• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 21:24
CEST 03:24
KST 10:24
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash10[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy18ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book20
Community News
$5,000 WardiTV TLMC tournament - Presented by Monster Energy2GSL CK: More events planned pending crowdfunding3Weekly Cups (May 30-Apr 5): herO, Clem, SHIN win0[BSL22] RO32 Group Stage4Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple6
StarCraft 2
General
Quebec Clan still alive ? Best Time to Book Blue Mountains Private Tours for BGE Stara Zagora 2026 cancelled Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool Weekly Cups (May 30-Apr 5): herO, Clem, SHIN win
Tourneys
GSL CK: More events planned pending crowdfunding $5,000 WardiTV TLMC tournament - Presented by Monster Energy Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Season 4 announced for March-April Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 520 Moving Fees Mutation # 519 Inner Power Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone
Brood War
General
ASL21 General Discussion so ive been playing broodwar for a week straight. Gypsy to Korea Pros React To: JaeDong vs Queen [BSL22] RO32 Group Stage
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL22] RO32 Group B - Sunday 21:00 CEST [BSL22] RO32 Group A - Saturday 21:00 CEST 🌍 Weekly Foreign Showmatches
Strategy
Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Darkest Dungeon
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Trading/Investing Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT] Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread General nutrition recommendations
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Loot Boxes—Emotions, And Why…
TrAiDoS
Broowar part 2
qwaykee
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1778 users

NFL 2014 Season - Page 13

Forum Index > Sports
Post a Reply
Prev 1 11 12 13 14 15 352 Next
cLutZ
Profile Joined November 2010
United States19574 Posts
March 19 2014 21:34 GMT
#241
How is #2 not already a rule?

On top of that, when are PI and Personal Fouls going to be reviewable, those penalties are just as impactful, if not more so, than catches, fumbles, etc.
Freeeeeeedom
jrwh
Profile Joined November 2011
United States37 Posts
March 19 2014 23:25 GMT
#242
On March 19 2014 06:08 AgentW wrote:
That and you don't give away a first rounder for a guy who scored a lot of touchdowns, which may be the most meaningless statistic in the world when that same guy never had a 20 yard rush and averaged 3.6 YPC.

It's the same reason I don't see why people think Le'Veon Bell is a stud, fantasy or otherwise. Dude rushes for 3.5 YPC with a terrible offensive line. That's not terrible, but it's leaps and bounds from good.


I disagree on the point about touchdowns, being able to punch the ball in from the redzone always > fieldgoal, and some team have a surprising amount of trouble with it. Also, the fact that he never had a 20+ yard rush only means that he was consistent, and one 80yd run from being over 4.0ypc, which is what Arian Foster/Marshawn Lynch/other top RBs put up. And again, he did this with the Browns, who had a rookie qb in Weeden throwing to mediocre receivers (some of whom developed into phenomenal receivers last year). It's not like any of his opponents had to respect the pass.

Speaking of Lynch, I don't remember what the Seahawks gave the Bills for him but I doubt it involved a first rounder. If they knew exactly what they were going to get, though, I'm sure they wouldn't have hesitated to send a first round pick for him. Lynch was like 20 when he came into the league, he just took some time to bloom. Richardson will turn 23 a few months before the season starts, so he has time to bloom like Beast Mode did.

For clarity's sake, I'm not a Colts fan. I hated the move from a personal standpoint cuz I had Bradshaw in fantasy and the Colts other RB (Ballard I think?) had just gone down for the season to a knee injury. I had about one day to rejoice in already having my Lamar Miller replacement sitting on my bench before the Richardson deal broke. I shopped my WRs and TEs galore all season long but never did get a deal done for a better RB2.


AgentW
Profile Blog Joined July 2012
United States7725 Posts
March 20 2014 00:20 GMT
#243
On March 20 2014 08:25 jrwh wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 19 2014 06:08 AgentW wrote:
That and you don't give away a first rounder for a guy who scored a lot of touchdowns, which may be the most meaningless statistic in the world when that same guy never had a 20 yard rush and averaged 3.6 YPC.

It's the same reason I don't see why people think Le'Veon Bell is a stud, fantasy or otherwise. Dude rushes for 3.5 YPC with a terrible offensive line. That's not terrible, but it's leaps and bounds from good.


I disagree on the point about touchdowns, being able to punch the ball in from the redzone always > fieldgoal, and some team have a surprising amount of trouble with it. Also, the fact that he never had a 20+ yard rush only means that he was consistent, and one 80yd run from being over 4.0ypc, which is what Arian Foster/Marshawn Lynch/other top RBs put up. And again, he did this with the Browns, who had a rookie qb in Weeden throwing to mediocre receivers (some of whom developed into phenomenal receivers last year). It's not like any of his opponents had to respect the pass.

Speaking of Lynch, I don't remember what the Seahawks gave the Bills for him but I doubt it involved a first rounder. If they knew exactly what they were going to get, though, I'm sure they wouldn't have hesitated to send a first round pick for him. Lynch was like 20 when he came into the league, he just took some time to bloom. Richardson will turn 23 a few months before the season starts, so he has time to bloom like Beast Mode did.

For clarity's sake, I'm not a Colts fan. I hated the move from a personal standpoint cuz I had Bradshaw in fantasy and the Colts other RB (Ballard I think?) had just gone down for the season to a knee injury. I had about one day to rejoice in already having my Lamar Miller replacement sitting on my bench before the Richardson deal broke. I shopped my WRs and TEs galore all season long but never did get a deal done for a better RB2.



Agreed with the touchdown being so much better than a FG sentiment, but I just think it's too situation based to be useful in comparing RBs. The point about Richardson's YPC is that he's slow and makes bad decisions reading the hole, and it's not like he had a bad offensive line in Cleveland. Mediocre at worst, good at best.

Lynch argument isn't valid because he forced his way out of Buffalo. Lynch was nearly as good as he is now while in Buffalo running behind the measly lines we used to field in the mid 2000s.
Who's the bigger scrub, the scrub, or the scrub who loses to him?
jrwh
Profile Joined November 2011
United States37 Posts
March 20 2014 01:09 GMT
#244
On March 20 2014 09:20 AgentW wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 20 2014 08:25 jrwh wrote:
On March 19 2014 06:08 AgentW wrote:
That and you don't give away a first rounder for a guy who scored a lot of touchdowns, which may be the most meaningless statistic in the world when that same guy never had a 20 yard rush and averaged 3.6 YPC.

It's the same reason I don't see why people think Le'Veon Bell is a stud, fantasy or otherwise. Dude rushes for 3.5 YPC with a terrible offensive line. That's not terrible, but it's leaps and bounds from good.


I disagree on the point about touchdowns, being able to punch the ball in from the redzone always > fieldgoal, and some team have a surprising amount of trouble with it. Also, the fact that he never had a 20+ yard rush only means that he was consistent, and one 80yd run from being over 4.0ypc, which is what Arian Foster/Marshawn Lynch/other top RBs put up. And again, he did this with the Browns, who had a rookie qb in Weeden throwing to mediocre receivers (some of whom developed into phenomenal receivers last year). It's not like any of his opponents had to respect the pass.

Speaking of Lynch, I don't remember what the Seahawks gave the Bills for him but I doubt it involved a first rounder. If they knew exactly what they were going to get, though, I'm sure they wouldn't have hesitated to send a first round pick for him. Lynch was like 20 when he came into the league, he just took some time to bloom. Richardson will turn 23 a few months before the season starts, so he has time to bloom like Beast Mode did.

For clarity's sake, I'm not a Colts fan. I hated the move from a personal standpoint cuz I had Bradshaw in fantasy and the Colts other RB (Ballard I think?) had just gone down for the season to a knee injury. I had about one day to rejoice in already having my Lamar Miller replacement sitting on my bench before the Richardson deal broke. I shopped my WRs and TEs galore all season long but never did get a deal done for a better RB2.



Agreed with the touchdown being so much better than a FG sentiment, but I just think it's too situation based to be useful in comparing RBs. The point about Richardson's YPC is that he's slow and makes bad decisions reading the hole, and it's not like he had a bad offensive line in Cleveland. Mediocre at worst, good at best.

Lynch argument isn't valid because he forced his way out of Buffalo. Lynch was nearly as good as he is now while in Buffalo running behind the measly lines we used to field in the mid 2000s.


IDK. YPC seems to be potentially as misleading as TDs to me. I just went through last season's stats and there were 27 guys with 4.0 or more ypc, but only 15 of them had 200+ carries. Of the 7 who topped 5.0 ypc, only Murray, McCoy, and Charles had 200+ carries. Andre Ellington led the league with 5.5 ypc, Cam Newton and Donald Brown tied for second with 5.3.

I also don't know how we can call Richardson "slow" within 2 years of him going top 3 in the draft. The Browns and a whole lot of analysts didn't think he was slow when he ran a 4.4something at the combine, and that's not something that changes drastically without a serious injury or several years' aging. I can't comment on the "bad decisions reading the hole" bit cuz I don't have the expertise to judge that sort of thing, but again, having Weeden as your QB means no one has to respect the pass. Also, having to play the Steelers, Ravens, and Bengals for over a third of your games doesn't help anyone's ypc; those teams were ranked 3, 8, and 12 against the run respectively in 2012. None of this, of course, explains why he sucked so badly last year. Maybe the transition to a new team and having to learn a new playbook mid-season?

In addition to the value of giving up next year's 26 for last year's 3, what I really liked about the trade was how Richardson fits in with what the Colts already were/are. Franchise QB? Check. Solid Receiving Corps (even post-Wayne injury)? Check. Workhorse back? I believe Richardson will fill that role, and put up top 10 numbers doing so. Already targeting him as a mid-round steal for this year's fantasy drafts.

Then again, last year I sold myself on Case Keenum after he replaced Shaub, and ditched Matty Ice for him with the quickness. Didn't take long to see I was wrong about that, and fortunately I was able to cash in a bit on Josh McCown towards the end of the season. We shall see about Richardson.
cLutZ
Profile Joined November 2010
United States19574 Posts
March 20 2014 01:20 GMT
#245
Why do you keep talking about Richardson's draft pick #? It was widely panned as a reach when it was made. You wouldn't be making this argument if he was a right tackle picked at 15-25 2 years ago who gave up 3 sacks a game would you?
Freeeeeeedom
AgentW
Profile Blog Joined July 2012
United States7725 Posts
March 20 2014 01:23 GMT
#246
On March 20 2014 10:09 jrwh wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 20 2014 09:20 AgentW wrote:
On March 20 2014 08:25 jrwh wrote:
On March 19 2014 06:08 AgentW wrote:
That and you don't give away a first rounder for a guy who scored a lot of touchdowns, which may be the most meaningless statistic in the world when that same guy never had a 20 yard rush and averaged 3.6 YPC.

It's the same reason I don't see why people think Le'Veon Bell is a stud, fantasy or otherwise. Dude rushes for 3.5 YPC with a terrible offensive line. That's not terrible, but it's leaps and bounds from good.


I disagree on the point about touchdowns, being able to punch the ball in from the redzone always > fieldgoal, and some team have a surprising amount of trouble with it. Also, the fact that he never had a 20+ yard rush only means that he was consistent, and one 80yd run from being over 4.0ypc, which is what Arian Foster/Marshawn Lynch/other top RBs put up. And again, he did this with the Browns, who had a rookie qb in Weeden throwing to mediocre receivers (some of whom developed into phenomenal receivers last year). It's not like any of his opponents had to respect the pass.

Speaking of Lynch, I don't remember what the Seahawks gave the Bills for him but I doubt it involved a first rounder. If they knew exactly what they were going to get, though, I'm sure they wouldn't have hesitated to send a first round pick for him. Lynch was like 20 when he came into the league, he just took some time to bloom. Richardson will turn 23 a few months before the season starts, so he has time to bloom like Beast Mode did.

For clarity's sake, I'm not a Colts fan. I hated the move from a personal standpoint cuz I had Bradshaw in fantasy and the Colts other RB (Ballard I think?) had just gone down for the season to a knee injury. I had about one day to rejoice in already having my Lamar Miller replacement sitting on my bench before the Richardson deal broke. I shopped my WRs and TEs galore all season long but never did get a deal done for a better RB2.



Agreed with the touchdown being so much better than a FG sentiment, but I just think it's too situation based to be useful in comparing RBs. The point about Richardson's YPC is that he's slow and makes bad decisions reading the hole, and it's not like he had a bad offensive line in Cleveland. Mediocre at worst, good at best.

Lynch argument isn't valid because he forced his way out of Buffalo. Lynch was nearly as good as he is now while in Buffalo running behind the measly lines we used to field in the mid 2000s.


IDK. YPC seems to be potentially as misleading as TDs to me. I just went through last season's stats and there were 27 guys with 4.0 or more ypc, but only 15 of them had 200+ carries. Of the 7 who topped 5.0 ypc, only Murray, McCoy, and Charles had 200+ carries. Andre Ellington led the league with 5.5 ypc, Cam Newton and Donald Brown tied for second with 5.3.

I also don't know how we can call Richardson "slow" within 2 years of him going top 3 in the draft. The Browns and a whole lot of analysts didn't think he was slow when he ran a 4.4something at the combine, and that's not something that changes drastically without a serious injury or several years' aging. I can't comment on the "bad decisions reading the hole" bit cuz I don't have the expertise to judge that sort of thing, but again, having Weeden as your QB means no one has to respect the pass. Also, having to play the Steelers, Ravens, and Bengals for over a third of your games doesn't help anyone's ypc; those teams were ranked 3, 8, and 12 against the run respectively in 2012. None of this, of course, explains why he sucked so badly last year. Maybe the transition to a new team and having to learn a new playbook mid-season?

In addition to the value of giving up next year's 26 for last year's 3, what I really liked about the trade was how Richardson fits in with what the Colts already were/are. Franchise QB? Check. Solid Receiving Corps (even post-Wayne injury)? Check. Workhorse back? I believe Richardson will fill that role, and put up top 10 numbers doing so. Already targeting him as a mid-round steal for this year's fantasy drafts.

Then again, last year I sold myself on Case Keenum after he replaced Shaub, and ditched Matty Ice for him with the quickness. Didn't take long to see I was wrong about that, and fortunately I was able to cash in a bit on Josh McCown towards the end of the season. We shall see about Richardson.

Hah, that's funny you bring up Keenum. This is totally unrelated, but my cousin and I have this crazy theory going that the Texans should draft someone that isn't a QB with the first pick and roll the dice with Keenum because we like him.

I believe that with most young players in all sports (see the NBA for prime examples), it takes at least three years to truly evaluate their abilities. Richardson's looked so bad to this point (I forgot to mention that he can't hold onto the ball as of the last few weeks of the season) that I think we're getting into "this guy's going to be a bust" range. I thought that it was a good trade for the Colts at the time because of the points you mentioned (18 months earlier he was regarded as the best back since Peterson coming out of college) but I'm starting to doubt it. The one point in his favor, besides my general position about reserving judgement, is that it can't be easy to just get up and change teams in the middle of a week and learn an entire new offense.

Overall, I think he deserves another year before we rip him and the Colts a new one for his poor overall performance, but we're getting there.
Who's the bigger scrub, the scrub, or the scrub who loses to him?
GTR
Profile Blog Joined September 2004
51576 Posts
March 20 2014 01:44 GMT
#247
I really, really think the Texans should take Clowney and grab a McCarron or something in the third.
Feels like the Mario Williams/Reggie Bush situation in 2006 all over again.
Commentator
cLutZ
Profile Joined November 2010
United States19574 Posts
March 20 2014 02:01 GMT
#248
Wasn't Vince young in that draft also?
Freeeeeeedom
AgentW
Profile Blog Joined July 2012
United States7725 Posts
March 20 2014 03:36 GMT
#249
Yes, and think about the sentiment going around Houston at the time. They wanted Young badly.
Who's the bigger scrub, the scrub, or the scrub who loses to him?
cLutZ
Profile Joined November 2010
United States19574 Posts
March 20 2014 03:43 GMT
#250
Man, what an odd draft that was.

Reminds me of ...really nothing.
Freeeeeeedom
AgentW
Profile Blog Joined July 2012
United States7725 Posts
March 20 2014 03:45 GMT
#251
It's strange to think they won that crapshoot, and Williams was really a good player for them for quite a while. Overall forgettable, or perhaps more memorable for its busts, although Bush has turned into a quality back.
Who's the bigger scrub, the scrub, or the scrub who loses to him?
Aveng3r
Profile Joined February 2012
United States2411 Posts
March 20 2014 05:07 GMT
#252
Heard bridgewater didnt look as good as some other guy whos name I cant remember today. Does anybody know who the texans are looking at?
I carve marble busts of assassinated world leaders - PM for a quote
Aveng3r
Profile Joined February 2012
United States2411 Posts
March 20 2014 05:11 GMT
#253
also what do you guys think of Manziel? from what I hear hes not really a stand in the pocket, change the protections, read the defense well kinda guy. ESPN still has a lot of analysts that see him going in the top 5. personally I hope the Eagles can snag him. what do you guys think?
I carve marble busts of assassinated world leaders - PM for a quote
jmbthirteen
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
United States10734 Posts
March 20 2014 05:16 GMT
#254
On March 20 2014 14:11 Aveng3r wrote:
also what do you guys think of Manziel? from what I hear hes not really a stand in the pocket, change the protections, read the defense well kinda guy. ESPN still has a lot of analysts that see him going in the top 5. personally I hope the Eagles can snag him. what do you guys think?

what? no, we don't need him. Foles is pretty damn good. Need to draft defense defense defense.

I think Manziel can be good. Kid has talent. Sure he is undersized, but so are Brees and Wilson. He's got that it factor. But is his head on straight? Can he survive being drafted by the Browns? There are a lot of questions still with him. And pretty much and QB in this draft.
www.superbeerbrothers.com
Aveng3r
Profile Joined February 2012
United States2411 Posts
March 20 2014 05:19 GMT
#255
I know but I still have a hunch that chip might go after him.

Think they trade up for clowney? I havent heard anyone suggest the idea but they need a pash rusher pretty bad and he could be a special talent, it kinda reeks of a Jerome McDougle situation all over again though
I carve marble busts of assassinated world leaders - PM for a quote
Shellshock
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States97276 Posts
March 20 2014 07:15 GMT
#256
On March 20 2014 14:07 Aveng3r wrote:
Heard bridgewater didnt look as good as some other guy whos name I cant remember today. Does anybody know who the texans are looking at?

Was it Blake Bortles? They were going on about how he had a pretty great pro day. I think they may have mentioned something about Bridgewater not looking very good during the segment I caught on tv
Moderatorhttp://i.imgur.com/U4xwqmD.png
TL+ Member
LeeDawg
Profile Joined April 2012
United States1306 Posts
March 20 2014 08:42 GMT
#257
On March 20 2014 16:15 Shellshock wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 20 2014 14:07 Aveng3r wrote:
Heard bridgewater didnt look as good as some other guy whos name I cant remember today. Does anybody know who the texans are looking at?

Was it Blake Bortles? They were going on about how he had a pretty great pro day. I think they may have mentioned something about Bridgewater not looking very good during the segment I caught on tv


Ron Jaworski said on ESPN that Bortles was very impressive at his pro day and he would be shocked if Bortles wasn't the first QB off the board. I don't think he's going to get past the Texans, honestly. new regimes usually mean new QBs, and with Bill O'Brien being an offensive guy, he will probably want a talented passer to groom.
:-)
jrwh
Profile Joined November 2011
United States37 Posts
March 20 2014 09:24 GMT
#258
On March 20 2014 10:20 cLutZ wrote:
Why do you keep talking about Richardson's draft pick #? It was widely panned as a reach when it was made. You wouldn't be making this argument if he was a right tackle picked at 15-25 2 years ago who gave up 3 sacks a game would you?


Because players get drafted in order of who teams think are the best first, and this early in his NFL career that information is still relevant. He wasn't a reach. Christian Ponder was a reach. And no, I wouldn't make the same argument for Michael Oher.

On March 20 2014 10:44 GTR wrote:
I really, really think the Texans should take Clowney and grab a McCarron or something in the third.
Feels like the Mario Williams/Reggie Bush situation in 2006 all over again.


Yes, totally reminded me of that draft! I think they'll take Clowney since it already worked for them once, and none of these QBs come close to what the Reggie Bush hype-level was.

On March 20 2014 14:19 Aveng3r wrote:
I know but I still have a hunch that chip might go after him.

Think they trade up for clowney? I havent heard anyone suggest the idea but they need a pash rusher pretty bad and he could be a special talent, it kinda reeks of a Jerome McDougle situation all over again though


Hehe, you must be an Eagles fan. I don't them taking a QB in the early rounds, even if Manziel falls to 22 or the second round. Foles looked too good last season. There's no way that a team with a shot at Clowney would give that up for anything less than way more than the Eagles would/should be willing to part with, either. They'd have to pull an RGIII like deal with multiple future draft picks I'd think. I forget what Atlanta did to move up to 6 and get Julio Jones a few years ago, but they basically viewed him as the absolute last piece needed for a championship puzzle. I don't think, as amazing a prospect as he is, that any team would see Clowney in that same way.



Ghostcom
Profile Joined March 2010
Denmark4783 Posts
March 20 2014 09:55 GMT
#259
I'm a Colts fan and I dare say that Richardson has a huge chip on his shoulder to not be considered a total bust. I have a hard time seeing any RB not Adrian Peterson being worth a first round pick and that we chose to trade ours for a guy who had proved so little in the NFL still baffles me. I think the trade was an incredibly bad move on our part, but hopefully I'll be proven wrong and he can live up to whatever Grigson sees in him.
GTR
Profile Blog Joined September 2004
51576 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-03-20 11:08:54
March 20 2014 11:07 GMT
#260
Commentator
Prev 1 11 12 13 14 15 352 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
CranKy Ducklings
00:00
TLMC #22: Map Judging #2
CranKy Ducklings24
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft333
SpeCial 74
RuFF_SC2 57
Vindicta 39
CosmosSc2 36
StarCraft: Brood War
GuemChi 6173
Artosis 706
NaDa 21
Terrorterran 2
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm11
League of Legends
JimRising 270
Counter-Strike
taco 627
Super Smash Bros
C9.Mang0403
hungrybox347
PPMD60
Other Games
summit1g11609
Day[9].tv776
Maynarde109
ViBE100
Mew2King45
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• CranKy Ducklings SOOP4
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki17
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift4443
• TFBlade1587
Other Games
• Scarra1008
• Day9tv776
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Team League
9h 36m
CranKy Ducklings
1d 8h
WardiTV Team League
1d 9h
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 13h
BSL
1d 17h
n0maD vs perroflaco
TerrOr vs ZZZero
MadiNho vs WolFix
DragOn vs LancerX
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
WardiTV Team League
2 days
OSC
2 days
BSL
2 days
Sterling vs Azhi_Dahaki
Napoleon vs Mazur
Jimin vs Nesh
spx vs Strudel
Replay Cast
2 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
3 days
Wardi Open
3 days
GSL
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Kung Fu Cup
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Elite League 2026
RSL Revival: Season 4
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W2
IPSL Spring 2026
Escore Tournament S2: W3
Acropolis #4
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
RSL Revival: Season 5
WardiTV TLMC #16
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.