• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 07:25
CEST 13:25
KST 20:25
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 20257Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202576RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18
Community News
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced22BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8
StarCraft 2
General
Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 2025 #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time I offer completely free coaching services Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 What tournaments are world championships?
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $10,000 live event Esports World Cup 2025 $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced $5,000 WardiTV Summer Championship 2025 WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign Dewalt's Show Matches in China BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers [G] Mineral Boosting Does 1 second matter in StarCraft?
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 621 users

The Mechanics of SC2 [Part 1]

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
sluggaslamoo
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
Australia4494 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-06-22 13:37:09
June 22 2010 13:29 GMT
#1
The Mechanics of Starcraft 2

Part 1


This will be the beginning of a multipart series on the differences of the mechanics of BroodWar and Starcraft 2. It will outline the pros and cons of each, with specific points and examples that hopefully everyone can understand and relate to. People prefer short and sweet, so I will try to get as close to that as possible, hence dividing this article into many threads over time.

What I intend to achieve is to allow more informed discussions about the mechanics of Starcraft 2. I often see irrational replies in threads that are mis-informed due to different use or lack of understanding. BroodWar fans end up looking like stubborn people who don't like change, and Starcraft 2 fans end up looking like people who want to win without trying.

Many of the points represented in this article will consist of estimations, I did not program BroodWar or Starcraft 2 so it's natural that there will be a lot of guess work on my part. Also please take my opinions with a grain of salt and make up your own opinion. Fact is fact, opinion is opinion, this article will contain elements of both.

Unit Control (Part 1)
Unit Control involves the ability to for players to move units in a way that makes them more effective individually, whether it be dealing damage, avoiding damage, or effective movement.

As Unit Control is such a broad topic, this also will have to be split into a few parts. Part 1 will cover aspects revolving around pathfinding.

Pathfinding
Starcraft 2 uses an AI pathfinding technique called flocking or swarm AI, the effect is coordinated movement the same as what you get with a school of fish or a flock of birds. Most likely Starcraft 2 uses an advanced algorithm that finds the fewest amount of waypoints and allows autonomous steering behaviour for units to smoothly hug their way around obstacles and other units.

From a purely development perspective Blizzard has done an extremely good job with this, it's quite a specialised field and there isn't a lot of information on it, with 200 units and chokes and obstacles everywhere it still works very efficiently and flawlessly. It is a technique which is highly regarded in the game development community, so it's understandable why Blizzard did it. Until I started playing BroodWar I also spent a long time trying to learn how to code this too.

BroodWar works a little differently. On an isometric map where each unit can only go in 8 directions, coupled with much lower processing power, this calls for a much more primitive pathfinding algorithm. The most common pathfinding algorithm in this situation would be a tile-based A* (A-Star) algorithm and just by looking at the units I would say this is a pretty good guess.

[image loading]
Tile-based A* Pathfinding Example


[image loading]
BroodWar Dragoons showcasing the A* algorithm


The map is filled with many nodes layed out like tiles, each unit follows these nodes one by one until they get to the destination, the nodes that units can take become waypoints. So while Starcraft 2 can avoid collision by using steering behaviour to hug their way around the small radius of another unit, BroodWar units are constrained by the fact that they are competing for waypoints. This is the main reason why you get much better surround in Starcraft 2 than in BroodWar., but also the reason why units have to spread out so much to move around.

[image loading]
Slight offsets cause the mutalisks take different waypoints when turning 180 degrees


[image loading]
Emulating BroodWar pathfinding by spamming waypoints towards a destination


The difference is that BroodWar relies almost solely on A* to get the units to move from one point to another, mapping every single node the unit needs to traverse over. In Starcraft 2, it seems that a lot of the pathfinding is left up to the unit individual, and waypoints are kept to a minimum.

Collision avoidance is also much more primitive in BroodWar as well. Units avoid collision by stopping to give-way while another unit moves around it or calculates a new path, this is probably one of the first things you learn about dealing with collision avoidance between units. You often see this in BroodWar with worker scouts, when one stops, and the other goes around, or both the players forcefully try to move them past and all it does is hold both the workers up.

In Starcraft 2, units will avoid obstacles and other units (but also flock together) using steering behaviour. Logically, every unit has sensors which when colliding with another unit, will signal for the unit to turn in an appropriate direction to avoid it. This allows units to weave in and out without calculating a whole new path or losing momentum, in a worst case scenario the units can ignore the collision radius, allowing for more fluid movement and higher movement efficiency overall.

[image loading]
OpenSteer: An open source library for autonomous steering behaviour


[image loading]
BroodWar zerglings are busy deciding who goes first, while SC2 zerglings start turning before they even get there


A lot of BroodWar fans dislike the new pathfinding AI and there's good reason to. One of the most effective tactics in the early game is flanking. If units move in a perfect tight ball, flanking will be useless, period. The reason zerglings dish so much damage to marines when they are spread out is because marines are ranged and zerglings are melee units. If you can effectively reduce the "surface area" of your army, your army will receive much less damage. This also becomes a compounded effect due to the difference in army size and damage growing bigger and bigger after each death.

[image loading]
Flash vs Effort (OSL Finals Game 3). Flash's un-attended marines competing for the same waypoints form a spread-out line, Effort punishes this with a well-timed zergling flank killing all the marines. Had Flash concentrated on his marines, this wouldn't have cost him the game


The other issue is that ideally, the amount of effort focused on unit movement should directly correlate to their effectiveness. Players that don't attend to their units should be able to be punished. However in Starcraft 2, there is a feeling that the AI can move the units better than humans, meaning that you get the opposite effect.

I can also see how bad unit movement can be frustrating for newer players, there is nothing worse for blizzard than to show what looks like an un-polished game. I believe that units should spread out if you carelessly move them about, but they should also not glitch out all the time due to bad pathfinding AI. We do not need to have people "fight the interface" to create good gameplay mechanics, but we still need the side-effects that improve gameplay as a result.

"Auto-surround" due to better pathfinding can be mitigated. Zerglings are faster off and on creep in Starcraft 2 than they were in BroodWar. Reducing the Zergling's on-creep and off-creep speed back to that of a worker and widening the radius means that an effective surround is necessary to take out a scouting worker, thus the skill of worker scouting can once again become a defining feature of good play.

[image loading]
A badly executed surround allows the probe to live on to fight another day


In a later issue, I will talk about Starcraft 2's extremely high rates of fire which also severely affects flanking ability and other mechanics. The next issue however will be about magic boxing and stacking, following that, probably moving shot.
Come play Android Netrunner - http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=409008
flyinfart
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
United States95 Posts
June 22 2010 13:42 GMT
#2
This is a very cool article. Its nice to see the mechanics behind what we have all noticed, but just don't know enough about to put into an intelligible post. I'll be looking forward to your expansions on this, and how they tie together.
rastaban
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States2294 Posts
June 22 2010 13:44 GMT
#3
Thanks for writing this up, I am looking forward to part 2.
Tyler: "...damn it, that's StarCraft. Opening doors is what we do. Being the first to find food is the greatest pleasure a player can have!"
kajeus
Profile Joined May 2010
United States679 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-06-22 13:50:11
June 22 2010 13:48 GMT
#4
It's true that autosurround makes the game easier with regard to melee units. On the other hand, I really like the aesthetic effect of swarming over a group of marines with superfast zerglings in SC2 -- it's beautiful and feels cool.

So while I respect your plea, I think this is a mechanic perhaps best left to BW. Your solution of lowering zergling speed seems like a huge sacrifice simply to encourage possible worker surrounds. Your proposal of having zerglings (etc) spread out when you don't tend to them is interesting, but I'm not sure anyone really understands what you mean. How would they "spread out''? When are they "moved carelessly"? How would this encourage interesting gameplay?

In the end, I think we're stuck with autosurround, and I'm not sure that's bad. Manual surrounds are just a different mechanic for a different era.
pro-MoMaN, pro-HuK, pro-Millenium
Bensio
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United Kingdom621 Posts
June 22 2010 13:48 GMT
#5
Thanks for takin the time to write this, enjoyed it.
Silkk
Profile Joined June 2010
United States41 Posts
June 22 2010 13:52 GMT
#6
Great read. From a more casual perspective I think that the improved AI is great. As the game evolves the better players will learn how to manipulate their units in creative ways.

Im looking forward to the firing rate article. My biggest struggle with sc2 so far has been how quickly the battles end.
Silkk
Profile Joined June 2010
United States41 Posts
June 22 2010 13:54 GMT
#7
On June 22 2010 22:48 kajeus wrote:
It's true that autosurround makes the game easier with regard to melee units. On the other hand, I really like the aesthetic effect of swarming over a group of marines with superfast zerglings in SC2 -- it's beautiful and feels cool.

So while I respect your plea, I think this is a mechanic perhaps best left to BW. Your solution of lowering zergling speed seems like a huge sacrifice simply to encourage possible worker surrounds. Your proposal of having zerglings (etc) spread out when you don't tend to them is interesting, but I'm not sure anyone really understands what you mean. How would they "spread out''? When are they "moved carelessly"? How would this encourage interesting gameplay?

In the end, I think we're stuck with autosurround, and I'm not sure that's bad. Manual surrounds are just a different mechanic for a different era.


Yea the aesthetics are very pleasingl.... I love when a patch of zerglings are running through a slower group of hydralisks... Its especially cool when they switch directions.... The swarm!!!!
Licmyobelisk
Profile Blog Joined August 2008
Philippines3682 Posts
June 22 2010 13:55 GMT
#8
So that's why marines feels that they have tougher skin than SC BW, cause of it's intelligence in path finding than their predecessor. Goodjob at explaining :D
I don't think I've ever wished my opponent good luck prior to a game. When I play, I play to win. I hope every opponent I ever have is cursed with fucking terrible luck. I hope they're stuck playing underneath a stepladder with a black cat in attendance a
Takkara
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2503 Posts
June 22 2010 13:56 GMT
#9
Really good article, an interesting read for sure.

I think I disagree about your line: "A lot of BroodWar fans dislike the new pathfinding AI and there's good reason to. One of the most effective tactics in the early game is flanking. If units move in a perfect tight ball, flanking will be useless, period."

It's shortsighted to say that this is only a negative thing, right? I mean, commentators like Day[9] have been spending the entire Beta lamenting the "one-control group syndrome" that leads to these perfect tight balls. The reason being that AoE abilities like storm, fungal growth, Collossi, etc really eat into groups like this, and units can really be caught out of position.

Lamenting the end of BW flanking is in some ways like the moving shot debate. It's a relic of an old engine, and wasn't likely to be replicated in a new engine. But this new engine has it's only quirks and limitations and it's just a matter of time until they're found. Then when SC3 comes out, we'll lament the end of those things.

At least, that's my hope in all this.
Gee gee gee gee baby baby baby
shawabawa
Profile Joined May 2010
United Kingdom417 Posts
June 22 2010 13:57 GMT
#10
On June 22 2010 22:48 kajeus wrote: Your proposal of having zerglings (etc) spread out when you don't tend to them is interesting, but I'm not sure anyone really understands what you mean. How would they "spread out''? When are they "moved carelessly"? How would this encourage interesting gameplay?

I think his point about spreading out is that if in BW you got a whole bunch of marines and A-clicked the other side of the map, they would spread out into a giant conga line and get owned by flanks, whereas in SC2 they stay in a very tight ball and flanks aren't as effective. He wants it so you have to baby sit your troops more carefully when moving your army.

I prefer how it is in SC2, bad pathfinding is the biggest problem with almost every RTS. I used to love WC3, but since playing SC2 I just can't play it any more because the god damn units just spaz out all the time.
piochelin
Profile Joined January 2010
Spain31 Posts
June 22 2010 13:57 GMT
#11
Soooo it was the AI then... i always thinked my goons were retarded

Really nice post, looking forward for the next
it's all about courage
Subversion
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
South Africa3627 Posts
June 22 2010 13:59 GMT
#12
wow. epic op and great read, thanks for this.
kajeus
Profile Joined May 2010
United States679 Posts
June 22 2010 13:59 GMT
#13
On June 22 2010 22:56 Takkara wrote:
Really good article, an interesting read for sure.

I think I disagree about your line: "A lot of BroodWar fans dislike the new pathfinding AI and there's good reason to. One of the most effective tactics in the early game is flanking. If units move in a perfect tight ball, flanking will be useless, period."

It's shortsighted to say that this is only a negative thing, right? I mean, commentators like Day[9] have been spending the entire Beta lamenting the "one-control group syndrome" that leads to these perfect tight balls. The reason being that AoE abilities like storm, fungal growth, Collossi, etc really eat into groups like this, and units can really be caught out of position.

Lamenting the end of BW flanking is in some ways like the moving shot debate. It's a relic of an old engine, and wasn't likely to be replicated in a new engine. But this new engine has it's only quirks and limitations and it's just a matter of time until they're found. Then when SC3 comes out, we'll lament the end of those things.

At least, that's my hope in all this.

You're absolutely right. "Careless spreading out" would effectively nerf fungal growth, storm, colossi, siege tanks, etc.

It could be lamented as causing the game to require LESS micro!
pro-MoMaN, pro-HuK, pro-Millenium
nihoh
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Australia978 Posts
June 22 2010 14:02 GMT
#14
On June 22 2010 22:59 kajeus wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 22 2010 22:56 Takkara wrote:
Really good article, an interesting read for sure.

I think I disagree about your line: "A lot of BroodWar fans dislike the new pathfinding AI and there's good reason to. One of the most effective tactics in the early game is flanking. If units move in a perfect tight ball, flanking will be useless, period."

It's shortsighted to say that this is only a negative thing, right? I mean, commentators like Day[9] have been spending the entire Beta lamenting the "one-control group syndrome" that leads to these perfect tight balls. The reason being that AoE abilities like storm, fungal growth, Collossi, etc really eat into groups like this, and units can really be caught out of position.

Lamenting the end of BW flanking is in some ways like the moving shot debate. It's a relic of an old engine, and wasn't likely to be replicated in a new engine. But this new engine has it's only quirks and limitations and it's just a matter of time until they're found. Then when SC3 comes out, we'll lament the end of those things.

At least, that's my hope in all this.

You're absolutely right. "Careless spreading out" would effectively nerf fungal growth, storm, colossi, siege tanks, etc.

It could be lamented as causing the game to require LESS micro!

U forget that spells like Storm were much more stronger due counter the "spreading out" of units from primitive AI.
Dont look at the finger or you will miss all that heavenly glory.
exnomendei
Profile Joined May 2010
Netherlands122 Posts
June 22 2010 14:11 GMT
#15
Thank you for the excellent post. It's a good short read up that can really benefit your micro if you use this information well. Units behave so differently from BW that micro has to take on different shapes and forms.

Can you give examples of what players can do to improve on the built-in pathing, swarm-effect, etc? I think a major problem with players now is the "one control group" syndrom; people group all their units in one group, and while it makes for effective attacks early on, you really benefit from getting a bigger concave later on in the game. This can be achieved bu just splitting one control group hap-hazardly into two, and moving the groups seperately.

What options do players have to improve their micro, movement-wise?
Trying something wacky, expanding it, adjusting it, perfecting it -> Build order
sluggaslamoo
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
Australia4494 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-06-22 14:39:22
June 22 2010 14:23 GMT
#16
Thanks

On June 22 2010 23:11 exnomendei wrote:
Thank you for the excellent post. It's a good short read up that can really benefit your micro if you use this information well. Units behave so differently from BW that micro has to take on different shapes and forms.

Can you give examples of what players can do to improve on the built-in pathing, swarm-effect, etc? I think a major problem with players now is the "one control group" syndrom; people group all their units in one group, and while it makes for effective attacks early on, you really benefit from getting a bigger concave later on in the game. This can be achieved bu just splitting one control group hap-hazardly into two, and moving the groups seperately.

What options do players have to improve their micro, movement-wise?


You could artificially create one on the spot by spamming waypoints till they form a line (as long as you break the magic box, the radius is 6 distance units wide, if your group is bigger than that it will form a line). If you continue to move in the direction of the line they should stay that way, then if you move sideways they should form a concave faster than normal.

Worth a shot if you think that units take too long to form a concave (its a bit risky though), the other thing though is you can just attack -> move -> attack and hold that ball so then all your units are in range already.

Unfortunately SC2 doesn't give you that much control in that regard, but ill hopefully have more tips with magic boxing and stacking as they are available in SC2 (although not as useful).

Its more about explaining though more than anything else
Come play Android Netrunner - http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=409008
Wippen
Profile Joined May 2010
Sweden15 Posts
June 22 2010 14:44 GMT
#17
Really intresting to get some of the mechanics explained. Good job OP.
Saracen
Profile Blog Joined December 2007
United States5139 Posts
June 22 2010 14:47 GMT
#18
Great article.
Peekay.switch
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Canada285 Posts
June 22 2010 14:47 GMT
#19
One of the best article I've read on TL.

Really well put and I'm really looking forward to Part 2.
I'm currently doing an Engineering Degree in Programming (Think that's what It's called, you'll have to forgive me, I'm French >_>) and Path finding really is an interesting subject, I have learned a whole bunch about it and I'll definitely be digging out OpenSteer.

Once again, very nice article!
mOnion
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States5657 Posts
June 22 2010 14:49 GMT
#20
wow this is really freaking impressive
☆★☆ 7486!!! Join the Ban mOnion Anti-Trolling Initiative! - Caller | "on a scale of machine to 10, how bad is that Zerg?" - LZgamer | you are the new tl.net bonjwa monion, congrats - Rekrul | "Cheeseburgers dynamite lilacs" - Chill
1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
FEL
09:00
Cracow 2025
Spirit vs GeraldLIVE!
Clem vs Krystianer
uThermal vs SKillous
Reynor vs MaNa
Lambo vs TBD
ComeBackTV 1426
RotterdaM1172
IndyStarCraft 484
CranKy Ducklings166
Rex142
3DClanTV 102
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 1172
IndyStarCraft 484
Rex 142
ProTech59
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 21906
Horang2 9629
Hyuk 5421
Hyun 1239
Barracks 1028
Mini 899
BeSt 733
EffOrt 510
firebathero 508
Larva 497
[ Show more ]
Stork 371
Soulkey 273
Last 206
sorry 116
ZerO 80
Free 55
Sharp 44
Noble 41
zelot 40
Sacsri 37
Rush 26
soO 25
Shinee 25
Movie 22
NaDa 21
Icarus 18
sSak 18
yabsab 12
ajuk12(nOOB) 12
sas.Sziky 10
Bale 4
Dota 2
XcaliburYe589
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K414
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor290
Other Games
gofns15209
B2W.Neo1011
Beastyqt703
DeMusliM158
SortOf59
QueenE30
ZerO(Twitch)12
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH363
• StrangeGG 25
• tFFMrPink 8
• Kozan
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• sooper7s
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 3988
• WagamamaTV619
• lizZardDota2245
League of Legends
• Jankos1033
Upcoming Events
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2h 35m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6h 35m
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 22h
WardiTV European League
2 days
Online Event
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Non-Korean Championship
BSL 20 Team Wars
FEL Cracov 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.