• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 17:52
CET 22:52
KST 06:52
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!9[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
Evil Geniuses - shutting down14ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier5Weekly Cups (October 12-18): 5.0.17 era begins1[$1250] International ShieldBattery League66Weekly Cups (October 5-11): Farewell to 5.0.167
StarCraft 2
General
No more SC2 streamers on team liquid? REPORT: StarCraft 2: Remastered In Development Evil Geniuses - shutting down How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR? Daily SC2 Player Grid - feedback wanted
Tourneys
ScienceCraft (October 24-25) - Live Event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier WORTEX Challenger Series — Open SC2 LAN in Budapes
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[G] How to playtest arcade maps [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Sweltering Sands
External Content
Mutation # 549 Endless Sparkles The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 548 Shining Bright Mutation # 547 Temple Of Terror
Brood War
General
[Recap] 0-6 Defeat for Mong's Team Do we even care about balance? BW General Discussion Rollback Netcode in Brood War Bot on ladder
Tourneys
[$1250] International ShieldBattery League [BSL23] RO24 Group C Small VOD Thread 2.0 2v2v2v2 Tournament
Strategy
Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) 50,000-Word Terran Builds Memo 2026-10-22 Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Armies of Exigo - YesYes? General RTS Discussion Thread Dawn of War IV
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Innovate or Game Over?
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 7901 users

No fix to clumpy unit movement - Page 10

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 HotS
Post a Reply
Prev 1 8 9 10 11 12 19 Next All
MasterCynical
Profile Joined September 2012
505 Posts
October 26 2012 05:11 GMT
#181
On October 26 2012 12:44 AnachronisticAnarchy wrote:
I never quite got why everyone hates clumping so much. I've never noticed how it's supposedly painful to look at or anything like that.


When an army is spread out, it looks alot bigger and overwhelming than when its clumped up imo. I also think it's more aesthetically appealing for some reason.
Falling
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada11607 Posts
October 26 2012 05:20 GMT
#182
It's also harder to tell what's going on when everything is so clumped together. Especially when the healthbars are up for tourneys. All you can see is healthbars. Partly a problem of healthbars being above instead of below so when units overlap, the healthbar covers everything behind it... which is the unit. A clumped army just looks like a stack of healthbars.
ModeratorWake me up when Trump's term is finished. Slava Ukraini.
mishimaBeef
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Canada2259 Posts
October 26 2012 05:40 GMT
#183
As far as I am concerned, tourneys should not have health bars always on... anything less is a major error in production. Can flash them on when battles are nearly over or if lots of damage just happened to show it. I believe there is also an option to show health bars on selected only. Maybe you can couple selected + flash health bars occasionally for groups of damaged units?

As for the "The base race, building sniping, deathball, base trade game we know today is directly a result of this sort of pathing, which pushes the units around and turns the game into each team trying to create 1 giant eraser.", I agree the game is more dynamic. But when I see series like Flash vs Soo MLG invitational I like it. Or Flash vs Ryung recent GSL up and downs. There are still games fighting for space and expect them more and more.
Dare to live the life you have dreamed for yourself. Go forward and make your dreams come true. - Ralph Waldo Emerson
ArvickHero
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
10387 Posts
October 26 2012 05:54 GMT
#184
It looks sooooooooooooooo much better spread out, who cares if it doesn't affect gameplay .. it'll make spectating a lot nicer
Writerptrk
Serpico
Profile Joined May 2010
4285 Posts
October 26 2012 05:55 GMT
#185
On October 26 2012 14:11 MasterCynical wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 26 2012 12:44 AnachronisticAnarchy wrote:
I never quite got why everyone hates clumping so much. I've never noticed how it's supposedly painful to look at or anything like that.


When an army is spread out, it looks alot bigger and overwhelming than when its clumped up imo. I also think it's more aesthetically appealing for some reason.

It's better to look at because it doesn't look ridiculous when it's spread out. It also is easier to see.
Neddal
Profile Joined July 2010
Netherlands85 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-26 06:02:53
October 26 2012 06:02 GMT
#186
I really do not get why they just don't change a ladder map or 2 on beta and let us test it...

I think it looks a lot better and it might fix a couple of problems with some AoE spells... Fungalling 20 vikings in 1 fungal is absolutely ridiculous and this might change the power of fungal and it might even need to get buffed.

Atm, as a zerg player, I think fungal is broken at the lower leagues,(I am plat). Almost nobody is good enough to split their units, but it is easy to fungal a group of marines

This should help lower league players to play against fungal (and other AoE-spells), I don't really know about pro-level play tho, at least it would look a lot better from a spectators point of view.

I really hope Blizzard will review their stance on this change and at least will let us test it.


raf3776
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States1904 Posts
October 26 2012 06:04 GMT
#187
Im wondering why people complain about this and then complain the game is too easy. Just split your units. Auto spreading would actually help the death ball since theyd start closer to getting the concave they need
WWJD (What Would Jaedong Do)
NukeD
Profile Joined October 2010
Croatia1612 Posts
October 26 2012 06:15 GMT
#188
On October 26 2012 15:04 raf3776 wrote:
Im wondering why people complain about this and then complain the game is too easy. Just split your units. Auto spreading would actually help the death ball since theyd start closer to getting the concave they need


If you use your brain a bit you might see that pathing change would actually increase micro.
sorry for dem one liners
raf3776
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States1904 Posts
October 26 2012 06:30 GMT
#189
On October 26 2012 15:15 NukeD wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 26 2012 15:04 raf3776 wrote:
Im wondering why people complain about this and then complain the game is too easy. Just split your units. Auto spreading would actually help the death ball since theyd start closer to getting the concave they need


If you use your brain a bit you might see that pathing change would actually increase micro.

well then please inform me how auto spreading would increase micro
WWJD (What Would Jaedong Do)
NukeD
Profile Joined October 2010
Croatia1612 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-26 09:53:54
October 26 2012 09:48 GMT
#190
On October 26 2012 15:30 raf3776 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 26 2012 15:15 NukeD wrote:
On October 26 2012 15:04 raf3776 wrote:
Im wondering why people complain about this and then complain the game is too easy. Just split your units. Auto spreading would actually help the death ball since theyd start closer to getting the concave they need


If you use your brain a bit you might see that pathing change would actually increase micro.

well then please inform me how auto spreading would increase micro


Well first of all its not "auto" anything. Its just different pathing rules. Units dont push eachother out of the way when they move so they look for a way around the unit resulting in a spread (but not necesarilly) that is natural and predictable. If you wanted to clump your units up, you would still have that option, you'd just have to take more consideration on map layout and obstacles while moving your deathball around.

Then there is an obvious argument that splash damage overall would recieve a huge nerf. Yeah, thats true, thats why you dont just implement this change and call it a day. This would require a considerable amount of rebalancing and buffing every aoe skill/spell/attack in the game and would, when buffed, further increase the micro requirement of playing the game.

How this increases micro? Well, there are A LOT of quality posts in various threads and blogs that break that issue down and explain how it would indeed ecourage micro. Because it is a lot of work to find the right posts ive read over the past two years, I have just included a few posts that give you the overall idea why this is a good change.

The mechanics of sc2

Oh micro, where art thou

Unfortunatelly I havent been able to find the post that i felt was most important to the issue but it went along the lines of: when units are not clumped up, you dont have a ball of tightly packed marines that have a huge dps over a small surface area. In the case of protoss its basically the whole army firing their dps at the same time at the target because they are so packed. When on the other hand they are not as packed, you could have a battle beetwen say a 70 food army and a 15 food army; right now in SC2 the 70 food army would absolutely demolish the 15 food one in less than 3 seconds, BUT if that 70 food army is spread out more, you would only have an interaction only beetween a part of that 70 food ( lets say 20 food) and the whole 15 food on the other side. 20 food to 15 is a fair fight and there is a lot of potential for stalling the deathball with your small army doing various micro untill your reinforcements arrive. This is just the most basic line of the thought layout in the post I was trying to find and i didnt go in depth with it, but im sure you get the idea.
sorry for dem one liners
SarcasmMonster
Profile Joined October 2011
3136 Posts
October 26 2012 10:51 GMT
#191
On October 26 2012 02:11 Falling wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 25 2012 21:25 SarcasmMonster wrote:
Props to Archer for linking to this thread http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/6573699544?page=6#104

If you guys have really good arguments, you should post them in that BNet thread.

Aw dang I didn't realize it was in the HotS beta forum. I was going to post about viewability, opportunity (harass army on the move), and playability (functional tools).


You should post your thoughts here. 23% of the community still needs convincing

If someone would be so kind, they'll repost it for you on the official BNet forums.
MMA: The true King of Wings
quistador
Profile Joined March 2011
United States43 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-26 13:23:39
October 26 2012 13:22 GMT
#192
On October 26 2012 15:30 raf3776 wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
On October 26 2012 15:15 NukeD wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 26 2012 15:04 raf3776 wrote:
Im wondering why people complain about this and then complain the game is too easy. Just split your units. Auto spreading would actually help the death ball since theyd start closer to getting the concave they need


If you use your brain a bit you might see that pathing change would actually increase micro.

well then please inform me how auto spreading would increase micro



Read two posts up, also consider that with this change, there is no auto spread button. Some people are suggesting a "hold formation" button, but I am STRONGLY opposed to that.

I simply want unit micro to be a bit similar to how it was in BW.

Don't get me wrong, i remember fighting my own units in BW, I only want the feature that had units keeping formation relative to how you used a group selection's "magic box".

Please read some of Brood War's liquipedia on Magic Boxes to understand how this will improve micro, and the game as a whole.
kratos-23
Profile Joined March 2011
303 Posts
October 26 2012 14:05 GMT
#193
On October 26 2012 12:44 AnachronisticAnarchy wrote:
I never quite got why everyone hates clumping so much. I've never noticed how it's supposedly painful to look at or anything like that.

than read the damn thread you just posted in, seriously wtf?!
aliquis
Profile Joined September 2012
Austria38 Posts
October 26 2012 14:33 GMT
#194
I think Unit clumping is only considered a problem because it leads to deathball vs deathball fights.

I would not change that by making unit pathing dumber but by giving every race at every tier a viable aoe that demands splitting.
Maybe increase baneling aoe, give protoss some earlier aoe unit, make tanks stronger again, spidermine etc, all of this would encourage unit splitting, and i think aoe units should be like tank templar baneling etc, that they deal lot of damage but with intervall or only for a certain time because this gives some time to relocate which again encourages unit control from the attacker, he must be certain for example that the slow tank shoot at correct target and from defender splitting his units etc and not like the collosi that deals a steady ammount of aoe damage and is attack move.

So my approach would be to give everyrace more viable aoe units at every tier or improve the ones they already have to encourage splitting(and i dont mean aoe units like collosi but like firebat hellion spidermine baneling templar reaver etc)
Pablonius
Profile Joined November 2011
Canada2 Posts
October 26 2012 18:43 GMT
#195
The reason the deathball is so jarring and provokes such negative reactions from viewers and players is because deep-down, we know it's completely unrealistic. The greatest flaw of SC2 is that deathballs are effective. Even Dustin Bowder suggests that there are scenarios where deathballs are advantageous. IMO, there should be no scenarios in which a deathball is advantageous. A deathball is obviously vulnerable to AoE, but more importantly, a deathball should actually be the least efficient formation for doing damage. But it's not and the reason is simple: everybody shoots. SC2 does not implement any line-of-sight mechanics so every marine, every roach, and every stalker can shoot through their buddies at anyone in range. Everybody has magic bullets and there's no need to get in position to shoot. Melee units, in constrast need to run around each other to get in contact with the enemy.

Have you ever noticed that nobody complains about Zealot or Zerling "deathballs"? When you think about all the problematic deathballs, they all involve ranged units who can shoot most-efficiently when in a ball.

The everybody-shoots phenomenon affects everything from eliminating defender's advantage to eliminating positional play to encouraging encouraging boring deathball vs. deathball play.
Gnarly?
bole
Profile Joined January 2011
Serbia164 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-26 19:33:37
October 26 2012 19:32 GMT
#196
Have you ever noticed that nobody complains about Zealot or Zerling "deathballs"? When you think about all the problematic deathballs, they all involve ranged units who can shoot most-efficiently when in a ball.


Great job noticing that.. simply Protoss high tech race !!! LOre.. have first unite Zealot that is joke and Terrans have Marines the best unite in game !!!! ...

With range reduced to marines and change of pathing Male unites will be also effective and not just range unites like now..

pathing will solve more problems in game not just look of game...

Post this on Bnet forum you have great point...
wcr.4fun
Profile Joined April 2012
Belgium686 Posts
October 26 2012 20:12 GMT
#197
Melee deathballs have the reverse effect; they get stomped so hard by aoe and ranged deathballs in general that they're practically not viable. In bw I could win end game with zerglings partially because one storm couldn't kill 50 of them, same for one collussu.
Antylamon
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1981 Posts
October 30 2012 17:49 GMT
#198
On October 27 2012 04:32 bole wrote:
Show nested quote +
Have you ever noticed that nobody complains about Zealot or Zerling "deathballs"? When you think about all the problematic deathballs, they all involve ranged units who can shoot most-efficiently when in a ball.


Great job noticing that.. simply Protoss high tech race !!! LOre.. have first unite Zealot that is joke and Terrans have Marines the best unite in game !!!! ...

With range reduced to marines and change of pathing Male unites will be also effective and not just range unites like now..

pathing will solve more problems in game not just look of game...

Post this on Bnet forum you have great point...

Uh, excuse me?
NukeD
Profile Joined October 2010
Croatia1612 Posts
October 30 2012 18:07 GMT
#199
On October 31 2012 02:49 Antylamon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 27 2012 04:32 bole wrote:
Have you ever noticed that nobody complains about Zealot or Zerling "deathballs"? When you think about all the problematic deathballs, they all involve ranged units who can shoot most-efficiently when in a ball.


Great job noticing that.. simply Protoss high tech race !!! LOre.. have first unite Zealot that is joke and Terrans have Marines the best unite in game !!!! ...

With range reduced to marines and change of pathing Male unites will be also effective and not just range unites like now..

pathing will solve more problems in game not just look of game...

Post this on Bnet forum you have great point...

Uh, excuse me?


I agree that male units feel a bit UP.

:D
sorry for dem one liners
Zanno
Profile Blog Joined February 2007
United States1484 Posts
October 30 2012 18:07 GMT
#200
On October 26 2012 15:04 raf3776 wrote:
Im wondering why people complain about this and then complain the game is too easy. Just split your units. Auto spreading would actually help the death ball since theyd start closer to getting the concave they need



it has nothing to do with spreading or splitting

this video is a clear example of why brood war pathing was better. reach is running a very specific formation with his units designed to let the probes deal the first hit so two zealots immediately attack and kill it - meanwhile july's zerglings are moving a formation that they can immediately surround any zealot that gets out of position

micromanagement like this simply isn't possible in sc2 because of the clumping. i've spent weeks trying to put it into words in my head, but i can't do it - this video, on the other hand, explains all the concepts so many people have failed to put into words as to why brood war pathing was just better

most of the dumb unit pathing in bw was a result of chokes on map that large units can't pass through, the rest of it were either too many things trying to get up a ramp, or legit animation glitches like the dragoon bug
aaaaa
Prev 1 8 9 10 11 12 19 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
BSL
05:00
RO24 Group C
OyAji vs Nesh
Kyrie vs Aeternum
ZZZero.O341
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Liquid`TLO 252
SpeCial 44
EmSc Tv 16
StarCraft: Brood War
ZZZero.O 341
ProTech158
Aegong 33
Dota 2
LuMiX1
League of Legends
JimRising 770
Heroes of the Storm
Grubby3868
Liquid`Hasu545
Other Games
FrodaN3429
summit1g2802
Liquid`RaSZi2399
B2W.Neo947
KnowMe167
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2138
StarCraft 2
EmSc Tv 16
EmSc2Tv 16
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Adnapsc2 37
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV808
League of Legends
• Nemesis3761
• Jankos3341
• Scarra1445
Other Games
• imaqtpie752
• Shiphtur445
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
1h 8m
WardiTV Weekly
14h 8m
IntoTheTV X SOOP
1d 13h
ByuN vs Lambo
MaxPax vs Bunny
PiGosaur Cup
2 days
The PondCast
2 days
Kung Fu Cup
2 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
3 days
SHIN vs GuMiho
Clem vs Classic
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
GSL
4 days
Epic.LAN
4 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Epic.LAN
5 days
Yamato Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #5 - GSC
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
BSL Season 23
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026

Upcoming

IPSL Winter 2026-27
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.