EPT+ Show Spoiler +
no fucking way?
Fan-fucking-tastic - Page 3
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Flakes
United States3125 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + no fucking way? | ||
|
SayaSP
Laos5494 Posts
gonna eat some pad thai | ||
|
fanatacist
10319 Posts
On June 29 2009 01:29 micronesia wrote: You guys aren't really obeying the "fucking before accented syllable" rule... Fanatacist how exactly do you pronounce bisu? BEE-soo There is really nowhere else to put it in the word, naw mean? Although my Russian instincts tell me to pronounce it bi(flat)-SU(flat accented) | ||
|
defenestrate
United States579 Posts
pido-fucking-ras kozlo-fucking-yob (bit of redundancy there, whatever) Lenin-fucking-grad and so forth | ||
micronesia
United States24810 Posts
On June 29 2009 02:11 fanatacist wrote: BEE-soo There is really nowhere else to put it in the word, naw mean? Although my Russian instincts tell me to pronounce it bi(flat)-SU(flat accented) The rule specifically says the 'fucking 'has to be before the accented syllable... so if it's a two syllable word with the first syllable being the accented one then you can't use it effectively. | ||
|
fanatacist
10319 Posts
On June 29 2009 02:21 defenestrate wrote: Micronesia's right, it works like a charm if stuck into an anapest. pido-fucking-ras kozlo-fucking-yob (bit of redundancy there, whatever) Lenin-fucking-grad and so forth o_O pidoras? kozloyob? I sense Slavic roots but not the Russian language. Is my insult/slang rhetoric outdated because I haven't been to Russia in a few years? | ||
|
fanatacist
10319 Posts
On June 29 2009 02:42 micronesia wrote: The rule specifically says the 'fucking 'has to be before the accented syllable... so if it's a two syllable word with the first syllable being the accented one then you can't use it effectively. Yes but I don't care. You can still say it... BEE-fucking-soo. It doesn't flow as well as Fucking Bisu, but I never claimed it to do so nor was it my intent to give a definitive list of perfect uses of this technique. | ||
|
FragKrag
United States11567 Posts
| ||
|
micronesia
United States24810 Posts
On June 29 2009 02:45 fanatacist wrote: Yes but I don't care. You can still say it... BEE-fucking-soo. It doesn't flow as well as Fucking Bisu, but I never claimed it to do so nor was it my intent to give a definitive list of perfect uses of this technique. If you are okay with complete failure then I suppose you can say whatever you want. | ||
|
fanatacist
10319 Posts
On June 29 2009 02:48 micronesia wrote: If you are okay with complete failure then I suppose you can say whatever you want. And if you are okay with forum fascism then I suppose you can continue making boring dissections of people's posts where it is completely unnecessary. | ||
|
micronesia
United States24810 Posts
On June 29 2009 02:52 fanatacist wrote: And if you are okay with forum fascism then I suppose you can continue making boring dissections of people's posts where it is completely unnecessary. This does not even describe what has happened lol | ||
|
fanatacist
10319 Posts
On June 29 2009 02:54 micronesia wrote: This does not even describe what has happened lol Although you were not quite a grammar Nazi like the "forum fascism" statement might allude to, it is a close relative of said Nazi to take one usage of a technique and explain why it is an inefficient use of a technique that wasn't really meant to be serious in the first place. EDIT: Although I will give you credit, this was more of a "nitpicking" act than a dissection. | ||
|
Andtwo
United States126 Posts
On June 29 2009 01:49 Arrian wrote: I thought the property was called 'infixation,' and yes, it's a phenomenon in English that may appear only otherwise in the use of 'bloody' in British English, but that's not confirmed. Infixation isn't a typical property typologically speaking, so to call it 'infixation' is a little more difficult for the linguistic community to accept. This is so no true. Firstly, while infixation isn't a typical property OF ENGLISH, it is a very robust morphological process in many many other languages, notably arabic where many root words consist of a 3 constant string and vowels are infixed. (Edit: I just thought of something else--infixation is a common process in ludlings/word games/pig latin as well) Stuff about morphology you probably don't care about: + Show Spoiler + Sidenote, really all that infixation means is that you have your root word and you have your "other stuff" which aren't quite words but sort of means things, aka morphemes, like the -s for plural for instance and in English. You gotta stick that shit somewhere and you have three options "beginning, middlesomewhere, and end". In English all inflectional morphemes (things like -s, -ing, they don't make a new word but they made it plural or progressive or something) go at the end. There are also derivational morphemes--parts of words that kinda sorta mean things but can't easily be added onto words--ie "pre" or "con", you sort of have the idea that pre means before and con means against but it would take you a while to realize that. Those mostly all go at the beginning. All infixes are are some languages like dumping shit in the middle of their words so instead of "bobcats", they'd do it like "bobscat". Some languages like doing things that way--I'm sure some of our readers who speak other languages than English are like that. Sign Languages: + Show Spoiler + Sign Languages don't necessarily have to obey this rule as you could simultaneous mark your morphological structure. They could also do it the other way, but they will often opt for a simultaneous strategy. Secondly I have no idea why you think that bloody is "unconfirmed" in British English. It happens. Also in British you sometimes get "blooming" inserted. In American English at least you can also infix other words that are less vulgur such as flippin (fan-flipping-tastic) or god damn "a-god damn-mazing". Also when you are thinking of doing this in your own language that's not English, try using native curse words and at least 3 syllable words. It doesn't work in English either if you use some words *Tex-fucking-as. | ||
|
defenestrate
United States579 Posts
On June 29 2009 02:42 fanatacist wrote: o_O pidoras? kozloyob? I sense Slavic roots but not the Russian language. Is my insult/slang rhetoric outdated because I haven't been to Russia in a few years? The first one might be a little off (supposed to be analogous to fag?) The second's improvised, because every language needs a goatfucker. Your Russian is certainly better than mine, FWIW. | ||
|
fanatacist
10319 Posts
On June 29 2009 03:08 defenestrate wrote: The first one might be a little off (supposed to be analogous to fag?) The second's improvised, because every language needs a goatfucker. Your Russian is certainly better than mine, FWIW. Maybe you are thinking of pizdetz? Goatfucker would be closer to kozloy'op (or kozli if you wanted it to be at least partially feminine in root), pretty clever though lol. Thanks btw :p It's not hard though when you are born with it. Learning it as a second language is REALLY tough. | ||
|
Fr33t
United States1128 Posts
On June 28 2009 20:05 Pholon wrote: 'Fantas-fucking-tic' Hahaha, congrats on reaching 1,000. | ||
|
MuffiN
Korea (North)201 Posts
| ||
|
defenestrate
United States579 Posts
pidoras (пидора́с), a bastardization of pederast, meaning a male homosexual in Russian. You're right with the goat though  | ||
|
beetlelisk
Poland2276 Posts
On June 29 2009 02:58 Andtwo wrote: This is so no true. Firstly, while infixation isn't a typical property OF ENGLISH, it is a very robust morphological process in many many other languages, notably arabic where many root words consist of a 3 constant string and vowels are infixed. (Edit: I just thought of something else--infixation is a common process in ludlings/word games/pig latin as well) Stuff about morphology you probably don't care about: + Show Spoiler + Sidenote, really all that infixation means is that you have your root word and you have your "other stuff" which aren't quite words but sort of means things, aka morphemes, like the -s for plural for instance and in English. You gotta stick that shit somewhere and you have three options "beginning, middlesomewhere, and end". In English all inflectional morphemes (things like -s, -ing, they don't make a new word but they made it plural or progressive or something) go at the end. There are also derivational morphemes--parts of words that kinda sorta mean things but can't easily be added onto words--ie "pre" or "con", you sort of have the idea that pre means before and con means against but it would take you a while to realize that. Those mostly all go at the beginning. All infixes are are some languages like dumping shit in the middle of their words so instead of "bobcats", they'd do it like "bobscat". Some languages like doing things that way--I'm sure some of our readers who speak other languages than English are like that. Sign Languages: + Show Spoiler + Sign Languages don't necessarily have to obey this rule as you could simultaneous mark your morphological structure. They could also do it the other way, but they will often opt for a simultaneous strategy. Secondly I have no idea why you think that bloody is "unconfirmed" in British English. It happens. Also in British you sometimes get "blooming" inserted. In American English at least you can also infix other words that are less vulgur such as flippin (fan-flipping-tastic) or god damn "a-god damn-mazing". Oh fucking wow oO kind of tl bloody dr  I wish I could compre-fucking-hend more of it Also when you are thinking of doing this in your own language that's not English, try using native curse words and at least 3 syllable words. It doesn't work in English either if you use some words *Tex-fucking-as. pie-fucking-rdolić... no fu-fuck-cking doesn't make any sense >< edit: translated it wrong pierdo-fucking-lony is fu-fucking-cking wa-fucking-kacje klawia-fucking-tura I don't feel like mixing languages like that makes sense to me ;P | ||
|
snowbird
Germany2044 Posts
no wait, that's weird | ||
| ||
