• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 09:16
CET 15:16
KST 23:16
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies3ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career !10Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win4Weekly Cups (Dec 1-7): Clem doubles, Solar gets over the hump1Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win2
StarCraft 2
General
What's the best tug of war? The Grack before Christmas Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career ! Micro Lags When Playing SC2?
Tourneys
$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship $100 Prize Pool - Winter Warp Gate Masters Showdow Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Winter Warp Gate Amateur Showdown #1 RSL Offline Finals Info - Dec 13 and 14!
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 505 Rise From Ashes Mutation # 504 Retribution Mutation # 503 Fowl Play Mutation # 502 Negative Reinforcement
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Recommended FPV games (post-KeSPA) BW General Discussion FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle soO on: FanTaSy's Potential Return to StarCraft
Tourneys
Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] LB QuarterFinals - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] WB SEMIFINALS - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Game Theory for Starcraft Current Meta Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Path of Exile General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Survivor II: The Amazon Sengoku Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI Russo-Ukrainian War Thread How Does UI/UX Design Influence User Trust? Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL+ Announced Where to ask questions and add stream?
Blogs
National Diversity: A Challe…
TrAiDoS
I decided to write a webnov…
DjKniteX
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1990 users

Oracle Changes - Page 6

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 HotS
Post a Reply
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 8 14 Next All
Cloak
Profile Joined October 2009
United States816 Posts
October 24 2012 20:33 GMT
#101
On October 25 2012 05:14 Skyro wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 25 2012 04:52 Cloak wrote:
On October 25 2012 04:17 Skyro wrote:
On October 25 2012 04:07 xsnac wrote:
On October 25 2012 02:31 Teoita wrote:
On October 25 2012 02:21 kcdc wrote:
This is a combat buff for the oracle but a big harass nerf. Buildings have hundreds or thousands of hit points. 20 DPS isn't enough to kill anything.


Adding on to this, a greater spire has 1k hp. This means that if you make 5 oracles (reasonable assumption for a lategame scenario), it takes 10 seconds to kill it...10 seconds is a whole lot of time for such an expensive unit.

Earlier on in the game, a single Oracle isn't going to kill anything except a third.

I wish they just gave up and also gave it something that kills workers.


voidray is way better then oracle then . killing third voidray charge does almost same damage and costs no energy + you can snipe overlords and queens aswel .


That's exactly why Pulsar Beam shouldn't have crazy DPS on buildings, it would make Void Rays even less useful. They should just add an additional tactical factor to the ability instead. And on that note I think giving Void Rays bonus damage vs buildings, say when fully charged, would be a great way to give the unit an actual defined role that it could actually do well, rather than the completely unrefined (and mostly useless) role it currently serves.


You would actually see more use of Voids in their only time slot (~1-2 min of midgame PvZ) because the main deterrent of Voids is Spores, so if an Oracle becomes a Spore-killer, you could see a resurgence of Void harass. I wouldn't worry about Void Rays because they're a mess to begin with. They're one of the WoL units that needs looking at once the HotS units are squared away.


It wouldn't make any sense if the Oracle were a Spore-killer as there is no way the Pulsar Beam will be 8+ range.


Well it depends on the final values, but the Oracle will necessarily need to do a heavy amount of structural DPS, so 2-3 could snipe one quick enough. Void Rays never had a prayer of bruteforcing a Spore unless fully charged.
The more you know, the less you understand.
Anomi
Profile Joined October 2011
Sweden149 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-24 20:34:19
October 24 2012 20:33 GMT
#102
On October 25 2012 05:26 Inf-badguy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 25 2012 05:23 kcdc wrote:
On October 25 2012 04:52 Lightscythe wrote:
I think people have forgotten that David Kim has said denying expansions under construction with the oracle is a breeze with a couple of oracles channeling Pulsar Beam, 20x2 or 20x3 dps kills constructing buildings fast. Fast zerg thirds are no more with an oracle + zealot combo, reminds me of the old void + zealot style but a hell of a lot faster.

Yeah, let's wait to see how it plays out before we trust that the platinum players at Blizzard have exhausted all options to take a fast third. Methinks Zergs will find a way to handle this.


That's also assuming you could even get an oracle out in time to harass the third if you fast expand yourself.


the oracle should pop out a bit before a normal expansion star gate opening with void ray. It cost 100 minerals less and have the same build time. Since it have the same speed as a speed prism it should get there allot faster then an void ray.
awesomoecalypse
Profile Joined August 2010
United States2235 Posts
October 24 2012 20:35 GMT
#103
One thing I wonder...

If Time Warp really does end up being an effective replacement of sorts for Forcefield for people who go Stargate tech, might it actually open up map design possibilities?

That is, right now map makers are very limited, in that Protoss is overly reliant on FF for defense. This makes it all but impossible to take a 3rd base, unless the map has a 3rd base that is easily defended with FF. This forces map makers to limit themselves, and make every map have an easy-to-take, easy-to-defend 3rd, which leads to stale gameplay.

But Oracles aren't slow like Sentries, and Time Warp isn't as utterly dependant on a narrow choke that you can totally block off. Might it be possible to actually defend your 3rd base on more open maps by investing in Oracles to use Timewarp to help defend? And if so, might this solve some of the current issues with Protoss and map design?
He drone drone drone. Me win. - ogsMC
Inf-badguy
Profile Joined July 2003
Canada171 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-24 20:47:08
October 24 2012 20:45 GMT
#104
On October 25 2012 05:29 awesomoecalypse wrote:
Show nested quote +

Yeah I added Queens as well given that the whole idea of entomb was to provide some form of continuous economic harassment. I know its awkward to be able to target queens but given the zerg mechanic of spawn larva, it would have to work that way for the ability to be viable in all three match ups. It does of course introduce the problem of it scaling differently against each race since the abilities they can use with energy, and the amount of energy required vary so much.


Having it work against Queens but not against other casters doesn't make sense--Queens aren't buildings, they're units. You'd literally have to make an ability read "Drains energy from buildings, and queens too, but not other units". Making a spell that works differently on one unit than every other unit is bad game design. OTOH, if it worked on every spellcaster, it could easily be way too strong, effectively giving Protoss their own version of EMP.



It may be a bit of a stretch comparing a single target drain of 1-2 energy per second to an instant aoe 100 energy drain. As is, protoss already has their own version of EMP, feedback, which is way stronger than what I am proposing, but higher up the tech tree.

After I've thought about it more I don't believe it would be that bad to allow it to drain from units as well. It wouldn't actually be that effective against most casters given that they are normally accompanied by a host of units that should chase the oracle away, or have abilities themselves to mitigate it. Even harassing the queen 1 on 1 would be difficult given that the queen can just kill the fucking oracle (range of oracle beam permitting). But perhaps we would see players draining energy from queens until the oracle shields are depleted, backing off to restore their shields and then re-engaging?

I'm getting excited just thinking about it! :D
Anomi
Profile Joined October 2011
Sweden149 Posts
October 24 2012 20:45 GMT
#105
On October 25 2012 05:35 awesomoecalypse wrote:
One thing I wonder...

If Time Warp really does end up being an effective replacement of sorts for Forcefield for people who go Stargate tech, might it actually open up map design possibilities?

That is, right now map makers are very limited, in that Protoss is overly reliant on FF for defense. This makes it all but impossible to take a 3rd base, unless the map has a 3rd base that is easily defended with FF. This forces map makers to limit themselves, and make every map have an easy-to-take, easy-to-defend 3rd, which leads to stale gameplay.

But Oracles aren't slow like Sentries, and Time Warp isn't as utterly dependant on a narrow choke that you can totally block off. Might it be possible to actually defend your 3rd base on more open maps by investing in Oracles to use Timewarp to help defend? And if so, might this solve some of the current issues with Protoss and map design?



LoL never thought about that. Maybe that's what they are aiming for. They did state they did not like how the current protoss is heavily reliant on force field. If it works out like you said it would be awesome to see how the maps would be like xD.
tehemperorer
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2183 Posts
October 24 2012 20:50 GMT
#106
Now this looks really interesting! Great job!
Knowing is half the battle... the other half is lasers.
Anomi
Profile Joined October 2011
Sweden149 Posts
October 24 2012 20:55 GMT
#107
On October 25 2012 05:45 Inf-badguy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 25 2012 05:29 awesomoecalypse wrote:

Yeah I added Queens as well given that the whole idea of entomb was to provide some form of continuous economic harassment. I know its awkward to be able to target queens but given the zerg mechanic of spawn larva, it would have to work that way for the ability to be viable in all three match ups. It does of course introduce the problem of it scaling differently against each race since the abilities they can use with energy, and the amount of energy required vary so much.


Having it work against Queens but not against other casters doesn't make sense--Queens aren't buildings, they're units. You'd literally have to make an ability read "Drains energy from buildings, and queens too, but not other units". Making a spell that works differently on one unit than every other unit is bad game design. OTOH, if it worked on every spellcaster, it could easily be way too strong, effectively giving Protoss their own version of EMP.



It may be a bit of a stretch comparing a single target drain of 1-2 energy per second to an instant aoe 100 energy drain. As is, protoss already has their own version of EMP, feedback, which is way stronger than what I am proposing, but higher up the tech tree.

After I've thought about it more I don't believe it would be that bad to allow it to drain from units as well. It wouldn't actually be that effective against most casters given that they are normally accompanied by a host of units that should chase the oracle away, or have abilities themselves to mitigate it. Even harassing the queen 1 on 1 would be difficult given that the queen can just kill the fucking oracle (range of oracle beam permitting). But perhaps we would see players draining energy from queens until the oracle shields are depleted, backing off to restore their shields and then re-engaging?

I'm getting excited just thinking about it! :D



Yea i like to ^^. Also emp already works on buildings if i am not wrong so don't see the problem with the oracles doing it also. So i don't get the complaint u got about your suggestion being bad game design. As far as i know the emp skill does not mention it works on building.
Treehead
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
999 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-24 20:58:37
October 24 2012 20:57 GMT
#108
On October 25 2012 04:07 Grubby wrote:
Remember, judge mostly the ability (Pulsar), not just the numbers. Numbers can be tweaked easily. Is it more balanced at 10 DPS? 30 DPS? Don't discard the ability just on its numbers.

In Time Warp I see an alternative to FF's which is great and opens up Protoss strategies like nothing else ever has. Absolutely wonderful idea.


Not that I could really disagree with Grubby anyway, but I happen to think his assessment of Time Warp is spot on. Provided it covers a large enough area to be relevant (if its so small that they come out of it and can start kiting by the time zealots attacks cooldown) and cheap enough on energy to be usable, it's a good change to add something other than the sentry which can help a zealot out before speed upgrades are available (and a change which doesn't discourage micro to boot). Zealots are still going to be pretty bad against roaches (don't get me wrong), but at least now they'll be able to do *something*. And it can't really be too good for zealots in the early game, because each race has a defense mechanism (spines, bunkers, FFs) which doesn't require mobility.

I think Pulsar is in a weird spot. You can't really use it against Terran (due to repair making your harassment approximately free to negate). Against protoss, you can only really get much out of it if you can go past the shields (which early game stalkers will be able to prevent). But then if you make it high enough dps to be decent against P or T, it'll be horrifying against Z. Zerg is a weird race to be effective against with a building-only attack, too, because they have so few buildings to begin with (and they tend to be all clustered up, at that). Even aside from this, stargate openers have the most trouble against zerg's early game anyway.

I have a hard time believing Pulsar can really be good in a way that's good for the game. Maybe if it makes its target building immune to repair or to the regeneration of hp/shields for an extended period of time (think wc3 batriders) - then I could see it being useful, given the right numbers. That would add a more strategic dimension to the ability too (i.e. you wouldn't have to "rush the building down", you could kill it slowly over time).
Gunnvaldr
Profile Joined September 2012
United States9 Posts
October 24 2012 20:59 GMT
#109
I think, with balancing, time warp affecting temporary units could be awesome, and really great for the pvz match-up. I could see it punishing a zerg player who goes too heavy on infestors and doesn't have much army backbone outside brood lords by stalling/diminishing the damage done by the first couple waves of broodlings.
awesomoecalypse
Profile Joined August 2010
United States2235 Posts
October 24 2012 20:59 GMT
#110
Yea i like to ^^. Also emp already works on buildings if i am not wrong so don't see the problem with the oracles doing it also. So i don't get the complaint u got about your suggestion being bad game design. As far as i know the emp skill does not mention it works on building.


The point is, abilities in SC2 dont work differently on different units. They might have categorical modifiers, like "only works on buildings" or "does +10 damage to psionic" or "cannot effect massive". But there is no unit or spell in the game that has something like "only works on High Templars" or "does +10 vs. ravens."

Given this, you could have a spell which drains energy from buildings, in which case its inherently useless against Zerg. Or you could have a spell which drains energy from everything. Which could actually be pretty versatile and powerful if balanced properly, especially if the Oracles absorbed the energy they drained to use for their own spells.

But what you can't do is have a spell that drains energy from the nexus, orbital command, and queens, but nothing else. That would just be breaking fundamental design principles.
He drone drone drone. Me win. - ogsMC
SarcasmMonster
Profile Joined October 2011
3136 Posts
October 24 2012 21:02 GMT
#111
Time Warp - Creates a warp field at the target location that reduces enemy ground units' movement speed by 50%


Poll: Should Time Bomb affect friendlies?

Yes (28)
 
62%

No (17)
 
38%

45 total votes

Your vote: Should Time Bomb affect friendlies?

(Vote): Yes
(Vote): No



Poll: Should Time Bomb affect air units?

Yes (18)
 
72%

No (7)
 
28%

25 total votes

Your vote: Should Time Bomb affect air units?

(Vote): Yes
(Vote): No



MMA: The true King of Wings
Crawdad
Profile Joined September 2012
614 Posts
October 24 2012 21:02 GMT
#112
Why is Pulsar Beam there? Isn't that what the Void Ray does?
Lorch
Profile Joined June 2011
Germany3690 Posts
October 24 2012 21:03 GMT
#113
Pulsar Beam sounds fucking retarded, especially since it's another auto cast ability (where is the skill gap when you don't even have to manually cast it).

Time whatever sounds really awesome!
SarcasmMonster
Profile Joined October 2011
3136 Posts
October 24 2012 21:04 GMT
#114
On October 25 2012 06:03 Lorch wrote:
Pulsar Beam sounds fucking retarded, especially since it's another auto cast ability (where is the skill gap when you don't even have to manually cast it).

Time whatever sounds really awesome!


It's basically an attack that cost energy. That's how I see it.
MMA: The true King of Wings
awesomoecalypse
Profile Joined August 2010
United States2235 Posts
October 24 2012 21:05 GMT
#115
i definitely think Time Warp should be enemy-only--one of the things I'm most excited about it is it opens up options for getting aggressive with Zealots without needing Forcefields or Charge. If Zealots were slowed by it though it'd be pointless. Making it enemy-only turns it from something that is exclusively harassment, to something that really opens up Protoss gameplay in a positive way by giving them options that don't rely on forcefield.
He drone drone drone. Me win. - ogsMC
Caissa
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
United States48 Posts
October 24 2012 21:05 GMT
#116
Pulsar Beam should also have the corsair's disruption web effect. Might mimic bw a tad bit, but if it disabled the building and killed it slowly, would actually be capable of doing some fun things. Not to mention 1 spore wouldnt shut down the oracle, and they would need fast reaction time
Don't underestimate the value of Doing Nothing, of just going along, listening to all the things you can't hear, and not bothering.
Crawdad
Profile Joined September 2012
614 Posts
October 24 2012 21:08 GMT
#117
On October 25 2012 06:05 Caissa wrote:
Pulsar Beam should also have the corsair's disruption web effect. Might mimic bw a tad bit, but if it disabled the building and killed it slowly, would actually be capable of doing some fun things. Not to mention 1 spore wouldnt shut down the oracle, and they would need fast reaction time


Nah, it should just slow movement speed AND attack speed. It is a time warp, after all.
Incomplet
Profile Blog Joined September 2011
United Kingdom1419 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-24 21:08:29
October 24 2012 21:08 GMT
#118
On October 25 2012 04:07 Grubby wrote:
Remember, judge mostly the ability (Pulsar), not just the numbers. Numbers can be tweaked easily. Is it more balanced at 10 DPS? 30 DPS? Don't discard the ability just on its numbers.

In Time Warp I see an alternative to FF's which is great and opens up Protoss strategies like nothing else ever has. Absolutely wonderful idea.


Grubby getting pleasant flashbacks of his far seer reaching Level 6!
Bow down to the sons of Aiur...SKT1_Rain, CreatorPrime, ST_Parting, Liquid_Hero.
Inf-badguy
Profile Joined July 2003
Canada171 Posts
October 24 2012 21:11 GMT
#119
On October 25 2012 05:59 awesomoecalypse wrote:
Show nested quote +
Yea i like to ^^. Also emp already works on buildings if i am not wrong so don't see the problem with the oracles doing it also. So i don't get the complaint u got about your suggestion being bad game design. As far as i know the emp skill does not mention it works on building.


The point is, abilities in SC2 dont work differently on different units. They might have categorical modifiers, like "only works on buildings" or "does +10 damage to psionic" or "cannot effect massive". But there is no unit or spell in the game that has something like "only works on High Templars" or "does +10 vs. ravens."

Given this, you could have a spell which drains energy from buildings, in which case its inherently useless against Zerg. Or you could have a spell which drains energy from everything. Which could actually be pretty versatile and powerful if balanced properly, especially if the Oracles absorbed the energy they drained to use for their own spells.

But what you can't do is have a spell that drains energy from the nexus, orbital command, and queens, but nothing else. That would just be breaking fundamental design principles.


Yeah I agree with you completely. My first thought process was simply finding a way for the oracle's ability to influence the base economic ability of each race (chrono, mule, larva). No question that it would be a poor read for uninitiated players wondering why the oracle was draining buildings in 2 races but a unit in another.

Being able to energy drain both structures and units with the right balance seems like a pretty decent idea. Maybe someone with beta access could post it in one of the active HotS bnet threads?
tehemperorer
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2183 Posts
October 24 2012 21:16 GMT
#120
Even if Time Warp affected friendlies, it would still help non-zealot units in chasing down kiters or runners, if used for that purpose. Also, if used in a choke behind the opponent, zealots will still be able to catch the units in front trying to path around the slower units.

I'm real excited. The ability provides for more synergy between the Stargate and Templar tech trees (Time Warp + Storm), allowing for Protoss to perhaps skip robo tech in PvZ if Storm proves to be more effective in a Time Warp against Roaches. I would go Stargate in a Templar opening PvT too, since it's got more speed and only 1 less vision than an observer but a lot more utility. I would gladly use these instead of observers when enemy gets ghosts!
Knowing is half the battle... the other half is lasers.
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 8 14 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 44m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Creator 149
Livibee 94
SKillous 6
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 43492
Sea 5652
Rain 3709
Horang2 2146
PianO 1480
GuemChi 885
EffOrt 714
Soma 264
Mini 263
firebathero 234
[ Show more ]
Mong 212
ggaemo 172
BeSt 170
Light 161
Snow 154
Sharp 136
Rush 135
Hyun 122
Zeus 103
Sea.KH 87
JYJ 77
Barracks 72
hero 56
Terrorterran 54
Mind 52
Leta 48
Sexy 28
scan(afreeca) 25
zelot 18
yabsab 16
Shine 13
Bale 8
JulyZerg 7
SilentControl 7
Dota 2
qojqva3043
XcaliburYe1272
Fuzer 232
Counter-Strike
olofmeister2961
zeus1342
shoxiejesuss835
edward171
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor211
Other Games
singsing2098
crisheroes317
XaKoH 131
Organizations
StarCraft 2
CranKy Ducklings87
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 6
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 92
• HeavenSC 20
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Michael_bg 3
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota249
Upcoming Events
Big Brain Bouts
2h 44m
Elazer vs Nicoract
Reynor vs Scarlett
Replay Cast
10h 44m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 19h
Krystianer vs TBD
TriGGeR vs SKillous
Percival vs TBD
ByuN vs Nicoract
Replay Cast
2 days
Wardi Open
2 days
OSC
3 days
Solar vs MaxPax
ByuN vs Krystianer
Spirit vs TBD
Liquipedia Results

Completed

KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
WardiTV 2025
META Madness #9

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
Slon Tour Season 2
CSL Season 19: Qualifier 2
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025

Upcoming

CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Big Gabe Cup #3
OSC Championship Season 13
Nations Cup 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.