• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 14:20
CEST 20:20
KST 03:20
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro4 Preview: On Course12Code S Season 1 - RO8 Preview7[ASL21] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Progenitors8Code S Season 1 - RO12 Group A: Rogue, Percival, Solar, Zoun13[ASL21] Ro8 Preview Pt1: Inheritors16
Community News
Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO8 Results0Weekly Cups (May 4-10): Clem, MaxPax, herO win1Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule !11Weekly Cups (April 27-May 4): Clem takes triple0RSL Revival: Season 5 - Qualifiers and Main Event12
StarCraft 2
General
Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO8 Results MaNa leaves Team Liquid Weekly Cups (May 4-10): Clem, MaxPax, herO win Code S Season 1 - RO8 Preview Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book
Tourneys
2026 GSL Season 2 Qualifiers Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule ! $5,000 WardiTV Spring Championship 2026 SC2 INu's Battles#16 <BO.9> Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2)
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players
External Content
Mutation # 525 Wheel of Misfortune The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 524 Death and Taxes Mutation # 523 Firewall
Brood War
General
Pros React to: TvT Masterclass in FlaSh vs Light vespene.gg — BW replays in browser BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion (Spoiler) Interview ASL Ro4 Day 2 Winner
Tourneys
[BSL22] RO8 Bracket Stage + Another TieBreaker Small VOD Thread 2.0 [ASL21] Semifinals B [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Hydra ZvZ: An Introduction Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game PC Games Sales Thread
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread UK Politics Mega-thread YouTube Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
streaming software Strange computer issues (software) [G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
How EEG Data Can Predict Gam…
TrAiDoS
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1662 users

No fix to clumpy unit movement - Page 10

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 HotS
Post a Reply
Prev 1 8 9 10 11 12 19 Next All
MasterCynical
Profile Joined September 2012
505 Posts
October 26 2012 05:11 GMT
#181
On October 26 2012 12:44 AnachronisticAnarchy wrote:
I never quite got why everyone hates clumping so much. I've never noticed how it's supposedly painful to look at or anything like that.


When an army is spread out, it looks alot bigger and overwhelming than when its clumped up imo. I also think it's more aesthetically appealing for some reason.
Falling
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada11512 Posts
October 26 2012 05:20 GMT
#182
It's also harder to tell what's going on when everything is so clumped together. Especially when the healthbars are up for tourneys. All you can see is healthbars. Partly a problem of healthbars being above instead of below so when units overlap, the healthbar covers everything behind it... which is the unit. A clumped army just looks like a stack of healthbars.
ModeratorDavid Duke, Richard Spencer, Nick Fuentes, Daily Stormer... "Some very fine people on both sides"
mishimaBeef
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Canada2259 Posts
October 26 2012 05:40 GMT
#183
As far as I am concerned, tourneys should not have health bars always on... anything less is a major error in production. Can flash them on when battles are nearly over or if lots of damage just happened to show it. I believe there is also an option to show health bars on selected only. Maybe you can couple selected + flash health bars occasionally for groups of damaged units?

As for the "The base race, building sniping, deathball, base trade game we know today is directly a result of this sort of pathing, which pushes the units around and turns the game into each team trying to create 1 giant eraser.", I agree the game is more dynamic. But when I see series like Flash vs Soo MLG invitational I like it. Or Flash vs Ryung recent GSL up and downs. There are still games fighting for space and expect them more and more.
Dare to live the life you have dreamed for yourself. Go forward and make your dreams come true. - Ralph Waldo Emerson
ArvickHero
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
10387 Posts
October 26 2012 05:54 GMT
#184
It looks sooooooooooooooo much better spread out, who cares if it doesn't affect gameplay .. it'll make spectating a lot nicer
Writerptrk
Serpico
Profile Joined May 2010
4285 Posts
October 26 2012 05:55 GMT
#185
On October 26 2012 14:11 MasterCynical wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 26 2012 12:44 AnachronisticAnarchy wrote:
I never quite got why everyone hates clumping so much. I've never noticed how it's supposedly painful to look at or anything like that.


When an army is spread out, it looks alot bigger and overwhelming than when its clumped up imo. I also think it's more aesthetically appealing for some reason.

It's better to look at because it doesn't look ridiculous when it's spread out. It also is easier to see.
Neddal
Profile Joined July 2010
Netherlands85 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-26 06:02:53
October 26 2012 06:02 GMT
#186
I really do not get why they just don't change a ladder map or 2 on beta and let us test it...

I think it looks a lot better and it might fix a couple of problems with some AoE spells... Fungalling 20 vikings in 1 fungal is absolutely ridiculous and this might change the power of fungal and it might even need to get buffed.

Atm, as a zerg player, I think fungal is broken at the lower leagues,(I am plat). Almost nobody is good enough to split their units, but it is easy to fungal a group of marines

This should help lower league players to play against fungal (and other AoE-spells), I don't really know about pro-level play tho, at least it would look a lot better from a spectators point of view.

I really hope Blizzard will review their stance on this change and at least will let us test it.


raf3776
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States1904 Posts
October 26 2012 06:04 GMT
#187
Im wondering why people complain about this and then complain the game is too easy. Just split your units. Auto spreading would actually help the death ball since theyd start closer to getting the concave they need
WWJD (What Would Jaedong Do)
NukeD
Profile Joined October 2010
Croatia1612 Posts
October 26 2012 06:15 GMT
#188
On October 26 2012 15:04 raf3776 wrote:
Im wondering why people complain about this and then complain the game is too easy. Just split your units. Auto spreading would actually help the death ball since theyd start closer to getting the concave they need


If you use your brain a bit you might see that pathing change would actually increase micro.
sorry for dem one liners
raf3776
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States1904 Posts
October 26 2012 06:30 GMT
#189
On October 26 2012 15:15 NukeD wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 26 2012 15:04 raf3776 wrote:
Im wondering why people complain about this and then complain the game is too easy. Just split your units. Auto spreading would actually help the death ball since theyd start closer to getting the concave they need


If you use your brain a bit you might see that pathing change would actually increase micro.

well then please inform me how auto spreading would increase micro
WWJD (What Would Jaedong Do)
NukeD
Profile Joined October 2010
Croatia1612 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-26 09:53:54
October 26 2012 09:48 GMT
#190
On October 26 2012 15:30 raf3776 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 26 2012 15:15 NukeD wrote:
On October 26 2012 15:04 raf3776 wrote:
Im wondering why people complain about this and then complain the game is too easy. Just split your units. Auto spreading would actually help the death ball since theyd start closer to getting the concave they need


If you use your brain a bit you might see that pathing change would actually increase micro.

well then please inform me how auto spreading would increase micro


Well first of all its not "auto" anything. Its just different pathing rules. Units dont push eachother out of the way when they move so they look for a way around the unit resulting in a spread (but not necesarilly) that is natural and predictable. If you wanted to clump your units up, you would still have that option, you'd just have to take more consideration on map layout and obstacles while moving your deathball around.

Then there is an obvious argument that splash damage overall would recieve a huge nerf. Yeah, thats true, thats why you dont just implement this change and call it a day. This would require a considerable amount of rebalancing and buffing every aoe skill/spell/attack in the game and would, when buffed, further increase the micro requirement of playing the game.

How this increases micro? Well, there are A LOT of quality posts in various threads and blogs that break that issue down and explain how it would indeed ecourage micro. Because it is a lot of work to find the right posts ive read over the past two years, I have just included a few posts that give you the overall idea why this is a good change.

The mechanics of sc2

Oh micro, where art thou

Unfortunatelly I havent been able to find the post that i felt was most important to the issue but it went along the lines of: when units are not clumped up, you dont have a ball of tightly packed marines that have a huge dps over a small surface area. In the case of protoss its basically the whole army firing their dps at the same time at the target because they are so packed. When on the other hand they are not as packed, you could have a battle beetwen say a 70 food army and a 15 food army; right now in SC2 the 70 food army would absolutely demolish the 15 food one in less than 3 seconds, BUT if that 70 food army is spread out more, you would only have an interaction only beetween a part of that 70 food ( lets say 20 food) and the whole 15 food on the other side. 20 food to 15 is a fair fight and there is a lot of potential for stalling the deathball with your small army doing various micro untill your reinforcements arrive. This is just the most basic line of the thought layout in the post I was trying to find and i didnt go in depth with it, but im sure you get the idea.
sorry for dem one liners
SarcasmMonster
Profile Joined October 2011
3136 Posts
October 26 2012 10:51 GMT
#191
On October 26 2012 02:11 Falling wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 25 2012 21:25 SarcasmMonster wrote:
Props to Archer for linking to this thread http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/6573699544?page=6#104

If you guys have really good arguments, you should post them in that BNet thread.

Aw dang I didn't realize it was in the HotS beta forum. I was going to post about viewability, opportunity (harass army on the move), and playability (functional tools).


You should post your thoughts here. 23% of the community still needs convincing

If someone would be so kind, they'll repost it for you on the official BNet forums.
MMA: The true King of Wings
quistador
Profile Joined March 2011
United States43 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-26 13:23:39
October 26 2012 13:22 GMT
#192
On October 26 2012 15:30 raf3776 wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
On October 26 2012 15:15 NukeD wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 26 2012 15:04 raf3776 wrote:
Im wondering why people complain about this and then complain the game is too easy. Just split your units. Auto spreading would actually help the death ball since theyd start closer to getting the concave they need


If you use your brain a bit you might see that pathing change would actually increase micro.

well then please inform me how auto spreading would increase micro



Read two posts up, also consider that with this change, there is no auto spread button. Some people are suggesting a "hold formation" button, but I am STRONGLY opposed to that.

I simply want unit micro to be a bit similar to how it was in BW.

Don't get me wrong, i remember fighting my own units in BW, I only want the feature that had units keeping formation relative to how you used a group selection's "magic box".

Please read some of Brood War's liquipedia on Magic Boxes to understand how this will improve micro, and the game as a whole.
kratos-23
Profile Joined March 2011
303 Posts
October 26 2012 14:05 GMT
#193
On October 26 2012 12:44 AnachronisticAnarchy wrote:
I never quite got why everyone hates clumping so much. I've never noticed how it's supposedly painful to look at or anything like that.

than read the damn thread you just posted in, seriously wtf?!
aliquis
Profile Joined September 2012
Austria38 Posts
October 26 2012 14:33 GMT
#194
I think Unit clumping is only considered a problem because it leads to deathball vs deathball fights.

I would not change that by making unit pathing dumber but by giving every race at every tier a viable aoe that demands splitting.
Maybe increase baneling aoe, give protoss some earlier aoe unit, make tanks stronger again, spidermine etc, all of this would encourage unit splitting, and i think aoe units should be like tank templar baneling etc, that they deal lot of damage but with intervall or only for a certain time because this gives some time to relocate which again encourages unit control from the attacker, he must be certain for example that the slow tank shoot at correct target and from defender splitting his units etc and not like the collosi that deals a steady ammount of aoe damage and is attack move.

So my approach would be to give everyrace more viable aoe units at every tier or improve the ones they already have to encourage splitting(and i dont mean aoe units like collosi but like firebat hellion spidermine baneling templar reaver etc)
Pablonius
Profile Joined November 2011
Canada2 Posts
October 26 2012 18:43 GMT
#195
The reason the deathball is so jarring and provokes such negative reactions from viewers and players is because deep-down, we know it's completely unrealistic. The greatest flaw of SC2 is that deathballs are effective. Even Dustin Bowder suggests that there are scenarios where deathballs are advantageous. IMO, there should be no scenarios in which a deathball is advantageous. A deathball is obviously vulnerable to AoE, but more importantly, a deathball should actually be the least efficient formation for doing damage. But it's not and the reason is simple: everybody shoots. SC2 does not implement any line-of-sight mechanics so every marine, every roach, and every stalker can shoot through their buddies at anyone in range. Everybody has magic bullets and there's no need to get in position to shoot. Melee units, in constrast need to run around each other to get in contact with the enemy.

Have you ever noticed that nobody complains about Zealot or Zerling "deathballs"? When you think about all the problematic deathballs, they all involve ranged units who can shoot most-efficiently when in a ball.

The everybody-shoots phenomenon affects everything from eliminating defender's advantage to eliminating positional play to encouraging encouraging boring deathball vs. deathball play.
Gnarly?
bole
Profile Joined January 2011
Serbia164 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-26 19:33:37
October 26 2012 19:32 GMT
#196
Have you ever noticed that nobody complains about Zealot or Zerling "deathballs"? When you think about all the problematic deathballs, they all involve ranged units who can shoot most-efficiently when in a ball.


Great job noticing that.. simply Protoss high tech race !!! LOre.. have first unite Zealot that is joke and Terrans have Marines the best unite in game !!!! ...

With range reduced to marines and change of pathing Male unites will be also effective and not just range unites like now..

pathing will solve more problems in game not just look of game...

Post this on Bnet forum you have great point...
wcr.4fun
Profile Joined April 2012
Belgium686 Posts
October 26 2012 20:12 GMT
#197
Melee deathballs have the reverse effect; they get stomped so hard by aoe and ranged deathballs in general that they're practically not viable. In bw I could win end game with zerglings partially because one storm couldn't kill 50 of them, same for one collussu.
Antylamon
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1981 Posts
October 30 2012 17:49 GMT
#198
On October 27 2012 04:32 bole wrote:
Show nested quote +
Have you ever noticed that nobody complains about Zealot or Zerling "deathballs"? When you think about all the problematic deathballs, they all involve ranged units who can shoot most-efficiently when in a ball.


Great job noticing that.. simply Protoss high tech race !!! LOre.. have first unite Zealot that is joke and Terrans have Marines the best unite in game !!!! ...

With range reduced to marines and change of pathing Male unites will be also effective and not just range unites like now..

pathing will solve more problems in game not just look of game...

Post this on Bnet forum you have great point...

Uh, excuse me?
NukeD
Profile Joined October 2010
Croatia1612 Posts
October 30 2012 18:07 GMT
#199
On October 31 2012 02:49 Antylamon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 27 2012 04:32 bole wrote:
Have you ever noticed that nobody complains about Zealot or Zerling "deathballs"? When you think about all the problematic deathballs, they all involve ranged units who can shoot most-efficiently when in a ball.


Great job noticing that.. simply Protoss high tech race !!! LOre.. have first unite Zealot that is joke and Terrans have Marines the best unite in game !!!! ...

With range reduced to marines and change of pathing Male unites will be also effective and not just range unites like now..

pathing will solve more problems in game not just look of game...

Post this on Bnet forum you have great point...

Uh, excuse me?


I agree that male units feel a bit UP.

:D
sorry for dem one liners
Zanno
Profile Blog Joined February 2007
United States1484 Posts
October 30 2012 18:07 GMT
#200
On October 26 2012 15:04 raf3776 wrote:
Im wondering why people complain about this and then complain the game is too easy. Just split your units. Auto spreading would actually help the death ball since theyd start closer to getting the concave they need



it has nothing to do with spreading or splitting

this video is a clear example of why brood war pathing was better. reach is running a very specific formation with his units designed to let the probes deal the first hit so two zealots immediately attack and kill it - meanwhile july's zerglings are moving a formation that they can immediately surround any zealot that gets out of position

micromanagement like this simply isn't possible in sc2 because of the clumping. i've spent weeks trying to put it into words in my head, but i can't do it - this video, on the other hand, explains all the concepts so many people have failed to put into words as to why brood war pathing was just better

most of the dumb unit pathing in bw was a result of chokes on map that large units can't pass through, the rest of it were either too many things trying to get up a ramp, or legit animation glitches like the dragoon bug
aaaaa
Prev 1 8 9 10 11 12 19 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 5h 40m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 379
UpATreeSC 129
SKillous 62
BRAT_OK 55
JuggernautJason24
MindelVK 16
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 39625
Calm 2621
Sea 467
ggaemo 264
firebathero 264
Light 210
Dewaltoss 160
actioN 151
910 27
Rock 21
[ Show more ]
Last 0
Dota 2
Gorgc7952
qojqva2149
Counter-Strike
fl0m1957
Fnx 1534
pashabiceps1364
byalli371
allub299
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu140
Other Games
Grubby1955
FrodaN1713
Liquid`RaSZi1293
Beastyqt1128
ceh9596
Hui .221
KnowMe160
monkeys_forever146
C9.Mang0132
ArmadaUGS117
QueenE90
Mew2King77
Livibee38
Organizations
StarCraft 2
angryscii 31
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Kozan
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Migwel
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix14
• Michael_bg 8
• blackmanpl 7
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Other Games
• imaqtpie935
• Shiphtur309
• WagamamaTV241
• tFFMrPink 7
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
5h 40m
RSL Revival
15h 40m
Classic vs Solar
herO vs SHIN
OSC
18h 40m
Big Brain Bouts
21h 40m
sebesdes vs Iba
Percival vs YoungYakov
Reynor vs GgMaChine
Korean StarCraft League
1d 8h
RSL Revival
1d 15h
Clem vs Rogue
Bunny vs Lambo
IPSL
1d 21h
Dewalt vs nOmaD
Ret vs Cross
BSL
2 days
Bonyth vs Doodle
Dewalt vs TerrOr
GSL
2 days
Cure vs herO
SHIN vs Maru
IPSL
2 days
Bonyth vs Napoleon
G5 vs JDConan
[ Show More ]
BSL
3 days
OyAji vs JDConan
DragOn vs TBD
Replay Cast
3 days
Monday Night Weeklies
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
The PondCast
4 days
GSL
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
GSL
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-05-13
WardiTV TLMC #16
Nations Cup 2026

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
Acropolis #4
KK 2v2 League Season 1
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
SCTL 2026 Spring
RSL Revival: Season 5
2026 GSL S1
Heroes Pulsing #1
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W7
YSL S3
Escore Tournament S2: W8
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Maestros of the Game 2
WardiTV Spring 2026
2026 GSL S2
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.