• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 00:22
CEST 06:22
KST 13:22
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall9HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL54Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?12FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event16Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster16Weekly Cups (June 16-22): Clem strikes back1
StarCraft 2
General
The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Statistics for vetoed/disliked maps How does the number of casters affect your enjoyment of esports? Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster
Tourneys
Korean Starcraft League Week 77 Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Semi Finals & Finals $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady
Brood War
General
Player “Jedi” cheat on CSL Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Unit and Spell Similarities Help: rep cant save
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Blogs
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 652 users

ZvP Changes Post 1.2? - Page 14

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 12 13 14 All
Nemireck
Profile Joined October 2010
Canada1875 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-01-14 13:23:46
January 14 2011 13:15 GMT
#261
On January 14 2011 16:47 kinetic_skink wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2011 13:21 roymarthyup wrote:
chronoboost increases the building power of a building by 50% for its duration

what this means is if a building is CONSTANTLY CHRONOBOOSTED it can produce 1.5 of a unit in its buildtime instead of 1

what that means is you can build 3 pheonix in the time it takes to build 2 pheonix assuming the stargate is constantly chrono boosted


3 pheonix is 105 seconds

2 pheonix builds in 70 seconds

so with constant chronoboost you can make 3 pheonix in 70 seconds, giving each one a buildtime of 23.333 seconds . so 35 seconds became 23.333 seconds. This means using chronoboost on a pheonix DOES NOT shave 10 seconds off its building time, in reality a fully chronoboosted pheonix gets 11.666 seconds shaved off its building time

this means in if you keep a building chronoboosted for 70 seconds, it shaved off 35 seconds of building time

do different units cause different results. lets compare

1 carrier builds in 120 seconds. so with chronoboost you can make 3 carriers in 240 seconds. this means a carrier is a 80 second buildtime with constant chronoboost. this means a fully chronoboosted carrier gets 40 seconds shaved off its building time

that means when you keep a building chronoboosted for 240 seconds for carriers, it shaved off 40x3=120 seconds of building time


so it seems chronoboost gives a specific percentage of buildtime being shaved off for how long a building is chronoboosted. If a building is chronoboosted for X seconds it shaves off 1/2x building time. So that means if you keep a building chronoboosted for 70 seconds it shaved off 35, or if you keep it chronoboosted for 240 seconds it shaved off 120


but each chronoboosted unit is fully chronoboosted gets more or less time shaved off to build depending on its buildtime. a gets 11.666 seconds of its buildtime shaved off if you chronoboost it


No - You're wrong. How can so many people here be so bad at maths.

10 seconds is correct like many people said already.

If you did your example correction

the 70 chonoboosted seconds would take 3.5 chronoboosts to achieve.

So to get the 35 seconds reducuction you mention takes 3.5 chronoboosts (Not 3)

35/3.5 = 10

So a single chronoboost reduces build times by 10 seconds (As have been repeated over and over). Your calculation was just wrong.


No, YOU'RE wrong (or rather, you're arguing the wrong point). Here, let me put, in bold, the claim that he's making.

what this means is if a building is CONSTANTLY CHRONOBOOSTED it can produce 1.5 of a unit in its buildtime instead of 1

followed by

each chronoboosted unit is fully chronoboosted gets more or less time shaved off to build depending on its buildtime. a (phoenix) gets 11.666 seconds of its buildtime shaved off if you chronoboost it (constantly)

You see, his point isn't that one chrono boost saves 11.66 seconds. His point is that if you constantly chrono boost a Phoenix, you ACTUALLY save 11.66 seconds (which is accurate and true). CB once, save 10 seconds, CB the final 5 seconds of build time, and you save 1.66 seconds. If you constantly CB a stargate while building phoenix, you build each phoenix in 23.34 seconds. If you build 3 Phoenix at 23.34 seconds, you build them in 70.02 seconds.

The build time of a Phoenix is originally 35 seconds. MEANING, you can build 3 phoenix in the same amount of time it takes to build 2. WHY? Because when you increase the production speed of a building by 50%, that's the same as saying that the building produces at 1.5x the production rate. And the last time I checked my math skills, 1.5 x 2 = 3.
Teamwork is awesome... As long as your team is doing all the work!
Nemireck
Profile Joined October 2010
Canada1875 Posts
January 14 2011 13:21 GMT
#262
On January 14 2011 20:15 Regentropfen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2011 16:47 kinetic_skink wrote:
On January 14 2011 13:21 roymarthyup wrote:
chronoboost increases the building power of a building by 50% for its duration

what this means is if a building is CONSTANTLY CHRONOBOOSTED it can produce 1.5 of a unit in its buildtime instead of 1

what that means is you can build 3 pheonix in the time it takes to build 2 pheonix assuming the stargate is constantly chrono boosted


3 pheonix is 105 seconds

2 pheonix builds in 70 seconds

so with constant chronoboost you can make 3 pheonix in 70 seconds, giving each one a buildtime of 23.333 seconds . so 35 seconds became 23.333 seconds. This means using chronoboost on a pheonix DOES NOT shave 10 seconds off its building time, in reality a fully chronoboosted pheonix gets 11.666 seconds shaved off its building time

this means in if you keep a building chronoboosted for 70 seconds, it shaved off 35 seconds of building time

do different units cause different results. lets compare

1 carrier builds in 120 seconds. so with chronoboost you can make 3 carriers in 240 seconds. this means a carrier is a 80 second buildtime with constant chronoboost. this means a fully chronoboosted carrier gets 40 seconds shaved off its building time

that means when you keep a building chronoboosted for 240 seconds for carriers, it shaved off 40x3=120 seconds of building time


so it seems chronoboost gives a specific percentage of buildtime being shaved off for how long a building is chronoboosted. If a building is chronoboosted for X seconds it shaves off 1/2x building time. So that means if you keep a building chronoboosted for 70 seconds it shaved off 35, or if you keep it chronoboosted for 240 seconds it shaved off 120


but each chronoboosted unit is fully chronoboosted gets more or less time shaved off to build depending on its buildtime. a gets 11.666 seconds of its buildtime shaved off if you chronoboost it


No - You're wrong. How can so many people here be so bad at maths.

10 seconds is correct like many people said already.

If you did your example correction

the 70 chonoboosted seconds would take 3.5 chronoboosts to achieve.

So to get the 35 seconds reducuction you mention takes 3.5 chronoboosts (Not 3)

35/3.5 = 10

So a single chronoboost reduces build times by 10 seconds (As have been repeated over and over). Your calculation was just wrong.


well, his calculation is not plain wrong, he just didnt account for the duration of a CB. A CB shaves off 1/2x building time. Insert CB-Duration (20 secs) and voila, 10 secs reduction...


You kinda got it. What CB does is build 1.5 times faster. That's not the same as saying it shaves off 1/2 the building time. It actually shaves 1/3 off the building time. If your claim were true, it would be possible to creat 4 phoenix in the time it takes to make 2, but in reality, it's only possible to make 3 phoenix in the time it takes to make 2. 6 in the time to 4, 9 in time to make 6, and so on.
Teamwork is awesome... As long as your team is doing all the work!
FLuE
Profile Joined September 2010
United States1012 Posts
January 14 2011 15:35 GMT
#263
lol - not a lot of future engineers in this thread and a few people that need to go back to school and take some pre-calc classes.

With that said, I've been working on a new build for ZvP in which I go back to 14 hatch/14 pool(been 14 pool, 16 hatch) with less fear of cannons at the choke. I've been getting a quick gas after that and instantly getting lair going on my main as soon as possible, and producing my 2 queens from the expansion.

Even with the delayed queens I make back up the larva because the early lair lets me spread some early creep between bases so I save that early creep tumor and been injecting instead(spreading creep w/ a 3rd queen).

At that point, with the fast lair been scouting with some lings or an OL. If it looks fast phoenix/stargate I throw the spire down and go corrupter/speed ling and get +1 on the lings. If it looks like gateways, throw the hydra den down. Very ling heavy either way.

Have to get a pretty early 2nd gas as well to support the tier 2 gas needs.

I'll report back, so far getting some timings down but it seems like it has potential.
farseerdk
Profile Joined May 2010
Canada504 Posts
January 14 2011 15:39 GMT
#264
I play random (lower master league), and I have tried using phoenix openings against zerg... errrr... I've been largely ineffective. I dunno, maybe I just suck.

When I play zvp, I rarely see anyone else use phoenix... I dunno why. I'm not much of a muta user so maybe that's why (I prefer mass roach/hydra with good creep spread and corruptors if I have to).
Perspective is merely an angle.
eth3n
Profile Joined August 2010
718 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-01-14 20:30:00
January 14 2011 20:26 GMT
#265
Also, totally anecdotal and more of a question, but I was so used to see superearly 1/2 zealot 1 stalker pressure before the patch came out, and now it seems every game where they go for 4 fast phoenix I don't see that early stalker. I'm not a toss but does that 50 gas really make such a difference (or is it saved chronos for your 4 fast phoenix?)? Cause that early harass was powerful and the fact that its missing now seems to be very telling to me...
Idra Potter: I don't use avada kedavra because i have self-respect.
Bonham
Profile Joined November 2010
Canada655 Posts
January 14 2011 22:19 GMT
#266
On January 14 2011 21:16 ch4ppi wrote:
Many people seem to think that Z units dont cost gas.... produce muta fast and in multiple nr... if u have good macro ure always at around 0 gas... and produce your mutas just like P produce Phoenix, only slower


Don't zergs usually stockpile gas for exactly this reason? Often in ZvPs I'm amazed at how my opponent can build up a critical mass of mutas and dominate the air even when I have 4-6 phoenix at the start of the dogfights. If he's going muta-ling, every hundred gas can become a muta, no? (As far as gas spent on units go, I mean. Obviously upgrades and tech cost gas too.)
Severedevil
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States4838 Posts
January 14 2011 22:27 GMT
#267
On January 14 2011 19:56 Rizell wrote:
I actually think this change made a huge effect. A toss that goes a 1/1/1 build (gate,cyber,stargate) and waits and chronoes out 4 phoenix (critical number to kill a queen in 1 gravitation beam) will is so much deadlier.

This usually attacks the zerg around the time his lair just finished. Its hard to scout since its easy to hide 1 stargate and those 4 phoenix are done sligthly after the 6min mark.. and even if u manage to scout it and you have 3 queens and a evo chamber almost finished. IT WILL do alot of damage to the zerg. Before 1.2 those 4 phoenix would come 40 seconds later.. enough time for you to have a hydra den up.

Now the amount of damage those 4 phoenix will do allows the toss to immidiatly put down a robo and expand, that robo even allowes him to have 1-2 collosi out in time for your hydra counter ( was a good followup before).

I dont know what to do to counter this shit, NO it dosent kill me, but it lets the protoss enter the midgame with mapcontrol, better eco, and better tech. A huge advantage. Sure there are blind counters to this, by going early pressure or blind evo chamber.. but those things have no room in a normal build at higher level play.

1 gate 1 stargate +1 air weapons was my go-to PvZ build, although I'm not active on the ladder anymore. I would pump a small ground force (mostly Zealots) and use it to support my air force, if the Zerg didn't have enough Zerglings to force me to defend with them instead, and pump Phoenix or Phoenix with a Void Ray.

I believe that Zerg players should build many Queens, and place one Spore Crawler beneath each hatchery, where the units spawn (NOT in the mineral line) and possibly an additional Crawler covering the walking space between the main and natural. Spore Crawlers are cheap, do good damage at good range, cannot be lifted, and defeat Void Rays one-on-one. You'll note the mineral line is left somewhat vulnerable; that's fine. If Protoss wants to lift your drones, and he has enough air units to overpower your Queens... let him lift your drones. At 50 mana for a 50 mineral unit, he's not really winning out.

Hydralisks are tempting because they kill Phoenix so quickly, and if you get a proper ball you can walk up to Protoss's base and JUST FUCKING KILL HIM. However, they're expensive and extremely vulnerable to Phoenix sniping. If you build them before you have secured your airspace with Queen or Queen/Spore, they will be lifted as they pop and you will lose.

I'm also pretty sure it's worthwhile for Zerg to maintain a dozen or so Speedlings, to threaten Protoss and keep him from expanding or ground-attacking you without first committing to a significant ground force.
My strategy is to fork people.
Arco
Profile Joined September 2009
United States2090 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-01-14 23:24:22
January 14 2011 23:18 GMT
#268
Seems to me a lot of people in this thread are missing the point of Phoenix. Sure, you can go kill some chobo toss who has no idea what he's doing. But in the hands of a skilled player, Phoenix are an insane and viable harass option.

FFE into Two Star is probably the best build at the moment. My own variation includes two Gates before Gases/Core but after Nexus/1 Cannon to add a pressure option to your FE build as well as some additional safety from Ling/Baneling all ins. A Zerg seeing two gateways producing at your nat is more than likely to build more Zerglings/Spines than needed, and perhaps force him to waste resources on Roach Warren/Roaches. Won't be too useful when you start the Stargate pump, though.

This build is an easy transition to Colossus/Void Ray, which is by far the best unit composition in PvZ at the moment. It's simply disgusting how easy it is to take wins off Z.

Massive Corruptor balls are easily dealt with when you're upgrading double upgrades at home and as you gain more bases (gas), you add plenty of Stalkers to aid against it anyways.

Also, slow pushing with Cannons greatly helps this "fragile" unit composition, as Corruptors will have a hard time picking your stuff off, and they have natural synergy with Cannons.
Keshuan
Profile Joined November 2010
Germany18 Posts
January 14 2011 23:40 GMT
#269
Played now 1 game where the zerg goes spire and i throw down a stargate imidiatly and my phönixproduction till the mutas arrived where that good i could defend with some micro so i guess thats what bliz want. As a toss u can defend now vs mutas if u scout them early enough without throwing down 2 gates!
6 Sentry + Hallucination = Free MapHack
Pigge
Profile Joined June 2010
Sweden88 Posts
January 14 2011 23:43 GMT
#270
i've noticed in the master league now that alot of protoss are coming at me (zerg) with 2 phoenix and 1 void ray really early, this means they pick of my queen real fast and then the voidray finishes my natural expansion, it's been quite annoying.
all muta all the time.
Severedevil
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States4838 Posts
January 14 2011 23:49 GMT
#271
On January 15 2011 08:18 Tump wrote:
FFE into Two Star is probably the best build at the moment. My own variation includes two Gates before Gases/Core but after Nexus/1 Cannon to add a pressure option to your FE build as well as some additional safety from Ling/Baneling all ins. A Zerg seeing two gateways producing at your nat is more than likely to build more Zerglings/Spines than needed, and perhaps force him to waste resources on Roach Warren/Roaches. Won't be too useful when you start the Stargate pump, though.

The best part about supporting a Stargate with a gateway (or two Stargates with two Gateways) is that if Zerg doesn't match your mineral-dump ground force, you can just send it to support your air, or to secure an expansion while you harass. It doesn't cost the Protoss much, because with most of his gas going to air he couldn't spend those minerals on much besides Gateway units (can't expand without a ground force) but if Zerg do, their economy/anti-air will be weaker.
My strategy is to fork people.
Yoshi Kirishima
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States10325 Posts
January 15 2011 01:03 GMT
#272
No, YOU'RE wrong (or rather, you're arguing the wrong point). Here, let me put, in bold, the claim that he's making.

what this means is if a building is CONSTANTLY CHRONOBOOSTED it can produce 1.5 of a unit in its buildtime instead of 1

followed by

each chronoboosted unit is fully chronoboosted gets more or less time shaved off to build depending on its buildtime. a (phoenix) gets 11.666 seconds of its buildtime shaved off if you chronoboost it (constantly)

You see, his point isn't that one chrono boost saves 11.66 seconds. His point is that if you constantly chrono boost a Phoenix, you ACTUALLY save 11.66 seconds (which is accurate and true). CB once, save 10 seconds, CB the final 5 seconds of build time, and you save 1.66 seconds. If you constantly CB a stargate while building phoenix, you build each phoenix in 23.34 seconds. If you build 3 Phoenix at 23.34 seconds, you build them in 70.02 seconds.

The build time of a Phoenix is originally 35 seconds. MEANING, you can build 3 phoenix in the same amount of time it takes to build 2. WHY? Because when you increase the production speed of a building by 50%, that's the same as saying that the building produces at 1.5x the production rate. And the last time I checked my math skills, 1.5 x 2 = 3.


Thanks for replying, I was about to rage at the people who failed their maths and claiming he should "test it himself". Rofl, isn't that what the math is for?

Anyways I've been using 2 stargate strategies even before 1.2, FFE is risky of course but 2 SG is a good follow up. I think in the end I won more games than I lost (probably just because the level I'm playing at, although relatively high diamond people still get lazy sometimes and don't scout properly). And then switch to colossi while he gets hydras, then gg

in PvZ i mean

Mid-master streaming MECH ONLY + commentary www.twitch.tv/yoshikirishima +++ "If all-in fails, all-in again."
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 15 2011 01:52 GMT
#273
On January 14 2011 00:41 Chaosvuistje wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2011 00:31 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 13 2011 08:36 TheCookieMonster wrote:
a quickly rushed phoenix is gonna destroy 50% of zerg scouting Pre-Lair. Now all we have is the ling poke at the ramp, phoenix mass can pick off any nearby ovvies that are being sacced pre-lair speed upgrade.... not to mention there goes any chance of muta map control. One balancing idea would be to make mutas non-light or slightly less expensive (because if phoenixes can be cheap, why cant mutas?)


WTF? Since when has 150/100 been cheap in comparison to 100/100?

Also, the fact that your opponent has revealed phoenixes is enough for a Zerg to commit to roach+hydra and get Corruptors. I guarantee you that a roach+hydra timing attack will kill the Protoss because the tech switch to colossus/HT leaves a huge timing window until storm/thermal lance is/are researched.

Personally I think we're gonna see a lot more burrowed roach play. Last patch the only solution to muta+ling was a 6 gate timing attack (which only sometimes works, as exemplified by tester) or the 2 star FE build. Now, muta+ling is still viable but it doesn't completely kill most toss builds. However, I think roach-based builds will just become more popular. It's essentially what happened with PvT:

In PvT nowadays, we see marauder+Viking+ghost. The same composition exists for Zerg: just replace the Marauder with the roach, the Viking with the corruptor, and the ghost with the infestor. Zerg players have an advantage in T3 units and the ball itself by teching to ultras and broodlords, but Terrans have harassment capability in blue flame and banshees. Both compositions work because the backbone of the strategy (roaches or Marauders) is cost efficient against all gateway units. For T, ghosts must combat the HTs, but Zerg players can simply burrow to avoid storm.

The scary part is that, IMO, toss players have no good way of responding to Zerg when they execute this composition correctly.


Use observers, seriously?

Burrowing roaches against storm only works if the protoss doesnt have observers and collosi. The only benefit of burrow moving roaches versus storm is when a protoss rushed for HT instead of collosi. If a roach moves slower and has no capability to attack, what makes you think that protoss has no answer to a slighly less immobile, retreating, not attacking unit?

Protoss has compositions that work against all zerg units, likewise, zerg has strong compositions versus the protoss, abeit being out a bit later than the protoss.


Phoenixes are definitely all the rage all of a sudden, which is very annoying. I've always disliked phoenixes because they force me to make units that I'd rather forget that they ever existed. I just need to adapt to the sillyness and get some evo chamber out quicker and just sporecrawler around my entire mineral line and plant all my scouting overlords inside the ring.


Although the only thing I'm looking forward is that this change might make PvP from a complete and utter 4gate million collosus matchup into something more dynamic. I honestly hate watching that match up in tournaments, as it hardly ever gets to the third base.
Who am I kidding right :D?


Have you played good Zergs recently?

Burrowed roaches don't just sit there under a storm. Good Zergs will go for your observers. They'll engage only when they know they can do damage to your army. They'll snipe what they can and then leave, to heal the damage they've taken. They'll engage with hydras ONLY after wearing the toss down multiple times.

The thing about roaches is that no toss composition is truly cost-efficient at killing them. No, roaches can't shoot air, but void rays are very cost-inefficient against roach+hydra. Colossi are murdered by corruptors, and are easily avoided by running away and burrow-healing.

As for storm, you CAN burrow through a storm, it's storm+colossi that actually kills a lot of roaches. However, it's pretty easy to run away, too, you just have to avoid the force fields. If you engage, force a couple storms, run away, and re-engage, you'll whittle down templar energy. Then you can engage again when the conditions are favorable to you.
Nemireck
Profile Joined October 2010
Canada1875 Posts
January 15 2011 07:37 GMT
#274
On January 15 2011 10:03 Yoshi Kirishima wrote:
Show nested quote +
No, YOU'RE wrong (or rather, you're arguing the wrong point). Here, let me put, in bold, the claim that he's making.

what this means is if a building is CONSTANTLY CHRONOBOOSTED it can produce 1.5 of a unit in its buildtime instead of 1

followed by

each chronoboosted unit is fully chronoboosted gets more or less time shaved off to build depending on its buildtime. a (phoenix) gets 11.666 seconds of its buildtime shaved off if you chronoboost it (constantly)

You see, his point isn't that one chrono boost saves 11.66 seconds. His point is that if you constantly chrono boost a Phoenix, you ACTUALLY save 11.66 seconds (which is accurate and true). CB once, save 10 seconds, CB the final 5 seconds of build time, and you save 1.66 seconds. If you constantly CB a stargate while building phoenix, you build each phoenix in 23.34 seconds. If you build 3 Phoenix at 23.34 seconds, you build them in 70.02 seconds.

The build time of a Phoenix is originally 35 seconds. MEANING, you can build 3 phoenix in the same amount of time it takes to build 2. WHY? Because when you increase the production speed of a building by 50%, that's the same as saying that the building produces at 1.5x the production rate. And the last time I checked my math skills, 1.5 x 2 = 3.


Thanks for replying, I was about to rage at the people who failed their maths and claiming he should "test it himself". Rofl, isn't that what the math is for?

Anyways I've been using 2 stargate strategies even before 1.2, FFE is risky of course but 2 SG is a good follow up. I think in the end I won more games than I lost (probably just because the level I'm playing at, although relatively high diamond people still get lazy sometimes and don't scout properly). And then switch to colossi while he gets hydras, then gg

in PvZ i mean



Like shit man, it's ok to be wrong, but to claim that the guy who's RIGHT has to check their math? Give me a break.
Teamwork is awesome... As long as your team is doing all the work!
vileChAnCe
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Canada525 Posts
January 15 2011 07:55 GMT
#275
My only concern is that at the top levels of masters every protoss has a unique build with different timing attacks, I can count 6 different kinds of 4gate alone. Nearly every day a new build is viable for protoss and then they decided they require several buffs..?

I think Protoss can agree that their race hasn't even begun to scratch the surface as far as timings and builds are concerned, the phoenix change was uncalled for the observer change I'm 100% fine with the more scouting thats available to races the more standardized play becomes.
Day[9] i've broken 6 mice, 5 keyboards, 3 pairs of headphones, and a mousepad, all from raging after starcraft losing streaks
AzureD
Profile Joined September 2010
United States320 Posts
January 16 2011 23:36 GMT
#276
153 seconds to go from Lair to having a Hydra out in the field.

75 + 65 + 65 or 205 seconds to get a Colossus out. Also think about the gas costs. Each Phoenix is 100 gas. Stargate 150 gas. Robo Facility 100 gas. Robo Support Bay 200 gas. Colossus 200 gas. Then you probably want Sentry as well as Stalkers? This is just not affordable off one base.

If he goes strait into Colossus from Stargate then you should be able to just walk up to his base with some units and kill him with Roach + Ling. A few Sentry won't save him. Colossus without ground support also die easily.

As for FFE into Stargate it depends on the map but you can often just walk up to his base and kill him with Roaches. Especially on maps like Blistering Sands and Xel Naga Caverns.

In fact I think there was a game like this in the GSL where Idra did just this.

Robo Facility and Stargate is a lot of tech and a huge money sink. The Toss will be lacking in basic units.

It all depends on how well the Phoenix do. If they fail to do any damage then the Toss player is pretty much dead. Only if the Phoenix do a lot of damage is the Toss able to get away with teching or expanding.

Lennon
Profile Joined February 2010
United Kingdom2275 Posts
January 18 2011 20:38 GMT
#277
I can't win anymore versus Protoss. The Phoenixes overlord/queen/drone sniping does way too much damage and then I lose to the push. It's doing my head in.
Prev 1 12 13 14 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Korean StarCraft League
03:00
Week 77
EnkiAlexander 89
davetesta88
HKG_Chickenman69
IntoTheiNu 52
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 297
PiLiPiLi 12
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 4551
NaDa 92
Dota 2
monkeys_forever733
NeuroSwarm114
febbydoto26
LuMiX1
League of Legends
JimRising 813
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor48
Other Games
summit1g10039
WinterStarcraft534
Livibee139
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV54
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 17
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH286
• Hupsaiya 97
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Migwel
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Lourlo1090
• Stunt398
• masondota2369
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
5h 38m
RSL Revival
5h 38m
ByuN vs Cham
herO vs Reynor
FEL
11h 38m
RSL Revival
1d 5h
Clem vs Classic
SHIN vs Cure
FEL
1d 7h
BSL: ProLeague
1d 13h
Dewalt vs Bonyth
Replay Cast
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 2v2 Season 3
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.