• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 07:28
CEST 13:28
KST 20:28
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8
Community News
SC4ALL: II SC2 Complete Invited Player Lineup5StarCraft II 5.0.17 PTR Patch Notes (Sept 30, 2026)67Weekly Cups (Sept 21-27): herO and ByuN double2Weekly Cups (Sep 13-20): herO scores triple3BSL Season 2316
StarCraft 2
General
StarCraft II 5.0.17 PTR Patch Notes (Sept 30, 2026) SC4ALL: II SC2 Complete Invited Player Lineup Back to SC2 after 14 years - Protoss CTRL groups? How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR? October World Ranking: herO stays #1, ByuN returns
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) 2026 GSTL Grand Finals Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) SC2 INu's Battles#21 [ 3-Days tournament ]
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Sweltering Sands [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 545 And Drops and Rifts Mutation # 544 Double Trouble Mutation # 543 Enhanced Defenses
Brood War
General
Sagi.gg Launcher Released Fantasy returning? Bot on ladder BSL Season 23 BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL22] Ro8 Day 4 2v2v2v2 Tournament [ASL22] Ro8 Day 3
Strategy
Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Total Annihilation Zero
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25! Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Artificial Intelligence Thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Escaping Into Video Games: G…
TrAiDoS
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 10800 users

ZvP Changes Post 1.2? - Page 13

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 11 12 13 14 Next All
kinetic_skink
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Australia125 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-01-14 07:56:09
January 14 2011 07:47 GMT
#241
On January 14 2011 13:21 roymarthyup wrote:
chronoboost increases the building power of a building by 50% for its duration

what this means is if a building is CONSTANTLY CHRONOBOOSTED it can produce 1.5 of a unit in its buildtime instead of 1

what that means is you can build 3 pheonix in the time it takes to build 2 pheonix assuming the stargate is constantly chrono boosted


3 pheonix is 105 seconds

2 pheonix builds in 70 seconds

so with constant chronoboost you can make 3 pheonix in 70 seconds, giving each one a buildtime of 23.333 seconds . so 35 seconds became 23.333 seconds. This means using chronoboost on a pheonix DOES NOT shave 10 seconds off its building time, in reality a fully chronoboosted pheonix gets 11.666 seconds shaved off its building time

this means in if you keep a building chronoboosted for 70 seconds, it shaved off 35 seconds of building time

do different units cause different results. lets compare

1 carrier builds in 120 seconds. so with chronoboost you can make 3 carriers in 240 seconds. this means a carrier is a 80 second buildtime with constant chronoboost. this means a fully chronoboosted carrier gets 40 seconds shaved off its building time

that means when you keep a building chronoboosted for 240 seconds for carriers, it shaved off 40x3=120 seconds of building time


so it seems chronoboost gives a specific percentage of buildtime being shaved off for how long a building is chronoboosted. If a building is chronoboosted for X seconds it shaves off 1/2x building time. So that means if you keep a building chronoboosted for 70 seconds it shaved off 35, or if you keep it chronoboosted for 240 seconds it shaved off 120


but each chronoboosted unit is fully chronoboosted gets more or less time shaved off to build depending on its buildtime. a gets 11.666 seconds of its buildtime shaved off if you chronoboost it


No - You're wrong. How can so many people here be so bad at maths.

10 seconds is correct like many people said already.

If you did your example correction

the 70 chonoboosted seconds would take 3.5 chronoboosts to achieve.

So to get the 35 seconds reducuction you mention takes 3.5 chronoboosts (Not 3)

35/3.5 = 10

So a single chronoboost reduces build times by 10 seconds (As have been repeated over and over). Your calculation was just wrong.
Day[9] (Aus): http://freezone.iinet.net.au/channels/freezone/gaming/day9-webcasts
NicolBolas
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States1388 Posts
January 14 2011 07:48 GMT
#242
To be honest, I think the change made players more aware of Phoenixes and their potential uses than anything else.

At first, people tried Phoenix play and it kinda worked. Sorta. But they didn't stick with it, instead opting for Robo-based play. So the possibilities of Phoenix-based play languished.

Now however, since Phoenixes got a buff, however slight, people are willing to have another go at them. And are in some cases finding success. Not so much because of the buff, but because they tried.
So you know, cats are interesting. They are kind of like girls. If they come up and talk to you, it's great. But if you try to talk to them, it doesn't always go so well. - Shigeru Miyamoto
Drazzzt
Profile Joined September 2002
Germany999 Posts
January 14 2011 08:12 GMT
#243
On January 14 2011 13:21 roymarthyup wrote:
chronoboost increases the building power of a building by 50% for its duration

what this means is if a building is CONSTANTLY CHRONOBOOSTED it can produce 1.5 of a unit in its buildtime instead of 1

what that means is you can build 3 pheonix in the time it takes to build 2 pheonix assuming the stargate is constantly chrono boosted


3 pheonix is 105 seconds

2 pheonix builds in 70 seconds

so with constant chronoboost you can make 3 pheonix in 70 seconds, giving each one a buildtime of 23.333 seconds . so 35 seconds became 23.333 seconds. This means using chronoboost on a pheonix DOES NOT shave 10 seconds off its building time, in reality a fully chronoboosted pheonix gets 11.666 seconds shaved off its building time

this means in if you keep a building chronoboosted for 70 seconds, it shaved off 35 seconds of building time

do different units cause different results. lets compare

1 carrier builds in 120 seconds. so with chronoboost you can make 3 carriers in 240 seconds. this means a carrier is a 80 second buildtime with constant chronoboost. this means a fully chronoboosted carrier gets 40 seconds shaved off its building time

that means when you keep a building chronoboosted for 240 seconds for carriers, it shaved off 40x3=120 seconds of building time


so it seems chronoboost gives a specific percentage of buildtime being shaved off for how long a building is chronoboosted. If a building is chronoboosted for X seconds it shaves off 1/2x building time. So that means if you keep a building chronoboosted for 70 seconds it shaved off 35, or if you keep it chronoboosted for 240 seconds it shaved off 120


but each chronoboosted unit is fully chronoboosted gets more or less time shaved off to build depending on its buildtime. a gets 11.666 seconds of its buildtime shaved off if you chronoboost it

Why so complicated? (and it's wrong anyways).
Just face it: Every chronoboost takes of 10 seconds of build time as long as it is not wasted on a non-producing building. Test it yourself.
Be Nice, Be Fair, Be Mannered.
iwannabelikeday
Profile Joined January 2011
United States2 Posts
January 14 2011 08:27 GMT
#244
i have been trying and tweeking zvp phinox (i spell it like this on purpose) builds before the patch, and always came to the conclusion they were never viable really.

I logged in the morning of the patch and almost had to change my pants when i realized the buildtime change. I instantly went into build order mode and started trying some stuff out. Here's what I came up with.

2Gate stargate is not very viable, as roaches will decimate, basically with any early phinox play you HAVE to have immortal. 111 Build is very nice, i've tested it against about 6 different strats twice each. It works very well in zvp in particular it obviously holds roaches well, and with one sentry and proper building placement you can defend lings rather easily.

The key to using phinox in the new patch are immortals. use the early obs to determine exactly how many immortals you need. Pretty much any early push should get chopped with a FF and decimated by your army.

its amazing how many people send ovies to corners of the maps. I can assure you that won't be happening anymore vs toss. This patch is going to dramatically lower vision for Zerg. Also, in a Gate,Star,Facility order, getting 3/4 phinox out early is very very very strong against Z, as at this point they will have at most 2 queens, which even then they usually dont have. Unless they spore up it can be very deadly.

It's a whole different game when you scratch the typical 4gate style, and you have to micro phinox's along with your core units. The other strong point about them, is the instant counter (usually on minerals) if you can hold their initial push.
there is no such thing as cheese... just poor scouting.
Severedevil
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States4839 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-01-14 09:53:12
January 14 2011 09:51 GMT
#245
On January 14 2011 17:27 iwannabelikeday wrote:
2Gate stargate is not very viable, as roaches will decimate, basically with any early phinox play you HAVE to have immortal.

Build a Void Ray. They compare favorably to Immortals in most circumstances, particularly if you're playing air-heavy and therefore want the +1 Air Weapons upgrade.

Stargate for Phoenix alone, or Void Rays alone, is a mediocre structure. It's the potential use of both that makes Stargate valuable.
My strategy is to fork people.
arnold(soTa)
Profile Joined March 2010
Sweden352 Posts
January 14 2011 10:29 GMT
#246

Stargate for Phoenix alone, or Void Rays alone, is a mediocre structure. It's the potential use of both that makes Stargate valuable.


well said, many people do not understand this
"I like turtles"
Rizell
Profile Joined August 2010
Sweden237 Posts
January 14 2011 10:56 GMT
#247
I actually think this change made a huge effect. A toss that goes a 1/1/1 build (gate,cyber,stargate) and waits and chronoes out 4 phoenix (critical number to kill a queen in 1 gravitation beam) will is so much deadlier.

This usually attacks the zerg around the time his lair just finished. Its hard to scout since its easy to hide 1 stargate and those 4 phoenix are done sligthly after the 6min mark.. and even if u manage to scout it and you have 3 queens and a evo chamber almost finished. IT WILL do alot of damage to the zerg. Before 1.2 those 4 phoenix would come 40 seconds later.. enough time for you to have a hydra den up.

Now the amount of damage those 4 phoenix will do allows the toss to immidiatly put down a robo and expand, that robo even allowes him to have 1-2 collosi out in time for your hydra counter ( was a good followup before).

I dont know what to do to counter this shit, NO it dosent kill me, but it lets the protoss enter the midgame with mapcontrol, better eco, and better tech. A huge advantage. Sure there are blind counters to this, by going early pressure or blind evo chamber.. but those things have no room in a normal build at higher level play.


So poor, cant' even pay attention.
Regentropfen
Profile Joined July 2004
Germany277 Posts
January 14 2011 11:15 GMT
#248
On January 14 2011 16:47 kinetic_skink wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2011 13:21 roymarthyup wrote:
chronoboost increases the building power of a building by 50% for its duration

what this means is if a building is CONSTANTLY CHRONOBOOSTED it can produce 1.5 of a unit in its buildtime instead of 1

what that means is you can build 3 pheonix in the time it takes to build 2 pheonix assuming the stargate is constantly chrono boosted


3 pheonix is 105 seconds

2 pheonix builds in 70 seconds

so with constant chronoboost you can make 3 pheonix in 70 seconds, giving each one a buildtime of 23.333 seconds . so 35 seconds became 23.333 seconds. This means using chronoboost on a pheonix DOES NOT shave 10 seconds off its building time, in reality a fully chronoboosted pheonix gets 11.666 seconds shaved off its building time

this means in if you keep a building chronoboosted for 70 seconds, it shaved off 35 seconds of building time

do different units cause different results. lets compare

1 carrier builds in 120 seconds. so with chronoboost you can make 3 carriers in 240 seconds. this means a carrier is a 80 second buildtime with constant chronoboost. this means a fully chronoboosted carrier gets 40 seconds shaved off its building time

that means when you keep a building chronoboosted for 240 seconds for carriers, it shaved off 40x3=120 seconds of building time


so it seems chronoboost gives a specific percentage of buildtime being shaved off for how long a building is chronoboosted. If a building is chronoboosted for X seconds it shaves off 1/2x building time. So that means if you keep a building chronoboosted for 70 seconds it shaved off 35, or if you keep it chronoboosted for 240 seconds it shaved off 120


but each chronoboosted unit is fully chronoboosted gets more or less time shaved off to build depending on its buildtime. a gets 11.666 seconds of its buildtime shaved off if you chronoboost it


No - You're wrong. How can so many people here be so bad at maths.

10 seconds is correct like many people said already.

If you did your example correction

the 70 chonoboosted seconds would take 3.5 chronoboosts to achieve.

So to get the 35 seconds reducuction you mention takes 3.5 chronoboosts (Not 3)

35/3.5 = 10

So a single chronoboost reduces build times by 10 seconds (As have been repeated over and over). Your calculation was just wrong.


well, his calculation is not plain wrong, he just didnt account for the duration of a CB. A CB shaves off 1/2x building time. Insert CB-Duration (20 secs) and voila, 10 secs reduction...
War is not about whos right, its about whos left
eksert
Profile Joined August 2010
France656 Posts
January 14 2011 11:18 GMT
#249
as a 2500 master leaguer i love tosses going air in the opening.. EG.Machine's build ownz them so much

SoulScream
Profile Joined June 2010
Bulgaria44 Posts
January 14 2011 11:26 GMT
#250
Well most probably more Queens + faster Hydras will be required. Since I am really not a good player it will be somewhat harder to deal/prevent harass. Ovy sniping will prevent them of spreading which will be really annoying even with the speed upgrade for them. Will see I still see 4gate most of the time anyway so I am not that worried.
ExoFun
Profile Joined August 2010
Netherlands2041 Posts
January 14 2011 11:34 GMT
#251
On January 14 2011 20:18 eksert wrote:
as a 2500 master leaguer i love tosses going air in the opening.. EG.Machine's build ownz them so much


What is this kind of build can you explain plz?
Twitches
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada365 Posts
January 14 2011 11:38 GMT
#252
To be honest it's not bugging me at all right now. There's a lot of Zerg QQ around, but I find that in the lower leagues a lot of Protosses are committing to too many phoenixes at the moment. Just because they come out faster, doesn't mean they don't still cost a lot.. Just my input, I guess.
Gravity is just a feeble plot.
clayn
Profile Joined November 2010
Germany444 Posts
January 14 2011 11:44 GMT
#253
imo it's still quite balanced and i didnt really change my ZvP BOs. If the opponent goes mass Phoenix for early/midgame harrass I mass hydras and queens for a counter attack (9/10 sucessful yet)


2,4k diamond btw
mind1337
Profile Joined April 2010
France107 Posts
January 14 2011 11:47 GMT
#254
On January 14 2011 19:56 Rizell wrote:
I actually think this change made a huge effect. A toss that goes a 1/1/1 build (gate,cyber,stargate) and waits and chronoes out 4 phoenix (critical number to kill a queen in 1 gravitation beam) will is so much deadlier.

This usually attacks the zerg around the time his lair just finished. Its hard to scout since its easy to hide 1 stargate and those 4 phoenix are done sligthly after the 6min mark.. and even if u manage to scout it and you have 3 queens and a evo chamber almost finished. IT WILL do alot of damage to the zerg. Before 1.2 those 4 phoenix would come 40 seconds later.. enough time for you to have a hydra den up.

Now the amount of damage those 4 phoenix will do allows the toss to immidiatly put down a robo and expand, that robo even allowes him to have 1-2 collosi out in time for your hydra counter ( was a good followup before).

I dont know what to do to counter this shit, NO it dosent kill me, but it lets the protoss enter the midgame with mapcontrol, better eco, and better tech. A huge advantage. Sure there are blind counters to this, by going early pressure or blind evo chamber.. but those things have no room in a normal build at higher level play.



That's exactly how i feel, the 1 stargate 4 phoenix into robo is REALLY effective vs Zerg, basically if the zerg doesn't get 4 queens the game is over when the 4 phoenixes arrive in the zerg base. If you get super fast hydras to counter that, then the protoss just has to push with his units produced from the 3 gates and he wins the game since you teched too fast to defend against the phoenixes.
Silidons
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States2813 Posts
January 14 2011 11:52 GMT
#255
On January 14 2011 20:47 mind1337 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2011 19:56 Rizell wrote:
I actually think this change made a huge effect. A toss that goes a 1/1/1 build (gate,cyber,stargate) and waits and chronoes out 4 phoenix (critical number to kill a queen in 1 gravitation beam) will is so much deadlier.

This usually attacks the zerg around the time his lair just finished. Its hard to scout since its easy to hide 1 stargate and those 4 phoenix are done sligthly after the 6min mark.. and even if u manage to scout it and you have 3 queens and a evo chamber almost finished. IT WILL do alot of damage to the zerg. Before 1.2 those 4 phoenix would come 40 seconds later.. enough time for you to have a hydra den up.

Now the amount of damage those 4 phoenix will do allows the toss to immidiatly put down a robo and expand, that robo even allowes him to have 1-2 collosi out in time for your hydra counter ( was a good followup before).

I dont know what to do to counter this shit, NO it dosent kill me, but it lets the protoss enter the midgame with mapcontrol, better eco, and better tech. A huge advantage. Sure there are blind counters to this, by going early pressure or blind evo chamber.. but those things have no room in a normal build at higher level play.



That's exactly how i feel, the 1 stargate 4 phoenix into robo is REALLY effective vs Zerg, basically if the zerg doesn't get 4 queens the game is over when the 4 phoenixes arrive in the zerg base. If you get super fast hydras to counter that, then the protoss just has to push with his units produced from the 3 gates and he wins the game since you teched too fast to defend against the phoenixes.


Show me a replay of a toss getting 4 phoenix with 3 gates, then throwing down a robo, then an expansion, and then having colossus out before you can counter attack with hydras.

oh wait, you can't, because that's impossible
"God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon Bonaparte
Rizell
Profile Joined August 2010
Sweden237 Posts
January 14 2011 12:14 GMT
#256
On January 14 2011 20:52 Silidons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2011 20:47 mind1337 wrote:
On January 14 2011 19:56 Rizell wrote:
I actually think this change made a huge effect. A toss that goes a 1/1/1 build (gate,cyber,stargate) and waits and chronoes out 4 phoenix (critical number to kill a queen in 1 gravitation beam) will is so much deadlier.

This usually attacks the zerg around the time his lair just finished. Its hard to scout since its easy to hide 1 stargate and those 4 phoenix are done sligthly after the 6min mark.. and even if u manage to scout it and you have 3 queens and a evo chamber almost finished. IT WILL do alot of damage to the zerg. Before 1.2 those 4 phoenix would come 40 seconds later.. enough time for you to have a hydra den up.

Now the amount of damage those 4 phoenix will do allows the toss to immidiatly put down a robo and expand, that robo even allowes him to have 1-2 collosi out in time for your hydra counter ( was a good followup before).

I dont know what to do to counter this shit, NO it dosent kill me, but it lets the protoss enter the midgame with mapcontrol, better eco, and better tech. A huge advantage. Sure there are blind counters to this, by going early pressure or blind evo chamber.. but those things have no room in a normal build at higher level play.



That's exactly how i feel, the 1 stargate 4 phoenix into robo is REALLY effective vs Zerg, basically if the zerg doesn't get 4 queens the game is over when the 4 phoenixes arrive in the zerg base. If you get super fast hydras to counter that, then the protoss just has to push with his units produced from the 3 gates and he wins the game since you teched too fast to defend against the phoenixes.


Show me a replay of a toss getting 4 phoenix with 3 gates, then throwing down a robo, then an expansion, and then having colossus out before you can counter attack with hydras.

oh wait, you can't, because that's impossible


I never said the toss gets 3gates, He goes 1/1/1, He will only have a zealot + stalker until his 4 phoenix is out. Zealot holds ramp and stalkers tries to deny scouting. Then he gets robo when 4 phoenix is done, and he can get some more ground units and a Expo. Those 4 phoenix will do ALOT of damage to zerg and you will have a hard time punishing him for it. Unless you for some reason went mass lings or very early roach, both that arent that viable normal openings at higher level imo.
So poor, cant' even pay attention.
ch4ppi
Profile Joined July 2010
Germany802 Posts
January 14 2011 12:16 GMT
#257
.Zerg can still produce mutalisks fast and in multiple numbers.


The only reason why u could go Mutalisk against Phoenix and fight even, was because u could build an overwhelming force faster, but now there are 4 Phoenix after 2CB Starports nearly at the same time build as the first batch of mutas of 4-6...
Also Phoenix come now in bigger Nr earlier than mutas. Catching up from behind in muta nr. is hard imo, I dont think its effective.
Many people seem to think that Z units dont cost gas.... produce muta fast and in multiple nr... if u have good macro ure always at around 0 gas... and produce your mutas just like P produce Phoenix, only slower
thehitman
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
1105 Posts
January 14 2011 12:28 GMT
#258
Too early to tell. I would imagine protoss can be more dangerous with a phoenix opening, but I would wait for a week or two before I conclude anything.

Other than that I think everything is same no?
ch4ppi
Profile Joined July 2010
Germany802 Posts
January 14 2011 12:44 GMT
#259
Other than that I think everything is same no?


I agree. But I like that the wall off is kinda gone now.
Reborn8u
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
United States1761 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-01-14 13:10:21
January 14 2011 12:59 GMT
#260
I was often complaining pre patch that I could never hold a 3rd vs zerg, so I often just tried to delay zergs natural, 4gate and hope it worked out. Which it often did and still does. The patch has opened up a lot of doors for me to play and win macro games vs zerg. While I haven't been using phoenix as much simply because they just are not a unit I seem to utilize effectively (except for early overlord harassment and scouting), having the cheeper obs and faster hallucinate have definitely allowed me to keep a better eye on the zerg and see when they are being greedy or preparing a push. This knowledge has allowed me to take and hold 3rds and I am often getting into split map, all out macro wars with zerg. That include tech switches, by me and my opponent, after almost every major engagement. It's a welcomed change for me. Not just because of being able to win macro games but because I'm not so tempted to 4 gate ever game. I feel like the matchup has become fun and interesting. I was so lost after the previous patch and roach buff. On maps like scrap station which I used to absolutely dread, I feel I can battle into the late game and not be hopelessly behind.

It's also very nice to be able to get phoenix out to deal with the muta threat and having the scouting to see it coming. While some zergs are obviously unhappy with this. I always got picked apart by muta harass after taking 3rd because my main ramp was usually semi-walled to prevent early ling harassment. Which delayed my stalkers from responding to the threat and being able to get from my main to my natural and 3rd. Blink's not 100% effective with handling this because smart zergs would fake one direction and cause you to blink the wrong way, costing me many probes. With zerg being able to make 10 muta's at the same time, and perform very fast tech and composition switches. I would think they wouldn't be so upset by a 10 second reduction in 1 units build time.

One final thought to all the zergs out there, USE CONTAMINATE. It's so good! You get scouting info and can delay colossus production and starport production. This can cripple toss's compositions and break timing attack windows. It's so underused, and so good. You can really punish players for bad building placement. Colossus and voids take a long time to produce, make it even longer.
:)
Prev 1 11 12 13 14 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
INu's Battles
20:00
INu's Battles#21
herO vs Classic
Percival vs Rogue
IntoTheiNu 587
LiquipediaDiscussion
Sparkling Tuna Cup
19:00
Weekly #149 (SHIN Mod Edition)
Krystianer vs YoungYakovLIVE!
ByuN vs AqueroN
CranKy Ducklings164
CranKy Ducklings SOOP24
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 21402
Shuttle 11410
FanTaSy 1795
Hyuk 925
Horang2 577
BeSt 499
Mini 257
Stork 256
Pusan 240
Killer 136
[ Show more ]
EffOrt 134
Zeus 127
Last 123
Mind 98
ggaemo 67
Hyun 60
sorry 52
PianO 45
Snow 39
Bale 33
Sea.KH 31
ToSsGirL 30
JYJ 27
Hm[arnc] 26
Aegong 21
zelot 14
Sacsri 10
ajuk12(nOOB) 7
Noble 4
Dota 2
XcaliburYe411
Counter-Strike
fl0m2022
byalli967
x6flipin241
Other Games
gofns27588
singsing2825
B2W.Neo663
ArmadaUGS85
Mew2King59
Livibee6
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick731
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream72
[ Show 10 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• Michael_bg 6
• FirePhoenix2
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Upcoming Events
Shopify Rebellion Sundays
3h 32m
MilkiCow vs TBD
Clem vs TBD
BSL Open Qualifier
7h 32m
BSL Open Qualifier
7h 32m
Replay Cast
11h 32m
Afreeca Starleague
22h 32m
Rush vs Light
WardiTV Weekly
23h 32m
Monday Night Weeklies
1d 4h
Replay Cast
1d 11h
Afreeca Starleague
1d 22h
Soma vs Soulkey
INu's Battles
1d 23h
SHIN vs Cure
ByuN vs Zoun
[ Show More ]
PiGosaur Cup
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
INu's Battles
3 days
Replay Cast
5 days
BSL: Ladder Tournament
6 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Calamity Invitational

Ongoing

ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
Acropolis #5
Acropolis #5 - GSB
Copium Cup
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSC
BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Custodian Cup
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.