| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Calamity
Canada161 Posts
On August 05 2010 05:34 PanzerDragoon wrote: If lurkers could move while burrowed by default, I think they'd be a fine tier 3 unit without any other changes. A moving siege tank? I think 2 Tier 3 units are fine already. | ||
|
Lexpar
1813 Posts
| ||
|
synapse
China13814 Posts
On August 05 2010 04:27 yrba1 wrote: I can only imagine the magnitude of the Terran bronze league QQ'ers if this was inputed. But it's true that MMM would be rendered nearly useless if this was intact unless you have good micro. There's nothing wrong with forcing Terrans to micro... Besides, Lurkers would be so high tier, you'd have enough tanks to annihilate any reasonable number of lurkers. | ||
|
KinosJourney2
Sweden1811 Posts
I can't find any units except the multiplayer units in my map editor. | ||
|
sebsation
Sweden33 Posts
On August 05 2010 05:34 PanzerDragoon wrote: If lurkers could move while burrowed by default, I think they'd be a fine tier 3 unit without any other changes. and attack while it's moving. | ||
|
goswser
United States3548 Posts
| ||
|
Sayer
United States403 Posts
Thank you Blizzard for removing the most badass and interesting unit we had.. There better be something extraordinary waiting for us in HofS... | ||
|
404.Delirium
United States1190 Posts
Also, my once flaccid self is now raging with excitement. | ||
|
Omegalisk
United States337 Posts
On August 05 2010 09:15 KinosJourney2 wrote: A question, where do you find all these units? I can't find any units except the multiplayer units in my map editor. You go to File->Dependencies then click Add Standard, click all the boxes, then click OK. That should do it, at least for one session. | ||
|
ghettohobbit2
United States93 Posts
And I fully expect to be flamed to all hell for suggesting this, but I think it might be nice if they could evolve from Roaches rather than from Hydralisks (i.e., upgrade Roach Warren into Deep Warren at Lair) That way, they could get a range upgrade from Hive and maybe a burrow move upgrade that would ONLY work on creep. Siege range with cloak would be ridiculous against static detectors, but if you had to spam creep tumors all the way out to his base, it might be a good deal more acceptable. And even then the things would still get slaughtered by Tanks, Banshees, Void Rays, Immortals, etc... Regardless, I really can't see how these things would overlap with Banelings. By that logic, Banelings would overlap with Ultralisks because they both do Splash Melee damage. | ||
|
mikerpiker
Canada30 Posts
| ||
|
lindn
Sweden833 Posts
On August 05 2010 11:08 ghettohobbit2 wrote: Wow. I wish Zerg still had them, might give 'em some help at chokes... And I fully expect to be flamed to all hell for suggesting this, but I think it might be nice if they could evolve from Roaches rather than from Hydralisks (i.e., upgrade Roach Warren into Deep Warren at Lair) That way, they could get a range upgrade from Hive and maybe a burrow move upgrade that would ONLY work on creep. Siege range with cloak would be ridiculous against static detectors, but if you had to spam creep tumors all the way out to his base, it might be a good deal more acceptable. And even then the things would still get slaughtered by Tanks, Banshees, Void Rays, Immortals, etc... Regardless, I really can't see how these things would overlap with Banelings. By that logic, Banelings would overlap with Ultralisks because they both do Splash Melee damage. +1 they do actually look quite similar to roaches ;O | ||
|
GhoSt[shield]
Canada2131 Posts
| ||
ArvickHero
10387 Posts
On August 05 2010 12:06 GhoSt[shield] wrote: If the Lurker was introduced Terran's would just continue to mech even heavily then now since the bio ball is more about mobility and finesse vs a retardedly powerful 1 punch mech army that turtled to 200/200. just split and spread your forces, Boxer style! | ||
|
sTYleZerG-eX
Mexico473 Posts
BRING THEM BACK!!!!!! | ||
|
Half
United States2554 Posts
Regardless, I really can't see how these things would overlap with Banelings. By that logic, Banelings would overlap with Ultralisks because they both do Splash Melee damage. You use Banelings to counter siege tanks and heavy protoss mech? Woah. What an intriguing strategy. What exactly would I use lurkers for other then contain and against infantry? | ||
|
Medzo
United States627 Posts
On August 05 2010 12:19 Half wrote: You use Banelings to counter siege tanks and heavy protoss mech? Woah. What an intriguing strategy. What exactly would I use lurkers for other then contain and against infantry? For contain and for defense is more than reason enough. | ||
|
Rinrun
Canada3509 Posts
| ||
|
Merikh
United States918 Posts
On August 05 2010 12:41 Rinrun wrote: I can see why they didn't include it in the MP, cause of that ball-unit-pathing-thing that units have would totally work in the Lurkers favour. That or they were just too lazy to tinker with the Lurker's attack and all that jazz. Bro lol, if there was a ball of banelings burrowed and a bio ball walked over and it was auto casted would have the same effect, except it costs more to do sadly. | ||
|
Medzo
United States627 Posts
On August 05 2010 12:41 Rinrun wrote: I can see why they didn't include it in the MP, cause of that ball-unit-pathing-thing that units have would totally work in the Lurkers favour. That or they were just too lazy to tinker with the Lurker's attack and all that jazz. Did you look at the part where the tanks did near the same damage even though they walked right through their deadzone? Why is this acceptable for terrans but not for zerg? | ||
| ||
|
|
Afreeca Starleague
Wardi Open
Replay Cast
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Kung Fu Cup
The PondCast
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
CranKy Ducklings
BSL
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
