| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Gabeski
42 Posts
On September 27 2010 03:15 flowandebb wrote: Sorry for the triple post but is there any possibility of me being able to switch races? To terran? Me and chris played earlier this week. Chris beat me 2-1. I asked on the last page whether both players had to send replays, but i wasnt sure so I didnt, I'll send the replays out later tonight | ||
|
flowandebb
Canada158 Posts
| ||
|
Gabeski
42 Posts
On September 27 2010 07:11 flowandebb wrote: Gabeski. Youre supposed to be playing hybris as we speak. I know, he isnt on. | ||
|
HolySpear
United States60 Posts
| ||
|
Gabeski
42 Posts
On September 27 2010 09:43 HolySpear wrote: Hybrid Gabeski is awiting for you yup yupp | ||
|
flowandebb
Canada158 Posts
| ||
|
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
| ||
|
Gabeski
42 Posts
| ||
|
Dagobert
Netherlands1858 Posts
Secondly, the 'season lineup' you put in spoilers is fubar, a garbled mess. Might wanna repair that I guess. Thirdly, while Crossfire technically is Blizzard-made as you claimed, it's a remake of the proleague map Sin Peaks of Baekdu. I checked the thread to see what server you were on. Seems it's NA so nevermind me.  | ||
|
flowandebb
Canada158 Posts
| ||
|
Karliath
United States2214 Posts
Gabeski's reply, "I know, he isnt on," was given 2 hours after Flowandebb's comment, "Gabeski. Youre supposed to be playing hybris as we speak." Hybrid, I (wanted to obs, lol), and I'm assuming Flowandebb waiting an hour. Now, if everyone (concerned) is cool about it, I think this match should just be rescheduled. In the future, however, I think it would be best to set up more precise play times, and also a rule as to how long a player has to wait after that time before his opponent automatically forfeits the round. | ||
|
Karliath
United States2214 Posts
On September 27 2010 10:22 Dagobert wrote: Sorry for interrupting, but... *twitch* the writing on the banner is... a bit too far to the left. *twitch* Secondly, the 'season lineup' you put in spoilers is fubar, a garbled mess. Might wanna repair that I guess. Thirdly, while Crossfire technically is Blizzard-made as you claimed, it's a remake of the proleague map Sin Peaks of Baekdu. I checked the thread to see what server you were on. Seems it's NA so nevermind me. 1. The banner is actually longer. With the new TL image upload system, things got messed up. 2. The season line up is just something we use to know who is playing against who. The "real" schedule is posted on the website. That said, it should probably be renamed huh? 3. Did not know that. Thanks for your input! | ||
|
HolySpear
United States60 Posts
if not it is recorded as a 2-0 loss for both players. | ||
|
Karliath
United States2214 Posts
On September 27 2010 11:36 HolySpear wrote: I propose that everyone is given 1 week after the week they are supposed to play to play their matches if not it is recorded as a 2-0 loss for both players. I agree with this. However, if one player openly states that he is ready to play, but the opponent is never on, then the opponent should get the 2-0 loss and the first player should get a 2-0 win. It's not the first player's fault, so the opponent essentially forfeits the set. What I was referring to, however, is when two players agree to play at a certain time, but one doesn't show up. For example, two players may agree to play at 3 pm. What happens if one player doesn't show up by 3:15, 3:30, 4:00? It's not fair for the other player. What if they decide to reschedule afterward, and one player again doesn't show up for some time? What's the time limit, and the reschedule limit? I understand that it may be hard for people to schedule exact times to play. What I suggest is that players agree on a rough time/date, and when that times comes closer, an exact time is set. Then, if a player does not show up after 30 minutes, he forfeits the set. | ||
|
DuncanIdaho
United States465 Posts
On September 27 2010 11:42 Karliath wrote: I agree with this. However, if one player openly states that he is ready to play, but the opponent is never on, then the opponent should get the 2-0 loss and the first player should get a 2-0 win. It's not the first player's fault, so the opponent essentially forfeits the set. What I was referring to, however, is when two players agree to play at a certain time, but one doesn't show up. For example, two players may agree to play at 3 pm. What happens if one player doesn't show up by 3:15, 3:30, 4:00? It's not fair for the other player. What if they decide to reschedule afterward, and one player again doesn't show up for some time? What's the time limit, and the reschedule limit? I understand that it may be hard for people to schedule exact times to play. What I suggest is that players agree on a rough time/date, and when that times comes closer, an exact time is set. Then, if a player does not show up after 30 minutes, he forfeits the set. Alright... See, this is why I left things unstructured, as far as the weekly rounds. It would be one thing if someone doesn't show if this were a tournament being held in a specific night. However, that's not the case, and players are free to arrange a time to meet. I have a few axioms that were in mind when I did structure things as I did, and where i left things unstructured, i did so on purpose, for the most part. Most important point: I do not want players to win by technicalities (e.g., opponents forfieted games due to inability to show) Season games are not scheduled at an exact time and date: I wanted this to be somewhat casual, in order to decrease losses due to nerves. I hoped that everyone can be honorable and make the times which they arrange to play, yet I do realize the possibility of real life issues getting in the way, thus the unstructured nature of playing within the week. Players should make their best attempt to live up to deals made: Although I understand things such as, "I ran into a boss/colleague/professor and had to chit-chat, in order to maintain professional relations, and giving some excuse like, 'Oh, look at the time, I have to go play a video game, I'll catch you later.' Might be inappropriate," or illness, car accidents, bad internet problems, etc. However, things such as, "Oh crap, I forgot, my bad," or frankly, inexcusable. Although this is meant to be all in good fun, I don't want players abusing the system of kindness, nor abuse technicalities: I really was averse to setting down concrete rules such as forfieting if not arriving within 30min, etc., since players may feel it wise under such conditions to throw up their hands and say, "Well i tried, I'll just be unavailable for any times he/she attempts to make up for the game, and thus I win." Given this possibility, and in light of the "most important point" above, I intend on handling such issues on a case by case scenario, rather than setting forth anything concrete. Despite the unstructured nature of weekly matches, the finals will be structured: I will coordinate schedules of those going into the finals/semifinals/etc., and we will agree on a date and time to play, and forfeitures will be possible and likely in case of no-shows. Furthermore, any ties or seatings that may change due to incomplete matches from the season weeks will be calculated if there were a possibility of changing the line-ups, such as say, bob has won 20 games, lost 4, and is waiting to play 2 others due to inability to coordinate schedules, but say the 4 in the finals won 21 games, thus making it possible for bobto have entered, then that may be an issue in need of resolution before the finals commence, but we can cross that bridge when/if we get there. However, say bob hasnt played 2 matches, but would need 4 match wins in order to get in, then who cares? Final Words: Just let me know of any issues, attempt to make up matches later on in the season if you haven't finished/started them, and be honorable, and don't no-show without a good reason and a good apology.  | ||
|
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
| ||
|
Gabeski
42 Posts
| ||
|
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
On September 28 2010 08:51 Gabeski wrote: hey hybrid, i'll be on for a bit tonight, probably idling while I do some english homework. if you pop on sometime i'm down to get our series done tonight though. once again sorry about the other day hah :x I'm not gonna be on for most of the night. But I guess I could get on at Midnight my time (2 am EST), and face you. Also, I'm free pretty much tomorrow, after school of course. | ||
|
Hayako
Canada54 Posts
On September 28 2010 07:33 L1F3 wrote: Good news everybody, AdSense has finally accepted us! Getting it up on the website now. thats fantastic news! can i like make the website money by just cliking on adds? lol | ||
|
HolySpear
United States60 Posts
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 TKL StarCraft: Brood War 269IndyStarCraft  210SC2Nice  155ProTech154 BRAT_OK   90JuggernautJason84 MaxPax 83trigger 65UpATreeSC 62MindelVK 24RushiSC  18Calm Dota 2 3058GuemChi  733Larva 688EffOrt 542Shuttle 376BeSt 193Hyuk 98Dewaltoss 91Mind  62scan(afreeca)  20[ Show more ] Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games Grubby2666 FrodaN1146 Beastyqt698 ceh9441 allub418 crisheroes328 Harstem254 Fuzer  245ArmadaUGS190 ToD171 Hui .124 QueenE88 |
|
OSC
Shameless vs MaNa
Nicoract vs Percival
Krystianer vs TBD
Cure vs SHIN
PiGosaur Monday
The PondCast
OSC
Big Brain Bouts
Serral vs TBD
BSL 21
BSL 21
Wardi Open
Monday Night Weeklies
|
|
|
EPT
