[M] The Dark Knight Rises (SPOILERS) - Page 18

On July 19 2011 05:46 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
edit: it's a fake.

On July 19 2011 06:21 UdderChaos wrote:

Its not a fake, go on the OFFICIAL website and click watch trailer and it redirects you to the official facebook page that i shared. Just because it starts off with clips from the old film... watch to the end.

On July 18 2011 01:43 TheAntZ wrote:


Somehow, I can imagine you swishing around some wine in a glass while making this statement with your eyes closed, and then giving a ripe ol' fart and reveling in its smell.
I hate how this "What i like is smarter than what you like, and that makes me smarter" attitude that shows up so often in the general forum

On July 19 2011 07:19 Saicam wrote:
omg!!!! this movie will be the biggest movie of summer 2012

I don't see how mindless popcorn entertainment can even hope to compete with the likes of "There Will Be Blood" or "No Country for Old Men."

On July 19 2011 07:48 DeepElemBlues wrote:


Well, The Dark Knight was a more serious film than Batman Begins. Even if the dialogue and acting could have been smoother at times (Maggie Gyllenhall lolwut) it still delivered on deeper levels than things exploding and Batman punching people.

Have you watched it?

On July 19 2011 08:01 Rybka wrote:


Agreed with DeepElemBlues. Anyone who can look at Heath Ledger's performance and call it mindless popcorn entertainment is a pompous pseudo-intellectual douche. Yes, Maggie Gyllenhall sucks ass and never should have been in the movie. We get that and agree with you. Christopher Nolan agrees with you too, which is why she **SPOILER ALERT** DIAF halfway through the film.

On July 19 2011 08:12 Cassel_Castle wrote:


Pseudo-Intellectual is exactly how I'd describe TDK, funnily enough. It doesn't make the movie bad, it just makes people think that it's deeper than it is.

Still enjoyed it, but I snicker whenever people mention how "deep" it is. Good movies don't need to be deep to be good, but I think a lot of people don't realize that and attempt to call it deep because they think it needs an Oscar to be legitimately good or something, I don't know.

Most good movies are deep, but not all. The few good movies that aren't deep, like TDK, Fight Club, The Matrix, etc. have fan bases that constantly feel the need to explain why those movies are deep when all of them revolve around very shallow philosophy, because they think that's the only way that people will accept them as being as good as deeper movies. The thing is, they are as good as deeper movies, they just aren't deep themselves.

On July 19 2011 08:12 Cassel_Castle wrote:


Pseudo-Intellectual is exactly how I'd describe TDK, funnily enough. It doesn't make the movie bad, it just makes people think that it's deeper than it is.

Still enjoyed it, but I snicker whenever people mention how "deep" it is. Good movies don't need to be deep to be good, but I think a lot of people don't realize that and attempt to call it deep because they think it needs an Oscar to be legitimately good or something, I don't know.

Most good movies are deep, but not all. The few good movies that aren't deep, like TDK, Fight Club, The Matrix, etc. have fan bases that constantly feel the need to explain why those movies are deep when all of them revolve around very shallow philosophy, because they think that's the only way that people will accept them as being as good as deeper movies. The thing is, they are as good as deeper movies, they just aren't deep themselves.

On July 19 2011 08:26 JasKo wrote:
In the chant they are saying "Matalo Matalo bane bane" which i was told means; "kill him bane kill him bane"