On March 20 2013 14:01 Oatsmaster wrote:
err. why are all the vote totals fucked up?
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
DarthPunk
Australia10847 Posts
March 20 2013 05:03 GMT
#1421
On March 20 2013 14:01 Oatsmaster wrote: Show nested quote + On March 18 2013 14:14 Oatsmaster wrote: VOTE COUNT! Day 2 ThePeashooter (0): Wade Fell, TranceStorm goodkarma (1): Kenpachi Wade Fell (0): Vivax, geript, Mr. Wiggles (12): zarepath (6): WaveofShadow (0):: glurio, kitaman27, ThePeashooter, DarthPunk, zarepath, VisceraEyes (0): cosmicomics, DoYouHas Voting is compulsory err. why are all the vote totals fucked up? | ||
sciberbia
United States1359 Posts
March 20 2013 05:03 GMT
#1422
On March 20 2013 12:55 Mocsta wrote: Show nested quote + On March 20 2013 11:59 sciberbia wrote: Hi all. I plan to be here for the next several hours. I agree with the general sentiment that lynching either BH or VE is dumb today as a matter of general strategy. here is no really strong evidence that either of them is scum. I don't think they should be lynch candidates. Sci.. the above is interesting.. so far the only case I noticed on VE is from DarthPunk. Henceforth, the corollary is that the DP case on VE is rubbish (i..e not really strong) Lets get context here: DP is a strong player.. after all DP does have the highest win ratio on the TL Database. And has had scum and town games that have all resulted in the same outcome.. victory With that context: Do you expect more substance from a town DP? If the case is "not strong' as you suggest, what impact does this have on your DP read? My thoughts on DP's case on VE and its influence of my read on DP (or lack thereof) + Show Spoiler + First of all, not really strong =/= rubbish I would describe his case as quite reasonable, but not as strong as he seemed to think it was. I think DarthPunk made some valid points about VE. Here are some things I agree with and think are more indicative of a scum agenda than a townie agenda: - VE made a bad case on DarthPunk - VE severely downplayed the popularity of 'pressure voting' among townies on TL - VE oddly lost interest in DP as a D1 lynch candidate and did not really explain why DP seems to have felt that this paints VE as extremely likely scum. I don't think this evidence is as strong as DP seems to think it is. From what I know of VE, he seems capable of this behavior as town. So DP clearly holds VE to a much higher standard than I do. Maybe DP is town and just wrong to hold him to such a high standard. Maybe I am wrong to not hold him to a higher standard. Who knows? Despite his supposedly impressive win percentage, neither of us is the be-all end-all jesus of scumhunting. And even the best of townies make incorrect conclusions all the time. So I'm not going to have a scumread on DP just because I disagree with him on the strength of one of his cases. My thoughts on the fact that he "delurked" to jump on the WoS wagon + Show Spoiler + I have no reason to believe that he was intentionally lurking and opportunistically jumped on the WoS wagon. I don't assume that people are intentionally lurking whenever they are not posting. That's just paranoid and silly. Also, I have significant suspicions of WoS and I thought the kita case was good. So it is not alarming for me that he sheeped it. my read on DP + Show Spoiler + I still think that he is town for reasons I have already said: - first post on geript draws attention to himself - interacted consistently with thread while under threat of bandwaggon - seemed like he genuinely wanted to get VE lynched - also, I really liked how he responded to the cases against him. IMO, the cases were just bad. And his response was "These cases totally suck. You guys must be scum for spouting this garbage" which is a response typical of an indignant townie The only thing I don't like in his filter is that he goes from VE is 100% scum to fine let's not lynch VE when VE claimed a hit. I mean, if VE was actually 100% scum then DP should be 100% sure that VE is lying so the blue claim should be nothing to DP so DP should still want to lynch VE. However, I think there is an obvious and plausible explanation in that DP simply overstated his confidence on the VE case in order to attract attention to it. @Mocsta I am quite puzzled by your line of questioning here, as I have said several times in the thread now that I think the DP wagon was bad, and I think DP is town. | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
March 20 2013 05:06 GMT
#1423
On March 20 2013 14:02 DarthPunk wrote: Show nested quote + On March 20 2013 13:56 WaveofShadow wrote: DP: Zarepath is NOT always lynchbait, which is exactly why I am ever more certain he is scum. I can't be sure about the others. And the town reads aren't weak at all. Notice how the other players that I've played with before ALSO haven't voted for me? VE/BH/Geript/Vivax/etc? As to whether or not I'm worried, you can be the judge of that. Cosmic to answer your questions: No, I'll speak however I want. I posted a sort-of-defense to kita right after he first accused me and we had a little back-and-forth. If need be later on or tomorrow I'll go more in depth but I don't see the need right now. As far as giving people more fuel, where are those good intentioned townies to push their oh-so-towny cases against me? They voted and fucked off with all the scum that's where. WTF kind of response is this?!?!? I can be the judge of whether you are worried or not? why the deliberate ambiguity? That rubs me the wrong way. You responded in a non townie way to that question. Townies would be suspicious as anything about town reads ripped from thin air. I can assure you. I am pretty confident this lynch is the right one. You'd be pretty wrong. I don't care what rubs you the wrong way. It's up to you whether or not you believe the townread Mocsta is giving based on my response to the cases against me, and whether you think that makes me worried based on that and earlier posts I've made. Now the only people who gave town reads were Coag and Mocsta, and I already mentioned that I understood your point but disagreed with it. As for the others, I'm not entirely sure they're all town but at the very least they all know my meta and haven't voted me whether they've said why or not. | ||
DarthPunk
Australia10847 Posts
March 20 2013 05:06 GMT
#1424
On March 20 2013 13:51 Mocsta wrote: Show nested quote + On March 20 2013 13:29 DarthPunk wrote: On March 20 2013 13:24 Mocsta wrote: On March 20 2013 13:18 DarthPunk wrote: On March 20 2013 13:10 Mocsta wrote: Sciberbia I dont want this request below to be lost. On March 20 2013 11:59 sciberbia wrote: Hi all. I plan to be here for the next several hours. I agree with the general sentiment that lynching either BH or VE is dumb today as a matter of general strategy. here is no really strong evidence that either of them is scum. I don't think they should be lynch candidates. On March 20 2013 12:55 Mocsta wrote: Sci.. the above is interesting.. so far the only case I noticed on VE is from DarthPunk. Henceforth, the corollary is that the DP case on VE is rubbish (i..e not really strong) Lets get context here: DP is a strong player.. after all DP does have the highest win ratio on the TL Database. And has had scum and town games that have all resulted in the same outcome.. victory With that context: Do you expect more substance from a town DP? If the case is "not strong' as you suggest, what impact does this have on your DP read? In addition: please add in the context that DP de-lurked specifically to bandwagon WoS. What is your DP read pl0x I think you'll find that before I bandwagoned WOS taht I posted a question to coag. and that that question was from about 10 pages back in the thread. So If you were really paying attention you would realise that I had just come back and started to read things. So in essence. NO. I did not 'delurk' to bandwagon WoS. I came back. read the thread. read kita's case which i feel to be very strong, and then voted for WoS based on that. What are you trying to say here? that you think I am scum? if you are how about YOU in fact say it rather than try and prompt others into saying it for you. Nice interjection DP. Curious is it not? I had a premonition that you wanted to know Sciberbia read on you? I thought I was doing you a favour dear. WTF are you talking about? I don't care what people's reads on me are unless I am about to get mislynched. Interesting choice of words. Personally, its a favourite move of mine to throw in the word 'mislynch" when scum. Its a soft-town claim as I am sure you are aware. In fact, I used the word in hydra when under the pump ![]() Lets be fair: Yes, town can say it.. but.. truth be told. I havent seen a town say it until they under genuine pressure of lynch.. And well, you are simply not in that position are you?. so it is fascinating that you choose to overreact and beat this drum so hard so early. Now in case you are struggling to piece together my motives. Let me be transparent. I am still trying to ascertain whether this game you can indeed get mislynched. So when I am asking others for opinions on YOU.. I think its bullshit to over-react and cut in like you did. now my questions to sciberbia are tainted all because of your 'choice of actions' and impatience. I am not trying to elicit stances for funsies. Everything has a purpose. And so far.. I got way more than I expected... WAY MORE. As for the criteria you raised earlier. + Show Spoiler + OK, you voted for WoS post-kita case, and pre-WoS limp "permission" post which you decided to call out. Do you want a pat on the back for making the follow up? & You can also continue to over-react over my choice of word in "de-lurk" which perhaps can be rephrased as decided to make your first post in essentially one hour. As for your spiel about calling scum directly instead of "prompting". Trust me, when I want to call you scum. I shall... and if others want to call you scum, it wont be because *I* gave them permission to either. Actually look at this post. He says he isn;t calling me scum. But he is colouring my quotes in red, look at how is doingg everything EXCEPT stating I am scum. and then he says this in the EXACT POST with RED QUOTES On March 20 2013 13:51 Mocsta wrote: I am still trying to ascertain whether this game you can indeed get mislynched. he states he doesn't know if I am scum or not, which is contrary to every other thing in the exact same post. He is being wishy-washy. This doesn't add up at all. | ||
sciberbia
United States1359 Posts
March 20 2013 05:08 GMT
#1425
Also, the fact that DP did not already know and therefore point out to you that I think he is town is comforting. I'm quite seriously thinking town on DP and I don't think you'd be able to change my mind. But if you feel that strongly, feel free to make a case. | ||
geript
10024 Posts
March 20 2013 05:10 GMT
#1426
| ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
March 20 2013 05:10 GMT
#1427
On March 20 2013 13:58 DarthPunk wrote: Yes, you can treat the event however you want.Show nested quote + On March 20 2013 13:51 Mocsta wrote: On March 20 2013 13:29 DarthPunk wrote: On March 20 2013 13:24 Mocsta wrote: On March 20 2013 13:18 DarthPunk wrote: On March 20 2013 13:10 Mocsta wrote: Sciberbia I dont want this request below to be lost. On March 20 2013 11:59 sciberbia wrote: Hi all. I plan to be here for the next several hours. I agree with the general sentiment that lynching either BH or VE is dumb today as a matter of general strategy. here is no really strong evidence that either of them is scum. I don't think they should be lynch candidates. On March 20 2013 12:55 Mocsta wrote: Sci.. the above is interesting.. so far the only case I noticed on VE is from DarthPunk. Henceforth, the corollary is that the DP case on VE is rubbish (i..e not really strong) Lets get context here: DP is a strong player.. after all DP does have the highest win ratio on the TL Database. And has had scum and town games that have all resulted in the same outcome.. victory With that context: Do you expect more substance from a town DP? If the case is "not strong' as you suggest, what impact does this have on your DP read? In addition: please add in the context that DP de-lurked specifically to bandwagon WoS. What is your DP read pl0x I think you'll find that before I bandwagoned WOS taht I posted a question to coag. and that that question was from about 10 pages back in the thread. So If you were really paying attention you would realise that I had just come back and started to read things. So in essence. NO. I did not 'delurk' to bandwagon WoS. I came back. read the thread. read kita's case which i feel to be very strong, and then voted for WoS based on that. What are you trying to say here? that you think I am scum? if you are how about YOU in fact say it rather than try and prompt others into saying it for you. Nice interjection DP. Curious is it not? I had a premonition that you wanted to know Sciberbia read on you? I thought I was doing you a favour dear. WTF are you talking about? I don't care what people's reads on me are unless I am about to get mislynched. Interesting choice of words. Personally, its a favourite move of mine to throw in the word 'mislynch" when scum. Its a soft-town claim as I am sure you are aware. In fact, I used the word in hydra when under the pump ![]() Lets be fair: Yes, town can say it.. but.. truth be told. I havent seen a town say it until they under genuine pressure of lynch.. And well, you are simply not in that position are you?. so it is fascinating that you choose to overreact and beat this drum so hard so early. Now in case you are struggling to piece together my motives. Let me be transparent. I am still trying to ascertain whether this game you can indeed get mislynched. So when I am asking others for opinions on YOU.. I think its bullshit to over-react and cut in like you did. now my questions to sciberbia are tainted all because of your 'choice of actions' and impatience. I am not trying to elicit stances for funsies. Everything has a purpose. And so far.. I got way more than I expected... WAY MORE. As for the criteria you raised earlier. + Show Spoiler + OK, you voted for WoS post-kita case, and pre-WoS limp "permission" post which you decided to call out. Do you want a pat on the back for making the follow up? & You can also continue to over-react over my choice of word in "de-lurk" which perhaps can be rephrased as decided to make your first post in essentially one hour. As for your spiel about calling scum directly instead of "prompting". Trust me, when I want to call you scum. I shall... and if others want to call you scum, it wont be because *I* gave them permission to either. Read any of my last 5 town games. Z-Boson once brought up that it was part of my meta that I never used the word mislynch as a townie and that I solely did so as scum. Since then I have started to use the word as both alignments. Now I wasn't reacting because I was the focus of whatever you were trying to do with sciberbia. I was reacting because you were phrasing what seemed to be a question in a way that seemes to lead others to draw the conclusion that you wished. That, to me, does not seem like a genuine attempt to gather information and then draw a conclusion. That to me seems like an attempt to find information that reaches the conclusion you wish it to reach. and THAT is scummy as fuck. This has created a new question for me though I would like you to address pl0x Context: In your opinion I phrased some of your thread interactions as scummy. I subsequently asked someone for their opinion of you. You are concerned that I am trying to 'lead" them to calling you scummy. (i.e. force their conclusion ============== Q: For you to react this way, you must think that Sciberbia is easily influenced. (1) What is your alignment position on Sciberbia? I did the same thing with Geript and Layabout, and Geipt came back with a town-ish read.. (2) Why are you so worried that Sciberbia would find you scummy? - Enough to interject at the least. | ||
DarthPunk
Australia10847 Posts
March 20 2013 05:12 GMT
#1428
On March 20 2013 14:06 WaveofShadow wrote: Show nested quote + On March 20 2013 14:02 DarthPunk wrote: On March 20 2013 13:56 WaveofShadow wrote: DP: Zarepath is NOT always lynchbait, which is exactly why I am ever more certain he is scum. I can't be sure about the others. And the town reads aren't weak at all. Notice how the other players that I've played with before ALSO haven't voted for me? VE/BH/Geript/Vivax/etc? As to whether or not I'm worried, you can be the judge of that. Cosmic to answer your questions: No, I'll speak however I want. I posted a sort-of-defense to kita right after he first accused me and we had a little back-and-forth. If need be later on or tomorrow I'll go more in depth but I don't see the need right now. As far as giving people more fuel, where are those good intentioned townies to push their oh-so-towny cases against me? They voted and fucked off with all the scum that's where. WTF kind of response is this?!?!? I can be the judge of whether you are worried or not? why the deliberate ambiguity? That rubs me the wrong way. You responded in a non townie way to that question. Townies would be suspicious as anything about town reads ripped from thin air. I can assure you. I am pretty confident this lynch is the right one. You'd be pretty wrong. I don't care what rubs you the wrong way. It's up to you whether or not you believe the townread Mocsta is giving based on my response to the cases against me, and whether you think that makes me worried based on that and earlier posts I've made. Now the only people who gave town reads were Coag and Mocsta, and I already mentioned that I understood your point but disagreed with it. As for the others, I'm not entirely sure they're all town but at the very least they all know my meta and haven't voted me whether they've said why or not. OK let me try this another way. Objectively. How strong do you believe kita's case on you to be? | ||
sciberbia
United States1359 Posts
March 20 2013 05:13 GMT
#1429
I really think this line of questioning is going nowhere. Off the top of my head, I can think of 5 times I have already said that I think the DP wagon is bad and that DP is town. If DP is in fact scum and does in fact care very much what I think about him, he would almost certainly have noticed this in my filter, and not been alarmed when you asked for my opinion. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
March 20 2013 05:16 GMT
#1430
On March 20 2013 14:06 DarthPunk wrote: Show nested quote + On March 20 2013 13:51 Mocsta wrote: On March 20 2013 13:29 DarthPunk wrote: On March 20 2013 13:24 Mocsta wrote: On March 20 2013 13:18 DarthPunk wrote: On March 20 2013 13:10 Mocsta wrote: Sciberbia I dont want this request below to be lost. On March 20 2013 11:59 sciberbia wrote: Hi all. I plan to be here for the next several hours. I agree with the general sentiment that lynching either BH or VE is dumb today as a matter of general strategy. here is no really strong evidence that either of them is scum. I don't think they should be lynch candidates. On March 20 2013 12:55 Mocsta wrote: Sci.. the above is interesting.. so far the only case I noticed on VE is from DarthPunk. Henceforth, the corollary is that the DP case on VE is rubbish (i..e not really strong) Lets get context here: DP is a strong player.. after all DP does have the highest win ratio on the TL Database. And has had scum and town games that have all resulted in the same outcome.. victory With that context: Do you expect more substance from a town DP? If the case is "not strong' as you suggest, what impact does this have on your DP read? In addition: please add in the context that DP de-lurked specifically to bandwagon WoS. What is your DP read pl0x I think you'll find that before I bandwagoned WOS taht I posted a question to coag. and that that question was from about 10 pages back in the thread. So If you were really paying attention you would realise that I had just come back and started to read things. So in essence. NO. I did not 'delurk' to bandwagon WoS. I came back. read the thread. read kita's case which i feel to be very strong, and then voted for WoS based on that. What are you trying to say here? that you think I am scum? if you are how about YOU in fact say it rather than try and prompt others into saying it for you. Nice interjection DP. Curious is it not? I had a premonition that you wanted to know Sciberbia read on you? I thought I was doing you a favour dear. WTF are you talking about? I don't care what people's reads on me are unless I am about to get mislynched. Interesting choice of words. Personally, its a favourite move of mine to throw in the word 'mislynch" when scum. Its a soft-town claim as I am sure you are aware. In fact, I used the word in hydra when under the pump ![]() Lets be fair: Yes, town can say it.. but.. truth be told. I havent seen a town say it until they under genuine pressure of lynch.. And well, you are simply not in that position are you?. so it is fascinating that you choose to overreact and beat this drum so hard so early. Now in case you are struggling to piece together my motives. Let me be transparent. I am still trying to ascertain whether this game you can indeed get mislynched. So when I am asking others for opinions on YOU.. I think its bullshit to over-react and cut in like you did. now my questions to sciberbia are tainted all because of your 'choice of actions' and impatience. I am not trying to elicit stances for funsies. Everything has a purpose. And so far.. I got way more than I expected... WAY MORE. As for the criteria you raised earlier. + Show Spoiler + OK, you voted for WoS post-kita case, and pre-WoS limp "permission" post which you decided to call out. Do you want a pat on the back for making the follow up? & You can also continue to over-react over my choice of word in "de-lurk" which perhaps can be rephrased as decided to make your first post in essentially one hour. As for your spiel about calling scum directly instead of "prompting". Trust me, when I want to call you scum. I shall... and if others want to call you scum, it wont be because *I* gave them permission to either. Actually look at this post. He says he isn;t calling me scum. But he is colouring my quotes in red, look at how is doingg everything EXCEPT stating I am scum. and then he says this in the EXACT POST with RED QUOTES Show nested quote + On March 20 2013 13:51 Mocsta wrote: I am still trying to ascertain whether this game you can indeed get mislynched. he states he doesn't know if I am scum or not, which is contrary to every other thing in the exact same post. He is being wishy-washy. This doesn't add up at all. Honey.. i picked up red quotes from supersoft & toadesstern - you gonna tell them as well that its scummy? Red quotes stand out better than bold - ironically, the first time SS used red quotes on me, I was scum, and shat myself... i didnt have the guts to make the post you just did.. so thats a benefit in ya favour. It just happens that a quote i found scummish and wanted it to stand out. | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
March 20 2013 05:17 GMT
#1431
On March 20 2013 14:12 DarthPunk wrote: Show nested quote + On March 20 2013 14:06 WaveofShadow wrote: On March 20 2013 14:02 DarthPunk wrote: On March 20 2013 13:56 WaveofShadow wrote: DP: Zarepath is NOT always lynchbait, which is exactly why I am ever more certain he is scum. I can't be sure about the others. And the town reads aren't weak at all. Notice how the other players that I've played with before ALSO haven't voted for me? VE/BH/Geript/Vivax/etc? As to whether or not I'm worried, you can be the judge of that. Cosmic to answer your questions: No, I'll speak however I want. I posted a sort-of-defense to kita right after he first accused me and we had a little back-and-forth. If need be later on or tomorrow I'll go more in depth but I don't see the need right now. As far as giving people more fuel, where are those good intentioned townies to push their oh-so-towny cases against me? They voted and fucked off with all the scum that's where. WTF kind of response is this?!?!? I can be the judge of whether you are worried or not? why the deliberate ambiguity? That rubs me the wrong way. You responded in a non townie way to that question. Townies would be suspicious as anything about town reads ripped from thin air. I can assure you. I am pretty confident this lynch is the right one. You'd be pretty wrong. I don't care what rubs you the wrong way. It's up to you whether or not you believe the townread Mocsta is giving based on my response to the cases against me, and whether you think that makes me worried based on that and earlier posts I've made. Now the only people who gave town reads were Coag and Mocsta, and I already mentioned that I understood your point but disagreed with it. As for the others, I'm not entirely sure they're all town but at the very least they all know my meta and haven't voted me whether they've said why or not. OK let me try this another way. Objectively. How strong do you believe kita's case on you to be? Let me re-read. And I gotta say I like you much more than I did early game. This kind of pressure actually makes me feel good about town's chances rather than all of the others who have provided nothing yet are prepared to vote me into oblivion. Before I read it I want to say that I think his case was actually pretty good, though I think that speaks more about my play than it does kita's skill. (See Zare's fake case on me in NMM 37. It was designed to draw scum in to a bandwagon even though he had a townread on me and breadcrumbed it. The gambit failed, but the case on me was actually pretty solid; being my first mafia game ever my play was rllllll bad.) | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
March 20 2013 05:17 GMT
#1432
On March 20 2013 14:08 sciberbia wrote: Also, the fact that DP did not already know and therefore point out to you that I think he is town is comforting.. I agree with this. Its an interesting contrast to WoS who is using references from me/Coag and co and part of his defense. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
March 20 2013 05:18 GMT
#1433
On March 20 2013 14:13 sciberbia wrote: @Mocsta I really think this line of questioning is going nowhere. Off the top of my head, I can think of 5 times I have already said that I think the DP wagon is bad and that DP is town. If DP is in fact scum and does in fact care very much what I think about him, he would almost certainly have noticed this in my filter, and not been alarmed when you asked for my opinion. I agree with this point in full as I mentioned above. But my latest questions to DP have a different motive, so I would still like him to address them. | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
March 20 2013 05:19 GMT
#1434
Now to re-read the kitacase. | ||
DarthPunk
Australia10847 Posts
March 20 2013 05:21 GMT
#1435
On March 20 2013 14:10 Mocsta wrote: For you to react this way, you must think that Sciberbia is easily influenced. (1) What is your alignment position on Sciberbia? WTF are you talking about? I have never played with sciberbia and have only read Yet another normal mini mafia as the entirety of my knowledge on him. How on god's earth do you think I think he is easily influenced is beyond me and also irrelevant. I do not believe anyone to be influenced more or less easily. I have an issue with the way you were approaching 'Scum-hunting' because, to me, the way you approached it is reflective of mafia mentality. Trying to lead someone to a conclusion rather than find and objectively review evidence is not a townie thought process. I think sciberbia is town. I am not 100% sure. I am not even 90% sure. But sciberbia is a town read right now. I did the same thing with Geript and Layabout, and Geipt came back with a town-ish read.. (2) Why are you so worried that Sciberbia would find you scummy? - Enough to interject at the least. I wasn't worried about what anyone thought of me. I was worried because your process screams scum to me. This isn;t about sciberbia. This was about you. and the way your leading questions make no sense for town. | ||
DarthPunk
Australia10847 Posts
March 20 2013 05:22 GMT
#1436
On March 20 2013 14:10 Mocsta wrote: For you to react this way, you must think that Sciberbia is easily influenced. (1) What is your alignment position on Sciberbia? WTF are you talking about? I have never played with sciberbia and have only read Yet another normal mini mafia as the entirety of my knowledge on him. How on god's earth do you think I think he is easily influenced is beyond me and also irrelevant. I do not believe anyone to be influenced more or less easily. I have an issue with the way you were approaching 'Scum-hunting' because, to me, the way you approached it is reflective of mafia mentality. Trying to lead someone to a conclusion rather than find and objectively review evidence is not a townie thought process. I think sciberbia is town. I am not 100% sure. I am not even 90% sure. But sciberbia is a town read right now. On March 20 2013 14:10 Mocsta wrote: I did the same thing with Geript and Layabout, and Geipt came back with a town-ish read.. (2) Why are you so worried that Sciberbia would find you scummy? - Enough to interject at the least. I wasn't worried about what anyone thought of me. I was worried because your process screams scum to me. This isn;t about sciberbia. This was about you. and the way your leading questions make no sense for town. | ||
sciberbia
United States1359 Posts
March 20 2013 05:27 GMT
#1437
Anyway, unless you have anything else for me Mocsta, I am going to resume looking over WoS. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
March 20 2013 05:30 GMT
#1438
This can be put to rest pretty easily. I apologise for jumping the gun and making thread comments without reading even 1/4 of Day 1. Thats pure laziness on my behalf, and there is no excuse for it. Fact is, i think (and still think) you over reacted to my initial question on Sciberbia. Yes, it was suggestive, but in no way was it going to force a conclusion from him. And whether you care or not, the question was actually to gain a better understanding of sciberbia, not you. Though I admit I was lazy in (not) reading the thread, I am still happy we went through this dance, because now I have a good town read on you. As an aside: Ironically, you are doing the same thing you accuse me of doing. You dont call me out as scum; but say, my actions exhibit mafia mentality. | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
March 20 2013 05:34 GMT
#1439
On March 20 2013 08:54 kitaman27 wrote: Finally have some spare time. I'll respond to a couple relavent issues, but first I wanted to get out a post on one of my strongest scum reads. I may have a second post about another player I'm suspicious of, depending on how much time I have. WaveofShadow The first player I'd like to bring up is WaveofShadow. Whenever I try to look at a player, the most important thing to look at in my opinion is motive. During the first few cycles of a game, it can be quite difficult to differentiate a townie post and a mafia post. The easiest way to tell the difference is to ask yourself, what is a player trying to accomplish with these posts and what does this player care most about. When I read through the filter of Wave, I can't help but notice that he is much more willing to play through others, than to put himself out there. On numerous occasions, we can see him prodding other players with questions, but there has been very little follow through. He questions other players reads, but fails to come to significant conclusions. Wave has approached the first two cycles in a way that shows me that he has little interest in being the guy that gets a player lynched. He is more interested in selecting a bandwagon based on the arguments of other players. In his support for the day one lynch, he posts the following: Show nested quote + On March 18 2013 04:16 WaveofShadow wrote: I CAN, however get behind a vote on DP. I support VE's case though I do not necessarily support his town circle; call that scummy if you wish but having never seen one in a game before I have no idea of their risks or benefits and it just seems manipulative to me. Vote: Darthpunk This is the first time in the game he actually mentions Darthpunk. He states in a single line that he supports VE's case, yet provides no reasoning for why he agrees. Notice how defensive he gets with his vote. In reference to his disapproval of VE's circle he states "Call that scummy if you wish." At a point where he has selected his preferred lynch candidate, he is still spending more time discussing VE's completely irrelevant circle. For the sake of keeping this post legible, I've edited out the previous part of this quote, but he spends a whole paragraph discussing the deal with yamato. Why is it that he is spending more time discussing events not relevant to his scumread, than the actual vote itself? It would be one thing if VE's case was so convincing that he had nothing to add. However, when I ask myself, does he care about this lynch, I come to the conclusion that he does not. Show nested quote + On March 18 2013 12:00 WaveofShadow wrote: I can also see it isn't likely that DarthPunk is goin' down but I want a chance to re-read before changing anything. I remember thinking that zare isn't scum but I don't remember why. DarthPunk is his preferred lynch candidate, but at this point he has put absolutely no effort in pushing his selection. He is more than willing to comment on unrelated issues, but when it comes to the part of the game that should be most relevant, he shows little interest. This post shows me that his scum read is influenced by whether or not he believes the town views it as a viable lynch. When a mafia player selects a bandwagon, they often due it based on where the town's sentiment lies. Once he realizes that DarthPunk isn't going to get lynched, he backs off, simply stating that he has responded well to pressure. Show nested quote + On March 17 2013 05:19 WaveofShadow wrote: No excuses here, but of the people I know in this game, very few have posted thus far so I can't read much into meta Show nested quote + On March 18 2013 13:18 WaveofShadow wrote: My meta reads are overall fairly weak thus far into my mafia career though so I'm not yet comfortable lynching zare based on that evidence. Show nested quote + On March 18 2013 04:16 WaveofShadow wrote: Meta reads are going to be something I will not be very good at until I play quite a few more games with all of you guys, so I can't look back at Yamato and try to find out if Vivax's claim is legitimate. Show nested quote + On March 18 2013 23:17 WaveofShadow wrote: My meta reads are very weak as I have stated earlier. Back to my point about his "defensive" phrasing of his vote, he has been acting quite defensive during the first two cycles. While a town player plays with confidence, Wave seems quite careful with his actions and is quite concerned with other's view of himself. Look how important it is to him for others to realize his meta based scum-hunting skills are sub-par. On four different occasions he makes this statement. Show nested quote + On March 18 2013 22:50 WaveofShadow wrote: It's also nice how everyone is going to be real fucking quick to jump down my throat thanks to GM randomly naming me before he dies (multiple times) without anything to back it up. I love how just like in LX I get ignored half the game and no one responds to anything I say, and as soon as somebody randomly decides to point fingers at me suddenly the whole fucking thread is up in arms. (Expletives deleted, don't want DrH yelling at me), I'm lone wolfing this game. In response to suspicion, he reacts quite strangely. Look how worked up he gets when GM names him as a scum read. There is essentially no pressure or votes on him at this point, yet he is responding as if he is about to be hammered. Show nested quote + On March 18 2013 23:17 WaveofShadow wrote: But please, by all means keep it coming and tunnel me instead of hunting for real scum. It's not like this is a distraction or anything from the real point of the game. Show nested quote + On March 19 2013 03:28 WaveofShadow wrote: Wat. GL with that. And as for responding to post-flip pressure, it just pisses me off that I don't get listened to at all on certain days; people only tend to pay attention to me when they think I'm scummy which has been...let's see....NEVER. These are more examples of how important it is to him that he is seen in good light. Note how he has spent more time talking about his annoyance of getting suspected, than he does about DarthPunk earlier. His vote of GreYMisT also occurred at a time where GreYMisT was suspicious of him. Show nested quote + On March 19 2013 03:34 WaveofShadow wrote: Haha wow I guess I really do have to be more careful what I post in these games...I make mistakes wayy too often that get seen as scummy. I guess it's good that people are pointing this shit out 'cause I didn't notice, and eventually I'll stop fucking myself over with these mistakes. I dunno, not much to say about that. I'll blame it on lack of sleep due to 3 month old baby. Finally, I come to this post which is what caused me to look at him further. Look how squirmish he is in his response. This is at a point where he accidentally mentioned to a lynch, rather than a night kill. It was a 100% typo and a non-issue. Yet here is his talking about how his has to be more careful about not making mistakes and coming up with more excuses. Wave has show that he cares more about himself, than town. He is willing to share opinions on less important issues, while skimping in pushing town objectives when it comes to the lynch. He responds in a mafia manner to suspicion and posts with an attitude that lacks the look of a town player. I think he would make an excellent lynch today. Kita's first post: Solid reads actually, though they're not for the reasons he thinks. He's right I didn't do much scumhunting of my own D1 because as I have stated before, I didn't have any strong reads. VE's case on DP struck a chord with me because I was previously schooled on how useless it is to drop a 'pressure' vote on a lurker in the first few hours so I got on board. As for attempting to make myself look good, I believe I responded to that already: The reason I want to be seen in a good light is because I'm town, and don't want people wasting their time trying to point out my dumb mistakes when they should be scumhunting for REAL scum. Who are the lynch targets for today that need to pushed that I'm skimping on? Up until your recent post calling for an end to it, I was attempting to push both BH and VE to see what I could get from them, as well as zare earlier in the day. No, I haven't voted yet, but the day is young, good sir. His second post: + Show Spoiler + On March 20 2013 09:39 kitaman27 wrote: Show nested quote + On March 20 2013 09:19 Vivax wrote: Well I read it right now but frankly I developed the feeling he is town, I find others way scummier than him and WoS is a newbie so I understand him being defensive, dunno why he rides so much on not knowing how to metaread though. Being defensive is a newbie scum trait, so I don't think that really plays much of a part. This is his 5th or 6th game though, so he should be more than capable of pushing a case. In one of his early posts he mentions how he would rather not provide a scum read until he is prepared to develop a strong case. It's 100+ hours and 60ish pages into the game and he still hasn't done so. This is my 5th game, yes. And I am very capable of pushing a case but usually in order for me to be capable it requires me to act like a fucking idiot first (see Hydra Mini Mafia) and get pressure on myself to get my ass in gear. I'm not sure why or why I'm incapable of fearlessly making cases before this happens in non-newbie games. (NMM 38 is the obvious exception; I played that very well in my opinion because I was more experienced than nearly everyone in there and either didn't post any bullshit to get called out on or they were too new to recognize it). Third: + Show Spoiler + On March 20 2013 09:45 kitaman27 wrote: Show nested quote + On March 20 2013 09:41 WaveofShadow wrote: Oh and kita, cute case. I defy you to go through my meta and find something I've done differently this game than any of my others. I have never once lied in a mafia game thus far and have never been anything but town, including this game. Vivax already gave you one of my typical defenses; hell I'll even add to it to attempt to appease you. I write up a case against you and your response is that you've never lied? Where am I calling you a liar? My case is that you show no interest in pushing a lynch. Even with this post, you ask "who are the lynch targets"? A town player decides a lynch target and pushes it on other players. A mafia player looks at the bandwagons and selects his favorite. I don't need another player to defend you. I'd like a response from yourself on the issues I mentioned. Using lying when unprovoked was an odd way to go, I'll admit, but I stand by my thoughts on meta, which I DID bring up before Mocsta, albeit really badly. He said what I should have though I'm not sure how compelling it would have been coming out of my own mouth. Fourth: + Show Spoiler + On March 20 2013 09:48 kitaman27 wrote: Show nested quote + On March 20 2013 09:45 WaveofShadow wrote: I think I am comfortable enough to vote Wiggle right now though because he really just doesn't appear to give a shit. Vote: Mr. Wiggles This is exactly what I'm referring to. Just minutes earlier you posted about how you wanted to know who where the lynch candidates in order to determine who to look at. Now you're voting Wiggles with a one line explanation. You clearly couldn't have taken the time to read through the filters of the players you just asked about. So why is it that you are voting based on town sentiment, rather than finding a player that you believe is scum and explaining to everyone why you believe this is the case. Early on in the day Wiggle said a few things that made me gut-read him as town but then looking over him I realized I had no reason to think as such. During the day multiple times I make mention of him appearing scummier to me. Fifth: Show nested quote + On March 20 2013 10:26 kitaman27 wrote: On March 20 2013 10:21 WaveofShadow wrote: Lol. I have had to defend myself against accusations like this every single game I've been in. Guess what the outcome has been EVERY SINGLE GAME. How is your alignment in past games relevant at all? It's completely relevant. In conclusion, Kita's case is not weak at all, it's my own fault for not playing as fearlessly as I should be early game and not defending myself with meta properly when I should have. Now I have defended myself in full and if people choose to go with it, great. If I'm still up for lynch then....we'll see how tomorrow goes. | ||
DarthPunk
Australia10847 Posts
March 20 2013 05:39 GMT
#1440
On March 20 2013 14:30 Mocsta wrote: DP, This can be put to rest pretty easily. I apologise for jumping the gun and making thread comments without reading even 1/4 of Day 1. Thats pure laziness on my behalf, and there is no excuse for it. Fact is, i think (and still think) you over reacted to my initial question on Sciberbia. Yes, it was suggestive, but in no way was it going to force a conclusion from him. And whether you care or not, the question was actually to gain a better understanding of sciberbia, not you. Though I admit I was lazy in (not) reading the thread, I am still happy we went through this dance, because now I have a good town read on you. As an aside: Ironically, you are doing the same thing you accuse me of doing. You dont call me out as scum; but say, my actions exhibit mafia mentality. That's me calling you scummy buddy. The question is why were you asking suggestive questions at all? Rather than reading the thread you are saying you haven't read or asking questions that generate real evidence and not evidence that is biased by the very nature of those questions? | ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games summit1g10481 Grubby5990 ScreaM3946 FrodaN1480 B2W.Neo768 syndereN424 mouzStarbuck191 Trikslyr71 sgares0 Organizations
StarCraft 2 • StrangeGG StarCraft: Brood War![]() • Reevou ![]() ![]() • Kozan • LaughNgamezSOOP • sooper7s • AfreecaTV YouTube • Migwel ![]() • intothetv ![]() • Laughngamez YouTube • IndyKCrew ![]() Dota 2 League of Legends Other Games |
Code For Giants Cup
SOOP
ShoWTimE vs Clem
Replay Cast
ReBellioN vs HonMonO
The PondCast
WardiTV Invitational
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
CranKy Ducklings
[BSL 2025] Weekly
[ Show More ] Replay Cast
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Replay Cast
Clem vs Zoun
|
|