSC
Replay Cast
Escore
CranKy Ducklings
Sparkling Tuna Cup
OSC
Afreeca Starleague
Rush vs Hm
Bisu vs Shuttle
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
