[M] The Dark Knight Rises (SPOILERS) - Page 93
Forum Index > General Forum |
FireS
Romania415 Posts
| ||
greenelve
Germany1392 Posts
At the end it was, for me, a mediocre movie with way too much hype maybe it would be better if Bane were the Batmanhunter he is in the comics..with a genius plan to catch Batman, who is demotivated and all other stuff he is actually in the movie... | ||
atmospheric
Austria49 Posts
![]() + Show Spoiler + best death scene in movie history? | ||
pyro19
6575 Posts
On August 04 2012 16:26 FireS wrote: ^ he should have given her a whip nonetheless.. Oh I Dream of this day good Sir. | ||
zalz
Netherlands3704 Posts
I still have no idea how that managed to get past the cutting floor. | ||
Arkless
Canada1547 Posts
Lol, hope you're being sarcastic. WE actually BURST out laughing at this part. | ||
Telcontar
United Kingdom16710 Posts
On August 04 2012 22:54 Arkless wrote: Lol, hope you're being sarcastic. WE actually BURST out laughing at this part. It was even worse than Bane's, which is saying a lot. | ||
vol_
Australia1608 Posts
On March 20 2011 20:01 vol_ wrote: BATMAN FIGHTING!!!!!!!!! Catwoman gets me excited in the pants. So this was my first and the first post in this thread. Ironic that I feel the movie would have been better without catwoman :S For some reason I just didn't feel she belonged there. | ||
e4e5nf3
Canada599 Posts
Also, it seemed like DKR tried too hard to pack in so many things into one movie, despite the fact that it's running length is loooong. The pacing seemed rushed. For example, when + Show Spoiler + Wayne escapes from the pit And the end didn't really do anything for me. I remember being floored by the dramatic impact of the ending in DK.+ Show Spoiler + I felt it would have been better if we didn't see Bruce Wayne alive at all; Alfred's nod would have sufficed, it would have left the audiences questioning whether or not Wayne was alive or not (I like ambiguous endings). | ||
FeUerFlieGe
United States1193 Posts
On August 04 2012 22:48 zalz wrote: I still have no idea how that managed to get past the cutting floor. If you watch the movie again, durring that scene Batman has this "You've got to be fucking kidding me" look on his face. | ||
![]()
XaI)CyRiC
United States4471 Posts
http://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/x5ms7/the_dark_knight_trilogy_explained/ | ||
Mr.Faces
United States121 Posts
Telling their enemy their plans? Having mercy towards their enemies? Committing fatal logical and strategical errors? More like the league of fools. | ||
lastshadow
United States1372 Posts
"How bizarre lol, I saw batman twice now, both times there was different scenes / words used? wtf is that? + The translation were different?" (from my twitter) There was so many different dialogues but the characters voices remained the same (aka I dont' think hey were digitally edited or anything). There were scenes missing from the first time I saw it, but also scenes added the second time. Sometimes the "chat dialogue" scenes also went different, like when bruce/alfred are speaking I distinctly remember certain words being said when the camera was on alfred rather than on bruce, but this time it was different. The korean subtitles were also different as my friend pointed out as we joked about some of the incorrect subtitles from the previous time. What the fuck? | ||
Scarecrow
Korea (South)9172 Posts
Other issues: stupid Robin shit on the bridge. Needed a more intense Bane final battle for how much he was built up, less of that stupid helicoptor and toy tanks. More Batman and cool gadgets. Either make it a full on Avenger's style blockbuster or give it some real emotional impact, for me it had neither. The script and acting was also sub-par compared to the two previous films. | ||
Vindicare605
United States16032 Posts
On August 04 2012 16:12 EpiK wrote: i want to sincerely thank nolan for not giving anne hatheway a tail That would have been a tragedy. | ||
kwizach
3658 Posts
On August 04 2012 13:09 Pyskee wrote: Yeah? You know a lot about charging into gun fire? Just look at D Day. The Allies charged into far greater fire power and far greater positioning and still got it done. Automatic weapons can jam, run out of ammo, miss, etc... Not to mention only the first and maybe second row of guys could fire and that street was pretty narrow. That many guys charging forward would certainly not be gunned down by a dozen or so assault rifles. Not every bullet = one kill. No offense, but I don't think you know a lot about charging into gun fire. The Allies' landing on D-DAY had nothing to do with this in terms of positioning. The cops should never have been able to come even close to the terrorists - the fact that the street was pretty narrow is precisely why the cops should have been moved down pretty easily. | ||
WniO
United States2706 Posts
| ||
Dfgj
Singapore5922 Posts
On August 07 2012 06:04 WniO wrote: Ah finally watched it. God you guys complain about the dumbest things. Its like you expect every movie to be perfect. I don't see the problem with criticizing imperfections, or wanting things to be as good as possible. | ||
TheRabidDeer
United States3806 Posts
On August 03 2012 06:19 mememolly wrote: To those people who are saying Nolan is a great director or that TDK is the best movie ever, I recommend you watch the link below, some nerd breaks down a famous action scene in TDK and shows why it's badly edited/directed etc, this was something that I noticed in TDKR as well, the action sequences are often confusing/a mash up of shots that don't follow one another coherently http://vimeo.com/28792404 Frequent cutting and direction changes have been used to create the atmosphere, it is an intended effect. There are some things that arent explainable, but are ridiculously nitpicky for an action film that is heavily based in story rather than pure action. Meanwhile other things that he nitpicks are straight up not true. For example, around 6 minutes in he says that the cut to the cop implies that the cop is the first car. Even though with the way the cop looks you cant specifically tell where he is. To me it looked more like he was in the 2nd or 3rd car. Then when he reacts specifically to the truck just before it hits him it becomes obvious hes the 2nd one. There are lots of little things like that that he nitpicks which I earnestly disagree with. Overall a very bad look at the film, even for an amateur. | ||
riotjune
United States3392 Posts
| ||
| ||